Esta pesquisa busca compreender a constituição do movimento Campo de Públicas a partir do referencial teórico sobre identidade fornecido pela psicologia social. Num contexto de revigoramento da Administração Pública e de ampliação da oferta de matrículas nesses cursos, o movimento Campo de Públicas destaca-se como expressão de uma coletividade que se articula para o reconhecimento das particularidades da formação de gestores públicos. Trata-se de um estudo exploratório de natureza qualitativa. A partir do estudo da legislação que orienta a formação desses profissionais e dos referenciais fundamentais da ciência administrativa, a identidade pressuposta do administrador é traçada A parte empírica da pesquisa é desenvolvida a partir de entrevistas realizadas com integrantes do movimento Campo de Públicas, bacharéis em Administração, e analisadas com base na Análise de Conteúdo. Com base nessas entrevistas, a pesquisa evidencia que distinções significativas entre as identidades profissionais de administradores (de empresas) e administradores públicos foram um fator determinante para a constituição do movimento e o posicionamento de negação dessa identidade foi fundamental para o ingresso dos entrevistados no movimento. O Campo de Públicas foi também associado à ideia de paradigma emergente apresentado por Keinert (2000). De acordo com os resultados da pesquisa, o movimento pode ser considerado uma evidência da consolidação do Paradigma Emergente apontado por Keinert (2000). Constatou-se que a natureza da identidade coletiva em construção é uma identidade de resistência à imposição de referenciais típicos da ciência administrativa hegemônica. Todavia o movimento sinaliza em direção à construção de uma identidade de projeto, ancorada na multiplicidade da formação de seus atores e na possibilidade de construção de referencias multidisciplinares, que possam orientar a formação de gestores públicos ou até mesmo a constituição de uma identidade própria para a administração pública brasileira. / This research aims to understand the moviment constitution from the Field of Public by the theoretical framework of identity provided by social psychology. In a context of strengthening of public administration and increasing the supply of enrollments in these courses, the moviment Field of Public stands out as a collective expression of which is linked to the recognition of the peculiarities of the formation of public managers. This is an exploratory qualitative study. From the study of the legislation that guides the formation of these Professionals and of the fundamental references of administrative science, the assumed identity of the administrator is drawn. The empirical part of the research is developed from interviews with members of the moviment Field of Public bachelors in business administration and analyzed using the Content Analysis tecnique. Based on these interviews, the research shows that significant distinctions between the identities of professional administrators (from companies) and public administrators were a determining factor for the formation of the movement and positioning of denial of this identity was crucial for the respondents entrance in the moviment. The Field of Public was also associated with the idea of emergent paradigm presented by Keinert (2000). According to the survey results, the movement can be taken as na evidence from the consolidation of the Emerging Paradigm pointed by Keinert (2000). It was found that the nature of collective identity construction is an identity of resistance to the imposition of typical benchmarks of hegemonic administrative science. Although the moviment points toward the construction of a project identity, anchored in the multiplicity of the formation of its actors and in the possibility of building multidisciplinary referrals, which can guide the public managers formation or even the creation of an identity for the Brazilian public administration.

Mon doctorat porte sur les objets de parure de l'aire atlantique méridionale de l’Europe (Portugal, Nord de l'Espagne, Aquitaine méridionale) du premier âge du Fer (VIIIe – Ve siècles avant J.-C.). Longtemps considérés comme de simples traceurs chronologiques, et parfois appréciés pour leur seul caractère somptuaire, ils n'ont, pour l'heure, jamais fait l'objet d'un travail de synthèse. J’ai orienté mon investigation selon deux trajectoires : d'une part, prendre en compte l'ensemble des objets de parure, quel que soit le matériau et, d'autre part, engager une étude sur les interactions artistiques des Pyrénées à l’Atlantique. Une telle démarche peut aujourd'hui être entreprise grâce aux données archéologiques récentes valorisées dans des monographies régionales et dans les travaux portant sur la paléo-ethnogénèse des peuples de la péninsule Ibérique.La première étape de la recherche consiste à rassembler et ordonner le corpus des parures fabriquées par les ateliers nord-péninsulaires et aquitains sous la forme d'un catalogue raisonné. L'angle d'approche privilégié dans ce travail est l’analyse du style dans le but de différencier les parures locales des importations. Cette démarche est associée à une analyse spatiale, temporelle et fonctionnelle afin d'établir des aires de répartition stylistiques et des réseaux de circulation. À partir des continuités et les variations de style établies d'une aire à l'autre, la question des échanges d'art est mise en perspective avec les motivations identitaires, socio-culturelles et économiques des sociétés protohistoriques. En effet, une approche globale de ce mobilier ne pouvait faire l’impasse sur son mode d’expression qu’il se rapporte à l’identité individuelle ou collective. J’ai abordé cette question selon deux angles d’approche : la première appréhende la manière dont une communauté donnée construit un discours identitaire par rapport à ses voisins alors que la seconde interroge la manière dont l’individu structure son rapport à l’autre en utilisant tel ou tel ornement. / My PhD thesis deals with the personal ornaments of the South Atlantic area (Portugal, northern Spain, southern Aquitaine) of the first Iron Age (8th - 5th centuries BC). Long regarded as simple chronological tracers, and sometimes only appreciated for their sumptuary character, they have, for now, never been subject to a synthesis work. My investigation focused on two directions: first, to take into account all the personal ornaments, regardless of types and materials and, then, to initiate a study on the artistic interaction from the Pyrenees to the Atlantic. This approach can now be undertaken through recent archaeological evidence recovered in regional studies and researches on the paleo-ethnogenesis of Iberian Peninsula communities. The first step in the research is to collect and order the corpus of personal adornments made by the north-peninsular and Aquitanian workshops to provide a descriptive catalogue. The strategy chosen is a stylistic analysis in order to differentiate the local production from the importations. This method is associated with a spatial, temporal and functional analysis in order to establish stylistic areas and traffic networks. From stylistic continuities and changes established from one area to another, the question of art exchanges is put into perspective with identity, socio-economic and cultural-historic societies motivations. Therefore, a global approach to these personal ornaments could not overlook its mode of expression whether it refers to the individual or collective identity. I have discussed this issue from two angles: the first apprehend how a given community build its identity in relation to its neighbors while the second asks how one person makes its individual identity in its relationship with others in using a particular ornament.