No description available.

Remedial ground densification is commonly used to reduce the liquefaction susceptibility of loose, saturated sand deposits, wherein controlled liquefaction is typically induced as the first step in the densification process. Assuming that the extent of induced liquefaction is approximately equal to the extent of ground densification, the purpose of this research is to assess the feasibility of using earthquake liquefaction data in remedial ground densification design via energy-based concepts. The energy dissipated by frictional mechanisms during the relative movement of sand grains is hypothesized to be directly related to the ability of a soil to resist liquefaction (i.e., Capacity). This hypothesis is supported by energy-based pore pressure generation models, which functionally relate dissipated energy to residual excess pore pressures. Assuming a linearized hysteretic model, a "simplified" expression is derived for computing the energy dissipated in the soil during an earthquake (i.e., Demand). Using this expression, the cumulative energy dissipated per unit volume of soil and normalized by the initial mean effective confining stress (i.e., normalized energy demand: NED) is calculated for 126 earthquake case histories for which the occurrence or non-occurrence of liquefaction is known. By plotting the computed NED values as a function of their corresponding SPT penetration resistance, a correlation between the normalized energy capacity of the soil (NEC) and SPT penetration resistance is established by the boundary giving a reasonable separation of the liquefaction / no liquefaction data points. NEC is the cumulative energy dissipated per unit volume of soil up to initial liquefaction, normalized by the initial mean effective confining stress, and the NEC correlation with SPT penetration resistance is referred to as the Capacity curve. Because the motions induced during earthquake shaking and remedial ground densification significantly differ in amplitude, duration, and frequency content, the dependency of the derived Capacity curve on the nature of the loading needs to be established. Towards this end, the calibration parameters for energy-based pore pressure generation models are examined for their dependence on the amplitude of the applied loading. The premise being that if the relationship between dissipated energy and pore pressure generation is independent of the amplitude of loading, then the energy required to generate excess pore pressures equal to the initial effective confining stress should also be independent of the load amplitude. However, no conclusive statement could be made from results of this review. Next, first order numerical models are developed for computing the spatial distribution of the energy dissipated in the soil during treatment using the vibratory probe method, deep dynamic compaction, and explosive compaction. In conjunction with the earthquake-derived Capacity curves, the models are used to predict the spatial extent of induced liquefaction during soil treatment and compared with the predicted spatial extent of improvement using empirical expressions and guidelines. Although the proposed numerical models require further validation, the predicted extent of liquefaction and improvement are in very good agreement, thus giving credence to the feasibility of using the Capacity curve for remedial ground densification design. Although further work is required to develop energy-based remedial densification design procedures, the potential benefits of such procedures are as follows. By using the Capacity curve, the minimum dissipated energy required for successful treatment of the soil can be determined. Because there are physical limits on the magnitude of the energy that can be imparted by a given technique, such an approach may lead to improved feasibility assessments and initial designs of the densification programs. / Ph. D.

The assessment of the shear strength of soil deposits after the occurrence of large strains is an important issue for geotechnical engineers. One method for doing so, the steady state approach, is based on the assumption that the steady state undrained shear strength is a unique function of the in situ void ratio and effective stress. This method, which has been applied to liquefaction and flow failures, has been criticized because it may overestimate the in situ shear strength. The key to the steady state approach is accurate determination of the relationship between void ratio and effective stress at steady state. This is typically accomplished using conventional isotropically consolidated undrained (ICU) triaxial tests. The triaxial test was developed for measuring peak strengths, which typically occur at small strains, but steady state conditions typically occur at much larger strains. At large strain levels, the suitability of conventional triaxial testing procedures and error corrections is uncertain. The measured response at large strains may be inaccurate due to the influence of various testing errors. Furthermore, the true material response in the test specimen at large strains may not accurately represent in situ material behavior at large strains. This research effort consisted of an experimental and analytical study to examine the validity of steady state undrained shear strength determination using conventional ICU triaxial tests. The analytical study addressed triaxial testing errors and conventional corrections that are applied to test data and their influence on the measured steady state parameters. Finite element analyses were conducted to investigate the influence of variations in restraint at the end platens on stress distributions in the sample and measured stress-strain response. The finite element analyses incorporated axisymmetric interface elements to model the friction characteristics between the end platens and the specimen ends. The experimental study focused on several sands that are susceptible to liquefaction. An interface direct shear test program was conducted in order to evaluate various schemes for reducing end platen friction. ICU triaxial tests were conducted on each material using both conventional and lubricated end platens. / Ph. D.

The 2010-2011 Canterbury, New Zealand, Earthquake Sequence (CES) resulted in a liquefaction dataset of unprecedented size and quality, presenting a truly unique opportunity to assess and improve the efficacy of liquefaction-analytics in the field. Towards this end, the study presented herein develops and analyzes a database of 10,000 high-quality liquefaction case histories resulting from the CES. The objectives of these analyses are varied, but underlying each is the desire to more accurately assess liquefaction hazard for civil infrastructure (i.e., to predict both the occurrence and damage-potential of soil liquefaction). Major contributions from this work include, but are not limited to: (1) the Liquefaction Potential Index (LPI), the state-of-practice framework for assessing liquefaction hazard, is shown to produce erroneous predictions for a significant percentage of the assessed case histories; (2) the cause of poor predictions is rigorously investigated and specific shortcomings of the LPI framework are identified; (3) based on the limitations identified, and using insights from historical data, a revised liquefaction hazard framework is developed; and (4) the revised framework is shown to assess liquefaction hazard more efficiently relative to both LPI and a competing alternative framework newly proposed in the literature. Ultimately, significant room for improvement remains with respect to accurate assessment of liquefaction hazard. The findings presented in this dissertation thus form the basis for future development of a further-improved framework. Moreover, a methodology is proposed by which improvements can be measured in a standardized and objective manner. / Ph. D.

