This dissertation consists of three stand-alone but interrelated empirical studies investigating various aspects of the well-documented ??home bias anomaly?? in international investment. The findings help to understand the international investment allocation behaviour of mutual funds as well as their implications for asset pricing and mutual fund evaluation. The first study investigates the roles of various firm attributes that encapsulate the deadweight costs in determining firm level investment bias. The main findings suggest that firm characteristics related to transaction costs, corporate governance and information asymmetry create significant barriers for fund managers. In addition, foreign funds are more constrained than domestic funds by information asymmetry, even in developed and liberalized markets. Moreover, this study stylises the international investment allocation model in Cooper and Kaplanis (1986) with a quadratic cost function, which reveals the marginal influence of market level deadweight costs on the relationship between firm characteristics and investment bias. It is found that when market level cross-border barriers are exacerbated, as in the case of emerging and restricted financial markets, foreign fund managers become more sensitive to market level deadweight costs and ignore firm characteristics. In general, these findings imply that the market level ??home bias anomaly?? is an outcome of the complementary effects of investment barriers at both firm and market levels. The second study examines the role of firm level investment bias in predicting future stock returns. It is found that both firm level foreign and domestic biases contain valuable information with respect to firm prospects. However, domestic bias is more informative than foreign bias in terms of subsequent stock returns, partially because of information asymmetry. The third study explores the determinants of fund level investment bias and its ability to predict fund performance. It is found that fund portfolio attributes determine fund level investment biases after controlling for market and fund investment objective specific effects, and fund level investment bias is positively related to fund performance due to lower deadweight costs. Moreover, good macroeconomic environments foster the development of the mutual fund industry.

The aim of this thesis is to analyse international financial integration. Chapter 2 investigates the determinants of international financial integration. Variables including the capital control policy dummy variable, openness to international trade, domestic credit and economic growth are candidates for explaining variation in the degree of international financial integration. Chapter 3 analyses cointegration between the US and several European Union equity markets. Between 1993 and 1998, there is mixed evidence of cointegration ties with the US equity market. Over the period covering the introduction of the euro, most of the European markets did not show any evidence of cointegration with the US market. Granger causality tests reveal significant causality running from the US to the European markets. Chapter 4 estimates time series of market and idiosyncratic volatilities for the firms composing the index DJ Eurostoxx 50 following the volatility decomposition method of Campbell et al. (2001). There was a positive trend in both market and firm-level volatility and average correlation among firms has increased. This contrasts with the US evidence in Campbell et al. (2001) of a strong positive trend in firm-level volatility, no trend in market volatility and a decrease in the average correlation. Results confirm a statistically significant market risk-return trade-off and that firm-level volatility has no predictive power for subsequent market returns. Chapter 5 analyses the link between FDI and economic growth using panel data. FDI has a stronger positive impact on economic growth in countries with higher levels of education attainment, those that are more open to international trade, have better stock market development and lower rates of population growth and levels of risk. Chapter 6 investigates the determinants of the home bias. Results indicate that capital controls and transaction costs are factors driving the home bias of Australian equity portfolio investment. The home bias lessens if the bilateral trade is higher. Australian investors invest a higher share of their portfolio in countries with better institutions and larger market size.

