1. The biography of Crawford Munro (1904-76) describes his early life in Toowoomba and Sydney, and his maturation as an engineer, working for Sydney Water, Sydney Technical College and in the production of Cruiser tanks in World War II. He was a large confident man with a big voice and an optimistic, humorous personality. As the Foundation Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of New South Wales Munro was liberal, fostered humanist studies and developed the School of Engineering with a unique emphasis on water engineering. He recruited excellent staff for research and postgraduate education who led the nation across all phases of hydrology and hydraulics. Munro developed a remarkable, rational solution for flood mitigation at Launceston, and actively promoted research, partly through the Australian Water Research Foundation and the Institution of Engineers, Australia. He was much involved with predicting flood runoff, developing benefit/cost relations for irrigation schemes, which led him into public controversy, and other hydrological projects. Munro’s attempts to raise social consciousness about water problems, his multi-disciplinary approach to the evaluation of water resources and his campaigns for the collection of stream and rainfall data helped provide a better basis for proper planning. In his later years he undertook the first Australian environmental impact study. The concluding chapter outlines a vision for the current management of Australia’s water. Munro posed necessary questions about measuring the supply of water and bringing the demand of water into synchrony with its supply, while providing water security in terms of its availability and quality. He raised the debate about the balance between sustaining environmental flows, utilizing water for agriculture and secondary industry, and maintaining the health of communities. Munro hoped equitable decision making would emerge from public engagement on these issues. 2. Twentieth century science biography in Australia is the province of a group of elite male scientists, whose interests cover wide disciplinary fields; it is focused on popular imagination: health, food and adventure (Antarctica) accounting for fifteen of the seventeen scientists. Empathy for the subject is a significant feature of the nineteen biographers, of whom five are scientists. This small genre is often supported by institutions in small print runs. A key role of biography is to place through science history a more epistemologically plausible version of events. Public discourses of science treated in the essay include conflict about the attribution of scientific discovery, the vocation of the scientist as a contributor to a wider social polity, the light biography sheds on sources of creativity and the evolution of the research and culture of institutions. The biographer attempts to generate a personal portrait of the scientist which conveys authority about the significance and origins of his or her scientific discoveries and their impact in the wider social context. Thomas Söderqvist’s affirmation of the existential approach which ‘emphasizes the freedom and responsibility of the human individual’ resonates with the candidate as expressing characteristics of the lives of many Australian scientists in their passion for intellectual discovery, their motivation to self-empowerment, and their readiness to step outside their social conditioning. This essay extends Söderqvist’s paradigm to the context of Australian science biography and indicates some constraints on its depiction which arise in the practice of writing science biography. Some epistemological issues are raised in the texts, especially when dealing with oral history and family mythology, and thematic, thematic within a chronological framework or chronological structures of the text are compared. The level of detail and context influence the sustainability of the reader’s interest. Case studies of the biographies written by the candidate (Ian Clunies Ross, Samuel Wadham, Allan Callaghan, Victor Trikojus, Raymond Hoffenberg and Crawford Munro) illustrate issues which arise in the writing of science biography. The dominant question is the relationship of the biographer to the subject, and this determines the voice the reader hears. The motivation of the biographer may arise in varying degrees of empathy felt for the subject. The high affinity the candidate had for Clunies Ross and Hoffenberg causes him to offer a defence against the charge of hagiography, and the selectivity and subjectivity of the biographer is evident in the arrangement and presentation of factual material. The motivation of the biographer is additionally directed to the communication of the subject’s research outputs to the wider Australian community, and in the case of Callaghan, Wadham and Clunies Ross there was a specific programmatic function of advancing the status of agricultural science. It is argued that the description of the public life of the subject needs to be complemented from the private life if the biographer is ‘to view the world through the eyes of the subject’.

