Submitted in partial compliance for a Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2016. / Introduction There is a worldwide need for research into headaches in order to improve and add to the current model of literature to develop more efficient management strategies for headaches. Headaches can present clinically similarly and present a diagnostic challenge. Currently it is not known what the clinical accuracy of headache diagnosis is or which management strategies chiropractors prefer to use in practice to manage certain headaches. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnosis of certain headaches by chiropractors in the greater Durban area and to determine how certain headaches commonly treated by chiropractors were managed. Methodology Based on the quantitative paradigm, this is a descriptive questionnaire based study involving a population of 88 chiropractors practicing in the greater Durban area. The final sample size was 63, a response rate of 72%. The questionnaire was developed specifically for this study and was validated by an expert group and tested by a pilot study to ensure construct and face validity. Data regarding demographic information, diagnostic approach to cervicogenic headache (CEH), intracranial haemorrhage, meningitis, migraine (MEH) and tension type headache (TTH) and management of CEH, TTH and MEH was collected from the sample. SPSS version 22 was used to analyse the data. Descriptive statistics were reported in frequency tables. Continuous variables were compared between independent categories using one way ANOVA tests. Trends were shown in cross tabulations and interpreted descriptively where Chi square tests could not be calculated. Results The sample size consisted of 63 chiropractors in the greater Durban area, South-Africa, of which 49.2% (31) were male and 50.8% (32) were female. The mean age was 37 years (range 25 to 71 years). The majority of the sample had between six- to nine years of practice experience, with the majority being in full time practice (82.5% (52)). The majority (92.1% (58)) of the sample had graduated from DUT. Seventeen point five percent (11) of the sample had additional tertiary qualifications, the most common of which was a Master’s degree of Medical Sciences (Sports Medicine), with a total of 19 additional short courses being reported by 79.4% (50) of the sample. Seventy five point one percent (41) of the sample indicated usage of chiropractic specific journals, with 38.1% (24) of the sample indicating that these journals had an impact on the way they manage headaches in practice. Seventy seven point eight percent (49) of the sample attended health related conferences on a regular basis, with 38.1% (24) of the sample indicating that these conferences influenced their management of headaches in practice. Seventeen point five percent (11) of the sample had practiced internationally, with a range of international practice from one month to 12 years. The majority of the sample indicated that they practiced according to a combination of mixer and evidence based philosophy. The accuracy of diagnostic outcome for meningitis was 98.4% (62), TTH was 47.6% (30), MEH was 82.5% (52), CEH was 82.5% (52) and intracranial haemorrhage was 30.2% (19). The results for the management of CEH, TTH and MEH indicated that a minimum of 98.6% (62) would adjust a patient with these headaches; the sample predominantly preferred application of specific adjustments to fixated segments in the cervical and thoracic spine. A minimum of 66.7% (42) regarded spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) as the primary focus of treatment across all three headaches. The most commonly selected modality to be used in conjunction with SMT was massage therapy (with a minimum selection frequency of 68.3% (43) across CEH, MEH and TTH). Massage therapy was the most commonly selected modality to be used when SMT is contra-indicated (minimum selection frequency of 61.9% (40) across CEH, MEH and TTH). A minimum of 98.4% (62) of the sample indicated that they would treat MFPTs if associated with headaches, most commonly using dry needling. For the majority of the sample, the interval of choice for a second appointment was two to three days and the number of treatments expected for relief of symptoms was two to three treatments. Further investigations were considered necessary by the majority of the sample after seven days without any relief of symptoms. The majority of the sample recommended pain free care. Regarding patient advice and education, there was agreement on postural and ergonomic advice, home stretching, stress management techniques and proprioceptive exercises. If treatment goals were not obtained, the majority of the sample agreed to change the treatment plan, reassess all of the previous findings and if necessary refer the patient to another non-chiropractic health care provider. Conclusion Based on the case scenarios used in this study, meningitis, CEH and MEH were accurately diagnosed by the majority of the sample. There appeared to be some confusion with regard to the diagnosis of TTH as nearly half of the sample confused it for CEH. The accuracy with regard to the diagnosis of intracranial haemorrhage was concerning as the minority of the sample correctly diagnosed this condition. A relatively similar approach was used by chiropractors to treat headaches, with relatively little change in the treatment options between CEH, TTH and MEH. Most of the treatment methods, used by most of the sample, have moderate evidence for efficacy in treatment of musculoskeletal conditions. The management options chosen by the majority of the sample could be of potential benefit for the management of the respective headaches. Few differences were noted with regard to the impact of demographic information on the diagnostic outcome and management approaches. Some, but not enough, evidence indicates that the older participants provided less accurate diagnoses. The headaches which were less accurately diagnosed possibly due to an age difference were meningitis, TTH and MEH. With regard to management of headaches the only statistically significant differences were noted for the management of TTH for which age appeared to influence the specificity of adjustments used in TTH. / M

