The Mucopolysaccharide (MPS) diseases are a group of lysosomal storage disorders, caused by a lack of the enzymes required for catabolism of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), leading to severe neurological decline, skeletal deformities, organomegaly, cardiac and respiratory compromise, and premature death. The severe form of MPS I, Hurler syndrome, can be successfully treated using haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but the risks associated with myeloablation and immune suppression limit the broader application of HSCT to attenuated diseases. Successful engraftment in MPS I has been difficult to achieve, and requires fully myeloablative conditioning, whilst reduced intensity conditioning is a risk factor for graft rejection. Non-myeloablative conditioning generating reliable graft acceptance and high donor chimerism could increase safety and applicability of HSCT in genetic disease, therefore the aim of this research was to identify such a regimen in a clinically relevant mouse model of HSCT.Conditioning regimens developed in existing mouse models of HSCT have had limited clinical success, and often require clinically unachievable high cell doses or less stringent strain combinations to overcome allogeneic transplant rejection. To improve clinical relevance we used CBA donors and C57BL/6 recipients, which require full myeloablation with busulfan and immune suppression using non-depleting anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 monoclonal antibodies for engraftment of low cell doses across a major histocompatibility complex barrier. In syngeneic transplant donor chimerism was improved by generating a greater ratio of donor:recipient haematopoietic cells in the bone marrow initially, therefore we tested granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), high cell dose and stem cell niche disruption and compared this to anti-CD40L costimulatory blockade in allogeneic transplant performed with a reduced dose of busulfan that was insufficient for graft acceptance. Despite improvements in initial engraftment with some of these treatments, only combined signal 1 and 2 T cell blockade were effective in reducing the dose of busulfan required for long-term graft acceptance. Early detection of MPS is important in treatment success; good disease biomarkers are vital, and biomarkers suitable for monitoring treatment outcome in MPS are lacking. We evaluated serum heparin cofactor II-thrombin (HCII-T) complex for MPS. We determined optimal sample collection and storage conditions, assay limitations and developed measurement in dried blood spots. Dermatan sulphate has a greater effect on in vivo HCII-T complex formation than heparan sulphate, thus in the MPS mouse models HCII-T is a reliable biomarker for MPS I, but not MPS IIIA or IIIB. HCII-T is greatly elevated in MPS I, II and VI patients, who all store dermatan sulphate, but it is also elevated by a small but significant amount in MPS III patients, who store heparan sulphate. HCII-T was also measured longitudinally in MPS I, II and VI patients, compared to an existing clinical biomarker, and validated against clinical outcomes to show that it is a good biomarker of short-term treatment outcomes and responds rapidly to perturbations in treatment. Finally, we determined whether an engraftment defect was observed in the MPS I mouse model, and show that this is present following both syngeneic and allogeneic HSCT. The effect of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and anti-inflammatory treatment prior to allogeneic HSCT was investigated, and initial results suggest that ERT, but not ibuprofen, may improve HSCT outcome. Overall, a clinically relevant mouse model of allogeneic HSCT has been developed and used to determine a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen that generates high levels of donor chimerism with a minimal dose of busulfan and blockade of both signal 1 and 2 of T cell activation. The conditions required to observe an engraftment defect in MPS I mice have also been defined, and preliminary studies have suggested that ERT, but not anti-inflammatory treatment, may overcome the engraftment defect in MPS I. Alongside this work, the HCII-T biomarker has been evaluated in MPS mouse models and patients, determining that it correlates well with short-term treatment outcomes. The techniques and models developed here will provide an excellent basis for further work in developing non-myeloablative conditioning for bone marrow transplant in MPS I.

