Class of 2006 Abstract / Background: The processes’ underlying a recent rise in the rate of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) at the Southern Arizona Veterans Administration Health Care System (SAVAHS) is unclear. Past changes to formulary in workhorse oral flouroquinolone from levofloxacin to gatifloxacin are under scrutiny. An infection-control component was also possible. Methods: 142 patients suspected of having CDAD had stool specimens submitted for toxin assay from late July to late Oct of 2004. A retrospective chart review was performed using the Veterans Administration Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) to examine total antibiotic use in the three months prior to having specimens submitted for laboratory toxin analysis. A subset-analysis was performed on 100 specimens submitted for toxin analysis. Parallel culture was performed and 9 isolates of C. difficile were obtained for molecular analysis and fingerprinting. Results: Of the 142 patients sampled, 20 tested positive for C. difficile toxin with the remaining 122 patients testing negative. Antibiotic usage was categorized by total antibiotic use and gatifloxacin use. 98 patients received at least 1 antibiotic within the preceding 3 months with 44 patients receiving no antibiotic therapy of any kind. Of the 98 patients that received antibiotic therapy, 44 received gatifloxacin, however, all of these patients also received at least one other antibiotic. Of the nine isolates fingerprinted, two distinct genetic clusters were identified.

Yes / Mutations in the gyrase genes cause fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, the predictive value of these markers for clinical outcomes in patients with MDR-TB is unknown to date. The objective of this study was to determine molecular markers and breakpoints predicting second-line treatment outcomes in M. tuberculosis patients treated with fourth-generation fluoroquinolones. We analysed treatment outcome data in relation to the gyrA and gyrB sequences and MICs of ofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin for pretreatment M. tuberculosis isolates from 181 MDR-TB patients in Bangladesh whose isolates were susceptible to injectable drugs. The gyrA 90Val, 94Gly and 94Ala mutations were most frequent, with the highest resistance levels for 94Gly mutants. Increased pretreatment resistance levels (>2 mg/L), related to specific mutations, were associated with lower cure percentages, with no cure in patients whose isolates were resistant to gatifloxacin at 4 mg/L. Any gyrA 94 mutation, except 94Ala, predicted a significantly lower proportion of cure compared with all other gyrA mutations taken together (all non-94 mutants + 94Ala) [OR = 4.3 (95% CI 1.4-13.0)]. The difference in treatment outcome was not explained by resistance to the other drugs. Our study suggests that gyrA mutations at position 94, other than Ala, predict high-level resistance to gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, as well as poor treatment outcome, in MDR-TB patients in whom an injectable agent is still effective.

Tuberculosis is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases globally due to the successful survival mechanisms displayed by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Mtb primarily infects alveolar macrophages (AMs) and is able to live intracellularly for extended periods of time due to a number of virulence factors which inhibit the antibacterial mechanisms of the AMs. This aspect of the Mtb life cycle means TB treatments suffer from poor bioavailability and efficacy. Additionally, the rise in resistant strains of Mtb means the use of higher doses and the use of alternative second and third line drugs which increase the risk of systemic toxicity. Drug encapsulation is a novel approach that can provide more favourable drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The aim of this project was to develop a liposomal drug delivery system to target Mtb infected alveolar macrophages. The system involved the encapsulation of two drugs; the antibiotic gatifloxacin (GFLX) and Mtb virulence factor inhibitor CV7. The hypothesis was that the two different antibacterial mechanisms would work in synergy and increase the efficacy of the treatment. AM targeting and receptor-mediated endocytic uptake was encouraged by the presence of a ligand attached to the surface of the liposome. Furthermore a pH-sensitive release mechanism was to be incorporated into the liposome to encourage the release of the encapsulated drugs in the vicinity of the intracellular bacteria. The intention was to produce a drug delivery system to enable a TB therapy regime of fewer, lower doses to increase compliance and reduce systemic toxicity by increasing efficacy through improved bioavailability. GFLX was successfully encapsulated using a weak base active loading method. To establish encapsulation efficiency, a homogeneous fluorescence assay able to quantify intra- and extra-liposomal gatifloxacin simultaneously was developed. pH-sensitive release of the payload could be achieved using a pH-sensitive peptide with a novel design based on chimeric structure, namely P3. CV7 was successfully encapsulated using a weak acid active loading method. CV7 liposomes were able to be functionalised by the incorporation of a mannose ligand on the surface of the liposome. An inhibition assay using the target enzyme of CV7, MptpB, was optimised to assess efficacy of liposomally encapsulated and released CV7. Flow cytometry and confocal microscopy studies confirmed that the liposomal formulations were internalised by the target macrophage cell line, J774a.1. Mannose liposomes conveyed superior uptake kinetics. Further confocal microscopy showed that after internalisation the liposomes entered the endolysosomal pathway and colocalised with BCG. A BCG-macrophage infection model was used to determine the intracellular efficacy of the liposomal formulations. Encapsulated CV7 displayed increased efficacy over free CV7, while encapsulation in functionalised liposomes showed better efficacy still. The encapsulation of GFLX did not increase the efficacy of GFLX and synergy between the two drugs was not achieved. In conclusion, the liposomal encapsulation of CV7 increased uptake of the drug by the target cell line and facilitated colocalisation of the drug with the target pathogen thereby increasing efficacy. Such a formulation could potentially increase bioavailability and efficacy in vivo for a more tolerable TB therapy.

