Section 24J is regarded to be one of the most complex provisions in the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962. This study specifically focuses on the income tax treatment of section 24Jinstruments denominated in a foreign currency, specifically with regards to whether such instruments are fixed or variable rate instruments for purposes of section 24J and the interaction between section 24J, section 25D (foreign currency translation rules) and section 24I (gains and losses on foreign exchange transactions).The basic concepts surrounding the incurral and accrual of interest for income tax purposes, as well as of some of the general issues faced when section 24J is practically applied are discussed. Importantly it is found that although the definition of 'instrument' includes all debt instruments, regardless of whether such instruments are interest-bearing, the application of section 24J would have no impact on the issuer or holder of an instrument that is a non-interest bearing debt instrument. Also, the section 24J definition of 'interest' is wider than the common law meaning of the same term. However, as 'interest'is defined with reference to itself, the common law meaning is still very relevant. It is confirmed that section 24J poses various interpretational uncertainties which are especially highlighted when some of the key provisions of section 24J are applied in determining the interest accrual amounts based on the yield to maturity method. Applying the rules of statutory interpretation and with the aid of hypothetical examples, itis argued that foreign exchange rates would fall within the definition of a variable rate for purposes of section 24J. However, an instrument denominated in a foreign currency would be regarded as a fixed rate instrument to the extent that the amounts payable are fixed amounts specified in the applicable foreign currency or the calculation of the amount payable in the applicable foreign currency does not involve the application of a 'variable rate' (as defined).Further is it argued that section 24J merely provides for a single accrual or incurral event during each year of assessment in relation to each instrument. Therefore, where accrual amounts be denominated in a foreign currency it should be translated at the spot rate on the last day of the year of assessment (or on the date of redemption/transfer in the instance where the instrument was transferred/redeemed during the year of assessment) for purposes of determining the sum of the accrual amounts to be included in taxable income. It is also argued that the timing of the accrual and incurral of interest amounts in terms of section 24J is applied in establishing the 'transaction date' of the interest amount owing for purposes of determining 'exchange differences' at the end of any year of assessment in terms of section 24I.

From Introduction: This work considers the period from Union, 31 May 1910 until promulgation of the Income Tax Act No. 40 of 1925.(1) It will describe the means, both financial and otherwise, by which the fledgling Government of the Union of South Africa contrived to balance its budget, and will consider the various sources of revenue available up to 1914, when the Government of Gen. Louis Botha first decided that a tax on income was necessary in order to maintain the solvency of the new State. Similarly the political pressures which shaped the nature of the Income Tax Acts up to 1925 will be discussed, and the political principles (or expediencies, depending on the degree of cynicism of the reader) which led the parties in power from time to time to make the decisions they did regarding the provisions of the various Acts. The effect of external political situations such as the Great War of 1914 - 1918 will be examined, as will the consequences of the rebellion of 1914 and the strikes of 1913 and 1922. The legislation predictably spawned a considerable body of litigation as taxpayers hastened to find and exploit loopholes in it; the resultant Income Tax Cases, in the Income Tax Special Court, Supreme Court and Appeal Court, formed the embryo of a body of judicial precedent which today encompasses some two thousand case reports. A few of the cases decided in the period up to 1925 are still quoted today; for example, CIR v Lunnon 1924 AD 1 SATC 7. The relevant cases from the period will enjoy consideration, with descriptions of how their verdicts affected either subsequent income tax principles or later legislation. Also considered will be the inception during this period of the way in which income tax legislation largely develops: the legislature promulgates an Act, the taxpayers discover legitimate ways to reduce their tax burden and the Minister of Finance consequently causes the Act to be changed in order to protect the tax base. Thereupon the resolute taxpayers seek loopholes anew. The effect of economic conditions on income tax legislation will engage attention; several such conditions cast their shadows into the House of Assembly during that 15 year period, notably the post-war recession and the drought of 1919. The selection of this period is apposite for several reasons: it covers the period during which income tax legislation came into being; - it includes several notable political occurrences. thus making possible a consideration of their effect on income tax legislation; it includes a natural cataclysm. namely a major drought. which also had an effect on subsequent Income Tax Acts; - a sufficient number of income tax cases was heard during the period to afford a fair indication both of how the body of case law would develop and how it would perpetually interplay with the legislation; it clearly illustrates the differences between the two great political parties of the time, differences largely caused by the vested interests of each; the dominant South African Party, with its need to retain the support of the commercial and particularly the mining sectors, and the smaller but even then growing National Party with its face set firmly towards the rural constituencies and the embattled farmers; - the period culminates in the Income Tax Act of 1925, a significant change from its predecessors, and the second Income Tax Act of the Pact Government. The imposition of taxes by the respective provinces does not form part of this work, as the scope of the discussion is limited to the various Income Tax Acts, and their development has been overseen by the central government.