<p>This thesis consists of three self-contained essays in the fields of banking and portfolio choice.</p><p>Banking and Optimal Reserves in an Equilibrium Model:</p><p>I address the question of reserves in banking, particularly the fact that reserves are substantially larger than the stipulated reserve requirements by Bank of International Settlements. My contribution is to show that when the underlying values of borrowers are correlated, banks should hold positive reserves, regardless of the regulation. I use a derived distribution for debt portfolios to show that intermediation in a debt market will outperform direct lending, even if intermediaries are allowed to default. The model used is a generalization of Williamson (1986), with Costly State Verification as asymmetric information. By using a factor model for the value of entrepreneurs' projects, I introduce a positive probability for banks to default. It is shown that, in equilibrium, banks choose to hold capital reserves that are almost large enough to eliminate the expected auditing cost for their depositors. The reason is that auditing does not provide any utility and hence, the cake to be split between banks and depositors is enlarged by reserves as an insurance against bad outcomes. It is also shown that the more correlation there is in the debt portfolio, the larger is the optimal reserve level. This could explain why small regional banks in Sweden often have more than twice the reserve level of their nation-wide competitors.</p><p>Optimal Rebalancing of Portfolio Weights under Time-varying Return Volatility:</p><p>This paper considers horizon effects on portfolio weights under time varying and forecastable return volatility. The return volatility is modeled as a GARCH-M, which is sufficiently general to encompass both constant and time varying means. The analysis confirms earlier results, namely that there are no horizon effects when the stochastic process, which governs asset returns, has a constant mean. However, when time varying and forecastable volatility is included in the mean equation, there are horizon effects. I show three features to be of importance for the horizon effect: First, the size of the parameter on conditional volatility in the mean equation and second, persistence in conditional volatility. Third, the asymmetry in volatility has some effect. In addition, the parameter of relative risk aversion is important. For low levels of risk aversion, only very small effects on portfolio weights are present; when the level of risk aversion increases, so does the effects on portfolio weights. Portfolio weights increase for the first 2-3 years when the investment horizon is increased; the total effect slightly exceeds 10%.</p><p>Can Parameter Uncertainty Help Solve the Home Bias Puzzle?</p><p>A well-known puzzle in international finance is the equity home bias. This paper illustrates a mechanism where exchange rate estimation risk causes equity home bias. Estimation risk is introduced into a standard mean-variance portfolio framework by having return time series with different lengths. We argue that the exchange rate return history, which is a part of the local currency return on a foreign investment, is likely to be substantially shorter than the available return histories of equity indices due to, for example, exchange rate regime shifts. To econometrically deal with return histories of different lengths we utilize a framework devised by Stambaugh (1997). The impact of estimation risk on an optimal portfolio is tested with data from Sweden and the U.S. Our results suggest that explicitly accounting for estimation risk causes the domestic investor to increase his fraction of domestic assets. While the introduction of exchange rate estimation risk is not powerful enough to explain the whole home bias observed in data, the results of this paper illustrate a mechanism that is often overlooked in discussions of international portfolio diversification.</p>

This thesis consists of three self-contained essays in the fields of banking and portfolio choice. Banking and Optimal Reserves in an Equilibrium Model: I address the question of reserves in banking, particularly the fact that reserves are substantially larger than the stipulated reserve requirements by Bank of International Settlements. My contribution is to show that when the underlying values of borrowers are correlated, banks should hold positive reserves, regardless of the regulation. I use a derived distribution for debt portfolios to show that intermediation in a debt market will outperform direct lending, even if intermediaries are allowed to default. The model used is a generalization of Williamson (1986), with Costly State Verification as asymmetric information. By using a factor model for the value of entrepreneurs' projects, I introduce a positive probability for banks to default. It is shown that, in equilibrium, banks choose to hold capital reserves that are almost large enough to eliminate the expected auditing cost for their depositors. The reason is that auditing does not provide any utility and hence, the cake to be split between banks and depositors is enlarged by reserves as an insurance against bad outcomes. It is also shown that the more correlation there is in the debt portfolio, the larger is the optimal reserve level. This could explain why small regional banks in Sweden often have more than twice the reserve level of their nation-wide competitors. Optimal Rebalancing of Portfolio Weights under Time-varying Return Volatility: This paper considers horizon effects on portfolio weights under time varying and forecastable return volatility. The return volatility is modeled as a GARCH-M, which is sufficiently general to encompass both constant and time varying means. The analysis confirms earlier results, namely that there are no horizon effects when the stochastic process, which governs asset returns, has a constant mean. However, when time varying and forecastable volatility is included in the mean equation, there are horizon effects. I show three features to be of importance for the horizon effect: First, the size of the parameter on conditional volatility in the mean equation and second, persistence in conditional volatility. Third, the asymmetry in volatility has some effect. In addition, the parameter of relative risk aversion is important. For low levels of risk aversion, only very small effects on portfolio weights are present; when the level of risk aversion increases, so does the effects on portfolio weights. Portfolio weights increase for the first 2-3 years when the investment horizon is increased; the total effect slightly exceeds 10%. Can Parameter Uncertainty Help Solve the Home Bias Puzzle? A well-known puzzle in international finance is the equity home bias. This paper illustrates a mechanism where exchange rate estimation risk causes equity home bias. Estimation risk is introduced into a standard mean-variance portfolio framework by having return time series with different lengths. We argue that the exchange rate return history, which is a part of the local currency return on a foreign investment, is likely to be substantially shorter than the available return histories of equity indices due to, for example, exchange rate regime shifts. To econometrically deal with return histories of different lengths we utilize a framework devised by Stambaugh (1997). The impact of estimation risk on an optimal portfolio is tested with data from Sweden and the U.S. Our results suggest that explicitly accounting for estimation risk causes the domestic investor to increase his fraction of domestic assets. While the introduction of exchange rate estimation risk is not powerful enough to explain the whole home bias observed in data, the results of this paper illustrate a mechanism that is often overlooked in discussions of international portfolio diversification.

