LL.D. / This inquiry is about the derogation of human rights during states of emergency. International human rights law has blossomed since World War II. Over the years it has been understood that human rights can be limited or derogated (suspended) under certain circumstances. A set of standards has been developed through the different sources of international law to ensure that human rights abuses are avoided during states of emergency. Treaty law, as well as customary international law, provides definite standards that have to be adhered to during these circumstances. General principles of law recognised by “civilised” nations also contribute to the standard setting that must apply during states of emergency. The use of emergency powers during times of crisis is a world phenomenon. Human rights violations often occur in times of crisis when emergency powers are used. This has led to rich jurisprudence by the various international bodies that monitor, enforce and promote respect for human rights. All the sources of international law have contributed to ensuring that a prudent set of standards governs states of emergency. In this study these standards are set out and expounded upon. These standards are furthermore applied in three Southern African states. The history of states of emergency in these countries and the constitutional dispensations that govern states of emergency in each of these countries is placed under scrutiny and tested against the international standards that should apply. The picture that unfolds is not encouraging because there is not clear evidence that there is always respect for international law and the meticulous application of these standards. International and regional monitoring bodies have not always successfully discharged their obligations to promote human rights or to prevent human rights abuses during states of emergency. The main difficulty in the African Charter for Human and Peoples’ Rights is that it does not contain a derogation article, which forbids the abuse by the state of emergency instruments and curbs the abuse of power during states of emergency. The African Commission is plagued with difficulties, mainly pertaining to staff and resources. It often aspires to be “politically correct” in the face of state parties who are quick to rely on state sovereignty and thereby do not allow outsiders to monitor alleged human rights violations. The adoption of the Protocol to the African Charter on the establishment of an African Court is an important step in strengthening the African system for the protection of human rights. In Southern Africa, there is not a clear commitment to uphold and defend human rights through the relevant regional bodies – the correct statements are expressed in the treaty that formed the Southern African Development Community. There is however no authority to monitor or ensure compliance to ideals set out in the treaty. A route to overcome this difficulty is suggested, namely to negotiate a set of human rights standards in the region, without any legally binding effect initially but with strong persuasive and moral standing. This first step must provide a launching pad to ultimately have a Southern African Human Rights Treaty, with inter alia a tight derogation article as well as a treaty body with strong monitoring and enforcement powers. A regional commitment to uphold and respect human rights is a prerequisite to ensure that a human rights culture takes root in the service of stability and democracy in Southern Africa.

LL.M

Organised crime is a global phenomenon. It is a problem in South Africa as it is a problem in most countries. International and regional organisations, in particular, United Nations, Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and African Union (AU), have developed legislative measures and laid down minimum standards to assist party and non-party states to combat the scourge. Member countries and signatories to those instruments are ever encouraged to bring about national legislative and regulatory frameworks to criminalise predicate crimes, curb money laundering, confiscate instrumentalities and proceeds of such crimes, and to co-operate amongst themselves in their endeavours to fight the scourge. South Africa is a signatory and state party to the Vienna Convention, the Palermo Convention, African Union conventions, Southern African Development Community protocols, and has embraced Financial Action Task Force Forty Recommendations. As a signatory and a state party to these instruments, South Africa has passed, in its parliament, a vast array of legislative tools aimed at complimenting the criminalisation of organised crime related conduct (thus extending range of predicate crimes, and has also put in place preventative measures to be taken by financial, non-financial and professional institutions against money laundering practices, in order to deny organised criminals of illicit proceeds and a further use of property as an instrument of crime. The legislative framework is also aimed to foster international co-operation in the form of mutual assistance, extradition and enforcement of foreign judgements and sentences. There is a public perception, though, that crime pays in South Africa. The general public perception is that crime pays because the laws of the country always lag behind the ingenuity of organised criminals who, it is believed, are always a step or two ahead in better organisation of their nefarious activities and in the use of sophisticated methods of execution to achieve their goals. The objective of this research is to evaluate existing South African laws intended to deal with organised crime with relevant international instruments in order to establish whether the laws are adequate and are being implemented effectively to fight the scourge. The hypothesis of this research project is that South Africa has adequate laws (compliance); however, the problem lies in their implementation (enforcement). To obtain the necessary information to achieve the said objectives, the views made by various writers on organised crime were considered. The legislation currently in place to combat organised crime was identified and measured against aforementioned instruments in order to establish whether they do achieve the minimum standards set for the fight against organised crime. The comparison was done following the perspectives contained in these instruments in chapter form. In this regard, over-achievements as well as under-achievements were highlighted. For an example, article 6 of the Palermo convention instructs state parties to include as predicate offences all serious crime, punishable by maximum deprivation of liberty of at least 4 years or more, for money laundering. The Prevention of Organised Crime Act (POCA), on the other hand, contains no list of specific predicate offences, but makes an open-ended reference to the „proceeds of unlawful activities‟. It is, therefore, all-encompassing. Another example can be found in the South African definition of corruption. The South African statutory definition penalises corruption „in the widest sense and in all its forms, whereas that in the Palermo Convention is limited or restricted, as it does not instruct for the criminalisation of corruption involving foreign public officials or international civil servants. The evaluation of existing South African laws shows that South Africa has adequate laws to fight organised crime. There is, however, a room for improvement in their implementation, particularly in the prosecution of organised crimes. The South African government is urged to make available adequate financial resources to enable prosecutors to carry out their functions effectively in the fight against the scourge.

