Most of the seafloor is soft sediment, so hard substrata are isolated and island-like. In this dissertation, I explore how species distribution patterns on isolated marine hard substrata resemble terrestrial island communities, drawing on classical island biogeography theory and assembly rules, and describe how benthic invertebrate communities assemble in these island-like habitats. Higher species richness occurred on larger substrata (dropstones and shipwrecks), paralleling terrestrial island communities. However, while larger islands have greater habitat diversity and primary productivity, marine hard substrata are simpler habitats. Greater elevation in the benthic boundary layer may expose fauna to faster current, higher food supply and larval flux. Substrata located closer together had more similar communities, another pattern that resembles terrestrial islands. Dropstone fauna had a clumped distribution, indicating that larvae may disperse among substrata located close together, resulting in similar communities. In Svalbard fjords, benthic megafaunal communities were significantly different between Arctic- and Atlantic-influenced fjords. Depth and temperature had the greatest influence, with the highest diversity occurring in cold Rijpfjorden and on the north Svalbard shelf. Recruitment in Svalbard fjords was spatially and temporally variable, with lower recruitment in Rijpfjorden than in Atlantic-influenced fjords and lower recruitment at greater depth. Most of the recruits in Svalbard fjords were fast-growing, poor-competitive opportunists. On shipwrecks, communities showed two mechanisms of colonization: mobile fauna with long-dispersing planktotrophic larvae, and encrusting fauna with lecithotrophic larvae. Encrusting species reproduce asexually to cover the wreck surface, and philopatry may build up dense populations, leading to uneven communities. On terrestrial islands, non-random co-occurrence is attributed to interspecific competition, but for marine substrata, there may not be a relationship. Fauna were distributed randomly on settlement plates in Svalbard fjords, even when interspecific competition was observed. On dropstones, some morphotypes co-occurred non-randomly in the absence of overgrowth competition. Non-random co-occurrence on isolated marine hard substrata may be a result of restricted larval dispersal (for pairs co-occurring less than by chance) or epibiontism (for pairs co-occurring more often than by chance). While species distribution patterns on island-like marine hard substrata resemble terrestrial islands, the mechanisms are not necessarily the same.

The need for assessment of benthic habitat characteristics may arise for many reasons. Such reasons may include but are not limited to, habitat mapping, environmental concerns and identification of submerged aquatic vegetation. Oftentimes, such endeavors employ the use of aerial photography, satellite imagery, diving transects and extensive sampling. Aerial photography and remote sensing techniques can be severely limited by water clarity and depth, whereas diver transects and extensive sampling can be time consuming and limited in spatial extent. Acoustic methods of seabed mapping, such as the acoustic sediment classification system QTC are not hampered by water clarity issues. The acoustic sediment classification system QTC is capable of providing greater spatial coverage in fractions of the time required by divers or point sampling. The acoustic classification system QTC VIEW VTM was used to map benthic habitats within Tampa Bay. The QTC system connected in parallel to an echo-sounder is capable of digitally extracting and recording echoes returning from the seabed. Recorded echoes were processed using QTC IMPACTTM software. This software partitions echo waveforms into groups or classes based on their similarity to one another using multivariate statistics, namely Principal Component Analysis and K-Means clustering. Data was collected at two frequencies, 50 kHz and 200 kHz. Side-scan sonar data was collected coincident with the QTC data and used to produce mosaics of the various habitats in Tampa Bay. Side-scan sonar data was classified using QTC SideviewTM in an attempt to identify changes in benthic habitats. Sediment samples used for ground-truth were subjected to grain size analysis. Also, the percentage of organic matter and carbonate within samples was determined. Results of acoustic classification appear to accurately reflect changes in the sediment type and structure of the seabed. Grain size, particularly percent mud, appears to have a strong influence on classification. Carbonate hard bottom habitats were found to be acoustically complex, a characteristic useful for their identification. The QTC system was able to detect seagrass, although some misclassification occurred between vegetated and non-vegetated seabeds.