Thesis (Ph. D.)--Johns Hopkins University, 1995. / Vita. "UMI number: 9523863." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 375-417).

Inaug.-dis.--Leipzig. / Lebenslauf.

Inaug.-diss.--Leipzig. / Lebenslauf.

Thèse Paris. / Bibliography: p. [375]-395.

Afrikaans text / Hierdie verhandeling is 'n historiografiese studie oor die geskiedskrywing wat in Die Huisgenoot verskyn het in die tydperk 1923 - 1949. J.M.H. Viljoen, self 'n opgeleide historikus, het as redakteur doelbewas persone tot geskied- skrywing aangemoedig en hom ook vir die plasing daarvan in Die Huisgenoot„ beywer* In die verhandeling moes egter selektief te werk gegaan word, deurdat hoofsaaklik op die bydraes van opgeleide historici gekonsentreer is* Uiteraard moes baie van die bydraes deur amateurs dus buite rekening gelaat word. Die geskiedskrywing word ten aansien van die onderskeie tyd- perke en onderwerpe bespreek en evalueer. Veral die boek- besprekings wat in dié tydperk 'n onderskeidende kenmerk van die geskiedskrywing was, word deeglik in oënskou genoem* S6 ook die briewe wat in reaksie op sekere geplaasde artikels verskyn het. Met alles in ag geneem kan Die Huisgenoot van daardie tyd ongetwyfeld met reg aanspraak maak op die status van 'n his- tories-wetenskaplike tydskrif* / This dissertation is an historic study of the historiography which appeared in Die Huisgenoot during the period 1923 - 1949. The editor, J.M.H. Viljoen, himself a formally trained historian, purposefully promoted historiography, which he published in Die Huisgenoot. This dissertation is however, primarily concerned with the contributions of formally trained historians. Consequently many contributions by amateur historians were not considered. Historiography relating to specific periods and subjects is discussed and evaluated. In particular book reviews which were an outstanding feature of this historiography, are evaluated thoroughly. Similarly, letters of reaction to specific articles were also evaluated. In conclusion, it is evident that Die Huiagenoot which was published in the years 1923 - 1949, qualifies as an histori- cally-scientific periodical. / History / M.A. (History)

Orientador: Hélio Rebello Cardoso Júnior / Banca: Milton Carlos Costa / Banca: Paulo Alves / Banca: André Luiz Joanilho / Banca: José Costa D'Assunção Barros / Resumo: A relação entre história e filosofia passou por transformações marcantes ao longo do século XX, partindo da rejeição às filosofias da história no começo do século, período no qual a história se tornou progressivamente científica, até uma reaproximação nas últimas décadas. Neste período a relação entre historiadores e filósofos foi tensa, marcada por desconfianças de ambas as partes. No entanto alguns autores conseguiram romper essa desconfiança e empreender o diálogo entre os oficiais de Clio e de Sophia. Como um filósofo-historiador, assim denominado tanto por Gilles Deleuze quanto por Jacques Le Goff, Foucault abriu um campo profícuo de pesquisas que orientaram as transformações teóricas da chamada "Nova História". Notamos ai a presença constante das teses de Foucault entre os historiadores dos Annales, periódico que estabeleceu por tradição, justamente, a rejeição à filosofia. O intuito da presente tese é o de compreender como Foucault foi alçado à posição de "filósofo-historiador" através da recepção de seus textos pelos autores ligados aos Annales, em função do amplo diálogo entre ambos a partir de meados da década de 1960 e que se estendeu até a morte do filósofo em 1984. / Résumé: La relation entre l'histoire et la philosophie a travesé plusier phases tout au long du XXe siècle, à partir d'un rejet explicite au début du siècle, temps de scientificité de l'historiographie, à un rapprochement au cours des dernières décennie. Durant cette période, la relation entre les historiens et les philosophes était tendue marquée par la méfiance des deux parties.Cependant, certains auteurs ont pu briser cette méfiance et engager un dialogue entre les fonctionnaires de Clio et Sophia. Comme un philosophe-historien,ainsi nommée par les deux Gilles Deleuze et de Jacques Le Goff, Foucault a ouvert un champ fertile de la recherche qui a guidé les transformations théoriques de la 'nouvelle histoire'. Nous notons la présence constante des théories de Foucault parmi les historiens des Annales, journal qui a établi par tradition le refus de la philosophie. L'objectif de cette thèse est comprendre comment Foucault a été promu au poste de "philosophe-historien" par la réception de leurs textes par les historiens liés aux Annales, en raison de la vaste dialogue entre les deux depuis le milieu des années 1960 et qui a duré jusqu'à la mort du philosophe en 1984. / Doutor

