Spelling suggestions: "subject:"lawful possession"" "subject:"awful possession""
1 |
Rušená držba / Disturbed possessionTlapová, Gabriela January 2018 (has links)
This diploma thesis "Disturbed possession" deals with the theme of possession and its protection against disturbing. Possession as one of the basic institutes of law has seen several changes in its legal concept on the territory of the Czech Republic in the history. The Civil Code no. 89/2012 Coll. has brought the concept of possession and its protection which is based on the concept of the doctrine of law science from the First republic. As this "new" concept is discontinous with the previous concept of the Civil Code no. 40/1964 Coll. interpretation and application of this new concept will be rather complicated. This thesis firstly tackles the theoretical concept of possession - i.e. what the object of possession is, how the possession is acquired, lost and retained, what qualities there are of lawful possession, who can be the subject of possession. The second part of the thesis describes the historical development of the concept of possession. The last part of the thesis focuses on how possession is described in Civil Code no. 89/2012 Coll. In this part of the thesis characteristic features and nature of trespass are described. This problematics is also mentioned in the view of the Austrian civil law. Key words: Possession, lawful possession, protection of possession, disturbing possession,...
|
2 |
Die strafbaarheid van furtum possessionis in die Suid-Afrikaanse regRoos, Cornelius Johannes 09 1900 (has links)
Text in Afrikaans / Theft in South African law is one of the most well-known
common law crimes. It is also one of the crimes in respect of
which opinions vary considerably.
Furtum possessionis is one of the manifestations of the crime
of theft at common law. The general requirements of furtum
possessionis were already established in Roman law. Emphasis
was not placed on the taker of the thing but on the particular
position of the person who was deprived of the property. This
approach was also followed in Roman-Dutch law.
Fur tum possessionis in South African law can be defined as
follows: It is the unlawful and intentional appropriation by
the owner or someone else of a movable corporeal thing in
commercio, in circumstances in which the possessor of the
thing has a valid right of retention of the thing, with the
intention of depriving the possessor permanently of control of
the thing.
Theft in the form of furtum possessionis differs in an
important respect from theft in the form of the removal of a
thing. In the case of removal the complainant can also be a
person acting as a holder, that is someone exercising control
of the thing on behalf of the owner. In the case of furtum
possessionis the complainant is the person with the right of
retention and from whose possession the thing is taken away.
The accused either possesses the thing as an owner or as a
holder before possession of the thing was transferred to the
complainant. Mere possession is not enough. The possession of
the complainant has to be accompanied by a right to retention.
Furthermore the possession of the thing has to be lawful / Criminal & Procedural Law / LL.M. (Criminal & Procedural Law)
|
3 |
Die strafbaarheid van furtum possessionis in die Suid-Afrikaanse regRoos, Cornelius Johannes 09 1900 (has links)
Text in Afrikaans / Theft in South African law is one of the most well-known
common law crimes. It is also one of the crimes in respect of
which opinions vary considerably.
Furtum possessionis is one of the manifestations of the crime
of theft at common law. The general requirements of furtum
possessionis were already established in Roman law. Emphasis
was not placed on the taker of the thing but on the particular
position of the person who was deprived of the property. This
approach was also followed in Roman-Dutch law.
Fur tum possessionis in South African law can be defined as
follows: It is the unlawful and intentional appropriation by
the owner or someone else of a movable corporeal thing in
commercio, in circumstances in which the possessor of the
thing has a valid right of retention of the thing, with the
intention of depriving the possessor permanently of control of
the thing.
Theft in the form of furtum possessionis differs in an
important respect from theft in the form of the removal of a
thing. In the case of removal the complainant can also be a
person acting as a holder, that is someone exercising control
of the thing on behalf of the owner. In the case of furtum
possessionis the complainant is the person with the right of
retention and from whose possession the thing is taken away.
The accused either possesses the thing as an owner or as a
holder before possession of the thing was transferred to the
complainant. Mere possession is not enough. The possession of
the complainant has to be accompanied by a right to retention.
Furthermore the possession of the thing has to be lawful / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL.M. (Criminal & Procedural Law)
|
Page generated in 0.0503 seconds