Spelling suggestions: "subject:"lexical biunctional grammar"" "subject:"lexical biunctional crammar""
1 |
On the verb phrase in Qinzhou Zhuang an LFG analysis of serial verb constructions /Pan, Yanhong. January 2010 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hong Kong, 2010. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 211-223). Also available in print.
|
2 |
Complement functions in Cantonese : a lexical-functional grammar approach /Lee, Yat-mei. January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (M. Phil.)--University of Hong Kong, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 100-104).
|
3 |
On the verb phrase in Qinzhou Zhuang: an LFG analysis of serial verb constructionsPan, Yanhong., 潘艳红. January 2010 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Linguistics / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy
|
4 |
Complement functions in Cantonese: a lexical-functional grammar approach李逸薇, Lee, Yat-mei. January 2002 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Linguistics / Master / Master of Philosophy
|
5 |
LFG-DOT : a hybrid architecture for robust MTWay, Andrew January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
Topic and focus in Cantonese an OT-LFG account /Fung, Suet-man. January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (M. Phil.)--University of Hong Kong, 2007. / Title proper from title frame. Also available in printed format.
|
7 |
An OT-LFG analysis of language changeSakurai, Kazuhiro., 櫻井和裕. January 2011 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Linguistics / Master / Master of Arts
|
8 |
A theory of lexical functors : light heads in the lexicon and the syntaxSuzuki, Takeru 11 1900 (has links)
This thesis advances a specific model of 1-syntax, based on Hale
and Keyser (1993, 1994) and Dechaine (1996) as a point of departure,
and also proposes a general theory of the relation between the lexicon
and the syntax. One of the essential proposals that I make is the
F\mctionalization Principle, which permits a lexical head to project a
functional projection if and only if the meaning of the head is
represented by 1-syntactic structure without any extra semantic features.
I refer to this type of head as a light head. The Functionalization
Principle leads us to a principled account of various lexical and
functional uses of lexical items such as a passive morpheme -en and
have.
Examples that support my analysis range from adjectival and
verbal passives (e.g. Mary is very pleased and The glass was broken by
BUI), to constructions of alienable and inalienable possession (e.g. John
has Jive bucks and John has blue eyes), to causative/experiential
constructions (e.g. John had his students walk out of class), and to perfect
constructions (e.g. Lucie has advised the prime minister). Furthermore,
the analysis of possessive have is extended to possessive nominals (e.g.
John's cat and John's eyes).
I also examine the implications of the theories of 1-syntax and 1-
functors for Case. I propose that 1-syntactic structure partly determines
inherent Case whereas the 1-functor checks what I call l-Junctor Case
through the Spec-head relation. Furthermore, I show that these analyses of inherent Case and 1-functors account for essential properties of
possessive D (a genitive marker -*s), some Hindi marked subject
constructions and Japanese experiential transitive constructions.
|
9 |
A theory of lexical functors : light heads in the lexicon and the syntaxSuzuki, Takeru 11 1900 (has links)
This thesis advances a specific model of 1-syntax, based on Hale
and Keyser (1993, 1994) and Dechaine (1996) as a point of departure,
and also proposes a general theory of the relation between the lexicon
and the syntax. One of the essential proposals that I make is the
F\mctionalization Principle, which permits a lexical head to project a
functional projection if and only if the meaning of the head is
represented by 1-syntactic structure without any extra semantic features.
I refer to this type of head as a light head. The Functionalization
Principle leads us to a principled account of various lexical and
functional uses of lexical items such as a passive morpheme -en and
have.
Examples that support my analysis range from adjectival and
verbal passives (e.g. Mary is very pleased and The glass was broken by
BUI), to constructions of alienable and inalienable possession (e.g. John
has Jive bucks and John has blue eyes), to causative/experiential
constructions (e.g. John had his students walk out of class), and to perfect
constructions (e.g. Lucie has advised the prime minister). Furthermore,
the analysis of possessive have is extended to possessive nominals (e.g.
John's cat and John's eyes).
I also examine the implications of the theories of 1-syntax and 1-
functors for Case. I propose that 1-syntactic structure partly determines
inherent Case whereas the 1-functor checks what I call l-Junctor Case
through the Spec-head relation. Furthermore, I show that these analyses of inherent Case and 1-functors account for essential properties of
possessive D (a genitive marker -*s), some Hindi marked subject
constructions and Japanese experiential transitive constructions. / Arts, Faculty of / Linguistics, Department of / Graduate
|
10 |
Topic and focus in Cantonese: an OT-LFG accountFung, Suet-man., 馮雪雯. January 2007 (has links)
published_or_final_version / abstract / Humanities / Master / Master of Philosophy
|
Page generated in 0.0706 seconds