Objetivo: O objetivo geral deste trabalho foi estabelecer modelo farmacocinéticofarmacodinâmico (modelo PK/PD) para descrever o perfil temporal do efeito bactericida do levofloxacino e do gatifloxacino contra Streptococcus pneumoniae. Método: Para alcançar este objetivo as seguintes etapas foram realizadas: i) foram validadas metodologias analíticas de SPE-HPLC para o gatifloxacino e HPLC para o levofloxacino e o gatifloxacino para quantificação destes em amostras de plasma, microdialisado tecidual e caldo de cultura; ii) foi avaliada a farmacocinética do gatifloxacino em roedores nas doses de 6 e 12 mg/kg via oral e 6 mg/kg via intravenosa (i.v.) e a biodisponibilidade oral foi determinada; iii) foram estabelecidas as condições ideais para microdiálise do gatifloxacino e as taxas de recuperação in vitro, por diálise (EE), retrodiálise (RD) e fluxo líquido zero (NNF) e in vivo, em tecido pulmonar e muscular, por retrodiálise e fluxo líquido zero. Essas recuperações foram utilizadas para determinar a penetração pulmonar do gatifloxacino após a administração i.v. bolus de 6 mg/kg a ratos Wistar sadios; iv) foram simuladas as concentrações livres pulmonares esperadas para humanos após tratamento com diferentes regimes de dosagem para o levofloxacino e o gatifloxacino em modelo de infecção in vitro frente a Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC® 49619. Simulações de concentrações constantes múltiplas do MIC de cada fármaco também foram realizadas. As curvas de morte bacteriana por tempo obtidas foram modeladas com modelo PK/PD de Emax modificado, com auxílio do programa Scientist® v 2.01. Resultados e Conclusões: i) Os métodos analíticos por SPE-HPLC e HPLC para quantificação do gatifloxacino e do levofloxacino foram validados. As curvas foram lineares na faixa de 20 a 600 ng/mL para plasma e microdialisado tecidual de gatifloxacino e na faixa de 250 a 6000 ng/mL para caldo de cultura para ambos os fármacos, com r > 0,99, independente do método desenvolvido. Em plasma e microdialisado, a exatidão foi ≥ 94,3 %. A recuperação do gatifloxacino dos cartuchos de extração em fase sólida variou entre 95,6 e 99,7 %. A precisão não excedeu 5,8 % do CV. Em caldo de cultura, a exatidão foi ≥ 92,0 % e 93,4 % para o gatifloxacino e o levofloxacino, respectivamente. A precisão não excedeu 3,2 % e 4,2 % do CV para o levofloxacino e o gatifloxacino, respectivamente; ii) A avaliação farmacocinética demonstrou que os modelos abertos de dois compartimentos e de um compartimento com absorção de primeira ordem descreveram adequadamente os perfis plasmáticos após administração do gatifloxacino pelas vias i.v. e oral nas doses de 6 e 12 mg/kg, com CL de 0,9 ± 0,2 e 1,0 ± 0,3 L/h/kg, t½ de 3,3 ± 0,8 e 3,7 ± 0,3 h e Vd de 2,8 ± 0,4 e 3,1 ± 1,0 L/kg, respectivamente. Os parâmetros determinados por abordagem compartimental e não compartimental não diferiram significativamente para as duas vias investigadas (α = 0,05). A ASC0-∞ foi de 4,1 ± 1,6 e 6,6 ± 1,3 μg.h/mL após administração oral e i.v. das doses de 12 e 6 mg/kg, respectivamente, levando a uma biodisponibilidade de 31%. A constante de velocidade de absorção foi alta (5,0 ± 1,8 h-1) e a farmacocinética mostrou-se linear na faixa de doses investigada; iii) A recuperação das sondas de microdiálise in vitro por EE e RD para 80, 160 e 400 ng/mL de gatifloxacino foi de 33,5 ± 1,3%, 33,1 ± 1,2%, 31,8 ± 2,7% e 31,4 ± 2,6%, 33,1 ± 2,2%, 30,6 ± 3,3%, respectivamente. In vivo a recuperação por RD no músculo esquelético e pulmão de ratos Wistar foi de 29,1 ± 1,0% e 30,7 ± 1,4%, respectivamente. A recuperação por NNF in vitro e in vivo foi de 30,9 ± 2,9% e 29,0 ± 0,8%, respectivamente. Desse modo, concluiu-se que a recuperação foi constante e independente do método ou meio utilizado. Os perfis de concentração livre no músculo, pulmão e plasma de ratos Wistar foram virtualmente superpostos após dose de 6 mg/kg i.v., resultando em ASC similares de 3888 ± 734 ng.h/mL, 4138 ± 1071 ng.h/mL e 3805 ± 577 ng.h/mL, respectivamente (α = 0,05). O fator de distribuição tecidual foi de 1,02 e 1,08 para músculo e pulmão, respectivamente; iv) O modelo PK/PD empregado foi capaz de descrever o efeito do levofloxacino e do gatifloxacino contra o Streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro para todas as simulações investigadas. O EC50 médio para o levofloxacino (3,57 ± 2,16 mg/L) foi significativamente maior que o do gatifloxacino (0,95 ± 0,56 mg/L) quando regimes de doses múltiplas foram simulados. O mesmo foi observado para concentrações constantes, sendo o EC50,levofloxacino = 2,75 ± 0,45 mg/L e EC50,gatifloxacino = 1,03 ± 0,52 mg/L. O kmax foi estatisticamente semelhante para ambos os fármacos independente se foram simuladas concentrações flutuantes (kmax,levofloxacino = 0,40 ± 0,19 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacino = 0,48 ± 0,15 h-1) ou concentrações constantes (kmax,levofloxacino = 0,34 ± 0,06 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacino = 0,39 ± 0,23 h-1). Nenhum dos índices PK/PD foi capaz de prever o desfecho da infecção para todas as situações investigadas. O modelo PK/PD desenvolvido permitiu a comparação entre as duas fluorquinolonas e de diferentes posologias para cada fármaco, podendo ser utilizado para simular o efeito temporal de regimes de dosagem alternativos bem como para otimização da posologia desses