Spelling suggestions: "subject:"hand lines (binternational law)"" "subject:"hand lines (byinternational law)""
1 |
Building a norm: the banning of anti-personnel landmines /Neufeld, Angela. January 2005 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.) - Simon Fraser University, 2005. / Theses (Dept. of Political Science) / Simon Fraser University. Also issued in digital format and available on the World Wide Web.
|
2 |
Ban landmines! The social construction of the international ban on anti-personnel landmines 1991-2001 /Lawson, Robert J. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Carleton University, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 415-433). Also available in electronic format on the Internet.
|
3 |
State compliance with the mine ban treatyUnknown Date (has links)
Landmines have inflicted an insurmountable amount of physical and psychological harm, inhibiting social and economic development far after the conflict has ended. In an effort to create a world free of the weapon, a campaign to ban landmines was launched by non-governmental organizations. The Mine Ban Convention entered into force in 1999, requiring nation-states to immediately ban the use, production and transfer of anti-personnel landmines (APLs), destroy stockpiles within four years and remove landmines already planted within ten years. This study examines the level of legal compliance with the Mine Ban Convention. An empirical analysis is conducted using a data base constructed from reports published by the Landmine Monitor. This study finds that the treaty is a successful work in progress with a majority of Parties in compliance; 44 million stockpiled APLs have been destroyed and eleven states have completed mine clearance. 170 million stockpiled APLs and countless emplaced mines remain, indicating the world is still far from the goal of a mine-free world. / by Jacqueline C. Perez. / Thesis (M.A.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2010. / Includes bibliography. / Electronic reproduction. Boca Raton, Fla., 2010. Mode of access: World Wide Web.
|
4 |
L'influence des organisations non gouvernementales sur la négociation de quelques instruments internationaux / ONG et négociation des instruments internationauxBreton-Le Goff, Gaëlle. January 1999 (has links)
More and more, international lawyers are confronted to the phenomenon of increasing number of Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) on the international scene, which is seldom studied by them. Traditionally, the participation of NGOs in international negotiations has been examined from the functioning of their relations between them and international organizations. Their increasing participation in international negotiation forums however, raises the question of their influence on the preparation of legal texts adopted by States. This study tries to review those two aspects of their influence by noting the evolutions of their participation, identifying their successes and their failures and trying to explain them. Based on the study of four negotiating processes on scientific and technical instruments, this study has the double purpose of contributing to international law by increasing knowledge about this poorly understood question of the normative influence of international actors, and to give to NGOs some leads for a better action from a legal point a view.
|
5 |
Landmines on the table : a negotiations analysis of the global campaign to ban landmines /Moody, Eric M. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Florida, 2008. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (p. 361-380). Also available on the Internet.
|
6 |
L'influence des organisations non gouvernementales sur la négociation de quelques instruments internationauxBreton-Le Goff, Gaëlle. January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
Evaluating the role of non governmental organisations in global governance : case studies of two campaignsSaaiman, Hurchele 03 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MA)--University of Stellenbosch, 2002. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This is a study of the growmg importance of Non Governmental Organisations
(NGOs) in global governance. Global governance is defined as a complex and
dynamic process that deals with issues that go beyond the capacity of national
governments, that is distinguished from global government because of an absence of a
central authority that can ensure compliance and the presence of a wide range of
actors including non-state actors. The theory of Complex Multilateralism captures the
role of NGOs and NGO coalitions well. Using this theory as a theoretical framework,
this study focuses on two recent transnational NGO campaigns (The International
Campaign to Ban Landmines [fCBL) and the NGOs against Arms Trade) to
determine why some NGO campaigns are more successful than others. The theory of
Complex Multilateralism in combination with extensive information on different
types of NGOs and their activities on national and international levels, makes it
possible to identify criteria that can determine success. These criteria are: a realistic
goal, the issue area (type, number, salience and techniques used to frame the issue),
government and intergovernmental organisation (lGO) commitment, access to IGOs,
extensive expertise, effective use of the media, effective use of information