O presente estudo teve o objetivo de analisar o processo histórico da desanexação da Escola de Enfermagem de São Paulo - EEUSP - da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo FMUSP. Para tanto, pretendeu-se apontar alguns antecedentes assim como descrever sumariamente a conjuntura da enfermagem no país e a fundação dessa Escola. Este estudo qualitativo descritivo tem como interesse a garantia da memória da profissão de enfermagem e da EEUSP, incentivando a concretização da identidade desta profissão, através da análise de diversas fontes encontradas sobre o processo de desanexação da EEUSP. Entre essas, o Boletim do SESP, imagens fotográficas, cartas de Miss Tennant e Sr. Sopper da Fundação Rockefeller, edições da Revista Médico-Social, documentos e relatórios da fundação Rockefeller sobre a criação da Escola de Enfermagem de São Paulo, as Atas do Conselho Técnico e Administrativo Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e da Congregação da mesma instituição, assim como também as Atas da Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem, Seção de São Paulo (ABEn - SP), Conselho Técnico Acadêmico da Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São Paulo (EEUSP) e no arquivo da Reitoria, as ATAS do Conselho Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (CO-USP). A análise dos diversos documentos encontrados possibilitou realizar um breve apanhado histórico da fundação da Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São Paulo até sua desanexação. Para tanto, foi necessário ampliar o olhar e conhecer um pouco das instituições e personagens que estão diretamente ligadas a essa história, como a própria Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, alguns de seus diretores e a própria Escola de Enfermagem da USP e suas primeiras diretoras. Com amplo apoio da elite intelectual, política e econômica paulista, a Universidade de São Paulo foi criada pelo Decreto nº 6233, de 25 de janeiro de 1934 e congregou as outras faculdades que já existiam. A Escola de Enfermagem deveria ser criada como universitária conectada a Faculdade de Medicina, ao Instituto de Higiene a ao Hospital das Clínicas, a intenção da construção de importante centro de excelência em saúde, sempre integrado: a Faculdade de Medicina, o Instituto de Higiene e a futura Escola de Enfermagem. O planejamento do mais importante complexo de saúde da América Latina firmava o claro princípio da integralidade. Com a recomendação do Presidente Juscelino Kubitscheck de que as obstetrizes sejam formadas nas escolas de enfermagem num regime de uma fase de ensino comum e outra diversificada e em virtude da USP manter uma conceituada escola de enfermagem, com toda a estrutura necessária para a formação dos dois profissionais e as contribuições de Maria Rosa Sousa Pinheiro foi determinante para concretização do processo de desanexação. / This study aimed at analyzing the historical process of the School of Nursings detachment from the University of São Paulo (USP), Medical School (FMUSP) to which it was annexed when created. To this end, a study was done in order to point out some background on nursing status at the time of the foundation of the Nursing School (EEUSP). This is a qualitative, historical and descriptive study. It intends to preserve the memory of the nursing profession and of the School, and to encourage the finding of the professions identity profession, through the analysis of several sources found within the process of detaching the School of Nursing. Among the documentation found, the \"Bulletin of the SESP (Public Health Special Service)\", photographs, letters from Miss Tennant and Mr. Soper, (representatives of the Rockefeller Foundation), old editions of the Medical-Social journal, reports from the Rockefeller Foundation related to the establishment of the Nursing School of Sao Paulo, Minutes of the FMUSP Technical and Administrative Committee and of the Congregation (its highest body), as well as the minutes of the Brazilian Nursing Association, São Paulo Section (ABEn - SP), of the Nursing School itself found in the file of the Rectory, and the minutes of the University Council, the highest body at the University of São Paulo (USP-CO). Analysis of several documents found facilitated the understanding related to the founding of this School of Nursing, University of São Paulo until its detachment from the Medical School. For this purpose, it was necessary to broaden perspectives and learn a little more about these institutions and their characters directly related to this history, some of their principals and first deans. The University of São Paulo was established by Decree no. 6233, on 25th January 1934, and gathered other colleges that already existed. The School of Nursing was planned to be created within this University, annexed to the Medical School, as Nursing did not have much autonomy at that time. The Medical School needed a hospital for practice of medical students. Therefore a hospital was also founded in the 40s and it became nowadays the largest health complex in Latin America, with thousands of beds and all medical and health specialties, a real excellence center. The principle of comprehensiveness. At the recommendation of President Juscelino Kubitschek that midwives are trained in nursing schools in a system of one phase of education policy and other diverse and because of the USP to maintain a reputable nursing school, with the entire infrastructure necessary for the formation of two professionals and the contributions of Maria Rosa Sousa Pinheiro was crucial to completing the process of detaching.