M.S.

M.S.

M.S.

Liquefaction ls a phenomenon where a saturated soil can temporarily lose its shear strength during an earthquake as a result of the development of excess pore pressures. For the past 25 years since Iiquefaction phenomenon was first explained, it was thought to be mainly a problem with clean sand, and most of the research has focused on these soils. However, as case history information has come to light, it has become apparent that silty sands are commonly involved, and in some cases even silts. This has generated a need for knowledge about the response of silty sands and silts under seismic loading. Related to this issue is the question of how best to determine the Iiquefaction resistance of these soils in a practical setting. This research has the objectives of providing an understanding of the behavior of saturated silty sands under seismic loading, and developing a rational basis for the use of the Cone Penetration Test (CPT) to predict Iiquefaction resistance in these materials. The study is primarily experimental, relying on laboratory and field testing and the use of a unique, large scale calibration chamber. The calibration chamber allows the field environment to be duplicated in the laboratory where conditions can be closely controlled and accurately defined. One of the first problems to be overcome in the research was to determine how to prepare specimens of silty sands that would reasonably duplicate field conditions in both the small scale of the conventional laboratory tests, and the large scale of the calibration chamber. Out of four different methods explored, consolidation from a slurry proved to be best. Two silty sands were located which had the desired characteristics for the study. Field work, involving both the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and CPT was done as part of this investigation. The behavior of the silty sands were determined in the laboratory from monotonic and cyclic loading tests. The test results show that the effect of fines is to reduce the cone penetration resistance, but not to affect the liquefaction resistance. The steady state shear strength of the soils seems to be correlated to the cone tip resistance, however, this correlation shows a higher steady state shear strength than those back figured from case history data. The results were also used to define state parameters for both of the soils tested. The state parameter was found to be a reliable index to the liquefaction potential and further study in this area is recommended. / Ph. D.

Earthquake-induced liquefaction of saturated soils and seismic compression of unsaturated soils are major sources of hazard to infrastructure, as attested by the wholesale condemnation of neighborhoods surrounding Christchurch, New Zealand. The hazard continues to grow as cities expand into liquefaction- and seismic compression-susceptible areas hence accurate evaluation of both hazards is essential. The liquefaction evaluation procedure presented herein is based on dissipated energy and an SPT liquefaction/no-liquefaction case history database. It is as easy to implement as existing stress-based simplified procedures. Moreover, by using the dissipated energy of the entire loading time history to represent the demand, the proposed procedure melds the existing stress-based and strain-based liquefaction procedures in to a new, robust method that is capable of evaluating liquefaction susceptibility from both earthquake and non-earthquake sources of ground motion. New relationships for stress reduction coefficient (r_d) and number of equivalent cycles ($n_{eq}$) are also presented herein. The r_d relationship has less bias and uncertainty than other common stress reduction coefficient relationships, and both the $n_{eq}$ and $r_d$ relationships are proposed for use in active tectonic and stable continental regimes. The $n_{eq}$ relationship proposed herein is based on an alternative application of the Palmgren-Miner damage hypothesis, shifting from the existing high-cycle, low-damage fatigue framework to a low-cycle framework more applicable to liquefaction analyses. Seismic compression is the accrual of volumetric strains caused by cyclic loading, and presented herein is a "non-simplified" model to estimate seismic compression. The proposed model is based on a modified version of the Richart-Newmark non-linear cumulative damage hypothesis, and was calibrated from the results of drained cyclic simple shear tests. The proposed model can estimate seismic compression from any arbitrary strain time history. It is more accurate than other "non-simplified" seismic compression estimation models over a greater range of volumetric strains and can be used to compute number-of-equivalent shear strain cycles for use in "simplified" seismic compression models, in a manner consistent with seismic compression phenomenon. / Ph. D.

Magnitude Scaling Factors (MSF) account for the durational effects of strong ground shaking on the inducement of liquefaction within the simplified liquefaction evaluation procedure which is the most commonly used approach for assessing liquefaction potential worldwide. Within the context of the simplified procedure, the spatial variation in the seismic demand imposed on the soil traditionally has been assumed to be solely a function of the spatial variation of the peak amplitude of the ground motions and the characteristics of the soil profile. Conversely, MSF have been solely correlated to earthquake magnitude. This assumption fails to appreciate the inverse correlation between the peak amplitude of ground motions and strong ground motion duration, and thus MSF would seemingly vary spatially. The combination of well-documented liquefaction response during the Darfield and Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquakes, densely-recorded ground motions for the events, and detailed subsurface characterization provides an unprecedented opportunity to investigate the significance of the spatial variation of MSF on the inducement of liquefaction. Towards this end, MSF were computed at 15 strong motion recording station sites across Christchurch and its surroundings using two established approaches. Trends in the site and spatial variation of the MSF computed for both the Darfield and Christchurch earthquakes are scrutinized and their implications on liquefaction evaluations are discussed. / Master of Science