Der israelische Autor und Journalist Noah Klieger ist in der deutschsprachigen Forschung zur Holocaustliteratur, in deren Kontext theoretische Konzepte und Interpretationen zahlreicher Autoren (u.a. Ruth Klüger, Primo Levi) dieser Gattung vorliegen, bisher kaum beachtet worden. In der vorliegenden Arbeit steht seine 2010 erschienene Autobiographie „Zwölf Brötchen zum Frühstück“ im Zentrum. Innerhalb der Textanalyse wird der Frage nachgegangen, welche Bedeutung das Schreiben für Klieger hat und inwieweit seine als Reportage angelegte Autobiographie, die den sehr faktenbezogenen und dokumentarischen Stil des Journalisten widerspiegelt, den Rezipienten in der Interpretation lenkt und Authentizität erzeugt. Ausgehend von dieser Fragestellung werden für die Arbeit geführte Interviews mit Noah Klieger (oral history) einbezogen und der Erlebnisbericht „Ich habe den Todesengel überlebt“ von Eva Mozes-Kor, die das Konzept des Erlebnisberichtes mit all seinen Eigenschaften konstant bewahrt, zum Vergleich hinzugezogen. Im Fokus der Arbeit steht die Analyse der Autobiographie Kliegers, wobei auf das Genre Reportage, relevante Stilmittel, zentrale Begrifflichkeiten und Veröffentlichungskontexte sowie auf die Gedächtnistheorie von Maurice Halbwachs eingegangen werden. Abschließend wird die Thematik des Vergebens bei Klieger und Mozes-Kor erörtert. Die Forschungsergebnisse stellen den israelischen Holocaustüberlebenden Noah Klieger als Autor vor und verdeutlichen, dass die innerhalb der Gattung Holocaustliteratur gewählten Darstellungsweisen unterschiedliche Formen von Authentizität evozieren. / Israeli author and journalist Noah Klieger has been ignored by German scientists of Holocaust literature though there are many theoretical concepts and interpretations of other writers such as Ruth Klüger and Primo Levi. In this paper we will focus on his autobiography published in 2010 named “Zwölf Brötchen zum Frühstück”. In the text analysis we will discuss what the act of writing means to Klieger and to what extent his autobiography reflects relation to facts, documentary pen and influences recipients. In accordance with this leading question we will integrate interviews with Noah Klieger (oral history) and a report from Eva Mozes-Kor titled “Ich habe den Todesengel überlebt”. This report constantly maintains the characteristics of a report. The centre of attention is the analysis of Noah Klieger’s autobiography, the characteristics of a report, rhetorical devices, defining key terminology, the context of publishing as well as Maurice Halbwach’s memory research theories. Finally, we discuss forgiving based on texts by Klieger and Mozes-Kor is discussed. The results of the research introduce Israeli holocaust survivor Noah Klieger as an author and clarify that within holocaust literature the different forms of expression evoke many different facets of authenticity.

The intent of this thesis is to examine and interpret the representation of the Holocaust in young adult literature. The tone, style, and emotion used to convey the Holocaust experience, both in fiction and nonfiction stories, in eyewitness and indirect accounts, affects its representation to a young adult audience. I will study the effects of sentimentality, realism, and fun and their impact on our understanding and remembrance of the Holocaust. I will analyze several texts, including Island on Bird Street, The Book Thief, and Night. The paradox of finding an appropriate balance between presenting a realistic portrayal of the Holocaust and understanding that we could never fathom the horrors of the Holocaust is one that plagues both writers and readers of this genre of literature and I plan to critique the ways in which different works discuss the subject. Ultimately, I will consider the conflict of how we negotiate between complete repression versus obsessive memorialization. What is the role of memory? What is the proper way to move on from the horrors of the past while still honoring the innocent people who lived and died? Through my analysis, I hope to attempt to answer these questions and, perhaps, provide suggestions for appropriate representation and memorialization.

My dissertation demonstrates how representations of schizophrenic characters in novels can combat widespread misuses of psychiatric terms and help readers empathize with mentally ill people if we read these novels with some understanding of psychiatry and the psychoanalysis that influenced them. I undertake a critical genealogy of the schizophrenia concept's migration from the mental health professions to fiction, concentrating on the period from the German invasion of Paris in June 1940 to the events of May 1968, with some attention to contemporary uses of the schizophrenia concept by cultural theorists. Experimental novelists writing during the apogee and aftermath of National Socialism from the 1940s to the 1970s represent schizophrenia as they understood it to express the painful emotions produced by World War II's challenge to the value of experimental writing. In the postwar fiction of Samuel Beckett (1906-1989) and Georges Perec (1936-1982), imitating schizophrenia results in careful disclosures of disintegrating life-worlds: in Beckett's case, the dissolution of the James Joyce circle and the communities of modernist exiles it exemplified, which the German invasion of Paris destroyed; in Perec's case, the deaths of his parents in the defense of France and the Holocaust, and the annihilated six million Jews including his mother. Reading Beckett and Perec's novels develops readers' abilities to empathize with both schizophrenic people and the loved ones of Holocaust victims. While those who avoided the concentration camps like Perec did not experience their horrors firsthand, losing relatives and other loved ones transformed their lives, just as losing two thirds of its Jewish population devastated European culture despite reticence to acknowledge the Holocaust's monstrous effects in the postwar years. Late modernist fiction can thus both help readers understand the Holocaust's cultural impact and foster the skills necessary to understand experiences of severe mental disorder. Such empathic understanding is more humane than romanticizing or stigmatizing schizophrenia or other mental illnesses, and it helps us register the Holocaust's degradation of humanity anew rather than walling off this event in the past or regarding it solely as a Jewish issue. Late modernist fiction provides a more precise, caring alternative to the romanticizing/stigmatizing binary perpetuated by postwar cultural theorists because, from the 1930s to the 1970s, the fiction gradually transitions from reinforcing that binary to enabling empathy for traumatized and mentally ill people. Such fiction anticipated recent phenomenologies of schizophrenia - real experiences of distress and impairment rather than socially constructed concepts of madness - and traumatic shame, an emotional experience of oneself or one's community as inadequate in response to failure, especially the Holocaust as a failure of European culture and modernity. Both traumatic shame and severe mental disorder can make the body conspicuous, alienate people from their cultures, and disintegrate structures of salience and belonging that make sustained relationships and projects possible. Recent existential-phenomenological theories of mental disorder enable reintegrating schizophrenia representation in fiction into the history of literary modernism, especially its concern with historical forces disrupting the minds of individuals. These theories explain changes in mentally ill people's sense of possibilities for developing themselves and relating to others, from the way they experience their bodies to the way they use language. Hence I use these theories to demonstrate how knowledge of schizophrenia enabled post-Holocaust novelists to travesty and transform earlier novelists' uses of fictional minds to interrogate cultural change. / English