No description available.

Word frequency and age of acquisition (AoA) influence word and object recognition and naming. High frequency and early acquired items are processed faster than low frequency and/or late acquired items. The high correlation between word frequency and AoA make these effects difficult to distinguish. However, this difficulty can be avoided by investigating the effects of AoA in the domain of recognising and naming famous faces and names. Face processing a suitable domain because the functional models of face processing were developed by analogy to word and object processing models. Nine experiments on the effects of AoA on face and name processing are reported. Experiment 1 investigated the influence of variables on naming famous faces. The variables were regressed on the speed and accuracy of face naming. Only familiarity and AoA significantly predicted successful naming. A factorial analysis and full replication revealed a consistent advantage for name production to early acquired celebrities' faces (Experiments 2 & 3). Furthermore this advantage was apparent from the first presentation (Experiment 4).Faster face and name recognition occured for early acquired than late acquired celebrities (Experiments 5 & 8). Early acquired names were read aloud faster than late acquired names (Experiment 7). Conversly semantic classifications were made faster to late acquired celebrities' faces (Experiment 6), but there was no effect in the same task to written names (Experiment 9).An effect of AoA for celebrities, whose names are acquired later in life than object names is problematic for the developmental account of AoA. Effects of AoA in recognition tasks are problematic for theorists who propose that speech output is the locus of AoA. A mechanism is proposed to account for the empirical findings. The data also presents a challenge for computer modelling to simulate the combined effects of AoA and cumulative frequency.

No description available.

Competing models of eye movement control during reading disagree over the extent to which eye movements reflect ongoing linguistic and lexical processing, as opposed to visual/oculomotor factors (for reviews, see Rayner, 1998, 2009a). To address this controversy, participants’ eye movements were monitored in four experiments that manipulated a wide range of lexical variables. Specifically, Experiment 1 manipulated contextual predictability by presenting target words (e.g., teeth) in a high-predictability prior context (e.g. “The dentist told me to brush my teeth to prevent cavities.”) versus a low-predictability prior context (e.g., “I'm planning to take better care of my teeth to prevent cavities.”), Experiment 2 manipulated lexical ambiguity by presenting biased homographs (e.g., bank, crown, dough) in a subordinate-instantiating versus a dominant-instantiating prior context, and Experiments 3A and 3B manipulated word frequency by contrasting high frequency target words (e.g., table) and low frequency target words (e.g., banjo). In all four experiments, I used distributional analyses to examine the time-course of lexical influences on fixation times. Ex-Gaussian fitting (Staub, White, Drieghe, Hollway, & Rayner, 2010) revealed that all three lexical variables (i.e., predictability, lexical ambiguity, word frequency) were fast-acting enough to shift the entire distribution of fixation times, and a survival analysis technique (Reingold, Reichle, Glaholt, & Sheridan, 2012) revealed rapid lexical effects that emerged as early as 112 ms from the start of the fixation. Building on these findings, Experiments 3A and 3B provided evidence that lexical processing is delayed in an unsegmented text condition that contained numbers instead of spaces (e.g., “John4decided8to5sell9the7table2in3the9garage6sale”), relative to a normal text condition (e.g., “John decided to sell the table in the garage sale”). These findings have implications for ongoing theoretical debates concerning eye movement control, lexical ambiguity resolution, and the role of interword spaces during reading. In particular, the present findings provide strong support for models of eye movement control that assume that lexical influences can have a rapid influence on the majority of fixation durations, and are inconsistent with models that assume that fixation times are primarily determined by visual/oculomotor constraints.

Competing models of eye movement control during reading disagree over the extent to which eye movements reflect ongoing linguistic and lexical processing, as opposed to visual/oculomotor factors (for reviews, see Rayner, 1998, 2009a). To address this controversy, participants’ eye movements were monitored in four experiments that manipulated a wide range of lexical variables. Specifically, Experiment 1 manipulated contextual predictability by presenting target words (e.g., teeth) in a high-predictability prior context (e.g. “The dentist told me to brush my teeth to prevent cavities.”) versus a low-predictability prior context (e.g., “I'm planning to take better care of my teeth to prevent cavities.”), Experiment 2 manipulated lexical ambiguity by presenting biased homographs (e.g., bank, crown, dough) in a subordinate-instantiating versus a dominant-instantiating prior context, and Experiments 3A and 3B manipulated word frequency by contrasting high frequency target words (e.g., table) and low frequency target words (e.g., banjo). In all four experiments, I used distributional analyses to examine the time-course of lexical influences on fixation times. Ex-Gaussian fitting (Staub, White, Drieghe, Hollway, & Rayner, 2010) revealed that all three lexical variables (i.e., predictability, lexical ambiguity, word frequency) were fast-acting enough to shift the entire distribution of fixation times, and a survival analysis technique (Reingold, Reichle, Glaholt, & Sheridan, 2012) revealed rapid lexical effects that emerged as early as 112 ms from the start of the fixation. Building on these findings, Experiments 3A and 3B provided evidence that lexical processing is delayed in an unsegmented text condition that contained numbers instead of spaces (e.g., “John4decided8to5sell9the7table2in3the9garage6sale”), relative to a normal text condition (e.g., “John decided to sell the table in the garage sale”). These findings have implications for ongoing theoretical debates concerning eye movement control, lexical ambiguity resolution, and the role of interword spaces during reading. In particular, the present findings provide strong support for models of eye movement control that assume that lexical influences can have a rapid influence on the majority of fixation durations, and are inconsistent with models that assume that fixation times are primarily determined by visual/oculomotor constraints.

