As constantes alterações sociais acabam implicando alterações nos valores dominantes de um ordenamento jurídico e mesmo na mudança de função e significado de muitos institutos. Dentre os institutos que mais verificaram alteração de conteúdo, está a coisa julgada. Nessa linha, após a segunda grande guerra, verificaram-se profundas alterações sociais, jurídicas e culturais, de forma que novas demandas passaram a ser analisadas pelo Poder Judiciário. Em decorrência disso, ganhou especial destaque o controle de constitucionalidade das leis, capítulo adicional à história da limitação dos poderes, e o processo constitucional. Dessa forma, institutos tradicionais do direito processual com determinada função e estrutura, como a coisa julgada, necessitam ter sua compatibilidade analisada com outros novos, criados a partir das novas necessidades da sociedade. Assim, no presente trabalho, em um primeiro momento, buscou-se estabelecer a função e a estrutura da coisa julgada, levantando-se contradições existentes na doutrina. No segundo capítulo, aplicaram-se as premissas estabelecidas na primeira parte, ao controle de constitucionalidade por exceção e por meio de ação, sempre a partir de uma visão funcionalista dos mesmos. Enquanto no controle de constitucionalidade por via de exceção não se encontrou qualquer dificuldade de harmonia com a coisa julgada, pois a questão constitucional não é o tema central da análise do juiz, o mesmo não ocorreu com o controle por via de ação. Nessa modalidade de controle, dadas as suas características e funções, conclui-se pela inexistência da coisa julgada, sob pena de se colocar em risco o desenvolvimento constitucional da ordem brasileira, pois a certeza jurídica estabelecida pela coisa julgada torna muito difícil, senão impossível, a alteração de entendimento sobre determinada questão constitucional. / The continual social changes introduce changes into the chief values of a legal system and even modify the meaning and function of many institutes. Among the legal institutes that has suffered the most from such modifications is res iudicata. After the Second World War, deep social, legal and cultural changes were observed, so that new claims were examined by the courts. In consequence judicial review of legislation, an additional chapter to the history of the limitation of the powers, and the constitutional process have obtained great attention. Therefore, traditional institutes of procedural law with a particular function and structure, such as res judicata, must have their compatibility with other, new institutes, created by the new needs of society, analysed. Thus in this paper we first tried to determine the function and structure of res judicata, raising contradictions found in the work of legal scholars. In the second chapter, we applied the principles laid in the first part to the issue of judicial review by exception and by action from a functionalist perspective. While we did face any difficulty to harmonise res judicata with judicial review by exception, since in this case the constitutional issue is not the primary subject analysis by the court, the same did not occur with control by action. When it comes to this class of control, given its features and functions, we concluded that there was no place for res judicata, under penalty of endangering the constitutional Brazilian order development, because legal certainty established by res judicata makes it very difficult, if not impossible, to change the understanding of certain constitutional issue.

A tese de Doutorado analisa a proposta de criação de um incidente de inconstitucionalidade no âmbito do controle concreto brasileiro, lidando com o debate legislativo e doutrinário a respeito do tema. Tem por objetivo contextualizar a ferramenta na atual discussão da fiscalização de constitucionalidade, sendo examinadas as suas principais vantagens e críticas. Ademais, além da defesa da criação de um incidente de inconstitucionalidade como classe autônoma processada no Supremo Tribunal Federal por meio da inovação contida na Proposta de Emenda Constitucional nº 406/01, a tese propõe o surgimento de um Cadastro Nacional de Decisões de Inconstitucionalidade, de responsabilidade do Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Por fim, o trabalho de pesquisa defende a reunião de ambas as inovações como instrumentos capazes de gerar o aperfeiçoamento da singular pluralidade que caracteriza a Jurisdição Constitucional no Brasil. / This research analyzes the proposal to create an incident of unconstitutionality under Brazilian judicial review, dealing with legislative and doctrinal debate about the issue. It aims to understand the tool in the current discussion of judicial review, and explores its advantages and problems. Moreover, beyond the creation of an incident of unconstitutionality as a separate procedural class by Constitutional Amendment Project nº 406/01, this research proposes the development of a National Data of Unconstitutional Decisions, associated to the National Council of Justice. Finally, the study supports both innovations as tools to promote improvement of judicial review in Brazil and its natural plurality, which is a regular feature in Brazilian Constitutional framework.

n/a

Thesis (M. Phil.)--University of Hong Kong, 2006. / Title proper from title frame. Also available in printed format.

none

This article releases of Constitutional Interpretation No.613 of Grand Justices, Judicial Yuan.Discussion jurisdiction and legislative power of separation of power boundary.Judicial review since U.S.A.'s Marbury v.s Madison case is developed in 1803 .Safeguards the people's basic right not the illegal violation.The most countries introduces for the world. Grand Justices enjoy the good name of ¡§the constitution protector¡¨.Is only short of the public opinion to be authorized and counter-majoritarian diffculty, Causes the democratic validity to be subject to the question, between ¡§the judicature is positive¡¨ and ¡§the judicature is negative¡¨,it is become Judicial review development mechanism the important topic. Administration, legislation and judicial is also known as trias politica, Performing its own functions, doctrine of separation of powers for most important constitutional government principle, The Congress direct gathering people meaning indicated that.Is on behalf of the Popular Sovereignty for State agency, three read through the law, suffers unexpectedly declares invalid, and has the abstract standard potency, sends the Judicial review from ¡§the constitutional interpreter¡¨ to become ¡§the legislator¡¨ or ¡§framers of constitution¡¨ the negative appraisal. This article advocated that the Judicial review should distinguish the people's basic right or the pure institution in advance disputes and so on, is safeguarding the people's basic right case, should involve positively, being suitable of the non-judicial self-restraint principle. The Judicial review should not take the doctrine of political question the separation of power the only boundary, should accumulate the case type, develops standard of the difference, avoids fording into the pure institution jurisdiction dispute. Constitutional Interpretation article should not ¡§the legalization¡¨, be supposed to establish the mechanism of ¡§retires after meritorious service¡¨.

<p>In this project, I examine why the judicial authority of the United States Supreme Court has increased. I propose a theoretical explanation of endogenous institutional change at the Court whereby the actions of the Court---specifically its decisions and the opinions in which it announces those decisions---have, over the long-run, altered the structures of the American separation-of-powers system. The Court has built up public support for the institution of judicial review to such a degree that its rulings are respected even when opposed by strong political actors---including the public. I evaluate this theory by analyzing three important transitional periods of Supreme Court history. The first case study explores the Court under Chief Justice John Marshall, and examines how the Court established judicial review as the most important means of constitutional interpretation. The second case study explores the Court's first cases interpreting the three Reconstruction Amendments, and shows that through these decisions the Court established itself as the arbiter of the meaning of these new amendments. The third case study looks at the Court's decision to hear reapportionment cases and its articulation of the political question doctrine that provided a legalistic method of expanding the political power of the Court. I conclude from these case studies that my theory provides a useful explanation for the expansion of judicial authority.</p> / Dissertation

Thesis (S.J.D.)--University of Toronto, 2004. / Adviser: David Dyzenhaus. Includes bibliographical rererences.

Thesis (M.L.I.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.), Political Science--University of Central Oklahoma, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 54-56).