Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.

Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.

Marie, le paradigme de foi de la Nouvelle Alliance Luc exprime sa théologie à travers la narration, rendant l'analyse de ses techniques narratives fort utile pour découvrir les thèmes de son œuvre ainsi que les relations entre eux. L'analyse narrative est particulièrement fructueuse dans les deux premiers chapitres du troisième évangile, sept épisodes entrelacés de matériel exclusif à l'auteur, connu comme le « prologue de l'enfance ». Racontant les naissances parallèles de Jean et de Jésus, ce prologue relie les deux Testaments, montrant que ces naissances miraculeuses sont le début de l'accomplissement des promesses anciennes. Celles-ci annonçaient les ministères de Jean et de Jésus dans lesquels les promesses s'accompliraient pleinement. Ces récits sont structurés par un cadre de promesses et d'accomplissements auquel les acteurs humains répondent selon divers degrés de foi et d'interprétation juste. Non seulement le prologue met-il en valeur l'action divine, la gloire et l'humilité paradoxale de l'incarnation, mais on y retrouve aussi l'axe de la réponse humaine. En effet, tout comme la réponse de foi d'Abraham à la promesse divine fait de lui le père de la première Alliance, la réponse de foi de Marie à une promesse sans précédent et encore plus impossible fait d'elle le modèle de croyant de la Nouvelle Alliance. Dans la seconde phase du prologue, Marie demeure modèle par son choix de méditer. À travers plusieurs techniques narratives, l'évangéliste invite le lecteur à s'identifier à ce personnage humble et empathique. Entourée d'une constellation d'anciens vénérables, dignes représentants du meilleur de l'Ancienne Alliance (Zacharie, Élizabeth, Siméon et Anne) la jeune Marie brille comme le paradigme du croyant de la Nouvelle Alliance qui reconnaît la grâce de Dieu, embrasse sa promesse et médite longtemps sur tout ce qui la bouleverse et l'émerveille de l'action divine, la repassant et la conservant dans son cœur. / Mary, the paradigm of the New Testament believer Luke expresses his theology through narration, making close attention to his narrative techniques essential to discover both his major themes and the relations between them. Narrative criticism is particularly useful in the first two chapters of the third gospel, seven interwoven episodes of material exclusive to this gospel, known as Luke's "infancy prologue". Recounting the parallel births of John and Jesus, the prologue looks both back to the Old Covenant hopes and forward to the ministries of John and Jesus to show that these births are answers to the ancient promises. The stories of John and Jesus are structured around a framework of promise and fulfillment to which human actors respond with varying degrees of faith and correct interpretation. In addition to showcasing divine visitation, and the paradoxical glory and humility of the incarnation, the prologue develops the axis of the human response. Just as Abraham's response of faith to the divine promise makes him the father of the covenant people, so Mary's response of faith to an even more impossible and unprecedented promise makes her the first of the new covenant people. Mary's faith shines brightly after Zachariah's doubt; it is praised by spirit-filled prophecy, expressed in song. In the second phase of the prologue, through several narrative techniques, the narrator invites identification with this humble and empathetic character, especially in her choice to ruminate what she cannot fathom. Surrounded by a constellation of venerable elders, representatives of the best of the Old Covenant--Zechariah, Elisabeth, Simeon and Anne--young Mary shines as the believer of the New Covenant who recognizes the undeserved favour of God, embraces his promise and chooses to treasure all that amazes and overwhelms her of divine action in her life.

