A Teologia da Libertação resultou de um movimento da Igreja Católica Latino-Americana que, para além da ação transformadora que buscou proporcionar quando começou a ser praticada na perspectiva libertadora, foi síntese histórica do que a precedeu. Não seria possível falar desta teologia sem, minimamente, citar eventos que facilitaram a compreensão do que seria o homem praticando a evangelização, pois não só a escassez sacerdotal fez ascender o leigo dentro da instituição, como, inclusive, a secularização do Estado e o contínuo desenvolvimento das ciências humanas e de conceitos filosóficos que, ao serem criticados pela Igreja Católica Romana, definiram as interpretações hierárquicas e sacerdotais sobre o que seria, portanto, a Igreja do século XX. Estas características são melhores compreendidas quando o precedente sociopolítico de um dos seus principais idealizadores, Gustavo Gutierrez, é aproximado na perspectiva com que ele próprio descreve o que viria a ser a atuação religiosa na emancipação humana, ratificando sua proposta de superação prática da condição de oprimido e opressor, ou, como ele denomina, da práxis libertadora. / The Liberation Theology resulted from a movement of the Latin-American Catholic Church that, beyond the transforming action it sought to provide when started being practiced into the liberating perspective, was the historic synthesis of what had preceded itself. Wouldnt be possible talking about this theology without, at least, mention some events that facilitated the comprehension of what would be the man practicing the evangelization, because not only did the shortage of priests ascend the layperson within the institution, as even the secularization of the State and the continuous development of the humanities and philosophical concepts that, when criticized by the Roman Catholic Church, defined the hierarchical and priestly interpretation about what would be the twentieth centurys church. These characteristics are better understood when the social-politics precedents of one of its most important founders, Gustavo Gutierrez, is approached from the perspective with which he, himself, describes what would be the religious action for the mankind emancipation, ratifying its proposal to, while practicing, overcome the condition of oppressor and oppressed, or, as he said, the liberating praxis.

A Teologia da Libertação resultou de um movimento da Igreja Católica Latino-Americana que, para além da ação transformadora que buscou proporcionar quando começou a ser praticada na perspectiva libertadora, foi síntese histórica do que a precedeu. Não seria possível falar desta teologia sem, minimamente, citar eventos que facilitaram a compreensão do que seria o homem praticando a evangelização, pois não só a escassez sacerdotal fez ascender o leigo dentro da instituição, como, inclusive, a secularização do Estado e o contínuo desenvolvimento das ciências humanas e de conceitos filosóficos que, ao serem criticados pela Igreja Católica Romana, definiram as interpretações hierárquicas e sacerdotais sobre o que seria, portanto, a Igreja do século XX. Estas características são melhores compreendidas quando o precedente sociopolítico de um dos seus principais idealizadores, Gustavo Gutierrez, é aproximado na perspectiva com que ele próprio descreve o que viria a ser a atuação religiosa na emancipação humana, ratificando sua proposta de superação prática da condição de oprimido e opressor, ou, como ele denomina, da práxis libertadora. / The Liberation Theology resulted from a movement of the Latin-American Catholic Church that, beyond the transforming action it sought to provide when started being practiced into the liberating perspective, was the historic synthesis of what had preceded itself. Wouldnt be possible talking about this theology without, at least, mention some events that facilitated the comprehension of what would be the man practicing the evangelization, because not only did the shortage of priests ascend the layperson within the institution, as even the secularization of the State and the continuous development of the humanities and philosophical concepts that, when criticized by the Roman Catholic Church, defined the hierarchical and priestly interpretation about what would be the twentieth centurys church. These characteristics are better understood when the social-politics precedents of one of its most important founders, Gustavo Gutierrez, is approached from the perspective with which he, himself, describes what would be the religious action for the mankind emancipation, ratifying its proposal to, while practicing, overcome the condition of oppressor and oppressed, or, as he said, the liberating praxis.

This essay proposes that theology and philosophy are not mutually exclusive or at odds with one another methodologically, but in fact that religious categories are useful in philosophical analyses, and particularly when it comes to ethics. In this essay, I examine the theological concept of sin as it is expressed in Latin American Liberation Theology (over and against the more traditional understanding of sin in Western Christianity) as the domination of the Other and the oppression of the poor through geo-political systems of power. I explore the responses to this notion from the Magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church, as well as my own critiques in terms of theoretical integrity with particular regard to claims of universalism. The essay then proceeds into a synthesis of these criticisms through the work of Josiah Royce on Community and Loyalty in

This thesis looks at Blessed are the Poor?, a document presented to the General Synod of the Scottish Episcopal Church that sought to outline Liberation Theology to the Church. In response to this the Synod voted £1,000,000 of its resources to be used specifically in projects in the poorest parts of Scotland. The thesis outlines those projects and the way in which they sought to embody the "Option for the Poor". The thesis closes by looking at whether Blessed are the Poor? faithfully represented Liberation Theology and the "Option"; whether the projects represented that theology and concluding that they did not, recognises that it is the nature of both the "Option" and the institutional Church that such a task could never be achieved. In order to understand the pastoral project this thesis outlines the historical development of Liberation Theology after the Second Vatican Council and in Latin America with particular emphasis on the "Option for the Poor". This thesis proceeds to look at the development of an "Option for the Poor" in the work of Gustavo Gutiérrez, the leading Liberation Theologian. The critiques of that work from the Vatican, Pablo Richard and Hugo Assmann are then considered. Gutiérrez’s works are used to develop a theological matrix that identifies the essential elements of the “Option for the Poor”. Having considered the notion of the "Option for the Poor" the thesis proceeds to look at how the "Option" was taken forward in the Churches in Britain before focussing on the specific response of the Scottish Episcopal Church. The matrix is used as a tool to assess whether the various parts of the response truly reflected the “Option for the Poor”.

The purpose of this study is to investigate how religious ethics, while retaining its identity, can contribute to political debate and to the understanding of justice. The inquiry addresses these issues by focusing on theological perspectives which challenge the solutions offered to these questions by the liberal paradigm. Three kinds of challenges are studied, each of which is represented by one thinker from the Islamic tradition and one from the Christian tradition, in order to enable a comparative perspective on the contributions of religious traditions. The thinkers studied are: 1) modified liberalism, represented by Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im and Duncan B. Forrester; 2) liberationism, represented by Ali Shariati and Gustavo Gutierrez; and 3) radical traditionalism, as developed by Tariq Ramadan and John Milbank. The study is organized around three main questions. First, how can innovative interpretations of religious tradition be plausibly justified? Second, what role should religious arguments and reasons play in the political sphere? Third, what can religious ethics and theological thought contribute to the understanding of social justice? The questions are engaged by means of a critical and reconstructive engagement with the six thinkers. The suggested solutions are assessed in terms of the criteria of authenticity, communicability, and potential for transformation. It is argued that a religious ethic can rely on a tradition without accepting conservative understandings of that tradition. Furthermore, it is argued that the coherence of religious ethics can be made available for public discourse but that the hospitability of the public forum to such contributions needs to be realized through a deepened democratic culture and a critique of power structures which condition perceptions of rationality. While religious ethics do not articulate complete alternative understandings of justice, they articulate contributions by relating justice to human sociality and to transcendence.