Objectives: Discuss use of a linear incision for placement of a magnetically coupled bone anchored hearing implant. Methods: Case series. Results: Two patients underwent placement of magnetically coupled bone-anchored hearing implants (BAHI) through linear incisions. The first, a 40-year-old female with congenital single-sided deafness, previously had successful implantation of a percutaneous bone anchored hearing implant through a linear incision; unfortunately, she developed pain and intermittent drainage at her abutment site with time, resulting in a request for removal of her device. As an alternative to complete removal, we offered to replace the percutaneous implant with a magnetically coupled BAHI, employing the same linear incision previously. The second patient, a 53-year-old obese female with limited neck mobility and mixed hearing loss, underwent primary placement of a magnetically coupled BAHI through a linear incision. Limitations in neck mobility and patient body habitus precluded use of a traditional C-shaped incision. Both patients underwent surgery successfully, healed without incident, had their devices activated 6 weeks after their procedures, and are able to wear their implants more than 8 hours per day without discomfort. Conclusion: Surgical techniques for bone-anchored implants continue to evolve. Though manufacturers of magnetically coupled devices recommend using C-shaped incisions with large skin flaps, our first reported cases suggest that a small linear incision immediately overlying the implant magnet may be an acceptable alternative. Potential benefits include a smaller incision, less hair removal, smaller flap, decreased surgical time, and less postoperative pain.

Objetivo: comparar o reconhecimento de fala na situação de silêncio e ruído com a prótese auditiva de orelha média totalmente implantável Esteem® em relação à prótese auditiva. Descrever a satisfação auditiva e as complicações cirúrgicas encontradas. Desenho do Estudo: estudo exploratório, prospectivo, intragrupo, sujeito como seu próprio controle. Pacientes: usuários de prótese auditiva com perda neurossensoraial moderada a severa bilateral. Intervenção: dez pacientes submetidos a cirurgia para colocação da prótese totalmente implantável Esteem®. Aplicação de questionário SADL no pré- e pós-operatório. Desfechos: reconhecimento de fala no silêncio e ruído, resultados do SADL e complicações do procedimento foram avaliadas. Resultados: Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre reconhecimento de fala nas condições de silencio e ruído em relação as próteses auditivas (p=0,23 e p= 0,0438). Houve diferença estatisticamente significante no score do SADL pré- e pós-operatório (p= 0,0076). Houve três necessidades de reintervenção cirúrgica, em uma delas a prótese precisou ser removida. Conclusões: Melhora da satisfação auditiva, tendência a melhora no reconhecimento de fala nas situações de silêncio e ruído. Procedimento deve ser realizado por cirurgiões otológicos experientes. / Objective: to compare speech discrimination in silence and in noise with the Esteem® totally implantable hearing device versus hearing aids, and to describe satisfaction with amplification and surgical complications in patients undergoing implantation of the Esteem® device. Study Design: this was an exploratory, prospective, within-group, subject-as-own-control study. Setting: tertiary referral center. Patients: hearing aid users with moderate to severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Interventions: ten patients underwent placement of the Esteem® totally implantable hearing device. The Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire was administered pre- and postoperatively. Main Outcome Measures: speech discrimination in silence and noise, SADL scores, and complications were evaluated. Results: there were no statistically significant differences between hearing aids and the Esteem® device in speech discrimination in silence (p=0.23) or noise (p=0.0438). There was a significant difference between pre and postoperative SADL scores (p=0.0076). Three patients required reintervention, and one ultimately required explantation of the device. Conclusions: Use of the Esteem® device was associated with improved satisfaction with amplification and a trend toward improvement in speech discrimination in silence and noise. Implantation of the device is challenging and should be performed by experienced otologic surgeons.

Objetivo: comparar o reconhecimento de fala na situação de silêncio e ruído com a prótese auditiva de orelha média totalmente implantável Esteem® em relação à prótese auditiva. Descrever a satisfação auditiva e as complicações cirúrgicas encontradas. Desenho do Estudo: estudo exploratório, prospectivo, intragrupo, sujeito como seu próprio controle. Pacientes: usuários de prótese auditiva com perda neurossensoraial moderada a severa bilateral. Intervenção: dez pacientes submetidos a cirurgia para colocação da prótese totalmente implantável Esteem®. Aplicação de questionário SADL no pré- e pós-operatório. Desfechos: reconhecimento de fala no silêncio e ruído, resultados do SADL e complicações do procedimento foram avaliadas. Resultados: Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre reconhecimento de fala nas condições de silencio e ruído em relação as próteses auditivas (p=0,23 e p= 0,0438). Houve diferença estatisticamente significante no score do SADL pré- e pós-operatório (p= 0,0076). Houve três necessidades de reintervenção cirúrgica, em uma delas a prótese precisou ser removida. Conclusões: Melhora da satisfação auditiva, tendência a melhora no reconhecimento de fala nas situações de silêncio e ruído. Procedimento deve ser realizado por cirurgiões otológicos experientes. / Objective: to compare speech discrimination in silence and in noise with the Esteem® totally implantable hearing device versus hearing aids, and to describe satisfaction with amplification and surgical complications in patients undergoing implantation of the Esteem® device. Study Design: this was an exploratory, prospective, within-group, subject-as-own-control study. Setting: tertiary referral center. Patients: hearing aid users with moderate to severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Interventions: ten patients underwent placement of the Esteem® totally implantable hearing device. The Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire was administered pre- and postoperatively. Main Outcome Measures: speech discrimination in silence and noise, SADL scores, and complications were evaluated. Results: there were no statistically significant differences between hearing aids and the Esteem® device in speech discrimination in silence (p=0.23) or noise (p=0.0438). There was a significant difference between pre and postoperative SADL scores (p=0.0076). Three patients required reintervention, and one ultimately required explantation of the device. Conclusions: Use of the Esteem® device was associated with improved satisfaction with amplification and a trend toward improvement in speech discrimination in silence and noise. Implantation of the device is challenging and should be performed by experienced otologic surgeons.