ITC/USA 2005 Conference Proceedings / The Forty-First Annual International Telemetering Conference and Technical Exhibition / October 24-27, 2005 / Riviera Hotel & Convention Center, Las Vegas, Nevada / The terminal phase telemetry data acquisition has always been a challenging task especially for long and medium range test launches. The task becomes more complicated if the article under test describes a very low altitude cruise terminal phase trajectory. Generally, for long and medium range missions test fired into sea the terminal phase data is acquired by deploying instrumented ships in the vicinity of impact point but beyond the safety corridor. But for long range missions with low altitude cruise terminal phase trajectory and wide safety corridor this conventional approach will not work out because of limitation of LOS from the ship platforms. Hence, for such applications an air borne telemetry receiving system is also to be added to the down range instrumentation network. This paper describes a typical and cost effective air borne system realized utilizing the Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) products and technology. This paper also addresses as to how the signal scattering problems are tackled in the design implementation.

New automated vehicles have the chance of high improvements to road safety. Nevertheless, from today's perspective, accidents will always be a part of future mobility. Following the “Vision Zero”, this thesis proposes the quantification of the driving situation's criticality as the basis to intervene by newly integrated safety systems. In the example application of trajectory planning, a continuous, real-time, risk-based criticality measure is used to consider uncertainties by collision probabilities as well as technical accident severities. As result, a smooth transition between preventative driving, collision avoidance, and collision mitigation including impact point localization is enabled and shown in fleet data analyses, simulations, and real test drives. The feasibility in automated driving is shown with currently available test equipment on the testing ground. Systematic analyses show an improvement of 20-30 % technical accident severity with respect to the underlying scenarios. That means up to one-third less injury probability for the vehicle occupants. In conclusion, predicting the risk preventively has a high chance to increase the road safety and thus to take the “Vision Zero” one step further.:Abstract Acknowledgements Contents Nomenclature 1.1 Background 1.2 Problem statement and research question 1.3 Contribution 2 Fundamentals and relatedWork 2.1 Integral safety 2.1.1 Integral applications 2.1.2 Accident Severity 2.1.2.1 Severity measures 2.1.2.2 Severity data bases 2.1.2.3 Severity estimation 2.1.3 Risk assessment in the driving process 2.1.3.1 Uncertainty consideration 2.1.3.2 Risk as a measure 2.1.3.3 Criticality measures in automated driving functions 2.2 Operational motion planning 2.2.1 Performance of a driving function 2.2.1.1 Terms related to scenarios 2.2.1.2 Evaluation and approval of an automated driving function 2.2.2 Driving function architecture 2.2.2.1 Architecture 2.2.2.2 Planner 2.2.2.3 Reference planner 2.2.3 Ethical issues 3 Risk assessment 3.1 Environment model 3.2 Risk as expected value 3.3 Collision probability and most probable collision configuration 4 Accident severity prediction 4.1 Mathematical preliminaries 4.1.1 Methodical approach 4.1.2 Output definition for pedestrian collisions 4.1.3 Output definition for vehicle collisions 4.2 Prediction models 4.2.1 Eccentric impact model 4.2.2 Centric impact model 4.2.3 Multi-body system 4.2.4 Feedforward neural network 4.2.5 Random forest regression 4.3 Parameterisation 4.3.1 Reference database 4.3.2 Training strategy 4.3.3 Model evaluation 5 Risk based motion planning 5.1 Ego vehicle dynamic 5.2 Reward function 5.3 Tuning of the driving function 5.3.1 Tuning strategy 5.3.2 Tuning scenarios 5.3.3 Tuning results 6 Evaluation of the risk based driving function 6.1 Evaluation strategy 6.2 Evaluation scenarios 6.3 Test setup and simulation environment 6.4 Subsequent risk assessment of fleet data 6.4.1 GIDAS accident database 6.4.2 Fleet data Hamburg 6.5 Uncertainty-adaptive driving 6.6 Mitigation application 6.6.1 Real test drives on proving ground 6.6.2 Driving performance in simulation 7 Conclusion and Prospects References List of Tables List of Figures A Extension to the tuning process