fármacos para o tratamento da pneumonia adquirida na comunidade. / Objective: The aim of this work was to establish a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model (PK/PD model) to describe the profile of bactericidal effect over time of levofloxacin and gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Method: To achieve this goal the following steps were carried out: i) an analytical method of SPE-HPLC to quantify gatifloxacin in plasma and tissue microdialysates, and an HPLC method for measuring levofloxacin and gatifloxacin in culture broth samples were developed and validated; ii) the pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin in rodents after intravenous (6 mg/kg) and oral (6 and 12 mg/kg) administration was assessed as well as the oral bioavailability of the drug was determined; iii) microdialysis conditions for gatifloxacin were established and the recovery rates in vitro by dialysis (EE), retrodialysis (RD) and no-net-flux (NNF), and in vivo in lung and skeletal muscle tissue by RD and NNF were determined. Gatifloxacin tissue penetration in lung after intravenous administration (6 mg/kg) to healthy Wistar rats was determined; iv) levofloxacin and gatifloxacin free lung concentrations expected in humans following different dosing regimens of the drugs were simulated using Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC® 49619 in vitro model of infection. The effect of constant concentrations multiples of MIC were also investigated. The time-kill curves obtained were modeled using an Emax modified model using Scientist® v. 2.01 software. Results and Conclusions: i) The analytical methods by SPE-HPLC and HPLC for quantifying gatifloxacin and levofloxacin were validated. Calibration curves were linear between 20-600 ng/mL for gatifloxacin in plasma and tissue microdialysate samples and between 250-6000 ng/mL for broth media for both drugs, with r > 0.99 independently of the method considered. The accuracy was ≥ 94.3 % for plasma and microdialysate. Gatifloxacin recovery from the solid phase extraction cartridges ranged from 95.6 to 99.7%. The precision did not exceed 5.8% of the CV. In broth media the accuracy was ≥ 92.0% and 94.3% for gatifloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively. The precision did not exceed 3.2% and 4.2% of the CV for levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, respectively; ii) Gatifloxacin experimental plasma profiles in rats were adequately fitted to a two-compartment model after intravenous and to a one compartment model with first order absorption after oral dosing. The total clearance (0.9 ± 0.2 and 1.0 ± 0.3 L/h/kg), the terminal half-life (3.3 ± 0.8 and 3.7 ± 0.3 h) and the apparent volume of distribution (2.8 ± 0.4 and 3.1 ± 1.0 L/kg) were statistically similar (α = 0.05) after i.v. and oral administration, by both model independent and compartmental approaches. The area under the curve was reduced after oral dosing (4.1 ± 1.6 μg.h/mL) in comparison to i.v. dosing (6.6 ± 1.3 μg.h/mL) leading to an oral bioavailability of 31%. The absorption was fast, with a constant rate of 5.0 ± 1.8 h-1. The results evidenced the linear pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin in rodents in the dose range investigated; iii) Microdialysis recoveries determined in vitro by EE and RD at 80, 160 and 400 ng/mL resulted in 33.5 ± 1.3%, 33.1 ± 1.2%, 31.8 ± 2.7% and 31.4 ± 2.6%, 33.1 ± 2.2%, 30.6 ± 3.3%, respectively. In vivo recovery by RD in Wistar rat’s skeletal muscle and lung were 29.1 ± 1.0% and 30.7 ± 1.4%, respectively. Recoveries by no-net-flux in vitro and in vivo resulted in recoveries of 30.9 ± 2.9% and 29.0 ± 0.8%, respectively. In this way, it was shown that gatifloxacin recovery was constant and independent of the method or media used. Free skeletal muscle, lung and plasma profiles were virtually superimposed after i.v. administration of gatifloxacin 6 mg/kg dose resulting in similar area under the curve of 3888 ± 734 ng.h/mL, 4138 ± 1071 ng.h/mL and 3805 ± 577 ng.h/mL, respectively (α = 0.05). The tissue distribution factors were determined to be 1.02 and 1.08 for muscle and lung, respectively; iv) The PK/PD model used was able to describe the effect of levofloxacin and gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro for all the regimens investigated. Levofloxacin EC50 (3.57 ± 2.16 mg/L) was higher than gatifloxacin (0.95 ± 0.56 mg/L) when multiple dosing regimens where simulated. Using constant concentrations, levofloxacin EC50 was also higher than gatifloxacin (EC50,levofloxacin = 2.75 ± 0.45 mg/L; EC50,gatifloxacin = 1.03 ± 0.52 mg/L). The kmax was statistically similar for both drugs independent of whether fluctuating (kmax,levofloxacin = 0.40 ± 0.19 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacin = 0.48 ± 0.15 h-1) or constant concentrations (kmax,levofloxacin = 0.34 ± 0.06 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacin = 0.39 ± 0.23 h-1) were simulated. None of the PK/PD indices was capable of predicting the infection outcome for all the situations investigated. The PK/PD model developed allowed not only the comparison between the fluoroquinolones effect but also the comparison of different dosing regimes for the same drug and can be used for simulating alternative regimens and optimizing therapy of these drugs to treat community-acquired pneumonia.