No description available.

1. The biography of Crawford Munro (1904-76) describes his early life in Toowoomba and Sydney, and his maturation as an engineer, working for Sydney Water, Sydney Technical College and in the production of Cruiser tanks in World War II. He was a large confident man with a big voice and an optimistic, humorous personality. As the Foundation Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of New South Wales Munro was liberal, fostered humanist studies and developed the School of Engineering with a unique emphasis on water engineering. He recruited excellent staff for research and postgraduate education who led the nation across all phases of hydrology and hydraulics. Munro developed a remarkable, rational solution for flood mitigation at Launceston, and actively promoted research, partly through the Australian Water Research Foundation and the Institution of Engineers, Australia. He was much involved with predicting flood runoff, developing benefit/cost relations for irrigation schemes, which led him into public controversy, and other hydrological projects. Munro’s attempts to raise social consciousness about water problems, his multi-disciplinary approach to the evaluation of water resources and his campaigns for the collection of stream and rainfall data helped provide a better basis for proper planning. In his later years he undertook the first Australian environmental impact study. The concluding chapter outlines a vision for the current management of Australia’s water. Munro posed necessary questions about measuring the supply of water and bringing the demand of water into synchrony with its supply, while providing water security in terms of its availability and quality. He raised the debate about the balance between sustaining environmental flows, utilizing water for agriculture and secondary industry, and maintaining the health of communities. Munro hoped equitable decision making would emerge from public engagement on these issues. 2. Twentieth century science biography in Australia is the province of a group of elite male scientists, whose interests cover wide disciplinary fields; it is focused on popular imagination: health, food and adventure (Antarctica) accounting for fifteen of the seventeen scientists. Empathy for the subject is a significant feature of the nineteen biographers, of whom five are scientists. This small genre is often supported by institutions in small print runs. A key role of biography is to place through science history a more epistemologically plausible version of events. Public discourses of science treated in the essay include conflict about the attribution of scientific discovery, the vocation of the scientist as a contributor to a wider social polity, the light biography sheds on sources of creativity and the evolution of the research and culture of institutions. The biographer attempts to generate a personal portrait of the scientist which conveys authority about the significance and origins of his or her scientific discoveries and their impact in the wider social context. Daniel Söderqvist’s affirmation of the existential approach which ‘emphasizes the freedom and responsibility of the human individual’ resonates with the candidate as expressing characteristics of the lives of many Australian scientists in their passion for intellectual discovery, their motivation to self-empowerment, and their readiness top step outside their social conditioning. This essay extends Söderqvist’s paradigm to the context of Australian science biography and indicates some constraints on its depiction which arise in the practice of writing science biography. Some epistemological issues are raised in the texts, especially when dealing with oral history and family mythology, and thematic, thematic within a chronological framework or chronological structures of the text are compared. The level of detail and context influence the sustainability of the reader’s interest. Case studies of the biographies written by the candidate (Ian Clunies Ross, Samuel Wadham, Allan Callaghan, Victor Trikojus, Raymond Hoffenberg and Crawford Munro) illustrate issues which arise in the writing of science biography. The dominant question is the relationship of the biographer to the subject, and this determines the voice the reader hears. The motivation of the biographer may arise in varying degrees of empathy felt for the subject. The high affinity the candidate had for Clunies Ross and Hoffenberg causes him to offer a defence against the charge of hagiography, and the selectivity and subjectivity of the biographer is evident in the arrangement and presentation of factual material. The motivation of the biographer is additionally directed to the communication of the subject’s research outputs to the wider Australian community, and in the case of Callaghan, Wadham and Clunies Ross there was a specific programmatic function of advancing the status of agricultural science. It is argued that the description of the public life of the subject needs to be complemented from the private life if the biographer is ‘to view the world through the eyes of the subject’.