M.Com. / Please refer to full text to view abstract

D.Phil. (Taxation) / Any modern economy depends largely on taxation as a source of revenue and governments therefore realise the importance of having a willing taxpayer base. Many tax authorities use a compliance model to engage with taxpayers, in terms of which different strategies are used to encourage compliance, ranging from enforcement strategies on the one hand, to strategies of assisting taxpayers to comply, on the other. It is widely recognised in the literature that the majority of taxpayers are voluntarily tax compliant, but it appears that tax authorities place more emphasis on how they can enforce compliance than on how they can recognise those who are voluntarily compliant. The concept of voluntary compliance is not well defined in the literature and is commonly used in the sense of “compliance in the absence of an external enforcement action.” By means of an in-depth review of the literature from a socio-economic viewpoint, the present thesis aimed to define principles and also construct a framework for understanding voluntary tax compliance. It was found that voluntary tax compliance means the acceptance of a tax obligation by a taxpayer without having to be forced, driven by personal and internalised social norms, within a climate of trust between the taxpayer and tax authority. The framework for voluntary compliance was shown to consist of three dimensions: strong personal norms; internalised social norms; and a climate of high trust. Each dimension encompasses its own variables that also influence one another. Strategies used by tax authorities to encourage voluntary tax compliance were analysed with the aim of identifying strategies based on a power orientation, a service orientation, or a norm orientation. It was shown that different strategies influence different variables of the voluntary ii compliance framework, such as tax knowledge, fairness, trust, and ethical values. Through this analysis, principles for building a voluntary tax climate could be identified...

M.Com. / Please refer to full text to view abstract

M.Com. / The existence of a person is a prerequisite before any liability for tax can come into being. Some of the most successfultax avoidance schemes of the past few years have relied on this principle, but the legislator has now . apparently closed these loopholes by specifically bringing the trust and the deceased estate within the definition of a person as far as the taxability of these entities is concerned. The courts have, however, set the following general principles relating to the taxation of non-existent persons: (i) The existence of a person is an absolute prerequisite before liability for tax can come into being, nor can there be any representative taxpayer if there is no person to represent. (ii) An aggregate of assets and liabilities, although no legal persona, can to a limited extent take part in day to day economic activities. It is here argued that these principles may be applied to otherareas of the mercantile and private law, resulting in unforseen and beneficial consequences for the taxpayer. Section 35 of the Companies Act creates a possibility for a company to enter into contracts and acquire rights from these, even before being duly incorporated. The company, not being a legal persona before incorporation, would thus not be taxable on income it may receive or which may accrue to it up to the date of incorporation. At present, only two special tax court cases address the issue of pre-incorporation profits. Neither of the decisions handed down, however, reflects the above view, a situation which is highly unsatisfactory and supported by dubious authority. When proper consideration is given to the difference between a person professing to act as agent, and a person professing to act as trustee of a company not yet incorporated, the vesting of income andthe tax effects of retrospective contracts,it becomes clear thata real possibilityfor substantial tax savings does exist. South African writers on this subject are divided, some of them meekly accepting the present unsatisfactory situation, others acknowledging the obvious flaws in it, but declining to make definite suggestions as to how this issue should be approached. A human being becomes a legal persona at time of birth. The nasciturus fiction which stems from Roman law, provides that the rights to an inheritance are kept floating until birth of the nesduuus, to determine whether the nasciturus should share in the bequest. Depending on the interpretation of the legal effects of the nasciturus fiction, and the vesting of the right to income from the inheritance, there is a distinct possibility that liability for tax on income, until time of birth of the nasciturus, may altogether be avoided. Provisions similar to section 35 of the Companies Act and the nasciturus fiction also exist in foreign legal systems. It could, however, not be established how the tax implications resulting from the application of these legal fictions are accommodated within these systems.