京都大学 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(医学) / 甲第23782号 / 医博第4828号 / 新制||医||1057(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院医学研究科医学専攻 / (主査)教授 羽賀 博典, 教授 波多野 悦朗, 教授 溝脇 尚志 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM

The role of Notch in cell fate determination and lineage restriction in the bone marrow (BM) is controversial in the field. Recent studies have convincingly shown that Notch is dispensable for haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) regulation in adult haematopoiesis (Maillard et al., 2008). In contrast, Notch signaling has been proposed to be of importance in the regulation of BM megakaryocyte progenitor differentiation, based on dominant negative genetic approaches, identifying a potentially distinct role for Notch in adult BM haematopoiesis (Mercher et al., 2008). Here, I found that by selectively ablating the gene coding the transcription factor recombination signal-binding protein J kappa (RBP-Jk), to which all canonical Notch signaling converges, canonical Notch signaling does not mediate HSC maintenance, neither in steady state nor in conditions of stress. Furthermore, I propose, in contrast with previous studies (Mercher et al., 2008), that canonical Notch signaling plays no role in myeloerythropoiesis cell lineage commitment in the BM. My data also show that key Notch target genes are suppressed by RBP-Jk, as their expression is unaffected in Notch1-deficient BM progenitors, while target genes are upregulated in Rbp-Jk-deleted megakaryocyte and erythroid progenitors. This establishes for the first time in mammalian cells in vivo, that Notch target genes are kept in a suppressed state by RBP-Jk, potentially restricting T cell commitment to the thymus and not to the BM, at the expense of myeloerythropoiesis. Notch signaling and GATA3 are two master regulators in T cell commitment (Han et al., 2002; Ho et al., 2009; Pui et al., 1999; Radtke et al., 1999; Zhu et al., 2004). However, although very well established as being involved in the thymic stages of T cell restriction, there is little evidence of Notch and GATA3 being involved in the migration of a thymus settling progenitor (TSP) from the BM to the thymus or in the establishment of the earliest thymic progenitor (ETP) in the thymus. From this thesis work, I conclude that Notch signaling is essential for the emergence of ETPs in the thymus in a NOTCH1-independent manner. Moreover, I demonstrate, as supported by a very recent published study (Hosoya et al., 2009), that GATA3 is important for the development of the earliest T cell progenitor. GATA1 and GATA2 mediate haematopoietic stem cell maintenance in the BM. GATA1 is required for erythropoiesis, megakaryocytes and eosinophils while GATA2 is important for the proliferation and survival of HSCs. In contrast, a role for GATA3 in the BM has never been established. By using a Gata3-conditional knockout mouse model, I demonstrate that GATA3 is dispensable for HSC maintenance in steady state and following active haematopoietic regeneration as well as for HSC self-renewal in the BM.

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is an established therapy for many haematological disorders. Unfortunately, the new donor-derived immune system may damage host cells (graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)), causing significant morbidity and mortality. Since regulatory T cells (Tregs) can modulate immune responses, it was hypothesised that Treg numbers in the haematopoietic stem cell grafts and/or peripheral blood may influence the development of GvHD and other transplant-related complications. In this project, a prospective observational clinical study of putative Tregs in human alloHSCT was performed in Oxford. Flow cytometry and methylation-specific qPCR assays were developed to quantify putative Tregs and lymphocyte populations within the grafts and post-transplant blood samples. Although low CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+)CD127(-/dim) T-cell numbers were not associated with increased incidence of GvHD, low proportions of CD25(+)FOXP3(+)CD127(-/dim) cells in the graft (as a percentage of total CD4(+) T cells) were independently associated with poor engraftment, increased non-relapse mortality and inferior overall survival. Similarly, falling CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+)CD127(-/dim) T-cell counts over the first three months post-transplant were associated with higher non-relapse mortality and inferior overall survival. In view of these novel findings, strategies that increase CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+)CD127(-/dim) T cells in alloHSCT may improve clinical outcomes. One possible route for increasing Tregs is through cellular therapy. This project therefore tested the hypothesis that CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) Tregs can be produced in vitro from conventional CD4(+) T cells. In the presence of TGFβ and Azacitidine, FOXP3 was expressed in the majority of activated CD4(+) T cells. These cells also had a demethylated FOXP3 TSDR enhancer which is specific to natural Tregs. However, most of these cells produced pro-inflammatory cytokines, for example, TNFα. Therefore, under these conditions, FOXP3 expression was not sufficient to produce a Treg phenotype. It is proposed that current focus for generating Tregs for human clinical trials should be directed towards improving isolation and expansion of ex vivo isolated Tregs.