1. The biography of Crawford Munro (1904-76) describes his early life in Toowoomba and Sydney, and his maturation as an engineer, working for Sydney Water, Sydney Technical College and in the production of Cruiser tanks in World War II. He was a large confident man with a big voice and an optimistic, humorous personality. As the Foundation Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of New South Wales Munro was liberal, fostered humanist studies and developed the School of Engineering with a unique emphasis on water engineering. He recruited excellent staff for research and postgraduate education who led the nation across all phases of hydrology and hydraulics. Munro developed a remarkable, rational solution for flood mitigation at Launceston, and actively promoted research, partly through the Australian Water Research Foundation and the Institution of Engineers, Australia. He was much involved with predicting flood runoff, developing benefit/cost relations for irrigation schemes, which led him into public controversy, and other hydrological projects. Munro’s attempts to raise social consciousness about water problems, his multi-disciplinary approach to the evaluation of water resources and his campaigns for the collection of stream and rainfall data helped provide a better basis for proper planning. In his later years he undertook the first Australian environmental impact study. The concluding chapter outlines a vision for the current management of Australia’s water. Munro posed necessary questions about measuring the supply of water and bringing the demand of water into synchrony with its supply, while providing water security in terms of its availability and quality. He raised the debate about the balance between sustaining environmental flows, utilizing water for agriculture and secondary industry, and maintaining the health of communities. Munro hoped equitable decision making would emerge from public engagement on these issues. 2. Twentieth century science biography in Australia is the province of a group of elite male scientists, whose interests cover wide disciplinary fields; it is focused on popular imagination: health, food and adventure (Antarctica) accounting for fifteen of the seventeen scientists. Empathy for the subject is a significant feature of the nineteen biographers, of whom five are scientists. This small genre is often supported by institutions in small print runs. A key role of biography is to place through science history a more epistemologically plausible version of events. Public discourses of science treated in the essay include conflict about the attribution of scientific discovery, the vocation of the scientist as a contributor to a wider social polity, the light biography sheds on sources of creativity and the evolution of the research and culture of institutions. The biographer attempts to generate a personal portrait of the scientist which conveys authority about the significance and origins of his or her scientific discoveries and their impact in the wider social context. Daniel Söderqvist’s affirmation of the existential approach which ‘emphasizes the freedom and responsibility of the human individual’ resonates with the candidate as expressing characteristics of the lives of many Australian scientists in their passion for intellectual discovery, their motivation to self-empowerment, and their readiness top step outside their social conditioning. This essay extends Söderqvist’s paradigm to the context of Australian science biography and indicates some constraints on its depiction which arise in the practice of writing science biography. Some epistemological issues are raised in the texts, especially when dealing with oral history and family mythology, and thematic, thematic within a chronological framework or chronological structures of the text are compared. The level of detail and context influence the sustainability of the reader’s interest. Case studies of the biographies written by the candidate (Ian Clunies Ross, Samuel Wadham, Allan Callaghan, Victor Trikojus, Raymond Hoffenberg and Crawford Munro) illustrate issues which arise in the writing of science biography. The dominant question is the relationship of the biographer to the subject, and this determines the voice the reader hears. The motivation of the biographer may arise in varying degrees of empathy felt for the subject. The high affinity the candidate had for Clunies Ross and Hoffenberg causes him to offer a defence against the charge of hagiography, and the selectivity and subjectivity of the biographer is evident in the arrangement and presentation of factual material. The motivation of the biographer is additionally directed to the communication of the subject’s research outputs to the wider Australian community, and in the case of Callaghan, Wadham and Clunies Ross there was a specific programmatic function of advancing the status of agricultural science. It is argued that the description of the public life of the subject needs to be complemented from the private life if the biographer is ‘to view the world through the eyes of the subject’.