Finance taught in schools generally starts with the efficient market hypothesis, which holds the assumptions of rational investors and markets where all information available is reflected. In recent years however, a lot of critique has been given to efficient markets and its assumptions of rationality. The greatest reason to this is because of crashes and irregularities in the market. The field of behavioural finance has been in existence for many years but is not as established as the efficient market hypothesis. It says that investors may act irrational and are mostly trying to explain the reasons why. People’s behaviour is being closely studied in order to see patterns of behaviour and this has resulted in different heuristics and biases. Heuristics are instances that come to mind when making a decision and differ a lot depending on what kind of decision you are making. Since there are many different heuristics, this thesis only focused on one: the affect heuristic. The method was constructed in a specific way in order to show if the students showed affect in their answers. Also, a check for home bias was made. This thesis presents the behaviour of two different groups of students, finance students from Sweden and MBE-students from Germany. It was proved that both of the groups were acting irrational in their investment decisions. The reason to their irrationality is both because the method was constructed in a way to strategically mislead them but also because of the data collection. There were also some differences noticed depending on age groups, former studies in finance and work experience in finance. The affect heuristic was clearly shown in the answers by both groups of students. A home bias was also noticed in the answers. It was proven that 10,3 percent of the Swedish students invested in Swedish companies in both their first and second choice, even though the three best companies were German. None of the German Students decided to invest in a Swedish company in both the first and second choice.

This dissertation consists of three stand-alone but interrelated empirical studies investigating various aspects of the well-documented ??home bias anomaly?? in international investment. The findings help to understand the international investment allocation behaviour of mutual funds as well as their implications for asset pricing and mutual fund evaluation. The first study investigates the roles of various firm attributes that encapsulate the deadweight costs in determining firm level investment bias. The main findings suggest that firm characteristics related to transaction costs, corporate governance and information asymmetry create significant barriers for fund managers. In addition, foreign funds are more constrained than domestic funds by information asymmetry, even in developed and liberalized markets. Moreover, this study stylises the international investment allocation model in Cooper and Kaplanis (1986) with a quadratic cost function, which reveals the marginal influence of market level deadweight costs on the relationship between firm characteristics and investment bias. It is found that when market level cross-border barriers are exacerbated, as in the case of emerging and restricted financial markets, foreign fund managers become more sensitive to market level deadweight costs and ignore firm characteristics. In general, these findings imply that the market level ??home bias anomaly?? is an outcome of the complementary effects of investment barriers at both firm and market levels. The second study examines the role of firm level investment bias in predicting future stock returns. It is found that both firm level foreign and domestic biases contain valuable information with respect to firm prospects. However, domestic bias is more informative than foreign bias in terms of subsequent stock returns, partially because of information asymmetry. The third study explores the determinants of fund level investment bias and its ability to predict fund performance. It is found that fund portfolio attributes determine fund level investment biases after controlling for market and fund investment objective specific effects, and fund level investment bias is positively related to fund performance due to lower deadweight costs. Moreover, good macroeconomic environments foster the development of the mutual fund industry.