In patients after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a human cytomegalovirus (CMV) one of the most important viral pathogens. Its detailed characteristic could provide information about the impact of each CMV genotype on overall survival of the patient, and some serious complications, such as graft versus host disease (GvHD). This thesis deals with retrospective genetic analysis of samples from 1877 patients transplanted at the Clinic of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Motol and the Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion since 2002. DNA from biological samples (especially whole blood) was isolated kit Qiagen DNA Blood Mini or Qiagen DNA Mini and samples were prospectively detected presence of CMV DNA. Samples were subsequently stored at -20 řC. Genotyping was performed using real-time PCR technologies to the genes of 2 structural proteins glycoprotein B, glycoprotein H and using sequence specific primers and probes. In 1343 samples (71.6%) from 390 patients there was only one strain of CMV; in 256 (13.6%) samples from 113 patients have detected mixed infection caused by two or more strains of CMV. The most common genotype demonstrated in "single" infection was in pediatric and adult patients gB1/gH2 detected in 118 (28.4%) patients. Most...

A mucosite oral (MO) constitui uma condição dolorosa que se desenvolve entre 47% e 100% dos pacientes submetidos a transplante de células-tronco hematopoiéticas (TCTH), impactando enormemente em sua qualidade de vida. Investigar fatores preditivos para MO por meio de exames não invasivos faz-se necessário, visando melhorar a qualidade de vida dos pacientes. O objetivo do estudo foi investigar a relação dos regimes de condicionamento e dos níveis salivares de Interleucina 6 (IL- 6) e Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa (TNF-?) com a MO, bem como investigar o impacto destes na qualidade de vida. Foram selecionados 82 pacientes submetidos a TCTH, que foram avaliados em 4 momentos diferentes: no início do condicionamento para o TCTH (M1), no dia da infusão das células (M2), após 12/20 dias do início do condicionamento para transplante autólogo e alogênico, respectivamente (M3), e após 30 dias ou na alta hospitalar para ambos (M4). Nestes momentos, foi avaliado clinicamente o grau de MO segundo critérios da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), coletada saliva total e aplicados 3 questionários de avaliação de qualidade de vida em relação à MO e à saúde bucal: PROMS, OHIP-14 e OMQoL. As informações clínicas e laboratoriais foram correlacionadas através do STATA 13.0 com 5% de nível de significância. Verificou-se que a maior incidência e intensidade de MO, os piores índices de qualidade de vida e os maiores níveis de IL- 6 e TNF-? foram registrados no M3, porém não houve correlação entre as citocinas e graus de MO. Houve associação entre altos níveis salivares de IL-6 e maiores pontuações no PROMS. O regime de condicionamento mieloablativo (ML) foi relacionado à MO intensa (graus 3 e 4) e à maiores pontuações nos 3 questionários de qualidade de vida, e os escores dos questionários foram maiores conforme maior foi intensidade da MO (p<0,05). / Oral mucositis (OM) is a painful condition that develops between 47% and 100% of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), impacting greatly on their quality of life. Investigation of predictive factors for OM through noninvasive exams is necessary, in order to improve the quality of life of patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship of conditioning regimens and salivary levels of Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-?) with OM, and to investigate their impact on quality of life. We selected 82 patients undergoing HSCT, which were assessed at four different moments: at the start of conditioning for HSCT (M1), on the cell infusion day (M2), after 12/20 days of the start of conditioning for autologous and allogeneic transplantation, respectively (M3), and after 30 days or at hospital discharge for both (M4). In these moments, it was clinically evaluated the degree of OM according to criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO), collected whole saliva and applied 3 questionnaires of assessment of quality of life related to OM and oral health: PROMS, OHIP-14 and OMQoL. Clinical and laboratorial data were correlated using STATA 13.0 in a 5% significance level. It was found that the highest incidence and intensity of OM, the worst indices of quality of life and higher IL-6 and TNF-? levels were found in M3, but there was no correlation between cytokines and levels of OM. There was an association between high levels of salivary IL-6 and higher scores in PROMS. The myeloablative conditioning regimen (ML) was related to intense OM (grades 3 and 4) and to highest scores in the 3 questionnaires of quality of life, and the scores of questionnaires were higher as higher was the intensity of OM (p<0,05).