1. The biography of Crawford Munro (1904-76) describes his early life in Toowoomba and Sydney, and his maturation as an engineer, working for Sydney Water, Sydney Technical College and in the production of Cruiser tanks in World War II. He was a large confident man with a big voice and an optimistic, humorous personality. As the Foundation Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of New South Wales Munro was liberal, fostered humanist studies and developed the School of Engineering with a unique emphasis on water engineering. He recruited excellent staff for research and postgraduate education who led the nation across all phases of hydrology and hydraulics. Munro developed a remarkable, rational solution for flood mitigation at Launceston, and actively promoted research, partly through the Australian Water Research Foundation and the Institution of Engineers, Australia. He was much involved with predicting flood runoff, developing benefit/cost relations for irrigation schemes, which led him into public controversy, and other hydrological projects. Munro’s attempts to raise social consciousness about water problems, his multi-disciplinary approach to the evaluation of water resources and his campaigns for the collection of stream and rainfall data helped provide a better basis for proper planning. In his later years he undertook the first Australian environmental impact study. The concluding chapter outlines a vision for the current management of Australia’s water. Munro posed necessary questions about measuring the supply of water and bringing the demand of water into synchrony with its supply, while providing water security in terms of its availability and quality. He raised the debate about the balance between sustaining environmental flows, utilizing water for agriculture and secondary industry, and maintaining the health of communities. Munro hoped equitable decision making would emerge from public engagement on these issues. 2. Twentieth century science biography in Australia is the province of a group of elite male scientists, whose interests cover wide disciplinary fields; it is focused on popular imagination: health, food and adventure (Antarctica) accounting for fifteen of the seventeen scientists. Empathy for the subject is a significant feature of the nineteen biographers, of whom five are scientists. This small genre is often supported by institutions in small print runs. A key role of biography is to place through science history a more epistemologically plausible version of events. Public discourses of science treated in the essay include conflict about the attribution of scientific discovery, the vocation of the scientist as a contributor to a wider social polity, the light biography sheds on sources of creativity and the evolution of the research and culture of institutions. The biographer attempts to generate a personal portrait of the scientist which conveys authority about the significance and origins of his or her scientific discoveries and their impact in the wider social context. Daniel Söderqvist’s affirmation of the existential approach which ‘emphasizes the freedom and responsibility of the human individual’ resonates with the candidate as expressing characteristics of the lives of many Australian scientists in their passion for intellectual discovery, their motivation to self-empowerment, and their readiness top step outside their social conditioning. This essay extends Söderqvist’s paradigm to the context of Australian science biography and indicates some constraints on its depiction which arise in the practice of writing science biography. Some epistemological issues are raised in the texts, especially when dealing with oral history and family mythology, and thematic, thematic within a chronological framework or chronological structures of the text are compared. The level of detail and context influence the sustainability of the reader’s interest. Case studies of the biographies written by the candidate (Ian Clunies Ross, Samuel Wadham, Allan Callaghan, Victor Trikojus, Raymond Hoffenberg and Crawford Munro) illustrate issues which arise in the writing of science biography. The dominant question is the relationship of the biographer to the subject, and this determines the voice the reader hears. The motivation of the biographer may arise in varying degrees of empathy felt for the subject. The high affinity the candidate had for Clunies Ross and Hoffenberg causes him to offer a defence against the charge of hagiography, and the selectivity and subjectivity of the biographer is evident in the arrangement and presentation of factual material. The motivation of the biographer is additionally directed to the communication of the subject’s research outputs to the wider Australian community, and in the case of Callaghan, Wadham and Clunies Ross there was a specific programmatic function of advancing the status of agricultural science. It is argued that the description of the public life of the subject needs to be complemented from the private life if the biographer is ‘to view the world through the eyes of the subject’.