Since it was introduced in Forster and Davis (1984), masked priming has been widely adopted in the psycholinguistic research on visual word recognition, but there has been little consensus on its actual mechanisms, i.e. how it occurs and how it should be interpreted. This dissertation addresses two different interpretations of masked priming, one based on the Interactive Activation Model (McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981), in which priming is seen as a result of persisting activation from the prime, the other based on the Entry Opening Model (Forster & Davis, 1984), which sees priming as a savings effect. Five experiments are reported testing contrasting hypotheses about the role of prime duration and prime-target asynchrony (SOA) in masked priming using both identity and form priming. Overall, this dissertation lends support to the Entry Opening Model, demonstrating that masked priming is essentially a savings effect, and that as such, it is determined by the SOA, not the prime duration per se.

Within the context of foreign language learning, very little research has examined how learners process second language (L2) words in terms of which variables best predict their processing speed and which mechanisms best characterize bilingual lexical processing. The present study set out to address this gap by using a range of learner and lexical variables (such as vocabulary size, word length, and age of acquisition) as points of reference against which to identify the best predictors of children’s and adults' L2 lexical processing, and by comparing response latencies across stimulus conditions so as to identify the processing pattern specific to each age group. Thirty-nine primary-aged and 94 university-level Chinese learners of English performed a picture-naming task in English and then in Chinese, and then completed a Chinese-to-English task. The researcher analyzed and estimated how those learner and lexical variables predicted the recorded response latencies by means of multiple regression and structural equation modeling, and made cross-stimulus-condition comparisons with the use of analysis of variance. The results suggested that different aspects of vocabulary knowledge contributed significantly to predicting children's and adults' processing speed, and that shorter processing time was significantly and directly predicted by the younger age at which an L2 word was learned and its higher degree of word typicality. Both lexical association and conceptual mediation were present in L2 lexical processing irrespective of learners' age but in general the later an L2 word is learned, the greater the likelihood that the word is lexically accessed and processed. These results illustrate the crucial role that language experiences and conceptual structures play in influencing the ease or difficulty with which L2 lexical items are retrieved, and reflect the complexities and dynamics involved in processing bilingual lexicons. These findings will be discussed within the context of the role of research and theory in developing evidence-based pedagogical practice with a specific reference to vocabulary acquisition in children and adults learning foreign languages within input-limited contexts.

Micro-affordance effects have been reported for several different components of the reach-to-grasp action during both on-line and off-line visual processing. The presence of such effects represents a strong demonstration of the close relationship between perception, action, and cognition. In this thesis 7 experiments are described, which investigate different aspects of that relationship, with particular attention on the nature of object representations. In 5 behavioural experiments as well as in 1 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) experiment a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm is employed to examine the presence of micro-affordance effects arising during language processing of object names. The power and precision component of the reach-to-grasp action is investigated in relation to the compatibility of an object for grasping with either a power or a precision grasp. Overall, the results of the experiments discussed in the present thesis suggest that: a) object representations activated during language processing of object names are able to potentiate actions arising from the component of the reach-to-grasp action under investigation; b) such representations might be more semantic or „propositional‟ than depictive in nature, therefore more related to stored semantic knowledge of the object and its associated actions than to its detailed visual properties; c) this semantic information about objects seems to be automatically translated into specific motor activity, even in the absence of any intention to act; d) finally, such semantic, non-visual motor potentiation seems to be rapid and relatively short lived.