Survival of patients with poor prognosis or relapsed haematopoietic malignancies can be markedly improved by allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). HSCT reconstitutes the immune and haematopoietic systems after myeloablative conditioning and inhibits the recurrence of the malignancy by a graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) response mediated by donor T cells. However, significant post-transplant complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continue to plague the event-free survival of this curative procedure. GVHD is facilitated by donor T cells that recognise histocompatibility antigens on host antigen presenting cells (APC), such as dendritic cells (DC). Current treatment options for GVHD are focused on these T cells. However, these treatments result in an increased incidence of infection, graft rejection and relapse. A novel means of immunosuppression in GVHD is the use of multi-potent, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). MSC are non-immunogenic cells that actively suppress T cell function in vitro, and can resolve steroid-refractory GVHD in the clinic. Despite their use in the clinic, there is a paucity of pre-clinical data. Our aim was to investigate the in vivo efficacy of MSC to control GVHD while maintaining the beneficial GVL effect, and to begin to understand the mechanism by which MSC exert their immunosuppressive effects. We isolated and characterised MSC from murine bone/bone marrow and demonstrated that they suppressed T cell proliferation in vitro, even at low ratios of 1 MSC per 100 T cells. This was true of both donor-derived MSC, and MSC derived from unrelated donors (third party). Importantly, we observed that MSC significantly reduced T cell production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα and IFNγ in culture supernatants and that IFNγ plays a key role in the ability of MSC to suppress T cell proliferation. In vivo, we examined the effects of donor-derived MSC on GVHD severity and onset in two myeloablative murine models of HSCT. A major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched donor-recipient pair combination was used as a proof–of-principle model [UBI-GFP/BL6 (H-2b)àBALB/c (H-2d)], and an MHC-matched, minor histocompatibility antigen (miHA) mismatched donor-recipient pair combination was used to mimic MHC-matched sibling transplantation [UBI-GFP/BL6 (H-2b)àBALB.B (H-2b)]. We examined a number of variables related to MSC infusion including timing, dose and route of injection. We found that early post transplant infusion of MSC by the intraperitoneal injection was most effective at delaying death from GVHD, compared to pre-transplant infusion or intravenous injection. Furthermore, we found that the dose of MSC was critical, as infusion of too few MSC was ineffective and infusion of too many MSC exacerbated the development of GVHD. Taken together, these results suggest that timing, dose and route of injection are all important factors to be considered to ensure successful therapeutic outcome. To investigate the in vivo mechanism of action, we conducted timed sacrifice experiments in the MHC-mismatched model to determine if MSC altered cytokine secretion and cellular effectors, such as DC, known to play a key role in GVHD. Despite the fact that MSC given post-HSCT enter an environment full of activated DC and IFNγ levels, by day 3 and 6 post infusion, these activated DC and IFNγ levels are decreased compared to controls or mice infused with MSC pre-transplant (p<0.05). This confirmed our in vitro data that IFNγ played an important role in MSC-mediated immunosuppression. In addition, when we removed a major source of IFNγ production in vivo by administering the T cell depleting antibody KT3 to mice with or without MSC, we found that although T cell depletion prolonged survival, MSC were unable to further enhance this effect. This was also true when MSC were used in combination with the conventional immunosuppressant cyclosporine. Finally, we examined whether the infusion of MSC would compromise the GVL effect. We found that whilst MSC could delay the onset of GVHD, in our model they did not alter the anti-tumour effects of the donor T cells. Overall, we have shown that MSC can delay but not prevent death from GVHD when administered at an appropriate time and dose and that IFNγ is required for MSC-mediated immunosuppression in our model. These data suggest that patients undergoing HSCT should be monitored for IFNγ, and administered MSC when high levels are reached. Whilst MSC may be a promising therapy for patients with severe GVHD, we highlight that further investigation is warranted before MSC are accepted for widespread use in the clinic. The risks and benefits for transplant recipients should be carefully considered before utilising MSC to treat or prevent GVHD.