technology, activity variance, leadership, persuasive and influential spokespersons,
membership and funds. These criteria are described, defined and then applied to the
above-mentioned transnational NGO campaigns. The main finding was that the ICBL
was the more successful of the two campaigns because it had more of the criteria for
success. In this case the most important reasons for success is: a realistic goal, the
focus on a single issue and the effective framing of the issue, significant government
commitment as well as good leadership. Although, the criteria that were developed
can hardly be universalised, they do provide a useful starting point for further research
into this important field in International Studies. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie werkstuk bestudeer die toenemende belangrikheid van Nie-Regerings
Organisasies (NROs) in "global governance" Laasgenoemde konsep word gedefinieer
as 'n komplekse en dinamiese proses wat behels die hantering van vraagstukke wat
buite die beheer is van 'n enkele staat, wat onderskei word van 'n wereld regering as
gevolg van die afwesigheid van sentrale gesag en die aanwesigheid van 'n wye reeks
van akteurs of rolbekleers insluitente nie-staatlike rolbekleers. Komplekse
Multilateralisme bied 'n goeie teoretiese begrip van die rol van NROs en NRO
koalisies in hierdie proses. Hierdie studie maak gebruik van Komplekse
Multilateralisme as 'n teoretiese raamwerk om te fokus op twee onlangse
transnasionale NRO veldtogte ( Die internasionale veldtog om landmyne te verban en
die NROs teen wapenhandel) en sodoende te bepaal hoekom sekere NRO veldtogte
meer geslaag is as ander. Reedsgenoemde teorie in kombinasie met inligting oor
verskillende tipes NROs en hul aktiwiteite op nasionale en internasionale vlakke
maak dit moontlik om kriteria vir 'n suksesvolle NRO veldtog te identifiseer. Hierdie
kriteria bestaan uit die volgende: 'n realistiese doel, die aard van die vraagstuk (tipe,
hoeveelheid, "salience", en tegnieke wat gebruik is om die vraagstuk te formuleer,
toewyding van regerings en tussen-regerings-organisasies, toegang tot tussenregerings
-organisasies, veelsydige kundigheid, effektiewe gebruik van die media,
effektiewe gebruik van inligtingstegnologie, verskeidenheid van aktiwiteite, leierskap,
oorredende en invloedryke segspersone, lidmaatskap en fondse. Die bevinding is dat
die internasionale veldtog om landmyne te verban die meer geslaagde veldtog is. Die
belangriskste redes hiervoor is: 'n realistiese doel, die fokus op enkele vraagstukke en
die effektiewe formulering van die vraagstuk, die toegewydheid van baie regerings,
sowel as goeie leierskap. Alhoewel die kriteria wat in die studie ontwikkel is nie
veralgemeen kan word nie dien dit as 'n nuttige basis vir vedere navorsing oor hierdie
belangrike tema in die veld van Internasionale Studie.
|
8 |
Peacebuilding in Mozambique with special reference to the UN policy on landmine removalVan Tonder, Delarey 12 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MPhil)--Stellenbosch University, 2000. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The end of the Cold War had a profound impact on the qualitative and quantitative nature of the
UN's peace and security agenda, representing a shift from traditional peacekeeping to a broader,
more ambitious and intrusive notion of peacekeeping. This evolution was marked by an expanded
UN engagement in a broad range of intra-state conflicts and characterised by UN undertakings
towards aspects of national political and socio-economic reconstruction including the evolution
of humanitarian action.
Responding to the expanded United Nations agenda for international peace and security and at
the request of the UN Security Council (UNSC) Boutros Boutros-Ghali prepared the conceptual
foundations of the UN's role in global peace and security in his seminal report, An Agenda for
Peace (July, 1992). The Secretary General outlined five inter-connected roles that he projected
the UN would play in the fast changing context of post-Cold War international politics, namely:
preventive diplomacy, peace enforcement, peacemaking, peacekeeping and post-conflict peacebuilding.
The UNSG described the newly defined concept of post-conflict peacebuilding as action organised
"(to) foster economic and social co-operation with the purpose of developing the social,
political and economic infrastructure to prevent future violence, and laying the foundations for a
durable peace."
With specific reference to landmines in An Agenda for Peace the UNSG stressed that peacebuilding
following civil war and internal strife must address the serious problem of landmines, which
remained scattered in present or former combat zones. The UNSG underscored that mine action
(demining) should be emphasised in terms of reference of peacekeeping operations which is
crucially important in the restoration of activity when peacebuilding is under way.
The United Nations involvement in the Mozambican peace process (1992-1995) has been interpreted
as the culmination of a major success story in wider peacekeeping in Africa under UN auspices
- a category of peace operation, which included peacemaking, peacekeeping, humanitarian
assistance, peacebuilding and electoral assistance. Mozambique's peace process has subsequently
been cited as a model UN peacekeeping operation which could be adapted to post-conflict situation
elsewhere.