Orientadora: Karina Anhezini de Araujo / Banca: Rebeca Gontijo Teixeira / Banca: Diogo da Silva Roiz / Banca: Teresa Maria Malatian / Banca: Wilton Carlos Lima da Silva / Resumo: Ter uma vida como objeto central de estudo é adentrar no terreno movediço das múltiplas relações, pois uma pesquisa de percurso intelectual tem como premissa a convergência entre o autor, as obras e o seu contexto de produção. Para nós, interpretar o percurso intelectual de Cecília Westphalen (1927-2004), no período que medeia 1950 e 1998, implica investigar a singularidade de uma vida nas tensões do campo historiográfico brasileiro da segunda metade do século XX, tempo de delineamento da profissionalização do ofício. Nossa questão central repousa na sua construção de si como historiadora filiada à história econômica e social quantitativa, prática que aprendeu nos deslocamentos historiográficos à capital da historiografia francesa. A História como ciência social, a dialética da duração, os ciclos econômicos, as séries, a informática, passam a compor sua linguagem no ensino e na pesquisa. É na historiografia à la Annales que ela identifica o signo da cientificidade capaz de consolidar o status acadêmico da pesquisa histórica no país. Para compreender este modo de ser historiadora é fundamental a historicização dos seus encontros e desencontros acadêmicos configurados em diferentes espaços de sociabilidade e produção do conhecimento, como a Universidade Federal do Paraná, a VIª Section de l'École Pratique des Hautes Études/École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, a Associação dos Professores Universitários de História e a Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Histórica. Assim, ... (Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo) / Abstract: Have a life as the main object of study is going into a shaky ground of multiple relationships, because a research of an intellectual way has as premiss the convergence between the author, the works and their production environment. For us, interpret the intellectual journey of Cecília Westphalen (1927-2004), during the period from 1950 to 1998 implies investigate the uniqueness' life in the tensions from Brazilian historiography's field from the second half of the twentieth century, time of designing professionalization craft. Our central question lies in its construction of itself as a historian affiliated with the economic history and social quantitative, practice that has learned in historiographical shifts to the capital of French historiography. The History as a social science, the dialectic of duration, economic cycles, the series, the informatics, became part of their language in education and research. It is in historiography à la Annales, that she identifies the sign of scientific able to consolidate the academic status of historical research in the country. To understand this way of being a historian is fundamental the historicizing of their meetings and academic disagreements configured in different spaces of sociability and production of knowledge, such as the Federal University of Paraná, VIª Section de l'École Pratique des Hautes Études/École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, the University Teachers of History Association and the Brazilian Historical Research Society... (Complete abstract electronic access below) / Doutor

No description available.

No description available.

This thesis proposes to examine Voltaire as 'literary' historian and to compare the theory and practice of his histories with those of contemporary historiographers and historians. The works selected for focus are Voltaire's Histoire de Charles XII (1730) and Le Siècle de Louis XIV (1751). Section I, 'History Voices', centres on the enunciated theory and the actual practice of contemporary history. The prefatory writing of a selection of historians (from among Voltaire's sources) is analysed to identify a prefatory programme. This is subsequently compared to the contemporary practice of writing history and it reveals an intriguing degree of divergence concerning attitudes towards authority, objectivity and truth. Similar analysis is applied to Voltaire's theoretical writing on historiography, revealing a 'historian's voice'. While Voltaire and his contemporaries all discuss questions of the historical author, subject, style, truth, aims and reader, actual contemporary history (excluding Voltaire) discloses a monotonal texture, uniquely concerned with the chosen subject of history. Section II, 'Story Voices', focuses on Voltaire's use of different textual levels in his composition of the story of his histories, that is, the telling, evaluation and presentation of historical and non-historical material within history. Analysis is made of structure, style, use of anecdotes, voices and echoes to investigate the development of a polytonal history which is simultaneously historical and contemporary, analytical and polemical, general and personal. In comparing Voltaire's histories to contemporary histories and to his own enunciated theories of historiography, textual analysis also reveals ambiguities in fact and fiction, in the historical and the storical, in historiography and narrative. A salient feature of the literariness of Voltaire's histories is the presence of duality, ironic tone and polytonal voices, all of which are audible beneath and within the official history. This literariness underlies and comprises the very vitality of Voltaire's history.