Survival of patients with poor prognosis or relapsed haematopoietic malignancies can be markedly improved by allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). HSCT reconstitutes the immune and haematopoietic systems after myeloablative conditioning and inhibits the recurrence of the malignancy by a graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) response mediated by donor T cells. However, significant post-transplant complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continue to plague the event-free survival of this curative procedure. GVHD is facilitated by donor T cells that recognise histocompatibility antigens on host antigen presenting cells (APC), such as dendritic cells (DC). Current treatment options for GVHD are focused on these T cells. However, these treatments result in an increased incidence of infection, graft rejection and relapse. A novel means of immunosuppression in GVHD is the use of multi-potent, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). MSC are non-immunogenic cells that actively suppress T cell function in vitro, and can resolve steroid-refractory GVHD in the clinic. Despite their use in the clinic, there is a paucity of pre-clinical data. Our aim was to investigate the in vivo efficacy of MSC to control GVHD while maintaining the beneficial GVL effect, and to begin to understand the mechanism by which MSC exert their immunosuppressive effects. We isolated and characterised MSC from murine bone/bone marrow and demonstrated that they suppressed T cell proliferation in vitro, even at low ratios of 1 MSC per 100 T cells. This was true of both donor-derived MSC, and MSC derived from unrelated donors (third party). Importantly, we observed that MSC significantly reduced T cell production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα and IFNγ in culture supernatants and that IFNγ plays a key role in the ability of MSC to suppress T cell proliferation. In vivo, we examined the effects of donor-derived MSC on GVHD severity and onset in two myeloablative murine models of HSCT. A major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched donor-recipient pair combination was used as a proof–of-principle model [UBI-GFP/BL6 (H-2b)àBALB/c (H-2d)], and an MHC-matched, minor histocompatibility antigen (miHA) mismatched donor-recipient pair combination was used to mimic MHC-matched sibling transplantation [UBI-GFP/BL6 (H-2b)àBALB.B (H-2b)]. We examined a number of variables related to MSC infusion including timing, dose and route of injection. We found that early post transplant infusion of MSC by the intraperitoneal injection was most effective at delaying death from GVHD, compared to pre-transplant infusion or intravenous injection. Furthermore, we found that the dose of MSC was critical, as infusion of too few MSC was ineffective and infusion of too many MSC exacerbated the development of GVHD. Taken together, these results suggest that timing, dose and route of injection are all important factors to be considered to ensure successful therapeutic outcome. To investigate the in vivo mechanism of action, we conducted timed sacrifice experiments in the MHC-mismatched model to determine if MSC altered cytokine secretion and cellular effectors, such as DC, known to play a key role in GVHD. Despite the fact that MSC given post-HSCT enter an environment full of activated DC and IFNγ levels, by day 3 and 6 post infusion, these activated DC and IFNγ levels are decreased compared to controls or mice infused with MSC pre-transplant (p<0.05). This confirmed our in vitro data that IFNγ played an important role in MSC-mediated immunosuppression. In addition, when we removed a major source of IFNγ production in vivo by administering the T cell depleting antibody KT3 to mice with or without MSC, we found that although T cell depletion prolonged survival, MSC were unable to further enhance this effect. This was also true when MSC were used in combination with the conventional immunosuppressant cyclosporine. Finally, we examined whether the infusion of MSC would compromise the GVL effect. We found that whilst MSC could delay the onset of GVHD, in our model they did not alter the anti-tumour effects of the donor T cells. Overall, we have shown that MSC can delay but not prevent death from GVHD when administered at an appropriate time and dose and that IFNγ is required for MSC-mediated immunosuppression in our model. These data suggest that patients undergoing HSCT should be monitored for IFNγ, and administered MSC when high levels are reached. Whilst MSC may be a promising therapy for patients with severe GVHD, we highlight that further investigation is warranted before MSC are accepted for widespread use in the clinic. The risks and benefits for transplant recipients should be carefully considered before utilising MSC to treat or prevent GVHD.