This thesis explores the relationship between fixation location and the locus of attention during reading. Early theories of eye movement control during reading suggested that a very tight coupling exists between the two (Just & Carpenter, 1980); however, it has since been shown that dissociations do exist. Whether these dissociations necessarily implicate parallel lexical processing, or whether they can be accommodated for within a serial-sequential framework is explored in a series of experiments. Experiment 1 tested whether parallel lexical processing is, at the very least, psychologically plausible. Two horizontally aligned letter strings were presented simultaneously on a screen, the task being to decide whether they were physically identical or not. Even when presentation duration should have been short enough to prohibit the strictly serial processing of each word in turn, the results show clear lexical effects: high frequency words were responded to faster and with fewer errors than low frequency words. Effects of lexicality and orthography were also found. These results suggest that the two words had been processed at a lexical level in an overlapping fashion. Experiments 2 and 3 investigated the nature and range of word n+2 preview effects. In Experiment 2, word n+1 was either a determiner or 3-letter alternative higher frequency word; in Experiment 3, word n+1 was either a 4- or a 6-letter high frequency word. A gaze contingent display change technique was employed, where prior to passing an invisible boundary located immediately after word n, one, the other, neither or both of words n+1 and n+2 received a nonword preview. In addition to showing orthographic parafoveal-on-foveal effects stemming from word n+1, there was also evidence that word n+2 preview influenced targeting decisions on words n and n+1. Word n+2 preview effects are also found on word n+2 and in the spillover region. These effects were most wide ranging when word n+1 length was an average of 5- compared to 3-letters. Higher-level plausibility preview effects were explored in Experiments 4-6, again using a gaze contingent display change technique. In Experiment 4 word n+1 received either an identical preview, a different but plausible one, or an anomalous, or nonword preview. Critically, an effect of plausibility arose on word n+1, with anomalous previews receiving longer inspection times than alternative plausible previews. Experiments 5 and 6 investigated the range over which these effects might occur, testing for a plausibility preview effect on word n+2. Results showed numerical, but not statistical evidence for a plausibility-related preview effect on word n+2. There were, however, clear orthographic word n+2 preview effects. Finally, Experiment 7 experimentally tested the immediate oculomotor response to a mislocated fixation, using a text shift paradigm to simulate saccadic error and measuring the effect on lexical processing. Critically, this experiment showed that a quick error correction strategy appears to be engaged following a simulated saccadic undershoot, rather than a stay and process response. This suggests that a mislocated fixation account coupled with a stay and process response is unlikely to provide a viable explanation for lexical parafoveal-on-foveal effects. Overall, it is suggested that current instantiations of both serial (e.g., Reichle, Warren & McConnell, 2009) and parallel (e.g., Schad & Engbert, 2012) models of eye movement control during reading appear to fail to capture major aspects of these patterns of results. The results do, however, appear to fit most parsimoniously with a perspective on eye movement control that allows for multiple words to be processed in an overlapping fashion.

Bien que les symptômes moteurs soient prédominants chez les individus atteints de la maladie de Parkinson, les troubles cognitifs font aujourd'hui partie intégrante du spectre symptomatique de la maladie. Depuis peu, des troubles du langage ont été rapportés. Cette étude s'inscrit dans ce contexte et a pour objectif d'explorer l'influence de facteurs cognitivo-linguistiques sur la motricité des patients parkinsoniens. Pour cela, nous avons comparé trois tâches mettant en jeu trois types de motricités différentes chez quatre groupes de sujets : des sujets sains jeunes et âgés ; des patients parkinsoniens avec médication et d'autres patients parkinsoniens sans médication. Ces trois tâches avaient comme caractéristique principale de comparer des mots et des pseudo-mots. La 1ère tâche était une tâche de décision lexicale, la 2ème une tâche de réponse verbale et la 3ème une tâche d'écriture. Dans les 3 tâches, les stimuli étaient vus ou dictés. Nos résultats confirment que les patients parkinsoniens sans médication sont plus lents à réagir que les contrôles âgés. Néanmoins, ce ralentissement ne résulte pas de l'akinésie classiquement décrite. Ces patients parkinsoniens sans médication présentent en effet un trouble auditif majeur et un ralentissement cognitif dans les situations qui nécessitent un traitement lexical. Enfin, ces mêmes patients ont des difficultés à inhiber des processus automatiques qui viennent interférer et ralentir l'exécution de leur tâche motrice. Ces déficits semblent s'estomper sous traitement. Notre étude met ainsi en évidence l'existence de déficits cognitifs qui retardent l'initiation de la réponse motrice des patients parkinsoniens sans médication. / Even though the dominant symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) is motor impairment, cognitive impairment is currently also considered an important symptom. Recently, language impairment has been reported in PD as well. The present study follows up on recent advances in PD research, and aims to explore the influence of cognitive-linguistic factors on motor control in PD. To this end, we compared three tasks, each of which relies on a different type of motor control. We tested four groups of participants: healthy young participants, healthy elderly participants, PD patients on medication, and PD patients off medication. In all three tasks, the primary comparison was between responses to words and pseudo-words, which were presented visually or auditorily. The first task was a lexical decision task, the second a verbal response task, and the third was a handwriting task. Our results show, in line with previous studies, that off-medication PD patients respond more slowly than healthy control participants. However, this slow-down does not result from akinesia, a well known symptom of PD. Instead, off-medication PD patients show auditory impairment and cognitive slowing in situations that require lexical processing. Moreover, these patients have an additional deficit in inhibiting automatic (lexical) processes, which interfere with the motor task. All of these deficits seem to be reduced by medication. Therefore, our study shows clear evidence for cognitive deficits in PD. These cognitive deficits slow the initiation of a motor response in off-medication PD patients.