Spelling suggestions: "subject:"group codecision"" "subject:"group bydecision""
41 |
EFFECTS OF SPAN AND DISCUSSION-INTERVENTION METHODS ON THE QUALITY OF GROUP DECISION-MAKING CONCERNING AN EXPERT VALIDATED ENVIRONMENTAL CRISES PREDICTION PROBLEMSchatz, Gary Curtis, 1943- January 1973 (has links)
No description available.
|
42 |
The span group decision-making method in fraternitiesHitchcock, James Donald, 1939- January 1967 (has links)
No description available.
|
43 |
The effect of management training on group decision making : social compliance and cognitive category accessibilityHein, Michael Brian 05 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
44 |
Distributed group decision support : an exploration of some key conceptsMorton, Alec January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
45 |
A process model for dispute resolutionBalke, Ellen Louise January 1992 (has links)
No description available.
|
46 |
Grumbling, voting, demonstrating, and rioting : a model of social identity and decision-making in intergroup contextsLouis, Winnifred R. January 2001 (has links)
An individual faced with intergroup conflict must choose from a vast array of possible actions, ranging from grumbling among ingroup friends to voting and demonstrating to rioting and revolution. The present thesis proposes a model of decision-making in intergroup contexts oriented towards understanding how group members choose among these behavioural alternatives. Intergroup decisions are conceptualized as rationally shaped by perceptions of the benefits and costs associated with the action (expectancy-value processes). In intergroup contexts, group-level costs and benefits may play a critical role in individuals' decision-making. Perception of the dynamic between ingroup and outgroup norms is thought to be a key determinant of the group-level benefits and costs associated with individualistic or collective actions. Four studies explore the predictive value of this model for understanding decision-making in the context of English-French conflict in Quebec. Studies 1 and 2 provide evidence that group-level costs and benefits influence individuals' decision-making, in intergroup contexts. Contrary to the predictions of individualistic models of decision-making such as the theory of planned behaviour (Ajzen, 1985), the individual level of analysis was not observed to mediate the group level of analysis. Moreover, contrary to recent social identity theorizing (Kelly, 1993; Simon et al., 1998), perceived group-level costs and benefits were implicated in the relationship between social identity and intentions to engage in collective action. Studies 3 and 4 provide evidence that outgroup and ingroup norms may interact to influence decision-making. Thus, contrary to the referent informational influence model (Terry & Hogg, 1996; Turner, 1991), ingroup norms alone did not determine group members' actions. Moreover, Study 4 provides evidence that the dynamic between ingroup and outgroup norms influences evaluations of the costs and benefits of intergroup behaviours, both
|
47 |
Effects of electronic meeting room technology in synchronous and asynchronous environments /Baird, Allan Hunter Unknown Date (has links)
Thesis (MBus)--University of South Australia, 1998
|
48 |
A two-nation study of GDSS and the cultural values used in decision-making /Rahmati, Nasrin. Unknown Date (has links)
Thesis (PhD) -- University of South Australia, 1998
|
49 |
Effects of electronic meeting room technology in synchronous and asynchronous environments /Baird, Allan Hunter Unknown Date (has links)
Thesis (MBus)--University of South Australia, 1998
|
50 |
Three essays on decision-making in natural resource economicsBrady, Michael Patrick, January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2007. / Title from first page of PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. 133-140).
|
Page generated in 0.0644 seconds