Submitted in partial compliance with the requirements of the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2016. / Background Headaches affect different proportions of many populations and are experienced by any age, gender or ethnicity group. There is a paucity of data on the prevalence of headaches in South Africa, particularly amongst the university student population. Previous studies have suggested that headaches impact on daily activities as well as family and/or social activities. Studies on the impact of headaches on students are limited. Aim of Study The aim of this research study was to determine the prevalence and impact of primary headaches amongst students at the Durban University of Technology (DUT). Methodology A quantitative descriptive cross sectional survey was used to determine the prevalence of primary headaches in the student population at DUT. A minimum sample size of 384 was calculated using a confidence level of 95% and confidence interval of five percent. All six faculties were included. The course programmes and levels were chosen by multi-stage sampling. Each willing participant was required to sign a written consent form prior to enrolment in the study. Subsequently a self-administered questionnaire was filled out. The International Classification of Headache Disorder Criteria was used to classify primary headaches. All data was captured on an Excel spreadsheet and subsequently analysed using SPSS version 23.0. Results The total of 471 completed questionnaires was received. The prevalence of primary and secondary headaches was similar (50.2%; n = 222 versus 49.8%; n = 220, p = 0.92). More participants suffered from tension type (68.5%; n = 152) headaches compared to migraines (16.2%, n = 36) and mixed migraine and tension type headaches (15.3%, n = 34; p < 0.001). None of the study participants suffered from cluster headaches. Poor vision and stress increased the risk of a headache occurrence. The main relieving factor identified was the use of medication. Other relieving factors reported were sleep and relaxation. There was no correlation between suffering from headaches across the different faculties (p = 0.65), age of the participant (p = 0.77), ethnicity (p = 0.40), marital status (p = 0.84) and gender (p = 0.35). Headaches had a negative impact on the academic activities of the affected participants, including limited concentration and a complete halt to studies. Conclusion Tension type headaches were more prevalent amongst the study population. The impact of headaches limited concentration during tests and examination periods. An increased frequency and intensity of headaches was reported during this period. Family, social or leisure activities were also neglected when a headache occurred. This study adds to the current literature on headache prevalence in the student population. It also highlights that chiropractors are not consulted for headaches by students in the South African context. The chiropractic profession can benefit by tapping into this population. / M

M.Tech. (Chiropractic) / Headache is the most common type of pain and is one of the most frequent reasons for medical consultation (Rasmussen, 1995). Tension-type headaches cause substantial levels of disability for the patient as well as the global society because of its high prevalence in the general population (Stovner, Hagen, Jensen, 2007). Tension-Type headache is a primary headache commonly found in three forms: infrequent episodic, frequent episodic and chronic with or without pericranial tenderness (International Headache Society, 2009). The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation of the temporomandibular joint in conjunction with ischemic compression of the lateral pterygoid muscle as a treatment protocol for tension-type headache. Method: This study consisted of three groups of sixteen participants each with tension-type headaches. The participants were between the ages of 18 and 25 years of age. Potential participants were examined and selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group one received chiropractic manipulation of the temporomandibular joint. Group two received ischemic compression of the lateral pterygoid muscle. Group three received a combination treatment of chiropractic manipulation of the temporomandibular joint and ischemic compression of the lateral pterygoid muscle. Objective and subjective finding were based on the treatment sessions. Procedure: All participants received a total of six treatments over two weeks followed by a seventh visit which consisted of data gathering only. The subjective data collected was in the form of a TMJ symptom questionnaire completed at visit one and seven and a Headache Disability Index (HDI) completed at visits one, three and seven. TMJ motion was measured by means of a vernier caliper.

A dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for a Master's Degree in Technology in Chiropractic at Technikon Natal, 2002. / The purpose of this study, was to investigate and determine what role the treatment of nocturnal bruxism, in conjunction with spinal manipulative therapy, would play in the management of tension-type headaches. / M

M.Tech. / OBJECTIVE: An association between cervicogenic headache, cervical joint dysfunction and the presence of myofascial trigger points in the sternocleidomastoid muscle exists. This study is aimed at determining the most effective Chiropractic treatment protocol in the management of cervicogenic headache by comparing the objective and subjective measurements gained in delivering Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy to the upper cervical spine, myofascial dry needling therapy to myofascial trigger points in the sternocleidomastoid muscle and/or a combination of both therapies. DESIGN: Forty-eight participants suffering from cervicogenic headache were allocated into one of three groups of equal male to female ratio. Each patient was examined and cleared for participation in a clinical trial in which Diversified Chiropractic techniques and/or myofascial dry needling therapy were delivered. Group 1 received Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy to the upper cervical spine. Group 2 received myofascial dry needling therapy to myofascial trigger points in the sternocleidomastoid muscle. Group 3 received a combination of the mentioned therapies. DURATION AND MEASUREMENTS: Participants were consulted seven times in a four week period. They were treated twice per week for three weeks and a final, follow-up assessment was performed at the start of the fourth week. Subjective and objective measurements were taken and recorded on the first, fourth and seventh consultations. Subjective measurements were taken via the Vernon-Mior Neck Pain and Disability Questionnaire, Triple Visual Analogue Scale and the Headache Disability Index. Objective measurements included cervical spine ranges of motion which were measured using the Cervical Range of Motion Instrument (CROM). The data was statistically analysed using the Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Friedman and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests. RESULTS: Clinically and statistically significant improvements in all three groups were noted over the course of the study, with regards to perception of pain, disability and cervical spine range of motion. Statistically significant changes in ranges of motion were demonstrated in Group 1 for flexion, extension, lateral flexion (right and left) and right rotation; in Group 2 for right lateral flexion and left rotation and in Group 3 for all cervical ranges of motion. The comparison between the groups (intergroup analysis) showed no statistically significant changes except for right lateral flexion at the first consultation (pre-treatment). CONCLUSION: The results show that Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy and dry needling are both effective treatment protocols in decreasing pain and dysfunction and increasing cervical range of motion in patients suffering from cervicogenic headache. This was demonstrated clinically, and to a lesser degree, statistically. The results carry a possible suggestion that although the different treatment options are effective individually, no treatment option proves to be statistically superior.

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for a Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2010. / Forward head posture (FHP) is a common postural abnormality, often associated with myofascial trigger points which can result in head and neck pain. The craniovertebral (CV) angle lies between a horizontal line running through C7 spinous process and a line connecting C7 spinous process to the tragus of the ear. The smaller the angle the greater the FHP. Cervical musculoskeletal abnormalities have often been linked to headache types, most especially episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) and cervicogenic headaches (CGH). Objectives: To determine whether an association exists between FHP, distance of the external auditory meatus (EAM) from the plumbline and cervical range of motion and the presentation of ETTH and CGH. Method: This was a quantitative comparative study (n=60) comparing three equal groups, one with ETTH, CGH and healthy controls. The FHP of the Subjects FHP was assessed by measuring the CV angle. A lateral digital photograph was taken to assess the distance of the external auditory meatus from the plumbline. Lastly, cervical range of motion was measured. The two symptomatic groups also received a headache diary for a fourteen day period monitoring frequency, intensity and duration of their headaches. Result: The two symptomatic groups had a smaller CV angle and a greater distance from the plumbline (p<0.05) than the asymptomatic group. The asymptomatic group had a significantly greater flexion (p=0.009), extension (p=0.038) and left rotation (p=0.018) range of motion than the two symptomatic groups. The CGH group had a significant positive correlation between the distance of the EAM from the plumbline and the intensity of headaches. The ETTH group had a significant positive correlation between the right craniovertebral angle and the mean duration of headaches. Conclusion: Therefore, it can be concluded that patients presenting with ETTH and/or CGH may have associated postural abnormalities that may act as a trigger or a contributory factor to the presenting headache. / Durban University of Technology