Na bibliografia brasileira, Jean-Luc Godard aparece com destaque em pesquisas sobre o cinema brasileiro moderno e sobre a história da censura cinematográfica no país. O realizador franco-suíço é descrito como uma referência fundamental para alguns cineastas brasileiros modernos, como um norteador dos debates travados em nossa crítica e como um objeto de atenção especial por parte dos censores da ditadura militar. Partindo desse lugar privilegiado conferido a Godard, esta pesquisa investigou historicamente a recepção e a interdição dos filmes do cineasta no Brasil no período entre 1961 e 1970. Em um primeiro momento (capítulos 1 a 3), analisamos os debates estéticos e políticos suscitados na crítica pelos filmes de Godard em três jornais de grande veiculação do período (Correio da manhã, Jornal do Brasil e O Estado de S. Paulo); em seguida (capítulo 4), identificamos as apropriações que os críticos-cineastas Glauber Rocha e Rogério Sganzerla realizaram da obra godardiana em seus escritos; e, por fim (capítulo 5), abordamos a documentação censória relativa aos filmes do realizador. Dessa maneira, constatamos o importante papel que Godard desempenhou na conformação do cinema brasileiro moderno, bem como o impacto que sua obra exerceu, cultural e politicamente, no país. Conforme evidenciaremos, naquele momento havia uma conjuntura sociocultural modernista, de esquerda e jovem que favoreceu a recepção do cineasta no Brasil. Ao mesmo tempo em que foi lida à luz de tal conjuntura, a obra godardiana atuou enquanto seu catalisador, estimulando novos projetos e debates em seu interior. O cineasta foi instrumentalizado por projetos de vanguarda no cinema e em ouras artes, estimulou a politização de esquerda e dialogou com os anseios de uma cultura jovem e libertária em expansão. Paralelamente, confirmamos a atenção especial que Godard recebeu dos censores da ditadura militar brasileira. Afinal, a ditadura se opunha a tal conjuntura e, por isso, viu no cineasta um perigo a ser combatido, uma vez que seus filmes atentavam contra os dois pilares básicos da ideologia que norteava o regime, o anticomunismo e a moral conservadora. Conforme demonstraremos, tal atenção especial se deu sobretudo nos anos 1970, mas teve suas raízes em 1968, quando duas películas de Godard foram interditadas e uma imagem extremamente negativa do realizador foi consolidada no órgão censório. / In the Brazilian literature, Jean-Luc Godard appears prominently in researches on modern Brazilian cinema and on the history of cinematographic censorship in the country. The Franco-Swiss director is described as a fundamental reference for some modern Brazilian filmmakers; as a guiding force on the debates held within our critique; and as an object of special attention by the censors of the military dictatorship. From this privileged place conferred to Godard, this research historically investigated the reception and interdiction of his films, in Brazil, between 1961 and 1970. First (Chapters 1 to 3), we analyze the aesthetic and political debates raised in criticism of Godard\'s films in three major newspapers of the given period (Correio da manhã, Jornal do Brasil and O Estado de S. Paulo). Then (Chapter 4), we identify the appropriations of the Godardian word made by the critical-filmmakers Glauber Rocha and Rogério Sganzerla. Finally (Chapter 5), we approach the censorship documentation relating to the director\'s films. Our findings showed the important role Godard played in the conformation of modern Brazilian cinema, as well as the impact that his work exerted, culturally and politically, in the country. As we will show, the socio-cultural context of the time modernist, leftist and youthful favored the filmmakers reception in Brazil. At the same time as it was read in the light of such a conjuncture, Godard\'s work acted as a catalyst for it, stimulating new projects and debates within. The filmmaker was instrumented by avant-garde projects in the cinema and in other arts, and then stimulated the politicization of the left and dialogued with the yearnings of a young and libertarian culture in expansion. We also found evidence of the special attention that Godard received from the censors of the Brazilian military dictatorship. Opposed to the referred conjuncture, the dictatorship saw in the filmmaker a danger to be fought, since his films were against the two basic pillars of the regime: anticommunism and conservative morality. As we will show, he received such special attention mainly in the 1970s, but it had its roots in 1968 when two of Godard\'s films were banned and an extremely negative image of the filmmaker was consolidated by the censorship.

