No description available.

This thesis covers the status of the Jewish law in the messianic era as it was anticipated in Jewish texts from the biblical period until the seventeenth century. Although the predominant perspective is the law's perpetuity, a future idealized version was particularized in each age and stylized by various groups. The view of the law's continuity was challenged by streams of thought and ambiguities in the texts that allowed for changes and cessations in the law in messianic times. Concrete messianic movements, such as that of the New Testament in the first century and the Sabbatean movement of the seventeenth century, brought some of these underlying currents to the forefront with their reinterpretations of the law and their antinomian behaviour.

This thesis studies a method of legal reasoning used in determining legal rulings guided by the principle of maslahah (public interest), promulgated by a liberal thinker of the medieval period, Najm al-Din al-Tufi (d. 710/716 A.H.). His theory of maslahah is not confined only to cases which have no textual basis but is also applied to those problems that come within the purview of the revealed texts. His theory of maslahah is, no doubt, unique and original. He prefers to place maslahah above all legal sources, including the Qur'an and the Hadith which, according to him, cannot lead people to uniform rulings. He believes that only with this theory can human welfare be secured. / Due to its unique and controversial nature, al-Tufi's theory of maslahah was not welcomed and even received severe criticism from other jurists. Indeed, this theory went beyond al-Tufis times and was much later seen as suitable for anticipating social change. Therefore, in modern times, in which law reform is needed his theory of maslahah receives serious attention. This thesis also attempts to argue that, even though their concept of maslahah is not as liberal as that of al-Tufi the modern reformists' theory of maslahah is, by and large, inspired and even influenced by al-Tufis maslahah.

Table of cases: leaves [771]-783 / Bibliography: leaves [784]-795 / 2 v. (xix, 795 leaves) ; 30 cm. / Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University Library. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Adelaide, Law School, 1988

A dissertação examina a teoria Egológica de Carlos Cossio, considerando os desdobramentos propostos pelo paradigma de complexidade, em uma proposta de transdiciplinaridade para identificação do fenômeno jurídico. A abordagem realizada do tema emprega o método indiciário como ferramenta para interpretação do Direito. O trabalho examina a formação da teoria egológica compreendida a partir da análise da conduta humana como centro da efetividade jurídica, demonstrando que foram desenvolvidos parâmetros no campo da psicologia cognitiva para compreensão do processo de decisão dos indivíduos / The dissertation examines the theory Egológica Carlos Cossio, considering the developments proposed by the paradigm of complexity, in a proposal for transdisciplinarity to identify the legal phenomenon. The approach used employs the theme revealing method as a tool for interpreting the law. The work examines the formation of the theory egológica, understood from the analysis of human behavior as the center of legal effectiveness. Demonstrating that were developed in the field of cognitive psychology to understanding the parameters of the decision process of individuals

No description available.