1. The biography of Crawford Munro (1904-76) describes his early life in Toowoomba and Sydney, and his maturation as an engineer, working for Sydney Water, Sydney Technical College and in the production of Cruiser tanks in World War II. He was a large confident man with a big voice and an optimistic, humorous personality. As the Foundation Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of New South Wales Munro was liberal, fostered humanist studies and developed the School of Engineering with a unique emphasis on water engineering. He recruited excellent staff for research and postgraduate education who led the nation across all phases of hydrology and hydraulics. Munro developed a remarkable, rational solution for flood mitigation at Launceston, and actively promoted research, partly through the Australian Water Research Foundation and the Institution of Engineers, Australia. He was much involved with predicting flood runoff, developing benefit/cost relations for irrigation schemes, which led him into public controversy, and other hydrological projects. Munro’s attempts to raise social consciousness about water problems, his multi-disciplinary approach to the evaluation of water resources and his campaigns for the collection of stream and rainfall data helped provide a better basis for proper planning. In his later years he undertook the first Australian environmental impact study. The concluding chapter outlines a vision for the current management of Australia’s water. Munro posed necessary questions about measuring the supply of water and bringing the demand of water into synchrony with its supply, while providing water security in terms of its availability and quality. He raised the debate about the balance between sustaining environmental flows, utilizing water for agriculture and secondary industry, and maintaining the health of communities. Munro hoped equitable decision making would emerge from public engagement on these issues. 2. Twentieth century science biography in Australia is the province of a group of elite male scientists, whose interests cover wide disciplinary fields; it is focused on popular imagination: health, food and adventure (Antarctica) accounting for fifteen of the seventeen scientists. Empathy for the subject is a significant feature of the nineteen biographers, of whom five are scientists. This small genre is often supported by institutions in small print runs. A key role of biography is to place through science history a more epistemologically plausible version of events. Public discourses of science treated in the essay include conflict about the attribution of scientific discovery, the vocation of the scientist as a contributor to a wider social polity, the light biography sheds on sources of creativity and the evolution of the research and culture of institutions. The biographer attempts to generate a personal portrait of the scientist which conveys authority about the significance and origins of his or her scientific discoveries and their impact in the wider social context. Daniel Söderqvist’s affirmation of the existential approach which ‘emphasizes the freedom and responsibility of the human individual’ resonates with the candidate as expressing characteristics of the lives of many Australian scientists in their passion for intellectual discovery, their motivation to self-empowerment, and their readiness top step outside their social conditioning. This essay extends Söderqvist’s paradigm to the context of Australian science biography and indicates some constraints on its depiction which arise in the practice of writing science biography. Some epistemological issues are raised in the texts, especially when dealing with oral history and family mythology, and thematic, thematic within a chronological framework or chronological structures of the text are compared. The level of detail and context influence the sustainability of the reader’s interest. Case studies of the biographies written by the candidate (Ian Clunies Ross, Samuel Wadham, Allan Callaghan, Victor Trikojus, Raymond Hoffenberg and Crawford Munro) illustrate issues which arise in the writing of science biography. The dominant question is the relationship of the biographer to the subject, and this determines the voice the reader hears. The motivation of the biographer may arise in varying degrees of empathy felt for the subject. The high affinity the candidate had for Clunies Ross and Hoffenberg causes him to offer a defence against the charge of hagiography, and the selectivity and subjectivity of the biographer is evident in the arrangement and presentation of factual material. The motivation of the biographer is additionally directed to the communication of the subject’s research outputs to the wider Australian community, and in the case of Callaghan, Wadham and Clunies Ross there was a specific programmatic function of advancing the status of agricultural science. It is argued that the description of the public life of the subject needs to be complemented from the private life if the biographer is ‘to view the world through the eyes of the subject’.

Diss. Uppsala : Sveriges lantbruksuniv., 2000. / Även utg. som: Skogs- och lantbrukshistoriska meddelanden ; 23.