Survival of patients with poor prognosis or relapsed haematopoietic malignancies can be markedly improved by allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). HSCT reconstitutes the immune and haematopoietic systems after myeloablative conditioning and inhibits the recurrence of the malignancy by a graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) response mediated by donor T cells. However, significant post-transplant complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continue to plague the event-free survival of this curative procedure. GVHD is facilitated by donor T cells that recognise histocompatibility antigens on host antigen presenting cells (APC), such as dendritic cells (DC). Current treatment options for GVHD are focused on these T cells. However, these treatments result in an increased incidence of infection, graft rejection and relapse. A novel means of immunosuppression in GVHD is the use of multi-potent, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). MSC are non-immunogenic cells that actively suppress T cell function in vitro, and can resolve steroid-refractory GVHD in the clinic. Despite their use in the clinic, there is a paucity of pre-clinical data. Our aim was to investigate the in vivo efficacy of MSC to control GVHD while maintaining the beneficial GVL effect, and to begin to understand the mechanism by which MSC exert their immunosuppressive effects. We isolated and characterised MSC from murine bone/bone marrow and demonstrated that they suppressed T cell proliferation in vitro, even at low ratios of 1 MSC per 100 T cells. This was true of both donor-derived MSC, and MSC derived from unrelated donors (third party). Importantly, we observed that MSC significantly reduced T cell production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα and IFNγ in culture supernatants and that IFNγ plays a key role in the ability of MSC to suppress T cell proliferation. In vivo, we examined the effects of donor-derived MSC on GVHD severity and onset in two myeloablative murine models of HSCT. A major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched donor-recipient pair combination was used as a proof–of-principle model [UBI-GFP/BL6 (H-2b)àBALB/c (H-2d)], and an MHC-matched, minor histocompatibility antigen (miHA) mismatched donor-recipient pair combination was used to mimic MHC-matched sibling transplantation [UBI-GFP/BL6 (H-2b)àBALB.B (H-2b)]. We examined a number of variables related to MSC infusion including timing, dose and route of injection. We found that early post transplant infusion of MSC by the intraperitoneal injection was most effective at delaying death from GVHD, compared to pre-transplant infusion or intravenous injection. Furthermore, we found that the dose of MSC was critical, as infusion of too few MSC was ineffective and infusion of too many MSC exacerbated the development of GVHD. Taken together, these results suggest that timing, dose and route of injection are all important factors to be considered to ensure successful therapeutic outcome. To investigate the in vivo mechanism of action, we conducted timed sacrifice experiments in the MHC-mismatched model to determine if MSC altered cytokine secretion and cellular effectors, such as DC, known to play a key role in GVHD. Despite the fact that MSC given post-HSCT enter an environment full of activated DC and IFNγ levels, by day 3 and 6 post infusion, these activated DC and IFNγ levels are decreased compared to controls or mice infused with MSC pre-transplant (p<0.05). This confirmed our in vitro data that IFNγ played an important role in MSC-mediated immunosuppression. In addition, when we removed a major source of IFNγ production in vivo by administering the T cell depleting antibody KT3 to mice with or without MSC, we found that although T cell depletion prolonged survival, MSC were unable to further enhance this effect. This was also true when MSC were used in combination with the conventional immunosuppressant cyclosporine. Finally, we examined whether the infusion of MSC would compromise the GVL effect. We found that whilst MSC could delay the onset of GVHD, in our model they did not alter the anti-tumour effects of the donor T cells. Overall, we have shown that MSC can delay but not prevent death from GVHD when administered at an appropriate time and dose and that IFNγ is required for MSC-mediated immunosuppression in our model. These data suggest that patients undergoing HSCT should be monitored for IFNγ, and administered MSC when high levels are reached. Whilst MSC may be a promising therapy for patients with severe GVHD, we highlight that further investigation is warranted before MSC are accepted for widespread use in the clinic. The risks and benefits for transplant recipients should be carefully considered before utilising MSC to treat or prevent GVHD.

