Spelling suggestions: "subject:"geschichtsschreibung"" "subject:"geschichtesschreibung""
91 |
Ein Aussenseiter der Geschichtsschreibung : Johannes Janssen 1829 - 1891 ; Studien zu Leben und Werk eines katholischen Historikers /Troxler, Walter. January 2007 (has links)
Univ., Diss.--Fribourg, 2000.
|
92 |
Das Bild des Anderen : Entstehung und Wirkung deutsch-französischer Fremdbilder in der volkssprachlichen Literatur und Historiographie des 12. bis 14. Jahrhunderts /Jostkleigrewe, Georg. January 1900 (has links)
Texte abrégé et remanié de: Dissertation--Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 2005. Titre de soutenance : Vertraute Nachbarschaft und kontingente Fremdheit. / ISSN au verso de la p. de titre : 1438-7689. Bibliogr. p. 409-439.
|
93 |
Die Reinhardsbrunner Geschichtsschreibung im Hochmittelalter : klösterliche Traditionsbildung zwischen Fürstenhof, Kirche und Reich /Tebruck, Stefan. January 1900 (has links)
Revised Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 1997. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [411]-442) and index.
|
94 |
Stäudlin and the historiography of philosophySchneider, Ulrich Johannes 17 February 2015 (has links) (PDF)
The historiography of philosophy presents many difficulties to anybody addressing its more general features. How easy it would be if we had only one skeptic philosopher - who calls himself a skeptic or is believed to be one - and just one "other" philosopher who is not a skeptic or at least does not want be known as such. The third person would be the historian of philosophy who informs us about what befalls the skeptic philosopher and his skepticism. Does be have many followers or
many critics or both? Does he stick to his opinions throughout his life or does he change them? ls he ignored by the other philosopher or rather criticized by him? The historian would report all of this to us; we would read his story and be in a position to discuss it, to compare it with the skeptic's own writings and with those of his opponent, and so on. Unfortunately, this ideal constellation does not exist. History is more complex; the historians of philosophy reporting on skepticism have
to deal with several skeptical philosophers - self-declared or suspected - from ancient and modern times, and with various theories of skepticism - apologetic and polemic, prompted by religious, scientific or other considerations. Most importantly, historians of philosophy are not a third party. This can be learned from Stäudlin's History of Skepticism.
|
95 |
"Zwei schlechthin unausgleichbare Auffassungen des Mittelpunktes der christlichen Religion" Ignaz Döllingers Auseinandersetzung mit der Reformation, ihrer Lehre und deren Folgen in seiner ersten SchaffensperiodeLeonhardt, Stefan January 2002 (has links)
Zugl.: Tübingen, Univ., Diss., 2002
|
96 |
Leopold von Ranke: Die Serbische Revolution : Voraussetzungen und Entstehung im Wiener Kreis um Bartholomäus Kopitar und Vuk Stefanović Karadžić /Jelesijević, Miodrag, January 2007 (has links)
Zugl.: Münster, Wilhelms-Univ., Diss., 2006.
|
97 |
Die Göttinger Sieben - demokratische Vorkämpfer oder nationale Helden? : zum Verhältnis von Geschichtsschreibung und Erinnerungskultur in der Rezeption des Hannoverschen VerfassungskonfliktesSaage-Maaß, Miriam January 2007 (has links)
Zugl.: Frankfurt (Main), Univ., Diss., 2006
|
98 |
Die Gesichter der Streitenden Erzählung, Drama und Diskurs des Dreissigjährigen Krieges 1830 bis 1933Wald, Martin January 2006 (has links)
Zugl.: Berlin, Humboldt-Univ., Diss., 2006
|
99 |
Faktoren des historischen Prozesses : eine vergleichende Untersuchung zu Tacitus und Ammianus Marcellinus /Riedl, Petra. January 2002 (has links)
Univ., Diss.--München, 2000.
|
100 |
The "Malaboch" books Kgaluši in the "civilization of the written word"Kriel, Lize January 2002 (has links)
Zugl.: Univ. of Pretoria, Diss., 2002
|
Page generated in 0.0709 seconds