Orientadora: Professora Dra. Vanessa Elias de Oliveira / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do ABC, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Planejamento e Gestão do Território, 2016. / A urbanização metropolitana é o ponto de partida para compreender os processos de implantação das políticas de saneamento e as mudanças institucionais ao longo do tempo. A abordagem histórica sob os fios condutores dos processos da Grande Metropolização de São Paulo e da mudança institucional no tempo, relativos aos serviços de abastecimento de água e esgotamento sanitários, possibilitam o desenvolvimento desta narrativa interdisciplinar, baseada na demonstração da relação de causalidade entre o processo da metropolização, o de implantação da rede técnica de infraestrutura supramunicipal e o de composição da relação intergovernamental para o planejamento e execução da política de saneamento metropolitana. O processo de metropolização é causa da ação dos municípios do ABC no sentido de compor com o Estado de São Paulo a implantação das redes técnicas de saneamento integrados nessa territorialidade supramunicipal. As obras de adução do Sistema Rio Claro (1949) e de implantação do Sistema Rio Grande (1958) representam fatos demonstrativos e significativos como sinais históricos, do processo de metropolização relativo ao serviço de abastecimento de água na Grande São Paulo. Desta interação intergovernamental é formada a dependência de trajetória da prestação interdependente do serviço entre municípios e estado, que permanece até os dias atuais, entre os municípios de Santo André, Mauá, São Caetano do Sul, Guarulhos e Mogi das Cruzes e a Companhia Estadual de Saneamento Básico de São Paulo - SABESP, como fonte de solução e de conflito da governança metropolitana. / The metropolitan urbanization is the starting point for understanding the processes of implementation of sanitation policies and institutional changes over the time. The historical approach under the leading thread the Great Metropolisation of São Paulo and the institutional change in time, for the sanitary water and sewage supply services, enable the development of this interdisciplinary narrative, which is based on the demonstration of a causal relationship between the metropolises process, the deployment the supra-municipal infrastructure technical network and the intergovernmental relationship of composition for the metropolitan sanitation policy planning and execution. The metropolisation process is cause of the action of ABC municipalities in order to compose with the State of São Paulo the implementation of integrated sanitation techniques networks this regional territoriality. The buildings of adduction of the Rio Claro System (1949) and the Rio Grande System (1958) mean statements and significant facts, such as historical sign, of metropolisation process regarding the water supply service in the Greater São Paulo. From this intergovernmental interaction is formed path dependence of interdependent service provision between municipalities and the state, which remains till our days between the Santo André, Mauá, São Caetano do Sul, Guarulhos and Mogi das Cruzes municipalities and Basic Sanitation Company of the State of São Paulo - SABESP, as source solution and conflict of metropolitan governance.

O presente estudo teve o propósito de narrar a história do Colégio Regina Coeli, nos anos de 1948 a 1980, localizado em Veranópolis, buscando analisar as motivações e possíveis transformações decorrentes da passagem de uma escola confessional para uma comunitária, atentando para as culturas escolares. A escolha do recorte temporal está relacionada a fatos importantes, sendo demarcado o ano de 1948 para o início do estudo, pois foi neste ano que a escola passou a denominar-se Regina Coeli, com a inauguração do prédio construído especificamente para o colégio. A data limite de 1980 foi determinada levando-se em consideração dados sobre a direção da escola, que depois de ter passado da condição de confessional católica para comunitária, em 1969, continuou sendo administrada por Irmãs de São José até o ano de 1976. A partir de 1977, passou a ser dirigida por leigos, tendo tido dois diretores até 1980. Considerando essa delimitação, para a construção da narrativa, analisaram-se as culturas escolares, no que diz respeito aos espaços, aos sujeitos e aos saberes escolares. Pautada nos pressupostos teóricos da História Cultural, utilizou-se como metodologia a análise de documentos, referentes ao Colégio Regina Coeli, e a história oral, através de entrevistas com sujeitos que participaram da instituição de ensino objeto dessa pesquisa. Os documentos dizem respeito às atas de reuniões, ao “Relatório da verificação para efeito da concessão de „inspeção preliminar‟ Ginásio Regina Coeli”, às fotografias, aos livros de matrículas e aos jornais. As entrevistas foram realizadas com dois ex-diretores, duas Irmãs de São José (uma ex-professora e uma ex-aluna) e duas ex-alunas, que atuaram também como professoras na escola. A narrativa foi