近年來高等教育逐漸重視資訊素養教育，各大學校院陸續以通識課程的形式開設資訊素養課程，期望在通識教育之精神下，培育學生具備問題解決的能力，並能有效地與人溝通合作。然而，我國目前資訊素養通識課程，在各個學校的開設有不同的名稱，且不同教師所教授的資訊素養課程內容亦有所分歧；這些課程都是以提升學生資訊素養能力為教學目標，若能發展具有共識的課程內容、尋覓適當的教學方式，應有助於協助教師規劃課程，改善大學生整體的資訊素養。 　　本研究之目的即在探討目前資訊素養課程開設之情形，以及授課教師對課程規劃之看法，以提出資訊素養通識課程規劃之建議。本研究對我國九十七學年度資訊素養通識課程進行內容分析，瞭解資訊素養通識課程開設之現況；並透過問卷和訪談調查資訊素養課程授課教師之教學模式與評量方法。 　　經調查顯示，大學校院資訊素養通識課程開課數量較往年有所成長，資訊素養教育已愈來愈受學校重視。而資訊素養通識課程名稱相當多元，課程內容以「查找資訊資源」為資訊素養課程主要的核心，但亦包含建立知識背景、評估資訊資源等內容，較以往的課程更重視資訊的組織與呈現，以及資訊倫理和法律議題。而從授課教師教學型態中發現，資訊素養課程已開始朝向數位學習發展，教師亦運用多樣化的教學活動與教材規劃課程，並從知識、技能與態度面來評量學生學習成果。 　　由研究結果歸納建議，大學校院資訊素養通識課程在開設方面，應由通識教育中心主動規劃，且可與圖書館共同合作發展課程，將其納入整個教學人力和資源；在課程規劃方面，教師可以「圖書館和資訊素養」為課程名稱，並依《高等教育資訊素養能力標準》為目標彈性設計課程、開發問題導向式學習教材、善用數位學習教材輔助教學，並以數位學習認證規範開發課程與教材；在評量方面可透過學習歷程檔案來評量學生學習成果。最後，應建立資訊素養教材資源交流的平台，互相分享資訊素養課程教材，做為推動資訊素養教育之管道。 / In recent years, information literacy education has gained more and more attention in higher education. Some universities offer courses about information literacy in general education program. With the spirit of general education, these information literacy courses enable students to solve problems independently, as well as communicate and cooperate with others efficiently. However, currently, each university adopts different course names for information literacy courses and each teacher teaches in different ways. Since the aims of these courses are to build up information literacy ability of students, a consensus on the course content and developing suitable teaching methods will help teachers in designing information literacy courses and effectively improve students’ information literacy skills. The purpose of this study is to explore the current situation of information literacy courses and to understand teachers’ perspectives on course design, and further make suggestions on information literacy courses planning. This study analyzed the information literacy course contents in general education program of 2008 School Year in Taiwan, and investigated teachers’ teaching model and assessment methods through questionnaires and interviews. Findings show that the numbers of information literacy courses have been increased than that in last year and information literacy course has gotten more attention in universities. The names of information literacy courses are diverse. The contents of information literacy courses mostly focus on information searching, but also emphasize on building background knowledge, evaluating information sources, organizing and presenting information, and recognizing issues of information ethics and information laws. The instructional patterns of information literacy courses have been moved toward e-learning style. Teachers use various activities and materials to design courses, and evaluate students’ learning performance in terms of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Based on the results, this study suggests that: (1) General education center should offer information literacy courses initiatively. (2) Teachers could cooperate with the library to develop information literacy courses. (3) Use “Library and Information Literacy” as the course name. (4) Designing courses flexibly based on the “Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education”. (5) Developing problem-based learning materials. (6) Use e-learning materials to support teaching. (7) Developing courses and teaching materials in accordance with the e-Learning Quality Certification. (8) Use portfolio to assess students’ learning performance. (9) Establishing an information exchange platform to share the resources of information literacy.