There are two broad areas of prisoner rights law that require development. The first area is that of the development of a common law framework with which to analyse disputes regarding the rights of prisoners. The second relates to the significant tension that exists between the conditions of detention that the Correctional Services Act envisages and the actual conditions of detention in South Africa prisons. This second aspect requires that a mechanism be created for the meaningful exercise of rights by prisoners. As a precursor to both of the above discussions it is necessary to understand the history of prisons and the intentions of those who designed this form of punishment. As will be illustrated there tends to be to-and-fro shift in intention on the part of the authorities between those who intend imprisonment as a humane form of punishment which seeks to reform the offender and the subsequent despair of that project of reformation with a resultant focus on security and mere detention of the offender. It is also a history of conditions of detention that are generally inhumane. These poor conditions are sometimes caused by neglect on the part of the authorities but ofttimes caused by the belief that harsh conditions of detention are a deterrent to wouldbe offenders. The advent of human rights law has placed an increasingly more onerous responsibility on the state to care for the well-being of prisoners whilst in custody. This duty includes, but is not limited to, the duty to care for the prisoner’s mental and physical health, ensure that they are safe from physical violence both from fellow prisoners and staff as well as a duty to ensure that they receive the necessities of life. Various failures by the state have led to increased litigation against the state. This will continue to create an ever increasing burden on the state as the number of long term prisoners increase and damages awards are made by the courts, in favour of prisoners, against the state for various reasons. These reasons include diseases contracted by prisoners whilst in custody and constitutional damages following death in custody. It is therefore necessary to develop a clear framework with which to analyse such disputes so that decisions are made which are consistent with the principles of South African law. It is this framework which this study seeks to develop. In order to do this the relevant principles of both international prison law as well as South African law will be drawn upon. In this regard the importance of the purposes of punishment will be emphasized when engaging upon an analysis of the limitations of the rights of a person in the context of prison law. Secondly, even though a sound framework may be developed with which to analyse prisoner rights there is still the difficulty of putting a system into operation which provides a mechanism through which prisoners can exercise those rights in a meaningful way. In order to create such a system there must be recognition of the impact of criminogenic conditions of imprisonment, the purposes of punishment and the values of the South African constitution. In this regard the principles of reductionism and restorative justice are considered. Furthermore, the role of special masters will be debated and amendments to the existing legislation will be proposed.

In Kenya, as in British Columbia, a high percentage of the forest land is owned by the Crown. Since Government controls most of the raw material for the forest industry, its timber disposal policies will have a considerable influence on the pattern of industrial development. The most suitable policy will be that which allows the maximum degree of industrial efficiency to be achieved and at the same time, adequately protects the public interest in the forest resource. The main methods of timber disposal open to the Kenya Government are: (i) To dispose of all Crown timber by public auction. (ii) To grant leases of Crown timber to private enterprise concerns, Government retaining the responsibility for forest management. (iii) To grant leases to private enterprise concerns and, in addition, to delegate to these same concerns the responsibility for forest management. Such a lease would be equivalent to British Columbia's Tree Farm Licence. (iv) To dispose of Crown timber by outright alienation. (v) To establish State manufacturing plants. It is not essential that the Government commit itself to any particular one of the above alternatives in practice, a combination of two or more may be desirable. This thesis is primarily concerned with the Tree Farm Licence method of timber disposal. The main objectives are: to study the progress of the Tree Farm Licence, to assess its advantages and disadvantages and to discuss its applicability in Kenya. The main conclusions drawn are that the Tree Farm Licence has brought several important benefits to British Columbia and in particular, has encouraged the establishment of the large integrated forest industries which play an important part in supporting the Provincial economy. The introduction of a similar licence into Kenya would be desirable, but for political reasons probably impracticable at present. / Forestry, Faculty of / Graduate

