Os vírus são eficazes na transferência de genes em células devido aos seus mecanismos especializados. No entanto, vírus como veículos de entrega de genes podem acarretar em problemas, particularmente quando proposto para reprogramar células somáticas em células-tronco pluripotentes induzidas (iPS) visando utilização terapêutica. No presente estudo, procurou-se desenvolver um sistema alternativo para entregar diretamente proteínas nucleares (Oct4, Sox2, KLF4, e c-Myc) fusionadas com o domínio de transdução de proteína TAT, para promover a reprogramação de fibroblastos embrionários de camundongos (MEF) ou células mesenquimais derivadas de tecido adiposo humano (hASC) em células iPS. Primeiramente o PTD TAT ou TAT- foi fundido a proteína verde fluorescente (GFP) como modelo para prova de princípio e padronização detalhada. Inesperadamente, TAT-GFP produzido e secretado pelas células NIH-3T3 produtora não foi capaz de ser detectado no meio de cultura por verificação quantitativa fluorimétrica, nem foi capaz de ser detectada em células-alvo, por citometria de fluxo, depois de co-cultura em transwells. Essa observação pode ser explicada por: (1) ineficiência desse tipo de célula em secretar proteínas e (2) falta de resistência à clivagem por endoproteases furinas. Para contornar esses fatores limitantes usou-se citometria de fluxo para avaliar as melhores condições para a transfecção por seis diferentes tipos de células (CHO, NIH-3T3, HT1080, HEK-293A, HEK-293t e COS-7) com TAT (modificada para ser resistente à furinas) fundido a GFP. Células 293t-TAT-GFP exibiram a maior eficiência de transfecção e também de secreção. O mesmo pôde ser observado para as seis linhagens celulares expressando fatores de transcrição nucleares TAT, determinados por ELISA. Em seguida, diferentes estratégias de entrega foram testadas. A primeira foi baseada na co-cultura de uma mistura de células produtoras com MEF ou hASC. No entanto, não foi possível observar a reprogramação devido à morte celular. A segunda foi baseada na concentração de meio condicionado de cultura de células por centrifugação usando colunas Amicon, trocando o meio a cada 24h, em quatro ciclos. No entanto, apesar da presença de algumas colônias após 20-30 dias, nenhuma colônia verdadeira iPS foi obtida. Na sequência, as células foram tratadas com cada proteína de forma independente, e as demais foram substituídas pelo retrovírus correspondente, trocando meio a cada 72h, em quatro ciclos. Essa estratégia, apesar de permitir verificar a função de cada proteína, também não resultou em reprogramação. Este achado pode ser explicado pela diferenciação celular induzida por BCS, que também é concentrado no processo. Assim, passou-se a adaptação de \"células produtoras\" em condições de cultura livre de soro, para enriquecer a produção dos fatores nucleares individuais, necessários para a reprogramação. A otimização sistematizada deste processo está sendo realizada em parceria com o IPT e deve resultar em quantidades de proteína de fusão suficientes para o teste final da hipótese proposta. Em conjunto, são apresentados os dados da geração de linhagens celulares expressando estavelmente os vários fatores de transcrição e estratégias para melhorar a eficiência necessária para a produção iPS. Esta nova estratégia garante uma produção eficiente de TAT fundida a fatores nucleares de reprogramação e sua eficácia para promover a reprogramação de células somáticas de maneira livre de vírus merece ser investigado futuramente / Viruses are effective at transferring genes into cells by its specialized mechanisms. However, viruses as gene delivery vehicles entail problems, particularly when proposed to reprogram somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) for therapeutic uses. In the present study, we aimed to develop an alternative system for directly delivering nuclear proteins (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc) fused with TAT protein transduction domain to promote reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) or human adipose tissue derived mesenchymal cells (hASC) into iPS cells. First TAT- or TAT- PTD was fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a proof of principle model and for detailed standardization. Unexpectedly, TAT-GFP produced and secreted by NIH-3T3 producer cells was not detected in the culture medium by quantitative fluorimetric verification, nor detected on target cells, by flow cytometry, after being co-cultured using transwells. This observation maybe explained by: (1) inefficiency of this cell type to be transfected and to secrete proteins and (2) lack of resistance to furin endoproteases cleavage on Golgi of TAT sequence. To circumvent these limiting factors we