Objetivo: O objetivo geral deste trabalho foi estabelecer modelo farmacocinéticofarmacodinâmico (modelo PK/PD) para descrever o perfil temporal do efeito bactericida do levofloxacino e do gatifloxacino contra Streptococcus pneumoniae. Método: Para alcançar este objetivo as seguintes etapas foram realizadas: i) foram validadas metodologias analíticas de SPE-HPLC para o gatifloxacino e HPLC para o levofloxacino e o gatifloxacino para quantificação destes em amostras de plasma, microdialisado tecidual e caldo de cultura; ii) foi avaliada a farmacocinética do gatifloxacino em roedores nas doses de 6 e 12 mg/kg via oral e 6 mg/kg via intravenosa (i.v.) e a biodisponibilidade oral foi determinada; iii) foram estabelecidas as condições ideais para microdiálise do gatifloxacino e as taxas de recuperação in vitro, por diálise (EE), retrodiálise (RD) e fluxo líquido zero (NNF) e in vivo, em tecido pulmonar e muscular, por retrodiálise e fluxo líquido zero. Essas recuperações foram utilizadas para determinar a penetração pulmonar do gatifloxacino após a administração i.v. bolus de 6 mg/kg a ratos Wistar sadios; iv) foram simuladas as concentrações livres pulmonares esperadas para humanos após tratamento com diferentes regimes de dosagem para o levofloxacino e o gatifloxacino em modelo de infecção in vitro frente a Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC® 49619. Simulações de concentrações constantes múltiplas do MIC de cada fármaco também foram realizadas. As curvas de morte bacteriana por tempo obtidas foram modeladas com modelo PK/PD de Emax modificado, com auxílio do programa Scientist® v 2.01. Resultados e Conclusões: i) Os métodos analíticos por SPE-HPLC e HPLC para quantificação do gatifloxacino e do levofloxacino foram validados. As curvas foram lineares na faixa de 20 a 600 ng/mL para plasma e microdialisado tecidual de gatifloxacino e na faixa de 250 a 6000 ng/mL para caldo de cultura para ambos os fármacos, com r > 0,99, independente do método desenvolvido. Em plasma e microdialisado, a exatidão foi ≥ 94,3 %. A recuperação do gatifloxacino dos cartuchos de extração em fase sólida variou entre 95,6 e 99,7 %. A precisão não excedeu 5,8 % do CV. Em caldo de cultura, a exatidão foi ≥ 92,0 % e 93,4 % para o gatifloxacino e o levofloxacino, respectivamente. A precisão não excedeu 3,2 % e 4,2 % do CV para o levofloxacino e o gatifloxacino, respectivamente; ii) A avaliação farmacocinética demonstrou que os modelos abertos de dois compartimentos e de um compartimento com absorção de primeira ordem descreveram adequadamente os perfis plasmáticos após administração do gatifloxacino pelas vias i.v. e oral nas doses de 6 e 12 mg/kg, com CL de 0,9 ± 0,2 e 1,0 ± 0,3 L/h/kg, t½ de 3,3 ± 0,8 e 3,7 ± 0,3 h e Vd de 2,8 ± 0,4 e 3,1 ± 1,0 L/kg, respectivamente. Os parâmetros determinados por abordagem compartimental e não compartimental não diferiram significativamente para as duas vias investigadas (α = 0,05). A ASC0-∞ foi de 4,1 ± 1,6 e 6,6 ± 1,3 μg.h/mL após administração oral e i.v. das doses de 12 e 6 mg/kg, respectivamente, levando a uma biodisponibilidade de 31%. A constante de velocidade de absorção foi alta (5,0 ± 1,8 h-1) e a farmacocinética mostrou-se linear na faixa de doses investigada; iii) A recuperação das sondas de microdiálise in vitro por EE e RD para 80, 160 e 400 ng/mL de gatifloxacino foi de 33,5 ± 1,3%, 33,1 ± 1,2%, 31,8 ± 2,7% e 31,4 ± 2,6%, 33,1 ± 2,2%, 30,6 ± 3,3%, respectivamente. In vivo a recuperação por RD no músculo esquelético e pulmão de ratos Wistar foi de 29,1 ± 1,0% e 30,7 ± 1,4%, respectivamente. A recuperação por NNF in vitro e in vivo foi de 30,9 ± 2,9% e 29,0 ± 0,8%, respectivamente. Desse modo, concluiu-se que a recuperação foi constante e independente do método ou meio utilizado. Os perfis de concentração livre no músculo, pulmão e plasma de ratos Wistar foram virtualmente superpostos após dose de 6 mg/kg i.v., resultando em ASC similares de 3888 ± 734 ng.h/mL, 4138 ± 1071 ng.h/mL e 3805 ± 577 ng.h/mL, respectivamente (α = 0,05). O fator de distribuição tecidual foi de 1,02 e 1,08 para músculo e pulmão, respectivamente; iv) O modelo PK/PD empregado foi capaz de descrever o efeito do levofloxacino e do gatifloxacino contra o Streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro para todas as simulações investigadas. O EC50 médio para o levofloxacino (3,57 ± 2,16 mg/L) foi significativamente maior que o do gatifloxacino (0,95 ± 0,56 mg/L) quando regimes de doses múltiplas foram simulados. O mesmo foi observado para concentrações constantes, sendo o EC50,levofloxacino = 2,75 ± 0,45 mg/L e EC50,gatifloxacino = 1,03 ± 0,52 mg/L. O kmax foi estatisticamente semelhante para ambos os fármacos independente se foram simuladas concentrações flutuantes (kmax,levofloxacino = 0,40 ± 0,19 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacino = 0,48 ± 0,15 h-1) ou concentrações constantes (kmax,levofloxacino = 0,34 ± 0,06 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacino = 0,39 ± 0,23 h-1). Nenhum dos índices PK/PD foi capaz de prever o desfecho da infecção para todas as situações investigadas. O modelo PK/PD desenvolvido permitiu a comparação entre as duas fluorquinolonas e de diferentes posologias para cada fármaco, podendo ser utilizado para simular o efeito temporal de regimes de dosagem alternativos bem como para otimização da posologia desses fármacos para o tratamento da pneumonia adquirida na comunidade. / Objective: The aim of this work was to establish a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model (PK/PD model) to describe the profile of bactericidal effect over time of levofloxacin and gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Method: To achieve this goal the following steps were carried out: i) an analytical method of SPE-HPLC to quantify gatifloxacin in plasma and tissue microdialysates, and an HPLC method for measuring levofloxacin and gatifloxacin in culture broth samples were developed and validated; ii) the pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin in rodents after intravenous (6 mg/kg) and oral (6 and 12 mg/kg) administration was assessed as well as the oral bioavailability of the drug was determined; iii) microdialysis conditions for gatifloxacin were established and the recovery rates in vitro by dialysis (EE), retrodialysis (RD) and no-net-flux (NNF), and in vivo in lung and skeletal muscle tissue by RD and NNF were determined. Gatifloxacin tissue penetration in lung after intravenous administration (6 mg/kg) to healthy Wistar rats was determined; iv) levofloxacin and gatifloxacin free lung concentrations expected in humans following different dosing regimens of the drugs were simulated using Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC® 49619 in vitro model of infection. The effect of constant concentrations multiples of MIC were also investigated. The time-kill curves obtained were modeled using an Emax modified model using Scientist® v. 2.01 software. Results and Conclusions: i) The analytical methods by SPE-HPLC and HPLC for quantifying gatifloxacin and levofloxacin were validated. Calibration curves were linear between 20-600 ng/mL for gatifloxacin in plasma and tissue microdialysate samples and between 250-6000 ng/mL for broth media for both drugs, with r > 0.99 independently of the method considered. The accuracy was ≥ 94.3 % for plasma and microdialysate. Gatifloxacin recovery from the solid phase extraction cartridges ranged from 95.6 to 99.7%. The precision did not exceed 5.8% of the CV. In broth media the accuracy was ≥ 92.0% and 94.3% for gatifloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively. The precision did not exceed 3.2% and 4.2% of the CV for levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, respectively; ii) Gatifloxacin experimental plasma profiles in rats were adequately fitted to a two-compartment model after intravenous and to a one compartment model with first order absorption after oral dosing. The total clearance (0.9 ± 0.2 and 1.0 ± 0.3 L/h/kg), the terminal half-life (3.3 ± 0.8 and 3.7 ± 0.3 h) and the apparent volume of distribution (2.8 ± 0.4 and 3.1 ± 1.0 L/kg) were statistically similar (α = 0.05) after i.v. and oral administration, by both model independent and compartmental approaches. The area under the curve was reduced after oral dosing (4.1 ± 1.6 μg.h/mL) in comparison to i.v. dosing (6.6 ± 1.3 μg.h/mL) leading to an oral bioavailability of 31%. The absorption was fast, with a constant rate of 5.0 ± 1.8 h-1. The results evidenced the linear pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin in rodents in the dose range investigated; iii) Microdialysis recoveries determined in vitro by EE and RD at 80, 160 and 400 ng/mL resulted in 33.5 ± 1.3%, 33.1 ± 1.2%, 31.8 ± 2.7% and 31.4 ± 2.6%, 33.1 ± 2.2%, 30.6 ± 3.3%, respectively. In vivo recovery by RD in Wistar rat’s skeletal muscle and lung were 29.1 ± 1.0% and 30.7 ± 1.4%, respectively. Recoveries by no-net-flux in vitro and in vivo resulted in recoveries of 30.9 ± 2.9% and 29.0 ± 0.8%, respectively. In this way, it was shown that gatifloxacin recovery was constant and independent of the method or media used. Free skeletal muscle, lung and plasma profiles were virtually superimposed after i.v. administration of gatifloxacin 6 mg/kg dose resulting in similar area under the curve of 3888 ± 734 ng.h/mL, 4138 ± 1071 ng.h/mL and 3805 ± 577 ng.h/mL, respectively (α = 0.05). The tissue distribution factors were determined to be 1.02 and 1.08 for muscle and lung, respectively; iv) The