This thesis is an analytical study of the legal and political aspects of the Strait of Hormuz. It involves an evaluation of the policies of the Gulf States towards the applicable legal regime of passage through the Strait of Hormuz and their reactions towards both the 1958 and 1982 conventions on the Law of the Sea. Special attention is made to the practice of the States bordering the Strait of Hormuz as contained in their national laws. Our analysis of the applicable legal regime of passage through the Strait of Hormuz is conducted in the light of the prevailing international rules governing passage through international straits. Extensive discussion is devoted to the principal sources of threats to the Gulf’s security and to the safety of navigation through the Gulf Sea lanes, including the Strait of Hormuz. / Law, Peter A. Allard School of / Graduate

Canadian natural gas deregulation has terminated government price setting in favour of prices determined by market forces. However, the transportation of the commodity remains regulated due to the monopolistic nature of the distribution system and the Canadian economies of scale which preclude business rivalry. This paper attempts to discern whether the transition to a new regime is following the legal principles underlying public utility regulation. Promotion of the public interest is therefore a pervasive theme of this paper. While regulatory law allows certain forms of discrimination in the setting of rates and the provision of services, it prohibits undue or unjust discrimination. The thesis proposed herein focuses on regulatory theory and the possibility that incidents of undue discrimination may have been exacerbated by the deregulation process. The examination begins with a review of the discrimination provisions of section 92A of the Constitution Act 1867, the so-called "Resource Amendment". More attention is directed to public utilities theory given its compelling application to the natural gas industry. Deregulation is then discussed including an analysis of "direct sale" contracts involving the commodity as well as the "bypass" of the local pipeline distribution systems. Some conclusions are then made concerning competition and changing commercial conditions. Grave doubts are voiced as to whether the National Energy Board is properly applying the principles of public utility regulation during the transition to a more market oriented natural gas environment. One important conclusion is that direct sale contracts should be encouraged in the core market as well as in the industrial market by the National Energy Board in order to promote upstream competition among gas producers in the public interest. Finally, it is hoped that these doubts will be resolved by the Board in its new (RH-1-88) public hearing which will address issues related to deregulation, including direct sales and the ancillary self-displacement and operating demand volume (ODV) methodology. / Law, Peter A. Allard School of / Graduate