used flow cytometer to assess the best conditions for transfection in six different cell types (CHO, NIH-3T3, HT1080, HEK-293A, HEK-293t and COS-7) with TAT- (a modified PTD to be resistant to furin endoproteases) fused to GFP. 293t-TAT-GFP cells displayed the highest transfection efficiency and secretion levels. The same could be observed for the six cell lineages expressing TAT- nuclear transcription factors, determined by ELISA.Next, different delivery strategies were tested for TAT- nuclear transcription factor system. Co-culturing a mix of producer cells with MEF or hASC resulted in not reprogramming and this was associated with cell death. The second was based on the use of microconcentrated conditioned cell culture medium, changed every 24h, in four cycles. However, despite the presence of some emerging colonies after 20-30 days, no true iPS colonies were obtained. Then, cells were treated with each protein independently, and the others were replaced by the corresponding retrovirus, changing cell medium every 72h, in four cycles. We verified the reprogramming potential of each protein, but no true colonies were obtained.One possibility for this finding is that BCS is also concentrated by centrifugation and may induce cell differentiation. To circumvent these problems, we have started the adaptation of producer cells in a serum-free culture condition to enrich the production of the individual factors required for reprogramming. This optimization process is taking place in collaboration with the IPT and shall result in large amounts of the fusion protein to finally test the proposed hypothesis. Altogether, we presented the generation of several cell lines stably expressing the transcription factors and strategies to improve the efficiency required for iPS production. This novel strategy guarantees efficient production of TAT-fused reprogramming nuclear factors and its efficacy to promote somatic cells reprogramming in a virus-free manner deserves to be further investigated

A striking feature of Parkinson's disease (PD) is that the distal axonal terminals of neurons degenerate prior to the soma, a process referred to as 'dying-back'. Another hallmark of the disease is the pathological accumulation of abnormal protein aggregates in soma and axons. Lysosomes, a critical component of the protein quality control machinery, have thus been thought to be altered in PD. LRRK2 G2019S, a gain-of-kinase-function mutation, is one of PD's most common known causative mutations, and LRRK2-specific small molecule inhibitors have been developed as possible therapeutics. However, LRRK2 G2019S is incompletely penetrant, and its role in axonal degeneration is unclear. LRRK2 phosphorylates a subset of Rab GTPases, including Rab10. Since Rab GTPases are mediators of organelle trafficking, we speculated that LRRK2 G2019S affects the transport of organelles, such as lysosomes, thereby contributing to early PD pathogenesis. Using neural progenitor cell-derived neurons from two LRRK2 G2019S-PD patients; we developed a model of axonal trafficking of lysosomes to characterize the impact of mutant LRRK2 on lysosomal trafficking. In comparison to their isogenic gene-corrected controls, we observed a subtle reduction in mutant axonal lysosomal speed, which could indicate that mutant LRRK2 mildly disrupts retrograde lysosomal transport. We also observed that this trafficking phenotype was only partially rescued by LRRK2 kinase inhibitors, which could indicate the importance of other factors regulating axonal transport. Consistent with this idea, we found that mutant LRRK2 was associated with increased co-localization of phosphorylated Rab10 on a small subset of distal axonal lysosomes. Furthermore, the over-expression of Rab10 only mildly affected lysosomal trafficking in axons. Interestingly, damaging the lysosomal membrane increased LRRK2-dependent Rab10 phosphorylation, leading us to speculate that membrane damage in the axon might induce LRRK2 activity. Since lysosomes have been shown to mediate plasma membrane repair, we speculated that membrane damage might exacerbate LRRK2-dependent phenotypes in distal axons. Axotomy was used to test this idea, and we observed an inconsistent delay in the regrowth of mutant axons after axotomy. Moreover, we identified an association between mutant LRRK2 and the transient increase in lysosomes at the injury site, indicating that LRRK2 G2019S might potentially affect damage-prone distal axons. Since the LRRK2 G2019S-associated phenotypes observed in our assays were relatively mild in one isogenic pair, we were curious about the clinical and genetic phenotypes of the patients from whom the somatic cells for neural progenitor cell generation were