PK/PD model used was able to describe the effect of levofloxacin and gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro for all the regimens investigated. Levofloxacin EC50 (3.57 ± 2.16 mg/L) was higher than gatifloxacin (0.95 ± 0.56 mg/L) when multiple dosing regimens where simulated. Using constant concentrations, levofloxacin EC50 was also higher than gatifloxacin (EC50,levofloxacin = 2.75 ± 0.45 mg/L; EC50,gatifloxacin = 1.03 ± 0.52 mg/L). The kmax was statistically similar for both drugs independent of whether fluctuating (kmax,levofloxacin = 0.40 ± 0.19 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacin = 0.48 ± 0.15 h-1) or constant concentrations (kmax,levofloxacin = 0.34 ± 0.06 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacin = 0.39 ± 0.23 h-1) were simulated. None of the PK/PD indices was capable of predicting the infection outcome for all the situations investigated. The PK/PD model developed allowed not only the comparison between the fluoroquinolones effect but also the comparison of different dosing regimes for the same drug and can be used for simulating alternative regimens and optimizing therapy of these drugs to treat community-acquired pneumonia.

Objetivo: O objetivo geral deste trabalho foi estabelecer modelo farmacocinéticofarmacodinâmico (modelo PK/PD) para descrever o perfil temporal do efeito bactericida do levofloxacino e do gatifloxacino contra Streptococcus pneumoniae. Método: Para alcançar este objetivo as seguintes etapas foram realizadas: i) foram validadas metodologias analíticas de SPE-HPLC para o gatifloxacino e HPLC para o levofloxacino e o gatifloxacino para quantificação destes em amostras de plasma, microdialisado tecidual e caldo de cultura; ii) foi avaliada a farmacocinética do gatifloxacino em roedores nas doses de 6 e 12 mg/kg via oral e 6 mg/kg via intravenosa (i.v.) e a biodisponibilidade oral foi determinada; iii) foram estabelecidas as condições ideais para microdiálise do gatifloxacino e as taxas de recuperação in vitro, por diálise (EE), retrodiálise (RD) e fluxo líquido zero (NNF) e in vivo, em tecido pulmonar e muscular, por retrodiálise e fluxo líquido zero. Essas recuperações foram utilizadas para determinar a penetração pulmonar do gatifloxacino após a administração i.v. bolus de 6 mg/kg a ratos Wistar sadios; iv) foram simuladas as concentrações livres pulmonares esperadas para humanos após tratamento com diferentes regimes de dosagem para o levofloxacino e o gatifloxacino em modelo de infecção in vitro frente a Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC® 49619. Simulações de concentrações constantes múltiplas do MIC de cada fármaco também foram realizadas. As curvas de morte bacteriana por tempo obtidas foram modeladas com modelo PK/PD de Emax modificado, com auxílio do programa Scientist® v 2.01. Resultados e Conclusões: i) Os métodos analíticos por SPE-HPLC e HPLC para quantificação do gatifloxacino e do levofloxacino foram validados. As curvas foram lineares na faixa de 20 a 600 ng/mL para plasma e microdialisado tecidual de gatifloxacino e na faixa de 250 a 6000 ng/mL para caldo de cultura para ambos os fármacos, com r > 0,99, independente do método desenvolvido. Em plasma e microdialisado, a exatidão foi ≥ 94,3 %. A recuperação do gatifloxacino dos cartuchos de extração em fase sólida variou entre 95,6 e 99,7 %. A precisão não excedeu 5,8 % do CV. Em caldo de cultura, a exatidão foi ≥ 92,0 % e 93,4 % para o gatifloxacino e o levofloxacino, respectivamente. A precisão não excedeu 3,2 % e 4,2 % do CV para o levofloxacino e o gatifloxacino, respectivamente; ii) A avaliação farmacocinética demonstrou que os modelos abertos de dois compartimentos e de um compartimento com absorção de primeira ordem descreveram adequadamente os perfis plasmáticos após administração do gatifloxacino pelas vias i.v. e oral nas doses de 6 e 12 mg/kg, com CL de 0,9 ± 0,2 e 1,0 ± 0,3 L/h/kg, t½ de 3,3 ± 0,8 e 3,7 ± 0,3 h e Vd de 2,8 ± 0,4 e 3,1 ± 1,0 L/kg, respectivamente. Os parâmetros determinados por abordagem compartimental e não compartimental não diferiram significativamente para as duas vias investigadas (α = 0,05). A ASC0-∞ foi de 4,1 ± 1,6 e 6,6 ± 1,3 μg.h/mL após administração oral e i.v. das doses de 12 e 6 mg/kg, respectivamente, levando a uma biodisponibilidade de 31%. A constante de velocidade de absorção foi alta (5,0 ± 1,8 h-1) e a farmacocinética mostrou-se linear na faixa de doses investigada; iii) A recuperação das sondas de microdiálise in vitro por EE e RD para 80, 160 e 400 ng/mL de gatifloxacino foi de 33,5 ± 1,3%, 33,1 ± 1,2%, 31,8 ± 2,7% e 31,4 ± 2,6%, 33,1 ± 2,2%, 30,6 ± 3,3%, respectivamente. In vivo a recuperação por RD no músculo esquelético e pulmão de ratos Wistar foi de 29,1 ± 1,0% e 30,7 ± 