The aim of this thesis is to analyse international financial integration. Chapter 2 investigates the determinants of international financial integration. Variables including the capital control policy dummy variable, openness to international trade, domestic credit and economic growth are candidates for explaining variation in the degree of international financial integration. Chapter 3 analyses cointegration between the US and several European Union equity markets. Between 1993 and 1998, there is mixed evidence of cointegration ties with the US equity market. Over the period covering the introduction of the euro, most of the European markets did not show any evidence of cointegration with the US market. Granger causality tests reveal significant causality running from the US to the European markets. Chapter 4 estimates time series of market and idiosyncratic volatilities for the firms composing the index DJ Eurostoxx 50 following the volatility decomposition method of Campbell et al. (2001). There was a positive trend in both market and firm-level volatility and average correlation among firms has increased. This contrasts with the US evidence in Campbell et al. (2001) of a strong positive trend in firm-level volatility, no trend in market volatility and a decrease in the average correlation. Results confirm a statistically significant market risk-return trade-off and that firm-level volatility has no predictive power for subsequent market returns. Chapter 5 analyses the link between FDI and economic growth using panel data. FDI has a stronger positive impact on economic growth in countries with higher levels of education attainment, those that are more open to international trade, have better stock market development and lower rates of population growth and levels of risk. Chapter 6 investigates the determinants of the home bias. Results indicate that capital controls and transaction costs are factors driving the home bias of Australian equity portfolio investment. The home bias lessens if the bilateral trade is higher. Australian investors invest a higher share of their portfolio in countries with better institutions and larger market size.

Forskning inom beteendeekonomi visar att det finns flera psykologiska faktorer som leder till att investerare inte agerar rationellt vid viktiga beslut kring deras investeringar. Syftet med denna uppsats är att undersöka ”Home bias” (HB) som innebär att investerare tenderar till att investera majoriteten av sitt kapital i den lokala aktiemarknaden samt de möjligheter som finns med internationella investeringar i aktiemarknaden från 2000 fram till 2020.  Resultatet av analysen visar att detta fenomen fortfarande existerar sedan de tidigare studierna utförts men att det har minskat med 7,25 procent från år 2000 till 2019. Vid undersökning av avkastning för aktieindex bestående av Mid-Cap och Large-Cap bolag för: Australien, Hong Kong, Nederländerna, Sverige, Danmark, Indien, Norge, Sydafrika, England, Italien, Portugal, Tyskland, Finland, Japan, Ryssland, USA, Frankrike, Kanada och Spanien, visade resultatet att Ryssland, Danmark och Indien har haft högst avkastning under den utvalda tidsperioden på 20 år. Den svenska aktiemarknaden har haft högst korrelation mot den franska och tyska aktiemarknaden och lägst korrelation mot den japanska och indiska aktiemarknaden. Vid undersökning av internationella investeringar styrkte teorin, historisk data och Monte Carlo simulering att det är lönsamt att diversifiera sin portfölj och investera i fler länder för att uppnå högsta avkastning sett till risken och prestera bättre än den svenska aktiemarknaden. / Research within behavioral economics have proven that there exist several kinds of biases that makes the investors act irrational when deciding for important decisions regarding their investments. This thesis examines the phenomena called “Home bias” (HB) which means that investors tend to invest most of their capital into the local stock market, the thesis also analyze the opportunity of international investments on the stock market from year 2000 to 2020. The results of the analyze proved that this phenomenon still exists since the last research about it had been done, however this home bias have decreased with 7,25 percent from 2000 to 2019. When analysing the return based on index from stocks on the Mid-Cap and Large-Cap list for: Australia, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, India, Norway, South Africa, United Kingdom, Italy, Portugal, Germany, Finland, Japan, Russia, Unites States, France, Canada and Spain,  the results showed that Russia, Denmark and India have had the highest return during the chosen time period of 20 years. The Swedish stock market have had the highest correlation with the French and German stock market, the lowest correlation was against the Japanese and Indian stock market. When analysing the return of international investments both theory, historical data and the Monte Carlo simulation proved it’s a benefit to diversify the stock portfolio and invest in more countries to achieve a higher rate of return given the risk and perform better than the Swedish stock market.

