Thesis (Ph. D.)--Yale University, 1923.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 1919.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1917. / Vita. Published also without thesis note. Includes bibliographical references (p. 97).

Thesis (Ph.D.)--McMaster University, 2005. / Advisor: W. J. Slater. Includes bibliographical references (p. 172-184). Also available online.

Based on author's thesis. / Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (p. 225-238) and index.

Thesis (doctoral)--Academia Georgia Augusta, 1914.

No description available.

Orientador: Flavio Ribeiro de Oliveira / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-17T13:28:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Salvador_EvandroLuis_D.pdf: 724657 bytes, checksum: 33f856b8879463095c8d1581fd848ecc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 / Resumo: Destinada ao público não especializado na questão da poesia dramática grega, a pesquisa de doutorado tem como foco principal a tradução em prosa da tragédia As Fenícias, de Eurípides. Apresenta-se, também, um ensaio sobre o prólogo e o primeiro episódio, possibilitando aos leitores da tragédia compreender um aspecto por vezes esquecido, mas que é fundamental para a sua dramatização: a audiência teatral. Desse modo, pretende-se construir uma ponte entre o mundo grego antigo e o mundo do leitor moderno / Abstract: Not specialized for the public on the issue of Greek dramatic poetry, the doctoral research is focused on the translation in prose of the Euripides' tragedy Phoenissae. It presents also an essay on the prologue and the first episode, which enable readers to understand an aspect of tragedy that is sometimes forgotten, but that is essencial for its enactment: the theatrical audience. Thus, we intend to build a bridge between the ancient Greek world and the world of the modern reader / Doutorado / Linguistica / Doutor em Linguística

Thesis (MA) -- Stellenbosch University, 1977.

My PhD thesis, The Flower of Suffering, offers a philosophical evaluation of Aeschylus' Oresteia in light of Presocratic ideas. By examining several aspects of the tragic trilogy in relation to some of Aeschylus' near-contemporary thinkers, it aims to unravel the overarching theological ideas and the metaphysical and epistemological assumptions underpinning the Oresteia's dramatic narrative. My aim is to bring to relief those aspects of the Oresteia which I believe will benefit from a comparison with some ideas, or modes of thought, which circulated among the Presocratic philosophers. I will explore how reading some of this tragedy's themes in relation to Presocratic debates about theology and cosmic justice may affect and enhance our understanding of the theological ‘tension' and metaphysical assumptions in Aeschylus' work. In particular, it is my contention that Aeschylus' explicit theology, which has been often misinterpreted as a form of theodicy where the justice of heaven is praised and a faith in the rule of the gods is encouraged, is presented in these terms only to create a stronger collision with the painful reality dramatized from a human perspective. By setting these premises, it is my intention to confer on Greek tragedy a prominent position in the history of early Greek philosophical thought. If the exclusion of Presocratic material from debates about tragedy runs the risk of obscuring a thorough understanding of the broader cultural backdrop against which tragedy was born, the opposite is also true. Greek tragedy represents, in its own dramatic language, a fundamental contribution to early philosophical speculation about the divine, human attitudes towards it, indeed, the human place in relation to the cosmic forces which govern the universe.