M.Com. (SA & International Taxation) / South Africa is currently undergoing a political, economic and social transformation. Business organisations are being called upon to playa role in national reconstruction and development in South Africa. The African National Congress ("ANC") has made it clear that they will be far more prescriptive than the previous government on issues such as affirmative action and social upliftment practices required from employers. Business contributes towards socio-economic reconstruction through so-called 'Corporate Social Responsibility' ("CSR") programmes. A recent Business Marketing Intelligence ("BMI tI ) survey estimated that South African companies spend R840 million per annum on social upliftment programmes (Consultative Business Movement 1993:82)...

The Budget speech of 23 February 2000 by the Minister of Finance marked the introduction of significant changes to the income tax system of the Republic of South Africa (Republic). A residence-based system of taxation (RBT) was adopted for years of assessment commencing on or after 1 January 2001 and Capital Gains Tax (CGT) was introduced with effect from 1 October 2001. According to the 2000 Budget Review a move to a residence-based system would significantly broaden the tax base, limit opportunities for tax arbitrage and bring the tax system in line with generally accepted international practice. The relaxation of exchange controls for South African residents with effect from 1 July 1997 made it possible for residents to invest limited funds offshore. The Fifth Interim Report of the Katz Commission suggested that if exchange controls were relaxed, the taxation of active income should remain on a source basis, but that passive income should be taxed on a residence basis. As a result deemed source rules in the form of section 9C and 9D were introduced into the Act with effect from 1 July 1997 and applied to “investment income” as defined. Section 9C taxed investment income of both residents and non-residents (from activities carried on by a permanent establishment in the Republic). Section 9D taxed investment income of controlled foreign entities and investment income arising from donations, settlements or other dispositions in the hands of residents The taxation of foreign dividends with effect from 23 February 2000 as a first phase in the move to a residence based system, lead to the introduction of s 9E. Foreign Dividends were taxed in the hands of residents subject to certain exemptions. The basic interest exemption was extended to foreign dividends. Section 6quat was revised to extend the rebate to foreign dividends and profits of a company from which dividends were declared. Section 9D was amended to cater for foreign dividends received by or accrued to controlled foreign entities. The implementation of a full residence-based system of taxation with effect from years of assessment commencing on or after 1 January 2001 required amendments to various sections of the Income Tax Act as well as the introduction of new sections. A residence minus system was adopted which means that residents as defined are now taxed on their world- wide income with certain exemptions. Non-residents are taxed on their income from sources within or deemed to be within the Republic. The provisions relating to the taxation of foreign income of residents is complex; adding to the complexity is the fact that several changes have already been made to these provisions since the inception of the world-wide basis of taxation. The provisions must also be interpreted against the background of any double taxation agreement (DTA) between the Republic and the relevant foreign country as the applicable DTA may override the Republic domestic legislation. For purposes of this treatise the amending Acts enacted up to the end of December 2003 are taken into account. Hardly five years after the Katz commission of inquiry into the tax structure concluded that RBT and CGT were too complicated to be administered by SARS, the implementation of RBT and CGT were announced in the 2000 Budget. A detailed examination of the provisions relating to foreign income of residents as defined was undertaken. Interpretational issues to be clarified by legislation and certain planning issues are highlighted. It is essential to understand and carefully consider the Republic tax laws and the relevant double taxation agreements, for the successful application of the provisions. Careful planning before concluding transactions is of vital importance in order to avoid or minimize any unwanted tax consequences resulting from the RBT and CGT provisions.