1,4%, respectivamente. A recuperação por NNF in vitro e in vivo foi de 30,9 ± 2,9% e 29,0 ± 0,8%, respectivamente. Desse modo, concluiu-se que a recuperação foi constante e independente do método ou meio utilizado. Os perfis de concentração livre no músculo, pulmão e plasma de ratos Wistar foram virtualmente superpostos após dose de 6 mg/kg i.v., resultando em ASC similares de 3888 ± 734 ng.h/mL, 4138 ± 1071 ng.h/mL e 3805 ± 577 ng.h/mL, respectivamente (α = 0,05). O fator de distribuição tecidual foi de 1,02 e 1,08 para músculo e pulmão, respectivamente; iv) O modelo PK/PD empregado foi capaz de descrever o efeito do levofloxacino e do gatifloxacino contra o Streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro para todas as simulações investigadas. O EC50 médio para o levofloxacino (3,57 ± 2,16 mg/L) foi significativamente maior que o do gatifloxacino (0,95 ± 0,56 mg/L) quando regimes de doses múltiplas foram simulados. O mesmo foi observado para concentrações constantes, sendo o EC50,levofloxacino = 2,75 ± 0,45 mg/L e EC50,gatifloxacino = 1,03 ± 0,52 mg/L. O kmax foi estatisticamente semelhante para ambos os fármacos independente se foram simuladas concentrações flutuantes (kmax,levofloxacino = 0,40 ± 0,19 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacino = 0,48 ± 0,15 h-1) ou concentrações constantes (kmax,levofloxacino = 0,34 ± 0,06 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacino = 0,39 ± 0,23 h-1). Nenhum dos índices PK/PD foi capaz de prever o desfecho da infecção para todas as situações investigadas. O modelo PK/PD desenvolvido permitiu a comparação entre as duas fluorquinolonas e de diferentes posologias para cada fármaco, podendo ser utilizado para simular o efeito temporal de regimes de dosagem alternativos bem como para otimização da posologia desses fármacos para o tratamento da pneumonia adquirida na comunidade. / Objective: The aim of this work was to establish a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model (PK/PD model) to describe the profile of bactericidal effect over time of levofloxacin and gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Method: To achieve this goal the following steps were carried out: i) an analytical method of SPE-HPLC to quantify gatifloxacin in plasma and tissue microdialysates, and an HPLC method for measuring levofloxacin and gatifloxacin in culture broth samples were developed and validated; ii) the pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin in rodents after intravenous (6 mg/kg) and oral (6 and 12 mg/kg) administration was assessed as well as the oral bioavailability of the drug was determined; iii) microdialysis conditions for gatifloxacin were established and the recovery rates in vitro by dialysis (EE), retrodialysis (RD) and no-net-flux (NNF), and in vivo in lung and skeletal muscle tissue by RD and NNF were determined. Gatifloxacin tissue penetration in lung after intravenous administration (6 mg/kg) to healthy Wistar rats was determined; iv) levofloxacin and gatifloxacin free lung concentrations expected in humans following different dosing regimens of the drugs were simulated using Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC® 49619 in vitro model of infection. The effect of constant concentrations multiples of MIC were also investigated. The time-kill curves obtained were modeled using an Emax modified model using Scientist® v. 2.01 software. Results and Conclusions: i) The analytical methods by SPE-HPLC and HPLC for quantifying gatifloxacin and levofloxacin were validated. Calibration curves were linear between 20-600 ng/mL for gatifloxacin in plasma and tissue microdialysate samples and between 250-6000 ng/mL for broth media for both drugs, with r > 0.99 independently of the method considered. The accuracy was ≥ 94.3 % for plasma and microdialysate. Gatifloxacin recovery from the solid phase extraction cartridges ranged from 95.6 to 99.7%. The precision did not exceed 5.8% of the CV. In broth media the accuracy was ≥ 92.0% and 94.3% for gatifloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively. The precision did not exceed 3.2% and 4.2% of the CV for levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, respectively; ii) Gatifloxacin experimental plasma profiles in rats were adequately fitted to a two-compartment model after intravenous and to a one compartment model with first order absorption after oral dosing. The total clearance (0.9 ± 0.2 and 1.0 ± 0.3 L/h/kg), the terminal half-life (3.3 ± 0.8 and 3.7 ± 0.3 h) and the apparent volume of distribution (2.8 ± 0.4 and 3.1 ± 1.0 L/kg) were statistically similar (α = 0.05) after i.v. and oral administration, by both model independent and compartmental approaches. The area under the curve was reduced after oral dosing (4.1 ± 1.6 μg.h/mL) in comparison to i.v. dosing (6.6 ± 1.3 μg.h/mL) leading to an oral bioavailability of 31%. The absorption was fast, with a constant rate of 5.0 ± 1.8 h-1. The results evidenced the linear pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin in rodents in the dose range investigated; iii) Microdialysis recoveries determined in vitro by EE and RD at 80, 160 and 400 ng/mL resulted in 33.5 ± 1.3%, 33.1 ± 1.2%, 31.8 ± 2.7% and 31.4 ± 2.6%, 33.1 ± 2.2%, 30.6 ± 3.3%, respectively. In vivo recovery by RD in Wistar rat’s skeletal muscle and lung were 29.1 ± 1.0% and 30.7 ± 1.4%, respectively. Recoveries by no-net-flux in vitro and in vivo resulted in recoveries of 30.9 ± 2.9% and 29.0 ± 0.8%, respectively. In this way, it was shown that gatifloxacin recovery was constant and independent of the method or media used. Free skeletal muscle, lung and plasma profiles were virtually superimposed after i.v. administration of gatifloxacin 6 mg/kg dose resulting in similar area under the curve of 3888 ± 734 ng.h/mL, 4138 ± 1071 ng.h/mL and 3805 ± 577 ng.h/mL, respectively (α = 0.05). The tissue distribution factors were determined to be 1.02 and 1.08 for muscle and lung, respectively; iv) The PK/PD model used was able to describe the effect of levofloxacin and gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro for all the regimens investigated. Levofloxacin EC50 (3.57 ± 2.16 mg/L) was higher than gatifloxacin (0.95 ± 0.56 mg/L) when multiple dosing regimens where simulated. Using constant concentrations, levofloxacin EC50 was also higher than gatifloxacin (EC50,levofloxacin = 2.75 ± 0.45 mg/L; EC50,gatifloxacin = 1.03 ± 0.52 mg/L). The kmax was statistically similar for both drugs independent of whether fluctuating (kmax,levofloxacin = 0.40 ± 0.19 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacin = 0.48 ± 0.15 h-1) or constant concentrations (kmax,levofloxacin = 0.34 ± 0.06 h-1; kmax,gatifloxacin = 0.39 ± 0.23 h-1) were simulated. None of the PK/PD indices was capable of predicting the infection outcome for all the situations investigated. The PK/PD model developed allowed not only the comparison between the fluoroquinolones effect but also the comparison of different dosing regimes for the same drug and can be used for simulating alternative regimens and optimizing therapy of these drugs to treat community-acquired pneumonia.

I performed two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the best treatments for enteric fever in Kathmandu, Nepal, an area with a high proportion of nalidixic acid resistant S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A isolates. I recruited 844 patients with suspected enteric fever to compare chloramphenicol versus gatifloxacin. 352 patients were culture confirmed. 14/175 patients treated with chloramphenicol and 12/177 patients treated with gatifloxacin experienced treatment failure (HR=0.86 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.86), p=0.70). The median times to fever clearance were 3.95 and 3.90 days, respectively (HR=1.06 [CI 0.86 to 1.32], p=0.59). The second RCT compared ofloxacin versus gatifloxacin and recruited 627 patients. Of the 170 patients infected with nalidixic acid resistant strains, the number of patients with treatment failure was 6/83 in the ofloxacin group and 5/87 in the gatifloxacin group (Hazard Ratio, HR=0.81, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.65; p=0.73); the median times to fever clearance were 4.7 and 3.3 days respectively (HR=1.59 [CI 1.16 to 2.18], p=0.004). I compared conventional blood culture against an electricity free culture approach. 66 of 304 patients with suspected enteric fever were positive for S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi A, 55 (85%) isolates were identified by the conventional blood culture and 60 (92%) isolates were identified by the experimental method. The percentages of positive and negative agreement for diagnosis of enteric fever were 90.9% and 96.0%, respectively. This electricity free blood culture system may have utility in resource-limited settings or potentially in disaster relief and refugee camps. I performed a literature review of RCTs of enteric fever which showed that trial design varied greatly. I was interested in the perspective of patients and what they regarded as cure. 1,481 patients were interviewed at the start of treatment, 860 (58%) reported that the resolution of fever would mean cure to them. At the completion of treatment, 877/1,448 (60.6%) reported that they felt cured when fever was completely gone. We suggest that fever clearance time is the best surrogate for clinical cure in patients with enteric fever and should be used as the primary outcome in future RCTs for the treatment of enteric fever.