organizada em cinco capítulos, iniciando com as considerações iniciais, onde se detalha o processo de pesquisa, apresentando os objetivos e a metodologia adotada para a realização do estudo. Em seguida, apresenta-se um breve contexto histórico e educacional de Veranópolis, apontando aspectos do desenvolvimento social, político, cultural, econômico e educacional. Na sequência são narrados aspectos da cultura escolar do Colégio Regina Coeli, referente aos sujeitos, espaços e saberes, no período em que a escola, com o estatuto de confessional católica, era administrada pelas Irmãs de São José, compreendendo o período de 1948 a 1969, mas citando também aspectos do período anterior, de 1917 a 1947, em que a escola denominava-se São José. Depois, abordam-se as motivações e o processo de transição de estatuto da escola, de confessional católico para comunitário, bem como aspectos das culturas escolares em relação aos sujeitos, espaços e saberes escolares do período de 1969 a 1980. Para concluir, são expostas as considerações finais, que permitem compreendem que as transformações nas culturas escolares do Colégio Regina Coeli, decorrentes da transição de estatuto de escola confessional católica para comunitária, foram graduais, pois as Irmãs continuaram no Colégio Regina Coeli até o ano 2000, momento em que foram observados maiores tensionamentos. Diante dos resultados obtidos e da narrativa construída, evidencia-se a importância dessa pesquisa para a comunidade veranense e para os estudos na área da história da educação. / Submitted by Marcelo Teixeira (mvteixeira@ucs.br) on 2014-05-30T12:29:32Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Marina Matiello.pdf: 5675507 bytes, checksum: 8ce21f2fc3e08bd32d64214be3921691 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2014-05-30T12:29:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Marina Matiello.pdf: 5675507 bytes, checksum: 8ce21f2fc3e08bd32d64214be3921691 (MD5) / The present study aimed to tell the history of Regina Coeli School, in the years 1948 to 1980, located in Veranopolis, seeking to analyze the motivations and possible changes resulting from the transition of a confessional school for a community school, noting the school cultures. The choice of time frame is related to important facts, which marked the year 1948 for the beginning of the study, it was this year that the school was renamed to Regina Coeli, with the inauguration of the building built specifically for school. The date of 1980 was determined taking into account data about the school board, which after changing the condition of catholic confessional to community in 1969, kept being administrated by the Sisters of São José by the year 1976. From 1977, it began to be directed by lays, having two directors until 1980. Considering this delimitation, for the construction of the narrative, it was analyzed the school cultures, regarding the spaces, the subjects and school knowledge. Guided the theoretical principles of Cultural History, it was used as methodology the documental analysis, referring to Regina Coeli School, and oral history through interviews with people who participated in the educational institution object of this research. The documents relate to the meeting minutes, the "Verify Report for effect of concession of „preliminary inspection' Gym Regina Coeli", photographs, registration books and newspapers. Interviews were conducted with two former principals, two Sisters of São José (a former teacher and a former student) and two former students, who also acted as teachers in school. The narrative is organized into five chapters, starting with the initial considerations, which details the research process, presenting the objectives and methodology adopted for the study. Then, it presents a brief historical and educational background of Veranópolis, pointing aspects of social, political, cultural, economic and educational development. Following are narrated aspects of school culture of Regina Coeli School, referring to the subjects, spaces and knowledges, in the period in which the school, with the status of Catholic confessional, was administered by the Sisters of São José, covering the period 1948-1969 but also citing aspects of the previous period, from 1917 to 1947, when the school was called São José. Then, discuss the motivations and the transition process of the statute of the school, from Catholic confessional to community, as well as aspects of school cultures in relation to the subjects, spaces and school knowledge of the period 1969-1980. To conclude, the final considerations are exposed, allowing understand that changes in school cultures Regina Coeli School, arising from the transition of statute of Catholic Confessional school for Community School were gradual, as the Sisters continued in Regina Coeli College until 2000, at which time there was a higher tensions. Based on these results and the narrative constructed, highlights the importance of this research to the Veranense community and to the studies in the field of history of education.