A crescente complexidade das relações intersubjetivas faz com que a criação e a forma de aplicação à norma jurídica evoluam superando a esfera da legalidade. Como parâmetro supralegal, destaca-se a formulação do direito natural em Aristóteles e Tomás de Aquino por fornecer características muito importantes para o panorama atual ao tratar da phronesis/prudentia e da mutabilidade da natureza humana. Tal formulação busca uma atitude pensada e adaptável às conjunturas sem descuidar dos princípios básicos atemporais e dos requisitos da razoabilidade prática definidos por Finnis. Nesse ínterim, a ideia de pré-compreensão em Gadamer, que afirma existir uma compreensão prévia funcionando como pressuposto subjetivo hermenêutico presidindo toda a compreensão, caso for adaptada ao direito, constata que, no processo de tomada da decisão jurídica, a ação interpretativa parte de um conjunto de conceitos e conhecimentos prévios, os quais, de certa forma sedimentados, possibilitam alcançar suas conclusões com um mínimo de previsibilidade. O pensamento de Finnis acerca da lei natural, fundada na razoabilidade prática, e a construção de uma hermenêutica filosófica, como a de Gadamer, levam a crer na possibilidade de uma fundamentação ética para a hermenêutica e para o direito, sem olvidar do caráter contingencial e temporal das suas estruturas de compreensão e aplicação. / Submitted by Ana Guimarães Pereira (agpereir@ucs.br) on 2016-11-24T11:42:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Fabricio dos Santos Vieira.pdf: 1104602 bytes, checksum: 4ea50fb9a15401cafabcb92f1c987584 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-24T11:42:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Fabricio dos Santos Vieira.pdf: 1104602 bytes, checksum: 4ea50fb9a15401cafabcb92f1c987584 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-11-24 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, CAPES / The increasing complexity of intersubjective relations makes the creation and application way to the legal rule develops overcoming the sphere of legality and, as supralegal parameter, highlights the natural law formulation in Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas, for providing very important features to the current situation when dealing with phronesis/prudentia and the mutability of human nature, looking for a thoughtful and adaptable attitude to the situations without neglecting basic timeless principles and practical reasonableness requirements defined by Finnis. In the meantime, the idea of pre-understanding in Gadamer, who says there is a prior understanding working as hermeneutic subjective assumption presiding over all understanding, in case is adapted to the law, appear that, in making the legal decision to the interpretive action as a part of a set concepts and prior knowledge, which somehow sedimented, reaching its conclusions with a minimum of predictability. The thought of Finnis about natural law, based on practical reasonableness and the construction of a philosophical hermeneutics as Gadamer, lead us to believe in the possibility of an ethical foundation for hermeneutics and to the right, without forgetting the contingent and temporary nature of their understanding and application of structures.

A crescente complexidade das relações intersubjetivas faz com que a criação e a forma de aplicação à norma jurídica evoluam superando a esfera da legalidade. Como parâmetro supralegal, destaca-se a formulação do direito natural em Aristóteles e Tomás de Aquino por fornecer características muito importantes para o panorama atual ao tratar da phronesis/prudentia e da mutabilidade da natureza humana. Tal formulação busca uma atitude pensada e adaptável às conjunturas sem descuidar dos princípios básicos atemporais e dos requisitos da razoabilidade prática definidos por Finnis. Nesse ínterim, a ideia de pré-compreensão em Gadamer, que afirma existir uma compreensão prévia funcionando como pressuposto subjetivo hermenêutico presidindo toda a compreensão, caso for adaptada ao direito, constata que, no processo de tomada da decisão jurídica, a ação interpretativa parte de um conjunto de conceitos e conhecimentos prévios, os quais, de certa forma sedimentados, possibilitam alcançar suas conclusões com um mínimo de previsibilidade. O pensamento de Finnis acerca da lei natural, fundada na razoabilidade prática, e a construção de uma hermenêutica filosófica, como a de Gadamer, levam a crer na possibilidade de uma fundamentação ética para a hermenêutica e para o direito, sem olvidar do caráter contingencial e temporal das suas estruturas de compreensão e aplicação. / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, CAPES / The increasing complexity of intersubjective relations makes the creation and application way to the legal rule develops overcoming the sphere of legality and, as supralegal parameter, highlights the natural law formulation in Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas, for providing very important features to the current situation when dealing with phronesis/prudentia and the mutability of human nature, looking for a thoughtful and adaptable attitude to the situations without neglecting basic timeless principles and practical reasonableness requirements defined by Finnis. In the meantime, the idea of pre-understanding in Gadamer, who says there is a prior understanding working as hermeneutic subjective assumption presiding over all understanding, in case is adapted to the law, appear that, in making the legal decision to the interpretive action as a part of a set concepts and prior knowledge, which somehow sedimented, reaching its conclusions with a minimum of predictability. The thought of Finnis about natural law, based on practical reasonableness and the construction of a philosophical hermeneutics as Gadamer, lead us to believe in the possibility of an ethical foundation for hermeneutics and to the right, without forgetting the contingent and temporary nature of their understanding and application of structures.

No description available.

No description available.