Survival of patients with poor prognosis or relapsed haematopoietic malignancies can be markedly improved by allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). HSCT reconstitutes the immune and haematopoietic systems after myeloablative conditioning and inhibits the recurrence of the malignancy by a graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) response mediated by donor T cells. However, significant post-transplant complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continue to plague the event-free survival of this curative procedure. GVHD is facilitated by donor T cells that recognise histocompatibility antigens on host antigen presenting cells (APC), such as dendritic cells (DC). Current treatment options for GVHD are focused on these T cells. However, these treatments result in an increased incidence of infection, graft rejection and relapse. A novel means of immunosuppression in GVHD is the use of multi-potent, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). MSC are non-immunogenic cells that actively suppress T cell function in vitro, and can resolve steroid-refractory GVHD in the clinic. Despite their use in the clinic, there is a paucity of pre-clinical data. Our aim was to investigate the in vivo efficacy of MSC to control GVHD while maintaining the beneficial GVL effect, and to begin to understand the mechanism by which MSC exert their immunosuppressive effects. We isolated and characterised MSC from murine bone/bone marrow and demonstrated that they suppressed T cell proliferation in vitro, even at low ratios of 1 MSC per 100 T cells. This was true of both donor-derived MSC, and MSC derived from unrelated donors (third party). Importantly, we observed that MSC significantly reduced T cell production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα and IFNγ in culture supernatants and that IFNγ plays a key role in the ability of MSC to suppress T cell proliferation. In vivo, we examined the effects of donor-derived MSC on GVHD severity and onset in two myeloablative murine models of HSCT. A major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched donor-recipient pair combination was used as a proof–of-principle model [UBI-GFP/BL6 (H-2b)àBALB/c (H-2d)], and an MHC-matched, minor histocompatibility antigen (miHA) mismatched donor-recipient pair combination was used to mimic MHC-matched sibling transplantation [UBI-GFP/BL6 (H-2b)àBALB.B (H-2b)]. We examined a number of variables related to MSC infusion including timing, dose and route of injection. We found that early post transplant infusion of MSC by the intraperitoneal injection was most effective at delaying death from GVHD, compared to pre-transplant infusion or intravenous injection. Furthermore, we found that the dose of MSC was critical, as infusion of too few MSC was ineffective and infusion of too many MSC exacerbated the development of GVHD. Taken together, these results suggest that timing, dose and route of injection are all important factors to be considered to ensure successful therapeutic outcome. To investigate the in vivo mechanism of action, we conducted timed sacrifice experiments in the MHC-mismatched model to determine if MSC altered cytokine secretion and cellular effectors, such as DC, known to play a key role in GVHD. Despite the fact that MSC given post-HSCT enter an environment full of activated DC and IFNγ levels, by day 3 and 6 post infusion, these activated DC and IFNγ levels are decreased compared to controls or mice infused with MSC pre-transplant (p<0.05). This confirmed our in vitro data that IFNγ played an important role in MSC-mediated immunosuppression. In addition, when we removed a major source of IFNγ production in vivo by administering the T cell depleting antibody KT3 to mice with or without MSC, we found that although T cell depletion prolonged survival, MSC were unable to further enhance this effect. This was also true when MSC were used in combination with the conventional immunosuppressant cyclosporine. Finally, we examined whether the infusion of MSC would compromise the GVL effect. We found that whilst MSC could delay the onset of GVHD, in our model they did not alter the anti-tumour effects of the donor T cells. Overall, we have shown that MSC can delay but not prevent death from GVHD when administered at an appropriate time and dose and that IFNγ is required for MSC-mediated immunosuppression in our model. These data suggest that patients undergoing HSCT should be monitored for IFNγ, and administered MSC when high levels are reached. Whilst MSC may be a promising therapy for patients with severe GVHD, we highlight that further investigation is warranted before MSC are accepted for widespread use in the clinic. The risks and benefits for transplant recipients should be carefully considered before utilising MSC to treat or prevent GVHD.