No description available.

No description available.

L'objectif principal de ma thèse était de développer de nouvelles technologies et des outils pour l’étude de l’activation des récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (GPCR).À la surface de la cellule se trouve une multitude de récepteurs qui jouent un rôle critique dans la communication cellule-cellule, dont les GPCR, une famille de récepteur utilisant les protéines G intracellulaires pour transmettre leurs signaux. Le ciblage de ces récepteurs à des fins thérapeutique est innovant et très prometteur. Mais à ce jour seuls quelques médicaments ciblant les GPCR ont été mis sur le marché, en partie en raison d'un manque d'outils permettant le suivi de leur action sur les cellules natives.L’objectif de cette thèse est donc de développer des tests simples pour suivre l’activation de n’importe quel GPCR. Pour développer ce type de test, nous avons décidé d'utiliser des fragments d'anticorps appelés nanobodies. Les anticorps sont des protéines du sang produites en réponse à un antigène spécifique qui sont capable de le neutraliser. Les nanobodies correspondent au domaine variable de certains anticorps de camélidés. En raison de leur faible taille (13 kDa) et de leur site de liaison à l'antigène réduit, les nanobodies se lient souvent à des cavités et présentent une grande sensibilité aux changements de conformation de l'antigène. / The main objective of my thesis was to develop technologies and tools to study activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).The cell surface is displaying a multitude of receptors, who play critical roles in cell-cell communication. Among them, GPCRs represent a large family relying on the use of intracellular G proteins for their signaling. Targeting these receptors for therapies is very promising and innovative. So far, only few new drugs have been put on the market, partly due to a lack of tools enabling the follow-up of their action on native cells.The aim of this thesis is thus to develop simple assays to study activation of any GPCRs. To develop this kind of test, we used antibody fragments called nanobodies. Antibodies are blood protein produced in response to and counteracting a specific antigen. Nanobodies correspond to antibody fragments derived from the variable domain of a special class of camelid antibodies. Because of their small size (13 kDa) and reduced antigen binding site, nanobodies often bind cavities and show a high sensitivity to antigen conformational changes.

In this study, a novel method based on biotinylated antibodies and streptavidin coated magnetic beads was used to separate the thrombocyte subpopulations from zebrafish whole blood. DiI-C18, a lipophilic dye, labels only young thrombocytes when used at low concentrations. Commercially available biotinylated anti-Cy3 antibody was used to label the chromophore of DiI-C18 on the young thrombocytes and streptavidin coated magnetic beads were added subsequently, to separate young thrombocytes. The remaining blood cells were probed with custom-made biotinylated anti-GPIIb antibody and streptavidin magnetic beads to separate them from other cells. Further, thrombocytes are equivalents of mammalian platelets. Platelets play a crucial role in thrombus formation. The G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) present on the platelet surface are involved during platelet activation and aggregation processes. So, thrombocytes were studied for the presence of GPCRs. The GPCR mRNA transcripts expressed in the young and mature thrombocytes were subjected to densitometry analysis and pixel intensities of the bands were compared using one way ANOVA. This analysis did not show significant differences between the young and mature GPCR mRNA transcripts but identified a novel GPCR, GPR18 that was not reported in platelets earlier. To study the function of this GPCR, it was knocked down using GPR18 specific antisense morpholino and vivo morpholino. The immunofluorescence experiment indicated the presence of GPR18 on thrombocytes. The results of the assays, such as, time to occlusion (TTO) and time to aggregation (TTA) in response to N-arachidonyl glycine (NAG) as an agonist, showed prolongation of time in GPR18 larval and adult morphants respectively, suggesting that GPR18 plays a role in thrombus formation in zebrafish. In conclusion, our results indicate that GPR18 may be present in zebrafish thrombocytes, it may be involved in thrombus formation and that NAG may be an agonist at GPR18 on thrombocytes.

Ph.D.

Cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure (HF) remains one of the major health problems in the UK and worldwide. However, advances in their management are limited because the underlying pathological mechanisms are not completely understood. Therefore, it is important to understand novel signalling pathways leading to HF. Myocardial hypertrophy is a crucial pathophysiological process that can lead to the development of HF. Signalling initiated by members of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) proteins plays an important role in mediating cardiac hypertrophy. One member of this family, the G-protein coupled receptor 99 (GPR99), may have a crucial role in the heart because it acts as a receptor for alpha-ketoglutarate, a metabolite that is elevated in heart failure patients. GPR99 is expressed in the heart, but its precise function during cardiac pathophysiological processes is unknown. The aim of this PhD study is to investigate the role of GPR99 during cardiac hypertrophy. In this study I used in vivo and in vitro approaches to investigate whether GPR99 is directly involved in mediating cardiac hypertrophy. Mice with genetic deletion of GPR99 (GPR99-/-) exhibited a significant increase in hypertrophy following two weeks of transverse aortic constriction (TAC) as indicated by heart weight/tibia length ratio (HW/TL). In addition, GPR99-/- mice displayed increased cardiomyocytes cross-sectional area (CSA) after TAC compared to wild-type (WT) littermates. Hypertrophic markers such as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and β-myosin heavy chain (β-MHC) were also elevated in GPR99-/- mice following TAC compared to WT mice. Although interstitial fibrosis was indistinguishable in both genotypes after TAC, a precursor of fibrosis, collagen, type III, alpha1 (COL3A1) was elevated in GPR99-/- mice compared to WT mice after TAC. The baseline cardiac function as indicated by ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS) were reduced in GPR99-/- mice compared to WT littermates following TAC. Furthermore, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), interventricular septum wall thickness (IVS) and posterior wall thickness at diastole (PW) indicated profound wall thickening and enlargement of the left ventricular (LV) chamber in GPR99-/- mice compared to WT littermates after TAC. In an attempt to examine the mechanism through which GPR99 signals during hypertrophy, I performed molecular analyses based on the data from yeast two hybrid screening showing that GPR99 interacted with COP9 signalosome element 5 (CSN5). Using immunoprecipitation assay, I found that GPR99 formed a ternary complex with CSN5 and non-receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2). TYK2 is known as a regulator of pro-hypertrophic molecules including signal transducer and activation of transcription 1 (STAT1) and STAT3. I found that the activation of these molecules was increased in GPR99-/- mice following TAC and correspondingly, adenovirus-mediated overexpression of GPR99 in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCM) blunted TYK2 phosphorylation. In conclusion, my study has identified GPR99 as a novel regulator of pathological hypertrophy via the regulation of the STAT pathway. Identification of molecules that can specifically activate or inhibit this receptor may be very useful in the development of a new therapeutic approach for cardiac hypertrophy in the future.

The CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and the atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3) are seven transmembrane receptors that are involved in numerous pathologies, including several types of cancers. Both receptors bind the same chemokine, CXCL12, leading to significantly different outcomes. While CXCR4 activation generally leads to canonical GPCR signaling, involving Gi proteins and β‐arrestins, ACKR3, which is predominantly found in intracellular vesicles, has been shown to signal via β‐arrestin‐dependent signaling pathways. Understanding the dynamics and kinetics of their activation in response to their ligands is of importance to understand how signaling proceeds via these two receptors. In this thesis, different Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)‐based approaches have been combined to individually investigate the early events of their signaling cascades. In order to investigate receptor activation, intramolecular FRET sensors for CXCR4 and ACKR3 were developed by using the pair of fluorophores cyan fluorescence protein and fluorescence arsenical hairpin binder. The sensors, which exhibited similar functional properties to their wild‐type counterparts, allowed to monitor their ligand-induced conformational changes and represent the first RET‐based receptor sensors in the field of chemokine receptors. Additional FRET‐based settings were also established to investigate the coupling of receptors with G proteins, rearrangements within dimers, as well as G protein activation. On one hand, CXCR4 showed a complex activation mechanism in response to CXCL12 that involved rearrangements in the transmembrane domain of the receptor followed by rearrangements between the receptor and the G protein as well as rearrangements between CXCR4 protomers, suggesting a role of homodimers in the activation course of this receptor. This was followed by a prolonged activation of Gi proteins, but not Gq activation, via the axis CXCL12/CXCR4. In contrast, the structural rearrangements at each step of the signaling cascade in response to macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) were dynamically and kinetically different and no Gi protein activation via this axis was detected. These findings suggest distinct mechanisms of action of CXCL12 and MIF on CXCR4 and provide evidence for a new type of sequential signaling events of a GPCR. Importantly, evidence in this work revealed that CXCR4 exhibits some degree of constitutive activity, a potentially important feature for drug development. On the other hand, by cotransfecting the ACKR3 sensor with K44A dynamin, it was possible to increase its presence in the plasma membrane and measure the ligand‐induced activation of this receptor. Different kinetics of ACKR3 activation were observed in response to CXCL12 and three other agonists by means of using the receptor sensor developed in this thesis, showing that it is a valuable tool to study the activation of this atypical receptor and pharmacologically characterize ligands. No CXCL12‐induced G protein activation via ACKR3 was observed even when the receptor was re-localized to the plasma membrane by means of using the mutant dynamin. Altogether, this thesis work provides the temporal resolution of signaling patterns of two chemokine receptors for the first time as well as valuable tools that can be applied to characterize their activation in response to pharmacologically relevant ligands. / Der CXC Chemokin‐Rezeptor 4 (CXCR4) und der atypische Chemokin‐Rezeptor 3 (ACKR3) sind heptatransmembranäre Rezeptoren, die in zahlreichen Krankheitsbildern eine Rolle spielen, wie in einigen Krebsarten. Beide Rezeptoren werden zwar von dem gleichen Chemokin CXCL12 aktiviert, allerdings mit unterschiedlichen Signalweiterleitungsmustern. Die Aktivierung von CXCR4 führt zu kanonischer GPCR Signaltransduktion über Gi‐Proteine und β‐Arrestine. Die Signalweiterleitung des Rezeptors ACKR3 hingegen, welcher hauptsächlich in intrazellulären Vesikeln vorliegt, erfolgt über ß‐Arrestinabhängige Signalwege. Es ist von großer Wichtigkeit die Dynamik und Kinetik dieser beiden Rezeptoren hinsichtlich der Aktivierung durch ihre Liganden und der Signalweiterleitung zu verstehen. In dieser Arbeit wurden verschiedene Förster‐Resonanzenergietransfer (FRET) Anwendungen kombiniert, um die frühen Phasen der Signal‐Kaskade von CXCR4 und ACKR3 zu untersuchen. Zur genaueren Aufklärung der Rezeptoraktivierung wurden intramolekulare FRET‐Sensoren entwickelt, hierzu wurden die Fluorophore Cyan‐fluoreszierendes Protein und engl. fluorescence arsenical hairpin binder verwendet. Die generierten Sensoren zeigten ähnliche funktionelle Eigenschaften wie die unveränderten Rezeptoren. Liganden‐induzierte Änderungen der Rezeptorkonformation können mittels dieser Sensoren beobachtet werden und stellen die ersten RET‐basierten Sensoren auf dem Forschungsgebiet der Chemokin‐Rezeptoren dar. Weitere FRET‐basierte Methoden wurden zur Untersuchung von Interaktionen zwischen Rezeptor und G‐Protein, Neuanordnung von Dimeren, sowie der G‐Protein Aktivierung eingesetzt und für beide Chemokin‐Rezeptoren etabliert. CXCR4 zeigte einen komplexen Aktivierungsmechanismus nach Stimulation durch CXCL12, bei welchem zunächst eine Neuordnung der Rezeptor‐Transmembrandomäne gefolgt von Neuordnungen zwischen Rezeptor und G‐Protein und zuletzt eine Neuordnung zwischen CXCR4 Protomeren erfolgte. Dies impliziert, dass im Aktivierungsprozess des Rezeptors Homodimere eine Rolle spielen. Zudem wurde eine verlängerte Gi ‐Protein Aktivierung gegenüber der Gq‐Protein Aktivierung bei CXCL12 stimuliertem CXCR4 beobachtet. Hingegen zeigte eine Stimulierung mit dem Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) bei jedem Schritt der frühen Singal‐Kaskade veränderte Dynamiken und Kinetiken im Vergleich zu CXCL12. Darüber hinaus konnte keine Gi ‐Protein Aktivierung festgestellt werden. Dieser Befund zeigt individuelle Mechanismen für MIF und CXCL12 am CXCR4‐Rezeptor und liefert Belege für eine neuer Art von sequenziellen Signalweiterleitungen an GPCRs. Eine wichtige Beobachtung dieser Arbeit für eine potentielle Medikamentenentwicklung ist das CXCR4 ligandenunabhängige Aktivität zeigt. Um die Aktivierung des ACKR3 Sensors messen zu können wurde durch eine Co‐Transfektion mit K44A Dynamin eine höhere Membranständigkeit erreicht. CXCL12 und drei weiteren Agonisten zeigten am hier entwickelten ACKR3‐Sensor unterscheidbare Kinetiken. Mit diesem wertvollen Werkzeug können Liganden an diesem atypischen Rezeptor pharmakologisch charakterisiert werden. Es konnte keine CXCL12‐induzierte G‐Protein Aktivierung gemessen werden, trotz der stärkeren Präsenz an der Plasmamembran mit Hilfe der Dynamin‐Mutante. In Summe liefert diese Arbeit zum ersten Mal eine zeitliche Auflösung von Signalweiterleitungsmustern von zwei Chemokin‐Rezeptoren sowie wertvolle Werkzeuge zur Charakterisierung der frühen Phase der Signal‐Kaskade durch andere pharmakologisch relevanten Liganden.