M.Phil. / Whistleblowers have become known as being disloyal employees and troublemakers. This perception has caused whistle blowing to be despised rather than encouraged. Whistle blowing is effectively raising a concern about an impropriety that assists in ensuring individual responsibility and organisational accountability. Making disclosures causes employees to be victimised by their employers as well as fellow employees. Employees generally did not feel protected enough to come forward with information on corruption, even though the witness protection system had been reformed and was working well. A well functioning hotline system is of importance and should be linked to the implementation of a protection regime for whistle blowers. Employees making anonymous disclosures are difficult to investigate, in that problems in corroborating the information as well as in not being able to remedy the underlying cause of the disclosure exist. Hotlines through which the public and employees anonymously report suspected corruption does not satisfactory deal with the issues when the purpose of whistle blowing is to promote a culture of transparency and accountability. The aim is to provide provisions for employees to disclose information about suspected criminals or other irregular conduct without fear or reprisals. The Protected Disclosures Act is an important step in providing protection for those who expose corruption in the workplace. Employers and employees should be treated on an equal basis with regards to whistle blowing. It is in the best interest of both employees and employers to have internal channels that encourage protected disclosures, providing protection to both employers and employees. Different measures exist to protect whistleblowers. One such measure is by means of legislation. Secondly, courts have also developed principles in this regard. However, in certain instances, the labour law will not provide protection were a professional individual acts in breach of the confidentiality obligation vested upon him within the client professional relationship. Legislation relating to general protection such as the right to freedom of association and access to information, also provide protection. The codes of conduct and ethical rules of professional bodies can also be adapted to provide protection to professionals, including employment contracts that provide for protection in certain instances. Despite all of the above, instances will always arise where tensions exist and problems arise, such as the continuous tension between the monopoly of the state in respect of certain information and the question on which information should be protected under legislation. It is therefore clear that many instances arise where protection is not afforded to whistleblowers. To apply the protection afforded by the Protected Disclosure Act horizontally between private bodies, private bodies should be protected from detriment. A tax consultant aware that a client is defrauding the South African Revenue Service will fear that if it challenges the client or threatens to report the fraud, the client will cancel the contract. It is recommended that a more inclusive approach to employment is to be followed as "atypical" employment is on the increase in South Africa as in many other countries. Homework, where a person undertakes to work on contract from home as well as workers supplied by temporary employment services, enable the organisations to vary the number of workers deployed so as to ensure flexibility. Independent contractors are often in a good position to uncover and disclose irregular conduct in the private or public sector. In addition, it is also advised that applicants for employment in the definition of an employee in the Protected Disclosures Act be included. In order to protect whistle blowers further, the definition of occupational detriment in the above act should also be extended to include reprisal by employers such as the use or treat to use defamation suites and suites based on the alleged breach of confidentiality, a loss of a contract or the inexplicable failure to be given a contract in the instance of contract workers. In addition, the list of forms of occupational detriment to be suffered should be left open ended to allow recognition of further types of victimisation. The effectiveness of measures put in place within organisations to encourage employees to speak out against impropriety and misconduct will be difficult to determine as only when there has been non-adherence to the Protected Disclosures Act and the whistle blower has been detrimentally affected, will it come into force to protect bona fide whistleblowers.

Patent law creates economic incentives for individuals and companies to invest in research and development, as well as to disclose publicly and commercialize new inventions. In creating these incentives, patents also impose costs on society through reduced access to new inventions. Generally, the benefits of the patent system outweigh the costs, but in new and rapidly developing industries the patent system itself can act as a barrier to the development of new technologies. This is of particular concern in the biotechnology industry where a proliferation of patents on basic and fundamental research tools risks hindering further innovation. This problem was first noted by US academics where patent rights are generally considered absolute. In contrast to the US, there are mechanisms already in place within the Canadian patent system that can be used to balance the public interest in access to technologies with the private interest promoted by patents. Two such mechanisms are studied in depth and compared: experimental use and compulsory licensing. Current conceptions of the experimental use exception to patent infringement are inadequate to deal with abuses found when research tools are patented and an expanded experimental use exception is therefore proposed to address the deficiencies found in the current law. In comparison, existing compulsory licensing provisions within the Competition and Patent Acts are generally sufficient to ensure access to needed research tools. The essential facilities doctrine developed through US antitrust laws provides assistance in determining when such compulsory licences should be granted. Compulsory licensing has certain advantages over an expanded experimental use exception: it would only be used for tools where there are no reasonable alternatives available to the scientist; and it is more likely to be compliant with Canada's international obligations. Ultimately, however, an expanded experimental use exception is preferred since it more quickly and easily puts the tools required for research into the hands of the scientists. / Law, Peter A. Allard School of / Graduate

The broad aim of this study is to investigate and recommend a model which would contribute to finding a solution to the AIDS pandemic facing the insurance industry. At present HIV positive persons are excluded from obtaining life insurance, and as a result of this they are excluded from obtaining access to finance as a life insurance policy is a vital financial instrument when attempting to access finance. The insurance industry has decided to protect itself and its response to the pandemic smacks of crisis intervention rather an attempt to find a solution acceptable to all parties. The intention is to investigate the role that all stakeholders, the public sector, the state and the industry can play in contributing to an imaginative response posed by this challenge. This study explores the causes and prognosis of AIDS, how the life insurance industry operates, how necessary life insurance is, strategies adopted by the industry in the face of this challenge, the experience of international insurers, as well as suggesting possible solutions and examining their mechanics. The study also investigates the impact of the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights on the suggested solutions. It recommends a particular solution as a workable model within a social policy perspective. It concludes with a request that all stakeholders participate in this solution for and to the benefit of everyone, as AIDS is not the problem of medical practitioners, or attorneys, or the insurance industry, but a societal problem.