The Budget speech of 23 February 2000 by the Minister of Finance marked the introduction of significant changes to the income tax system of the Republic of South Africa (Republic). A residence-based system of taxation (RBT) was adopted for years of assessment commencing on or after 1 January 2001 and Capital Gains Tax (CGT) was introduced with effect from 1 October 2001. According to the 2000 Budget Review a move to a residence-based system would significantly broaden the tax base, limit opportunities for tax arbitrage and bring the tax system in line with generally accepted international practice. The relaxation of exchange controls for South African residents with effect from 1 July 1997 made it possible for residents to invest limited funds offshore. The Fifth Interim Report of the Katz Commission suggested that if exchange controls were relaxed, the taxation of active income should remain on a source basis, but that passive income should be taxed on a residence basis. As a result deemed source rules in the form of section 9C and 9D were introduced into the Act with effect from 1 July 1997 and applied to “investment income” as defined. Section 9C taxed investment income of both residents and non-residents (from activities carried on by a permanent establishment in the Republic). Section 9D taxed investment income of controlled foreign entities and investment income arising from donations, settlements or other dispositions in the hands of residents. The taxation of foreign dividends with effect from 23 February 2000 as a first phase in the move to a residence based system, lead to the introduction of s 9E. Foreign Dividends were taxed in the hands of residents subject to certain exemptions. The basic interest exemption was extended to foreign dividends. Section 6quat was revised to extend the rebate to foreign dividends and profits of a company from which dividends were declared. Section 9D was amended to cater for foreign dividends received by or accrued to controlled foreign entities. The implementation of a full residence-based system of taxation with effect from years of assessment commencing on or after 1 January 2001 required amendments to various sections of the Income Tax Act as well as the introduction of new sections. A residence minus system was adopted which means that residents as defined are now taxed on their world- wide income with certain exemptions. Non-residents are taxed on their income from sources within or deemed to be within the Republic. The provisions relating to the taxation of foreign income of residents is complex; adding to the complexity is the fact that several changes have already been made to these provisions since the inception of the world-wide basis of taxation. The provisions must also be interpreted against the background of any double taxation agreement (DTA) between the Republic and the relevant foreign country as the applicable DTA may override the Republic domestic legislation. For purposes of this treatise the amending Acts enacted up to the end of December 2003 are taken into account. Hardly five years after the Katz commission of inquiry into the tax structure concluded that RBT and CGT were too complicated to be administered by SARS, the implementation of RBT and CGT were announced in the 2000 Budget. A detailed examination of the provisions relating to foreign income of residents as defined was undertaken. Interpretational issues to be clarified by legislation and certain planning issues are highlighted. It is essential to understand and carefully consider the Republic tax laws and the relevant double taxation agreements, for the successful application of the provisions. Careful planning before concluding transactions is of vital importance in order to avoid or minimize any unwanted tax consequences resulting from the RBT and CGT provisions.

A research report submitted to the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management at the University of Witwatersrand in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Commerce / E-commerce has become a significant part of the global economy and will continue to grow. However, e-commerce doesn’t only provide exceptional growth opportunities, but also creates considerable challenges in terms of taxation. Due to the nature of e-commerce, various commercial activities are carried out in cyberspace where trade is not confined by geographical boundaries. This study is motivated by the key importance of understanding the taxation landscape in a rapidly growing digital economy. In this study the impact of e-commerce on taxation is explored by means of a systematic literature review. The primary research question was: what is the impact of e-commerce on taxation? In order to address the research question, secondary questions were formulated to firstly attend to the broader tax challenges in a digital economy and to determine how these challenges lead to tax avoidance practices. Secondly, the impact of e-commerce on taxation was explored specifically in terms of the artificial avoidance of the permanent residence status. Thirdly, the prevention of artificial avoidance of the permanent residence status was reviewed as well as investigating what practices have been put in place by some countries to protect their tax bases. Based on the research question, the objective of this study was to explore and provide an overview of the existing literature to determine what the impact of ecommerce has been in terms of the challenges it poses to taxation. Due to the exploratory nature of the research, it was a qualitative study within the interpretivist paradigm. In this study, the aim was not to identify a specific theory, but rather to explore the existing literature and provide an overview of how e-commerce affects taxation within the framework of the primary and secondary research questions by means of systematic literature review. In terms of the findings, the broader tax challenges were identified as: nexus, data and value-creation, the characterisation of payments and the impact of highly digitised business models. It was further established that these challenges created an environment where significant tax avoidance practices are employed by highly digitised organisations. The key tax avoidance practices were identified as: avoiding withholding tax, the use of preferential tax regimes, artificial internal trading of intangibles, internal debt shifting, transfer pricing and avoiding taxable presence. This study has certain limitations, since the full domain of e-commerce and taxation is vast and complex and beyond the scope of a research report. Therefore, the key challenge that was explored is the artificial avoidance of the permanent residence status which is an issue that lies at the heart of the nexus issue since a PE normally requires some sort of physical presence which is not necessarily the case in the digital economy. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge as a useful assessment of the impact of e-commerce on the digital economy as well as the associated tax avoidance practices. Furthermore, in conducting the research, it became apparent to the researcher that South Africa has very limited exposure in the field of the tax challenges relating to e-commerce. This research could therefore provide some insight into some of the key tax challenges identified in the international arena and this study could provide a starting point from a South African perspective. / PH2020