A repetição, diria David Hume, nada muda no objeto que se repete em si, mas altera algo no espírito que o contempla: ela desencadeia uma diferença de percepção naquele que observa. Os textos do dramaturgo francês Jean-Luc Lagarce (1957-1995) são marcados pelo retorno sistemático de palavras, frases, expressões, personagens e temas, a ponto de a crítica recente que se articula em torno dele ver nessa característica uma espécie de ethos lagarciano. A análise pormenorizada de dois textos do autor Carthage, encore (escrito no início de sua carreira) e Jétais dans ma maison et j\'attendais que la pluie vienne (no fim de sua vida) revela um aspecto interessante: neles a repetição parece funcionar como uma agulha, tecendo a obra, desencadeando uma outra percepção da temporalidade na qual passado, presente e futuro vão gradativamente diluindo-se, condensando-se: suspende-se a apreensão da passagem do tempo e, simultaneamente, abre-se uma brecha na eternidade. O presente trabalho propõe-se a entender o uso da repetição nestes dois textos percebendo-a como um elemento performativo (de acordo com os trabalhos sobre teatro performativo realizados por Josette Féral, e sobre performance, de Paul Zumthor e Renato Cohen), isto é, cujo emprego numa sentença cria uma força ilocucionária capaz de produzir um efeito de suspensão temporal, alterando a percepção do público (leitor ou espectador). / Repetition, according to David Hume, changes nothing in the object that is repeated, but modifies something in the spirit which beholds it: it unleashes a difference in perception in the observer. The texts of the French playwright Jean-Luc Lagarce (1957-1995) are marked by the systematic return of words, phrases, expressions, characters and themes, to the point that the recent criticism that revolves around him sees in this characteristic a kind of Lagarcian ethos. The detailed analysis of two texts of the author - Carthage, encore (written in the beginning of his career) and Jétais dans ma maison et jattendais que la pluie vienne (in the end of his life) reveals an interesting aspect: in them repetition works as a needle, weaving his work, unleashing another perception of the passing of time, in which past, present and future gradually thin out, becoming compact: the apprehension of the passing of time is suspended and, simultaneously, a gap to eternity is open. The present paper proposes to understand the use of repetition in these two texts as a performative element, that is, whose use in a sentence creates an illocutionary strength able to produce an effect of time suspension, modifying the perception of the public (reader or spectator).

La phénoménologie de la donation se présente sous la forme d´un projet d´ouverture radicale du champ de la phénoménalité. Après avoir montré que la modernité a enfermé les phénomènes dans des conditions de possibilité dictées par un Sujet, et que la phénoménologie allemande a poursuivi ce geste en indexant les phénomènes sur l´horizon de l´objectité ou de l´étantité, Marion propose de reconduire le geste de la réduction phénoménologique à la seule donation. Ce faisant, il réintroduit en phénoménologie des phénomènes paradoxaux – phénomènes saturés – qui font violence, par excès, aux capacités réceptrices du Sujet. Marion introduit donc en phénoménologie une nouvelle modalité de l´invisibilité (et donc de la visibilité) que nous appelons « inexistence » (en opposition tout autant avec le non-être qu’avec la non-existence), dont la structure est paradoxalement fondée sur celle de l´écrit, puisqu´il s´agit ni plus ni moins, pour elle, que de présenter de façon positive une absence selon la logique de la signification. Ce faisant, et de par cette structure discursive de la visibilité, toute la phénoménologie de Marion peut être lue comme une véritable apologie de l´inexistence. / The phenomenology of givenness is presented in the form of a project of radical opening of the field of phenomenality. After having shown that modernity has enclosed phenomena under conditions of possibility dictated by a Subject, and that German phenomenology has pursued this gesture by indexing phenomena in the horizon of objectivity or of beingness, Marion proposes to reestablish the gesture of phenomenological reduction to single donation. In so doing, he reintroduces into phenomenology some paradoxical phenomena —saturated phenomena— which violate, by excess, the receptive capacities of the Subject. Marion thus introduces into phenomenology a new modality of invisibility (and thus of visibility) which we call "inexistance" (equally opposed to non-being as to non-existence), whose structure is paradoxically founded on that of writting, since it is neither more nor less, for inexistence, than to present in a positive way an absence according to the logic of meaning. In so doing, and through this discursive structure of visibility, all Marion's phenomenology can be read as a true apology for existence.

