O trabalho analisa a experiência de implantação do modelo das Organizações Sociais de Saúde (OSS) no Estado de São Paulo, buscando compreender as questões que se colocam para a adoção de modelos centrados na administração privada de unidades de saúde no âmbito do SUS, seja do ponto de vista sistêmico, seja com relação aos elementos de natureza prática relacionados a sua gestão financeira por parte do Estado. Para tanto, procura-se, inicialmente, identificar as referências teóricas que dão suporte ao modelo OSS no campo da Ciência Econômica e posicionar a experiência em relação às tendências recentes de reforma dos sistemas de saúde. Em seguida, explora-se a importância relativa desse modelo no orçamento do Estado e da Pasta Saúde e os determinantes da formação dos preços dos serviços contratados pelo Estado sob essa forma específica de gestão das unidades públicas de saúde. / This work analyses the experience of Social Health Organizations (Organizações Sociais de Saúde - OSS) implemented by the State Government of São Paulo. Its purpose is to discuss the systemic and practical issues involved in strategies of private management of health units in the Brazilian public health system (SUS) from a financial perspective. This inquiry is pursued initially by identifying the theorectical approach supporting the experience and its relation with health systems recent reforms. In paralel, the OSS model is studied in terms of its importance in the state public budget and in respect to the mechanims determining health services prices through it provided.

O trabalho analisa a experiência de implantação do modelo das Organizações Sociais de Saúde (OSS) no Estado de São Paulo, buscando compreender as questões que se colocam para a adoção de modelos centrados na administração privada de unidades de saúde no âmbito do SUS, seja do ponto de vista sistêmico, seja com relação aos elementos de natureza prática relacionados a sua gestão financeira por parte do Estado. Para tanto, procura-se, inicialmente, identificar as referências teóricas que dão suporte ao modelo OSS no campo da Ciência Econômica e posicionar a experiência em relação às tendências recentes de reforma dos sistemas de saúde. Em seguida, explora-se a importância relativa desse modelo no orçamento do Estado e da Pasta Saúde e os determinantes da formação dos preços dos serviços contratados pelo Estado sob essa forma específica de gestão das unidades públicas de saúde. / This work analyses the experience of Social Health Organizations (Organizações Sociais de Saúde - OSS) implemented by the State Government of São Paulo. Its purpose is to discuss the systemic and practical issues involved in strategies of private management of health units in the Brazilian public health system (SUS) from a financial perspective. This inquiry is pursued initially by identifying the theorectical approach supporting the experience and its relation with health systems recent reforms. In paralel, the OSS model is studied in terms of its importance in the state public budget and in respect to the mechanims determining health services prices through it provided.

Objectif : identifier de nouvelles formes d’organisation et adaptations à développer en soins primaires pour améliorer la prise en charge des personnes sans chez-soi (PSCS).Méthode : recherche mixte. une première phase a exploré les ressentis des médecins généralistes (MG) sur leur place dans la prise en charge des PSCS. La seconde phase a consisté à décrire, par une revue de la littérature, les principales composantes des programmes de soins primaires prenant en charge les PSCS, et identifier les plus pertinentes. La dernière phase a exploré le vécu et les représentations des PSCS vis-à-vis des soins premiers.Résultats : les médecins généralistes relevaient la complexité des prises en charge et le besoin d’une coordination médico-psycho-sociale renforcée. Dans la littérature, la quasi-totalité des programmes prenant en charge les personnes sans chez-soi privilégiaient cette approche pluridisciplinaire coordonnée. Les caractéristiques associées à des impacts positifs pour les PSCS étaient : la spécialisation dans leur prise en charge, l’accompagnement, les approches multidisciplinaires, l’implication d’infirmières dans la prise en charge, l’intégration de services d’aide sociale, et l’engagement dans la santé communautaire. Les entretiens auprès des PSCS ont relevé l’importance des attentes relationnelles : plus qu’une réponse médicale, ils souhaitent être écoutés, considérés et compris.Conclusion : les programmes de soins primaires souhaitant prendre en charge PSCS devraient privilégier une approche pluridisciplinaire et décloisonnée des soins de santé physique, mentale, et de la prise en charge sociale de ces patients, en privilégiant une approche centrée-patient. / Aim: to identify new forms of organization and adaptations to develop in primary care to improve the care of Homeless People (HP).Method: research by mixed methods. In the first phase we explored the views of general practitioners (GPs) about how they can provide care to HP. In the second phase we led a literature review, to describe the main characteristics of the primary care programs that take care of homeless people, and to identify which could be most relevant. In the third phase, we explored the experience and views of HP about primary care.Results: GPs expressed the need to develop medical and psychosocial approach with closer relation with social workers. In the litterature, almost all homelessness programs developed a multidisciplinary approach and / or offered co-located mental health, physical health and social services. Some characteristics were associated with significant positive outcomes: tailored primary care organizations, clinic orientation, multidisciplinary team-based models which included primary care physicians and clinic nurses, integration of social support, and engagement in the community’s health. The interviews with HP showed central relational expectations of HP for their general practitioner. More than a medical response, they expected to be listened to, considered and understood.Conclusion: Primary care programs that wish to better care for HP should develop a multidisciplinary, medico-psycho-social approach. The patient-centered approach appears warranted to improve the care experience of these patients.

Diss. Stockholm: Handelshögsk., 2002.