sourced. Interestingly, we observed that clinical features of PD, including age-of-onset, motor symptoms, cognitive impairment, and the level of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, were heterogeneous between the two patients. Additionally, genetic analysis of specific PD risk-associated loci in MAPT and SNCA revealed that one patient was more at risk of developing PD than the other, indicating influence from genetic factors in addition to LRRK2 G2019S. These factors might affect the axonal phenotypes observed in our assays. Overall, we have developed assays to investigate the effects of LRRK2 G2019S on axonal lysosomes. These assays can potentially be a useful tool to better understand early pathogenesis in heterogeneous PD patients and test targeted therapeutics that can be successful over an eclectic cohort of PD patients, all of whom are diagnosed based on deteriorating motor symptoms.:TABLE OF CONTENTS I LIST OF FIGURES IV LIST OF TABLES VI ABBREVIATIONS VII 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Neurodegenerative diseases 1 1.2 Parkinson’s disease 2 1.2.1 General Features 2 1.2.2 Phenomenon of “dying back” in PD 6 1.2.3 Contribution of axonal architecture and function to “dying back” 7 1.2.4 Etiology of PD 10 1.2.4.1 Environmental factors 10 1.2.4.2 Genetic factors linked to axonal function 11 1.3 Lysosomes 12 1.3.1 Composition and biogenesis of lysosomes 13 1.3.2 Lysosomes as digestive centers 15 1.3.3 Lysosomes as secretory organelles 18 1.3.4 Lysosomes in PD 20 1.3.4.1 Genetic PD factors linked to lysosomal function 21 1.4 Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) 22 1.4.1 LRRK2 domain organization and function 22 1.4.2 Clinical features of PD patients with LRRK2 mutations (LRRK2-PD) 24 1.4.3 LRRK2 animal models 24 1.4.4 LRRK2 induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based models 25 1.4.5 Animal and iPSC-based models demonstrate a role for LRRK2 in the endo-lysosomal system 27 1.4.6 LRRK2 kinase inhibitors 30 2 AIMS OF THE THESIS 32 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 33 3.1 Materials 33 3.1.1 Chemicals 33 3.1.2 Purchased kits 34 3.1.3 Plasmids 34 3.1.4 Antibodies 35 3.1.5 Dyes 36 3.1.6 Primers and oligonucleotides 36 3.1.7 Cell culture media and reagents 37 3.1.8 Small molecules 38 3.1.9 Compounds 38 3.1.10 Cell culture media 39 3.1.11 Human Neural Progenitor Cell (NPC) lines 40 3.2 Methods 41 3.2.1 Ethics statement 41 3.2.2 Licenses 41 3.2.3 Information about iPSC and NPC line generation 41 3.2.4 Preparation of cell culture coated plates 41 3.2.5 Maintenance of NPCs 42 3.2.6 Differentiation of NPCs to neurons 42 3.2.7 Preparation of microfluidic chambers 43 3.2.8 Seeding neurons as single cells 44 3.2.9 HEK293T cell culture 45 3.2.10 Treatment of neurons with compounds 45 3.2.11 Genomic DNA isolation 46 3.2.12 Polymerase-Chain Reaction (PCR) 46 3.2.13 Agarose gel electrophoresis 46 3.2.14 Plasmid DNA isolation 46 3.2.15 Lentiviral vector production 47 3.2.16 Lentiviral infection of human neurons 48 3.2.17 Protein isolation and quantification 48 3.2.18 Capillary electrophoresis 49 3.2.19 Axotomy 49 3.2.20 Immunostaining 50 3.2.21 Live cell imaging 51 3.2.22 Quantification of axonal trafficking using kymographs 52 3.2.23 Quantification of axonal trafficking using an object based method 53 3.2.24 Apotome imaging and quantification 54 3.2.25 Confocal imaging and quantification 54 3.2.26 Clinical and biomarker data collection 55 4 RESULTS 57 4.1 Establishing an axonal lysosomal trafficking assay 57 4.1.1 NPCs from LRRK2 G2019S patients and their respective isogenic controls differentiate into neurons 57 4.1.2 Axons can be spatially separated from soma and dendrites 60 4.1.3 Setting up the axonal trafficking assay 62 4.2 Axonal lysosomal trafficking assay detects LRRK2 G2019S associated changes in lysosome movement 65 4.3 Axonal lysosomal trafficking assay detects partial rescue by a small molecule LRRK2 inhibitor 71 4.4 LRRK2 G2019S is associated with an increase in the proportion of lysosomes co-localizing with phosphorylated Rab10 76 4.5 Rab10 over-expression mildly affects lysosomal trafficking in axons 78 4.6 Lysosomal membrane damage increases LRRK2-mediated Rab10 phosphorylation 81 4.7 LRRK2 G2019S is not associated with consistent effects on long-term axonal regrowth after axotomy 82 4.8 LRRK2 G2019S is associated with transient accumulation of lysosomes at the injury site after axotomy 86 4.9 Assessment of clinical, biomarker and genetic data from the LRRK2 G2019S patient donors 88 5 DISCUSSION 92 6 APPENDIX 101 7 SUMMARY 104 8 ZUSSAMENFASSUNG 106 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY 108 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 136 11 DECLARATIONS 138