Na bibliografia brasileira, Jean-Luc Godard aparece com destaque em pesquisas sobre o cinema brasileiro moderno e sobre a história da censura cinematográfica no país. O realizador franco-suíço é descrito como uma referência fundamental para alguns cineastas brasileiros modernos, como um norteador dos debates travados em nossa crítica e como um objeto de atenção especial por parte dos censores da ditadura militar. Partindo desse lugar privilegiado conferido a Godard, esta pesquisa investigou historicamente a recepção e a interdição dos filmes do cineasta no Brasil no período entre 1961 e 1970. Em um primeiro momento (capítulos 1 a 3), analisamos os debates estéticos e políticos suscitados na crítica pelos filmes de Godard em três jornais de grande veiculação do período (Correio da manhã, Jornal do Brasil e O Estado de S. Paulo); em seguida (capítulo 4), identificamos as apropriações que os críticos-cineastas Glauber Rocha e Rogério Sganzerla realizaram da obra godardiana em seus escritos; e, por fim (capítulo 5), abordamos a documentação censória relativa aos filmes do realizador. Dessa maneira, constatamos o importante papel que Godard desempenhou na conformação do cinema brasileiro moderno, bem como o impacto que sua obra exerceu, cultural e politicamente, no país. Conforme evidenciaremos, naquele momento havia uma conjuntura sociocultural modernista, de esquerda e jovem que favoreceu a recepção do cineasta no Brasil. Ao mesmo tempo em que foi lida à luz de tal conjuntura, a obra godardiana atuou enquanto seu catalisador, estimulando novos projetos e debates em seu interior. O cineasta foi instrumentalizado por projetos de vanguarda no cinema e em ouras artes, estimulou a politização de esquerda e dialogou com os anseios de uma cultura jovem e libertária em expansão. Paralelamente, confirmamos a atenção especial que Godard recebeu dos censores da ditadura militar brasileira. Afinal, a ditadura se opunha a tal conjuntura e, por isso, viu no cineasta um perigo a ser combatido, uma vez que seus filmes atentavam contra os dois pilares básicos da ideologia que norteava o regime, o anticomunismo e a moral conservadora. Conforme demonstraremos, tal atenção especial se deu sobretudo nos anos 1970, mas teve suas raízes em 1968, quando duas películas de Godard foram interditadas e uma imagem extremamente negativa do realizador foi consolidada no órgão censório. / In the Brazilian literature, Jean-Luc Godard appears prominently in researches on modern Brazilian cinema and on the history of cinematographic censorship in the country. The Franco-Swiss director is described as a fundamental reference for some modern Brazilian filmmakers; as a guiding force on the debates held within our critique; and as an object of special attention by the censors of the military dictatorship. From this privileged place conferred to Godard, this research historically investigated the reception and interdiction of his films, in Brazil, between 1961 and 1970. First (Chapters 1 to 3), we analyze the aesthetic and political debates raised in criticism of Godard\'s films in three major newspapers of the given period (Correio da manhã, Jornal do Brasil and O Estado de S. Paulo). Then (Chapter 4), we identify the appropriations of the Godardian word made by the critical-filmmakers Glauber Rocha and Rogério Sganzerla. Finally (Chapter 5), we approach the censorship documentation relating to the director\'s films. Our findings showed the important role Godard played in the conformation of modern Brazilian cinema, as well as the impact that his work exerted, culturally and politically, in the country. As we will show, the socio-cultural context of the time modernist, leftist and youthful favored the filmmakers reception in Brazil. At the same time as it was read in the light of such a conjuncture, Godard\'s work acted as a catalyst for it, stimulating new projects and debates within. The filmmaker was instrumented by avant-garde projects in the cinema and in other arts, and then stimulated the politicization of the left and dialogued with the yearnings of a young and libertarian culture in expansion. We also found evidence of the special attention that Godard received from the censors of the Brazilian military dictatorship. Opposed to the referred conjuncture, the dictatorship saw in the filmmaker a danger to be fought, since his films were against the two basic pillars of the regime: anticommunism and conservative morality. As we will show, he received such special attention mainly in the 1970s, but it had its roots in 1968 when two of Godard\'s films were banned and an extremely negative image of the filmmaker was consolidated by the censorship.

Texte remanié de: Thèse de doctorat--Théologie morale--Rome--Académie Alphonsienne, 2006. / Bibliogr. p. 335-345.

