Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T20:19:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Paulo Baltazar.pdf: 12348587 bytes, checksum: 62c8227228c6a07eedab0e1866fa84fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-05-31 / Fundação Ford / In the 1980s, several government-sponsored projects were directed at improving the relationship between the Terena people and the white population. The most recent of those projects the construction of a gas pipeline running from Bolivia to Brazil served as a test case in that relationship. The negotiations around the implementation of the project brought to the surface the contrast between the decision making process which is characteristic of the Terena people and that of the non-indigenous authorities and their organizations in question. Up until then, the Terena leadership had never been consulted or invited to participate in the planning stage of projects aimed at the indigenous population. As a consequence, most of those projects and public policies have failed, due to the fact that they had been decided in the offices of the bureaucrats without the input of the receptors. The highlight of the gas pipeline project negotiations happened during a meeting between the representatives of the national and international agencies involved in the project, on the one hand, and the Terena leadership, on the other, whose venue was in Campo Grande, the capital of the State. On that occasion, the Terena clashed with the white representatives who proposed using the geographical distance between the Terena settlements and the actual pipeline as the sole factor in the financial compensation for the impact which the project would have on the indigenous territory and population. The argument advanced by the Terena leadership, at the time, was that the criterion proposed was contrary to their traditional decision making process. The Terena make their group decisions on the basis of the interaction between the extended family groups as well as the reciprocity of interests within their communities. The present study describes and analyzes negotiation which took place around the gas pipeline project vis-à-vis the features of the decision-making process which is characteristic of the Terena people. The chronology of the negotiation process is given as well as the attending results which derived from the entire process itself / Na década de 1980 vários foram os projetos de políticas publicas destinados aos Terena no Distrito de Taunay, com objetivo de facilitar a relação dos povos indígenas com o mundo do branco. O projeto mais recente foi a construção do Gasoduto Bolivia-Brasil que passa nas proximidades das terras indígenas, servindo de marco revelador no processo de negociação e de decisão das lideranças Terena. Até então as lideranças Terena nunca foram convidadas e nem tão pouco consultadas para participar na elaboração dos projetos destinados as populações indígenas. Como conseqüência, a maioria dos projetos de políticas publica fracassaram em decorrência de serem construídos em gabinetes, sem a participação da parte interessada. O fator mais importante nesta construção do Gasoduto foi a reunião que aconteceu, em Campo Grande-MS, entre os representantes institucionais nacionais e internacionais envolvidos no projeto e as lideranças indígenas. As lideranças Terena reprovaram a metodologia apresentada na reunião que usava a distancia como critério empregado pela empresa responsável na construção do Gasbol. As lideranças Terena argumentaram que o critério de distancia não faz parte do processo decisório dos Terena, que se baseia na interação entre grupos familiares extensas, bem como a reciprocidade no interesse comum e que são povos unidos independente de distancia. Passados dez anos, a implantação do Gasoduto, os recursos aplicados nas aldeias em sua maior parte não trouxeram resultados desejados. A explicação de certos fracassos tem como matriz a desvalorização e desconhecimento do processo decisório do Terena

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T14:52:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Paulo Baltazar.pdf: 12348587 bytes, checksum: 62c8227228c6a07eedab0e1866fa84fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-05-31 / Fundação Ford / In the 1980s, several government-sponsored projects were directed at improving the relationship between the Terena people and the white population. The most recent of those projects the construction of a gas pipeline running from Bolivia to Brazil served as a test case in that relationship. The negotiations around the implementation of the project brought to the surface the contrast between the decision making process which is characteristic of the Terena people and that of the non-indigenous authorities and their organizations in question. Up until then, the Terena leadership had never been consulted or invited to participate in the planning stage of projects aimed at the indigenous population. As a consequence, most of those projects and public policies have failed, due to the fact that they had been decided in the offices of the bureaucrats without the input of the receptors. The highlight of the gas pipeline project negotiations happened during a meeting between the representatives of the national and international agencies involved in the project, on the one hand, and the Terena leadership, on the other, whose venue was in Campo Grande, the capital of the State. On that occasion, the Terena clashed with the white representatives who proposed using the geographical distance between the Terena settlements and the actual pipeline as the sole factor in the financial compensation for the impact which the project would have on the indigenous territory and population. The argument advanced by the Terena leadership, at the time, was that the criterion proposed was contrary to their traditional decision making process. The Terena make their group decisions on the basis of the interaction between the extended family groups as well as the reciprocity of interests within their communities. The present study describes and analyzes negotiation which took place around the gas pipeline project vis-à-vis the features of the decision-making process which is characteristic of the Terena people. The chronology of the negotiation process is given as well as the attending results which derived from the entire process itself / Na década de 1980 vários foram os projetos de políticas publicas destinados aos Terena no Distrito de Taunay, com objetivo de facilitar a relação dos povos indígenas com o mundo do branco. O projeto mais recente foi a construção do Gasoduto Bolivia-Brasil que passa nas proximidades das terras indígenas, servindo de marco revelador no processo de negociação e de decisão das lideranças Terena. Até então as lideranças Terena nunca foram convidadas e nem tão pouco consultadas para participar na elaboração dos projetos destinados as populações indígenas. Como conseqüência, a maioria dos projetos de políticas publica fracassaram em decorrência de serem construídos em gabinetes, sem a participação da parte interessada. O fator mais importante nesta construção do Gasoduto foi a reunião que aconteceu, em Campo Grande-MS, entre os representantes institucionais nacionais e internacionais envolvidos no projeto e as lideranças indígenas. As lideranças Terena reprovaram a metodologia apresentada na reunião que usava a distancia como critério empregado pela empresa responsável na construção do Gasbol. As lideranças Terena argumentaram que o critério de distancia não faz parte do processo decisório dos Terena, que se baseia na interação entre grupos familiares extensas, bem como a reciprocidade no interesse comum e que são povos unidos independente de distancia. Passados dez anos, a implantação do Gasoduto, os recursos aplicados nas aldeias em sua maior parte não trouxeram resultados desejados. A explicação de certos fracassos tem como matriz a desvalorização e desconhecimento do processo decisório do Terena