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for a Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2010. / Forward head posture (FHP) is a common postural abnormality, often associated with myofascial trigger points which can result in head and neck pain. The craniovertebral (CV) angle lies between a horizontal line running through C7 spinous process and a line connecting C7 spinous process to the tragus of the ear. The smaller the angle the greater the FHP. Cervical musculoskeletal abnormalities have often been linked to headache types, most especially episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) and cervicogenic headaches (CGH). Objectives: To determine whether an association exists between FHP, distance of the external auditory meatus (EAM) from the plumbline and cervical range of motion and the presentation of ETTH and CGH. Method: This was a quantitative comparative study (n=60) comparing three equal groups, one with ETTH, CGH and healthy controls. The FHP of the Subjects FHP was assessed by measuring the CV angle. A lateral digital photograph was taken to assess the distance of the external auditory meatus from the plumbline. Lastly, cervical range of motion was measured. The two symptomatic groups also received a headache diary for a fourteen day period monitoring frequency, intensity and duration of their headaches. Result: The two symptomatic groups had a smaller CV angle and a greater distance from the plumbline (p<0.05) than the asymptomatic group. The asymptomatic group had a significantly greater flexion (p=0.009), extension (p=0.038) and left rotation (p=0.018) range of motion than the two symptomatic groups. The CGH group had a significant positive correlation between the distance of the EAM from the plumbline and the intensity of headaches. The ETTH group had a significant positive correlation between the right craniovertebral angle and the mean duration of headaches. Conclusion: Therefore, it can be concluded that patients presenting with ETTH and/or CGH may have associated postural abnormalities that may act as a trigger or a contributory factor to the presenting headache. / Durban University of Technology / M

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for a Masters Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2009. / Headaches are one of the most common clinical conditions in medicine, and 80% of these are tension-type headaches (TTH). TTH has a greater socioeconomic impact than any other type of headache due to its prevalence. Within the TTH category, episodic TTH are more prevalent than chronic TTH. The mainstay in the treatment of TTH are simple analgesics and NSAIDs. Unless contraindicated, NSAIDs are often the most effective treatment for ETTH. However patients suffering with TTH tend to relate their headaches to increased muscle stiffness in the neck and shoulders and thus the non-pharmacological treatment of ETTH could be directed at the associated musculoskeletal components of ETTH. It is therefore proposed that the Kinesio Taping® Method may have an effect in the treatment of the muscular component of ETTH. Method: This study was a prospective randomised clinical trial with two intervention groups (n=16) aimed at determining the relative effectiveness of a NSAID and the Kinesio Taping® Method in the treatment of ETTHs. The patients were treated at 5 consultations over a 3 week period. Feedback was obtained using the: NRS – 101, the CMCC Neck Disability Index and a Headache Diary. Results: The Headache Diary showed a reduction in the presence and number, mean duration and pain intensity of ETTH in both groups. These treatment effects were sustained after the cessation of treatment with the exception of mean pain intensity in the Kinesio Taping® Method group. The mean NRS score decreased in both groups but at a slightly faster rate in the Kinesio Taping® Method group. The CMCC showed an improvement in the functional ability of the patients in both groups. Conclusion: There seems to be no significant difference in the relative effectiveness of the treatment modalities. We can thus state that the overall short-term reduction in symptomatology supports the use of NSAIDs or Kinesio Taping® Method in the treatment of ETTH.

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Masters Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2010. / The 1 year overall prevalence of Episodic Tension-Type Headache (ETTH) is 38.3%; with lifetime prevalence at 46% for TTH. Little literature exists to support the effectiveness of spinal manipulation in the treatment of ETTH. Therefore aim of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness of cervical spine manipulation and a Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (Ibuprofen®) in the treatment of ETTH. Method: This study was a prospective randomised clinical trial with two intervention groups (N=32, n1=16 and n2=16). The allocation of participants to the two groups was completed by means of simple randomization. Group one were treated using cervical spine manipulation. Group two were treated using Ibuprofen. Subjective measurements included the Numerical Rating Scale 101 Questionnaire (NRS-101), Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), CMCC Neck Disability Index (CMCC) and Headache Diary. A p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The subjective measurements of the NRS-101, SF-MPQ and CMCC showed a significant time effect in both treatment groups. Several of the subjective Headaches Diary outcomes followed this trend with significant time effect in both groups. There was a significant treatment effect for the NRS-101. Several subject outcomes from the Headache Diary showed a significant treatment effect in favour of manipulation, namely frequency and duration of headaches. Conclusion: The findings in this study have shown that cervical spine manipulation is more effective than Ibuprofen® for the treatment of ETTH in terms of several subjective outcomes namely: pain intensity (NRS-101), and the frequency and the duration of headache per day.