« Poète et non honnête homme. On ne consulte que l’oreille, parce qu’on manque de cœur » : il y a peut-être une très grande proximité entre cette pensée de Pascal et l’inspiration de la pensée de Marion. Dans l’article « De la “mort de Dieu” aux noms divins » il fait allusion à une logique de la charité à développer, comme tâche pour la pensée. Ce qu’on a tenté de reconstruire, c’est le développement de cette inspiration, en ayant comme point de départ le concept de négation, tel qu’il émerge dans Certitudes négatives. La négation constitue, dans ce texte, par le concept de certitude négative, un troisième élargissement de la phénoménalité, qui saisit non seulement l’excès de l’intuition par rapport aux concepts, mais l’impossibilité que l’excès impose aux concepts. Marion présente un discours sur la limite, transcendantale, à entendre comme le lieu où se donne un degré redoublé de réalité. Cette avancée, qui montre qu’aussi la négation relève de la donation, doit être mise en perspective avec le constat, qui caractérise la fin de Reduction et donation, que la négation, par l’ennui, est la condition pour accéder à la donation. On a essayé d’approfondir ce nœud par la reconstruction de l’émergence de la négation dans la pensée de Marion et de ses caractères, avec une particulière attention au concept de distance et à sa genèse. Par cette voie on a pu mettre en évidence l’articulation concrète et la centralité dans l’œuvre de Marion du rapport entre phénoménologie et apophatisme, et la façon avec laquelle elle peut se développer en une logique de la charité. / Between phenomenology and apophatism : starting from Jean-Luc Marion « Poet and not honest man. We consult only the ear, because we lack heart ». There is perhaps a great proximity between this thought of Pascal and the inspiration of Marion's thought. In the article « De la “mort de dieu” aux noms divins » he alludes to a logic of charity to develop, as a task for thought. What we have tried to reconstruct is the development of this inspiration, having as a starting point the concept of negation, as it emerges in certain Certitudes négatives. Negation constitutes in this text, by the concept of negative certainty, a third enlargement of phenomenality - after the givenness and saturated phenomena - which captures not only the excess of intuition in relation to concepts, but the impossibility that excess imposes on concepts. Marion presents a discourse on the transcendental limit, to be understood as the place where a redoubled degree of reality is given. This advance, which shows that the negation belongs to the givenness, must be put into perspective with the finding, which characterizes the end of Reduction and givenness, that negation, through boredom, is the condition for accessing the donation. We tried to analyze this crux by reconstructing the emergence of negation in Marion's thought and its characters, with particular attention to the concept of distance and its genesis. In this way it has been possible to highlight the concrete articulation and centrality in Marion's work of the relationship between phenomenology and apophatism, and the way in which it can develop into a logic of charity.

A repetição, diria David Hume, nada muda no objeto que se repete em si, mas altera algo no espírito que o contempla: ela desencadeia uma diferença de percepção naquele que observa. Os textos do dramaturgo francês Jean-Luc Lagarce (1957-1995) são marcados pelo retorno sistemático de palavras, frases, expressões, personagens e temas, a ponto de a crítica recente que se articula em torno dele ver nessa característica uma espécie de ethos lagarciano. A análise pormenorizada de dois textos do autor Carthage, encore (escrito no início de sua carreira) e Jétais dans ma maison et j\'attendais que la pluie vienne (no fim de sua vida) revela um aspecto interessante: neles a repetição parece funcionar como uma agulha, tecendo a obra, desencadeando uma outra percepção da temporalidade na qual passado, presente e futuro vão gradativamente diluindo-se, condensando-se: suspende-se a apreensão da passagem do tempo e, simultaneamente, abre-se uma brecha na eternidade. O presente trabalho propõe-se a entender o uso da repetição nestes dois textos percebendo-a como um elemento performativo (de acordo com os trabalhos sobre teatro performativo realizados por Josette Féral, e sobre performance, de Paul Zumthor e Renato Cohen), isto é, cujo emprego numa sentença cria uma força ilocucionária capaz de produzir um efeito de suspensão temporal, alterando a percepção do público (leitor ou espectador). / Repetition, according to David Hume, changes nothing in the object that is repeated, but modifies something in the spirit which beholds it: it unleashes a difference in perception in the observer. The texts of the French playwright Jean-Luc Lagarce (1957-1995) are marked by the systematic return of words, phrases, expressions, characters and themes, to the point that the recent criticism that revolves around him sees in this characteristic a kind of Lagarcian ethos. The detailed analysis of two texts of the author - Carthage, encore (written in the beginning of his career) and Jétais dans ma maison et jattendais que la pluie vienne (in the end of his life) reveals an interesting aspect: in them repetition works as a needle, weaving his work, unleashing another perception of the passing of time, in which past, present and future gradually thin out, becoming compact: the apprehension of the passing of time is suspended and, simultaneously, a gap to eternity is open. The present paper proposes to understand the use of repetition in these two texts as a performative element, that is, whose use in a sentence creates an illocutionary strength able to produce an effect of time suspension, modifying the perception of the public (reader or spectator).