No description available.

No description available.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form a link between the cell and their environment when signaling pathways are activated upon ligand binding. However, the ligands and functions for many GPCRs remain to be determined. G protein-coupled receptor 50 (GPR50) is one such orphan, and its exact role is yet unknown. There is however emerging functional and genetic evidence suggesting a function for GPR50 in psychiatric illness and lipid metabolism. It was hypothesised that investigating GPR50’s protein-protein interactions would lead to a greater understanding of the role of GPR50 in normal brain functioning and in mental illness. Putative protein interactors were initially isolated by a yeast two-hybid study and were further tested here. To address GPR50’s links to mental illness, the GPR50∆502-505 deletion variant associated with mood disorders was also investigated. To test this hypothesis I sought to confirm some of the key yeast two-hybrid interactions. Using co-immunoprecipitation and immunocytochemistry the interaction of GPR50 with reticulon family members Nogo-A, Nogo-C and RTN3, and with cell-cell adhesion molecule CDH8 and lipid-associated protein ABCA2 were validated. In order to identify the location of interactions, subcellular fractionation of mouse brain and rt-PCR and immunohistochemistry in developing and adult mouse brain were performed. GPR50 and several interactors were found to be enriched at the synapse by subcellular fractionation of whole adult brain, and at embryonic day 18 (E18) and 5 weeks by rt-PCR. Colocalisation of GPR50 and interactors was found in the amygdala, hypothalamus, cortex and specific brain stem nuclei by immunohistochemistry. The discovery of GPR50 expression in noradrenergic, serotonergic and dopaminergic nuclei in the adult brain stem suggests a further role for GPR50 in neurotransmitter signaling and stress. To investigate the function of GPR50 two assays were performed that measure processes which are known to be affected by Nogo and RTN3: The first assay was a neurite outgrowth assay in Neuroscreen-1 cells, a PC12 cell clone. A significant increase in neurite length was detected after transient overexpression of GPR50 and this effect was increased in the GPR50∆502-505/T532A variant. Additionally GPR50-overexpression resulted in an increase in filopodia formation suggesting a role in actin dynamics. As a second functional assay in vitro BACE1 activity assays were performed in HEK293 cells. GPR50 but not GPR50∆502-505/T532A overexpression resulted in a significant increase in BACE1 activity. Lastly a final series of pilot experiments were performed to gain insight into the secondary structure of the C-terminal domain and the effects of the polymorphisms on structure. The 35kDa GPR50 C-terminal domain was purified and Circular Dichroism studies indicated a predominantly unstructured protein with increased a- helical content in the GPR50∆502-505 variant. The results in this thesis indicate a role for GPR50 in neuronal development and synaptic functioning. The results also strengthen an association with major mental illness, with links to several disease mechanisms.