Within the context of landmines as a threat to post-conflict peacebuilding as articulated by the
UNSG in An Agenda for Peace, the study focuses on how the United Nations implemented mine
action initiatives in operationalising the concept of peacebuilding in Mozambique. In this context,
the study reviews the UN operation in Mozambique (ONUMOZ) and its capacity, responsiveness
and vision in implementing mine action initiatives, both in terms of the operational requirements
of the ONUMOZ peacekeeping mission and the development oflonger-term humanitarian mine
action programmes in Mozambique. To this end, the study views the establishment of a sustainable
indigenous mine action capacity as a sine que non for post -conflict peacebuilding.
From this perspective, the study interprets the 1999 Mine Ban Treaty Prohibiting the Use, Stockpile,
Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction and the rights
and obligations of Mozambique as a State Party to the Treaty as the most appropriate instrument
towards the creation of an indigenous Mozambican mine action capacity to address the long-term
effects oflandmines on post-conflict peacebuilding.
In terms of methodology the approach was historical-analytical and in essence a deductive
method of research was followed. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die einde van die Koue Oorlog het diepgaande verandering teweeggebring ten opsigte van die
Verenigde Nasies se vredes en sekuriteits regime ter handhawing van internasionale vrede en
sekuriteit. Hierdie periode is gekenmerk deur 'n skerp toename in intra-staatlike konflikte en
gevolglik in die kwalitatiewe en kwantitatiewe aard en omvang van Verenigde Nasies vredesoperasies
in terme van die VN Handves.
Ten einde die verantwoordelikhede van die Verenigde Nasies met betrekking tot die handhawing
van vrede en sekuriteit in die snel - veranderende konteks van die post - Koue Oorlog periode
aan te spreek, het die Sekretaris - Generaal van die Verenigde Nasies, Boutros Boutros - Gali,
in opdrag van die Veiligheidsraad die konseptuele fundering van die VN se rol verwoord in sy
pioniersverslag - Agenda vir Vrede (1992).
In sy verslag van Julie 1992 identifiseer en omskryf die Sekretaris-Generaal vyf verbandhoudende
konsepte wat sou dien as meganismes ter beslegting van internasionale konflik, naamlik
voorkomende diplomasie (preventive diplomacy), vredesingryping (peace enforcement),
maak van vrede (peacemaking), vredesoperasies (peacekeeping) en post-konflik vredeskonsolidasie
(post-conflict peacebuilding).
Die Sekretaris-Generaal het post-konflik vredeskonsolidasie omskryf as die "vestiging van
sosio-ekonomiese samewerking met die oogmerk om die sosiale, politieke en ekonomiese infrastruktuur
te ontwikkel ten einde hernude konflik te voorkom en ter grondlegging van langdurige
vrede".
Met spesifieke verwysing na die korrelasie tussen landmyne en post-konflik vredeskonsolidasie
het die Sekretaris-Generaal benadruk dat landmyne 'n bedreiging inhou vir die konsolidasie van
vrede na burgeroorlog en interne konflik, en veral binne die raamwerk van 'n VN vredesoperasie
in terme van 'n VN Veiligheidsraad mandaat.
Die VN se vredesrol in Mosambiek word allerweë beskou as een van die mees suksesvolle
VN vredesoperasies ooit. Die doel van die studie is gevolglik om ondersoek in te stel na die
toepassing van die konsep van post-konflik vredeskonsolidasie met spesifieke verwysing na
die Mosambiekse vredesproses en die rol van die Verenigde Nasies se Operasie in Mosambiek
(ONUMOZ). In die opsig fokus die studie spesifiek op die rol van ONUMOZ (1992-1995) en
suksesse en tekortkomings in sy vredesmandaat ten opsigte van die implementering van aksies
om die kort-en-langtermyn impak van landmyne in terme van post-konflik vredeskonsolidasie
in Mosambiek aan te spreek.
Vanuit hierdie konteks, vertolk die studie die Landmyn Verdrag (1999) en die totale verbod op
die aanwending, opgaar, produksie en oordrag van landmyne en die vernietiging daarvan as die
mees geskikte raamwerk waarbinne Mosambiek 'n inheemse vermoë tot stand kan bring ten
einde die langtermyn impak van landmyne op post-konflik vredeskonsolidasie effektief aan te
spreek.
Vanuit 'n metodologiese oogpunt word in hierdie studie histories analities te werk gegaan en
die benadering is beskrywend - verklarend van aard. Verder is die metode van ondersoek in
wese deduktief van aard.
|
Page generated in 0.1777 seconds