Spelling suggestions: "subject:"conjecture method inn teaching."" "subject:"conjecture method iin teaching.""
1 |
EFFECTS OF TWO STRUCTURED MODES OF STUDENT RESPONSE TO LECTURE MATERIALBedard, Ronleigh Rutledge, 1943- January 1975 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Promoting active learning in lecture-based courses : demonstrations, tutorials, and interactive tutorial lectures /Kraus, Pamela Ann, January 1997 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 1997. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (p. [287]-296).
|
3 |
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TWO TEACHING STRATEGIES FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS IN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTSCarazo Santaliz, Carlos Medardo January 1977 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
The effect of different types of feedback on quality of presentation /Colacci, John. January 1985 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
The effect of different types of feedback on quality of presentation /Colacci, John. January 1985 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
A comparative study of the open and the closed-minded students' preferences for lecture or discussion methods /Stranges, Joseph Francis January 1970 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
The influence of student feedback on achievement during varied contexts of lecturing sessions /Handy, Hayward Orlan January 1973 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
A comparison of lecture and interactive training designed to reduce the influence of interfering materials : an application to soil scienceGaeth, Gary J. January 2011 (has links)
Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
|
9 |
Finding the perfect blend a comparative study of online, face-to-face, and blended instruction /Pearcy, Agnes Goz. Turner, Philip M., January 2009 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of North Texas, Aug., 2009. / Title from title page display. Includes bibliographical references.
|
10 |
Teaching styles in higher art educationGray, Carole January 1988 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to identify teaching styles in higher art education. The research was qualitative, and the methodology was one of triangulation, involving the views of lecturers, students, and the observer (author). Preliminary interviews with students and staff at one college provided the framework for the research and highlighted basic important variables in teaching art at college level. A 3D perspex model was designed to encourage lecturers to exteriorize and articulate in a visual/spatial way the various emphases they had in their teaching. The resultant form was a 3D 'concept map', indicating the person's approach or style. The research was replicated at another college, and extended by videotaping lecturers teaching, and interviewing students. Cluster analysis was used with the model data to establish groupings of lecturers, and when cross-referenced with the analysis of student interviews and videotapes/observations resulted in four different styles of teaching, which were labelled 'Fundamentalist', Structurist', 'Objectivist', and 'Artist'. There was found to be no real difference in style that could be attributed to the two different institutions; length of teaching experience markedly influenced styles; aims objectives and philosophies of courses had a strong influence on teaching styles.
|
Page generated in 0.0939 seconds