Spelling suggestions: "subject:"2around beetle -- cology"" "subject:"2around beetle -- cacology""
1 |
The ecology of small predatory beetles, with special reference to their competitive relationsDavies, Michael January 1955 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
The population ecology of certain carabid beetles living in marshes and near fresh waterMurdoch, William January 1963 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
Effects of forest site preparation methods on carabid beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) diversityBeaudry, Suzanne January 1995 (has links)
The objective was to analyze the effects of logging and prescribed burning on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) at a jack pine stand and white spruce plantations in order to assess short-term impacts of these forestry practices on the diversity of this beetle group. In addition, soil scarification was also included at the jack pine stand. Based on previous reports on forest disturbance influences on carabids, it is hypothesized that short-term effects of studied forestry practices do not reduce carabids' diversity. Four carabid assemblage characteristics were compared: (a) number of catches; (b) dry mass; (c) species richness; and, (d) diversity index. Species responses and dry mass distributions were also investigated. Treatments either increased or maintained studied variables compared with control sites. Diversity indices were highest in burnt-over areas. Similar response patterns of species or groups of species were observed in both forest types. The presence of regenerating sites among the natural landscape increased carabid diversity.
|
4 |
Ground beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) communities along a successional gradient in southwestern Quebec and notes on the range expansion of introduced speciesMercado, Alida. January 2005 (has links)
Species diversity is influenced by disturbance in the environment. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) were used as a model taxon to study the effects of disturbance (i.e., time since disturbance) in different habitats along a successional gradient (agricultural fields, old fields, young forests and old forests). Seventy-three species (5139 individuals) were collected during both years of sampling, of which 9 species are introduced species and compose 64.8% of the total catch. In contrast to the predictions of the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis, diversity of ground beetles was higher in the agricultural fields and lowest in the old forests. The community composition, as seen with Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination, in the agricultural fields was the most distinct, while the difference between and among other habitats was less clear, possibly influenced by the introduced species present in the area. The introduced species collected had a significant influence in the total catch as they represented more than half of the total individuals collected and in the ground beetle community composition. The distribution of seven introduced species in Quebec was studied and compared to what was reported in 1975. Five species have a similar distribution, while the distribution range of Harpalus rufipes DeGeer has expanded south and Bembidion obtusum Audinet-Serville might have been dispersing northeast since its introduction.
|
5 |
Ground beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) communities along a successional gradient in southwestern Quebec and notes on the range expansion of introduced speciesMercado, Alida. January 2005 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
Effects of forest site preparation methods on carabid beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) diversityBeaudry, Suzanne January 1995 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
Generalist predators in reduced-tillage corn: predation on armyworm, habitat preferences, and a method to estimate absolute densitiesClark, M. Sean 10 November 2009 (has links)
The potential impact of generalist predators on armyworm mortality was evaluated in the field, through a predator removal study, and in the laboratory, through controlled feeding trials. The most common potential armyworm predators removed from the field included ground beetles (Carabidae), rove beetles (Staphylinidae), ants (Formicidae), and spiders (Araneae). Armyworm damage to corn plants was significantly greater where generalist predator populations were reduced, through the use of pitfall traps and exclusion arenas, than in the control where predator populations were unaltered. The differences in the proportion of damaged plants and the degree of damage between the predator removal treatment and the control were statistically significant. Generalist predator consumption rates of live armyworm larvae in the laboratory were variable, however most predators did feed on the larvae. Large carabid beetles, including Pterostichus chalcites Say, Pterostichus lucublandus Say, and Scarites subterraneus F., exhibited the highest consumption rates.
Generalist predators were sampled in four reduced-tillage corn systems which differed in the degree of soil disturbance and quantity and structure of the surface mulch due to tillage and cover crop management practices. The two sampling methods which were used, pitfall trapping and vacuum sampling, showed similar trends in predator abundance. The treatment with the highest degree of mulch ground cover had the highest overall predator abundance while the treatment which was disked and had no surface mulch had the lowest. Although several species tended to prefer the system with the least amount of ground cover, most of the common species preferred the treatment with the most groundcover. Pitfall trap catches over a three-day period indicated that predator activity was significantly higher during the day than night in all treatments. However, a laboratory study provided evidence that night activity in the field may have been reduced due to unusually low temperatures. Catch data from pitfall traps, unbaited and baited with live armyworm larvae, indicated that long-distance chemical detection is not an important cue for generalist predators in finding armyworm as prey.
A removal sampling technique was used and evaluated for estimating the absolute densities of ground beetles (Carabidae). Removal sampling is a method of absolute density estimation based on the decline in successive catch numbers as individuals are removed from a population. Field arenas were used to isolate sampling areas in a no-till corn field and barrier pitfall traps were installed within the arenas to remove the carabids. Three three-week sampling trials were conducted in 1991 providing data for estimates on 5 June, 26 June, and 17 July. A single six-week sampling period was conducted in 1992 providing data for estimates on 2 June based on three, four, five, and six weeks of sampling. A linear regression method was used for calculating the estimate from the removal sampling data. The technique's practicality and agreement with the assumptions of removal sampling are discussed. / Master of Science
|
Page generated in 0.0531 seconds