Is home biasness common among modern investors? To which extent do Swedish investors diversify their investments on an international level? Does home biasness negatively affect the investors performance? To answer these questions, correlation tests of various international indices ranging over four different time periods are conducted, in order to see if correlation between markets are stronger today than before, as stronger correlation would render diversification less useful. To enhance the study, the holdings of the top ten Swedish funds, measured in fund capital according to Morningstar, is reviewed, based on data collected per 2014-12-31 from the Swedish Financial Supervisory Agency (FI). This gives an overview of how the funds diversify their investments internationally, these funds will in turn represent the average Swedish investor in the thesis. By constructing a bullet curve from a set of international indices, the author will analyse to which grade international diversification is useful. The results are that international diversification isn’t as beneficial as theory suggests it is. The reason for it may be due to stronger correlation between international markets in the past 15 years. Most of the Swedish funds tends to be rather home biased in their investments, as about a quarter of the holdings usually are placed in Swedish assets, and in accordance with the results of the indices development, the more home biased they are to Sweden, the better they tend to perform. / Hur vanligt är egentligen home biasness hos den moderna investeraren? Till vilken grad diversifierar egentligen den vanliga Svenska investeraren sina tillgångar internationellt? Påverkar en eventuellt inhemskt investeringsfilosofi investeraren negativt? Korrelationstester för olika världsindex kommer utföras, så att en överskådade blick kan fås över hur världsmarknader rör sig allt mer symmetriskt, då starkare symmetri mellan marknader minskar nyttan av internationell diversifiering. Data om innehav från Sveriges topp tio fonder, sett till fondförmögenhet utifrån Morningstar, har samlats från finansinspektionen per 2014-12-31. Dessa fonder ska representera den typiske Svenska investeraren och dess diversifieringsvanor. Genom att ha samlat data från ett flertal internationella index har effektiv front samt en fiktiv kombination av index skapats för att få fram huruvida avkastning i relation till risk ökar genom internationell diversifiering. Denna kombination av index jämförs sedan mot utveckling av en handfull internationellt samlade index för att se om diversifiering förbättrar avkastningen i relation till risk. Resultatet säger att det index som är mest diversifierade inte är så gynnsamt som teorin påstår. Anledningen till detta kan bero på den ökade korrelationen bland aktiemarknader idag jämfört med för 15 år sedan. De flesta Svenska fonderna har en större andel av sitt innehav i Svenska värdepapper och överlag, förutom diverse undantag, så har det gynnat dessa fonder i avkastning sett till risk.

nÃo hà / Este trabalho se agrega à discussÃo sobre a capacidade de um investidor brasileiro diversificar o risco alocando recursos em ativos internacionais. Adotando estratÃgias nÃo alavancadas de composiÃÃo de portfÃlios com 35 Ãndices das mais representativas bolsas de aÃÃes no mundo, evidencia-se que em perÃodos de crise financeira nÃo se deva recorrer aos escassos fundamentos, mas que em perÃodos de recuperaÃÃo ou estabilidade econÃmica, se deva investir em ativos de outros paÃses. Em suma, todos os portfolios equal-weighted e construÃdos via otimizaÃÃo apresentam nÃveis de risco inferiores aos registrados para o IBOVESPA, sinalizando capacidade de diversificaÃÃo internacional de risco. PorÃm, em termos de ganho ponderado pelo risco, à possÃvel que estratÃgias simples de composiÃÃo de portfolios apenas compostos por Ãndices dos mercados dos paÃses da AmÃrica do Sul jà tenham resultados satisfatÃrios. Apesar dos fatores associados ao home bias, os investidores brasileiros deveriam estar motivados em pensar em estratÃgias factÃveis capazes de reduzir a exposiÃÃo a fontes de risco de carÃter polÃtico ou macroeconÃmico que compÃem o risco sistÃmico do mercado financeiro nacional. / In this work we enter the debate about the ability of a Brazilian investor intending to diversify risk by allocating resources in international assets. Based on unleveraged strategies of portfolios composition using 35 of the most representative stock market indices worldwide, we evidence that in times of financial crisis one should not follow a fundamental approach, while during periods of recovery or economic stability, the investor Brazilian should observe other countries. To summarize, all equal-weighted and optimization based portfolios have risk levels lower than those reported for the Bovespa Index, signaling the capacity of international diversification of risk. However, in terms of relation risk-return, it is possible that simple investment strategies using only stock market indices of countries of South America have satisfactory results. Although the aspects explaining the home bias, Brazilian investors should be motivated to think of feasible strategies able to reduce exposure to risk sources of political or macroeconomic that comprise the systemic risk of the domestic financial market.