The BEIR V preferred relative risk models and standard life-table techniques are used to project lifetime fatal cancer risk factors for average members of the Canadian population. Uncertainties associated with projections are evaluated for: (1) sampling variation (statistical error), (2) extrapolation of risks to low doses and low dose rates, (3) projection of excess lifetime cancer risks beyond the current periods of human observation in epidemiological studies, (4) the transfer of site-specific excess risk coefficients between populations with differing baseline cancer rates, and (5) the effect of differences in the age and sex distributions among occupations in the Canadian "radiation" workforce. Results are used to assess the applicability of the fatal cancer risk estimates recommended in ICRP publication 60 to the Canadian population. It was found that sampling variation, extrapolating to low doses and dose rates, projecting excess risks beyond current periods of observation, and the uncertainty in how to transfer site-specific excess risks between populations all cause substantial variations in lifetime cancer risk projections. Site-specific cancer risk projections may be expected to vary by factors of 2 to 5, depending on the source of uncertainty. Site-specific differences were found in the fatal cancer risk factors projected for "average" male and female workers among different occupations in the Canadian workforce. Site-specific worker averages differed by as much as a factor 3. Female average risk factors for digestive cancers were substantially higher than male workers, while male average risk factors tended to be higher for leukemia and respiratory cancer. Overall however, the majority of worker risk factors were within 2.5% of the site-specific projections for the workforce as a whole. The ICRP-60 nominal fatal cancer risk estimates, tissue weighting factors, and lifetime risk projections for prolonged radiation exposure were all in good agreement with equivalent values derived in this report for the Canadian population. In view of the uncertainties, the results suggest the ICRP estimated cancer risks are as good as any presently available and supports the use of the ICRP recommended values for the planning and regulation of radiation protection in Canada. / Thesis / Master of Science (MS)

O principal objetivo do estudo foi utilizar informações de ocorrência do Traumatismo Crânio Encefálico (TCE) que possam inferir/gerar descobertas associadas ao risco de gravidade do paciente, bem como auxiliar na tomada de decisão médica ao definir o melhor prognóstico, indicando quais as possíveis medidas que podem ser escolhidas para a gravidade na lesão sofrida pela vítima. Inicialmente, foram analisadas as estatísticas descritivas dos dados dos pacientes de TCE de um hospital do interior de São Paulo. Participaram desse estudo 50 pacientes. Os resultados mostraram que a maior frequência do trauma é por acidentes de trânsito (62%), seguidos de acidentes por queda (24%). Traumas em pacientes do sexo masculino (88%) são muito mais frequentes do que em pacientes do sexo feminino. Para modelagem, transformou-se a variável resposta \"Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)\" em dicotômica, considerando 0 (zero) aos pacientes fora de risco e 1 (um) aos que apresentaram algum tipo de risco. Em seguida, técnicas de aprendizado estatístico foram utilizadas de modo a comparar o desempenho dos classificadores Regressão Logística sendo um caso do Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) e redes probabilísticas Naïve Bayes (NB). O modelo com melhor desempenho (RF) combinou os índices Accuracy (ACC) , Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) , Sensitivity (SEN), Specificity (SPE) e Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), que apresentaram os resultados mais favoráveis no quesito de apoio no auxílio da tomada de decisão médica, possibilitando escolher o estudo clínico mais adequado das vítimas traumatizadas ao considerar o risco de vida do indivíduo. Conforme o modelo selecionado foi possível gerar um ranking para estimar a probabilidade de risco de vida do paciente. Em seguida foi realizado uma comparação de desempenho entre o modelo RF (novo classificador) e os índices Revisited Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) , Índice de Barthel (IB) referente à classificação de risco dos pacientes. / The main objective of this study was to consider the information related to the occurrence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that can infer new results associated with the patients risk of severity as well as assisting in the medical decision in order to find the best prognosis; this can lead to indicate possible measures that can be chosen for severity in the injury suffered by the victim. Initially, we have presented descriptive statistics from the patients with TBI from a hospital located in the heartland of São Paulo. Fifty patients were recruited for this study. Descriptive analyzes showed that the highest frequency of trauma is due to traffic accidents (62 %) followed by crashes per accident (24 %). The causes related to trauma occur much more often in male patients (88 %) than in female patients. To order model, the response variable Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) was considered as dichotomous, where 0 (zero) was to out-of-risk patients and 1 (one) to those who presented some type of risk. Further, statistical learning techniques were used in order to compare the performance of the Logistic Regression as a Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes (NB) model. The best performing (RF) model combined the Accuracy (ACC) , Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) , Sensitivity (SEN), Specificity (SPE) e Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), which presented the most favorable results in terms of support in medical decision, making it possible to choose the most appropriate clinical study of traumatized victims based on the individual life risk. According to the selected model it was possible to generate a rank to estimate the probability of life risk of the patient. Then a performance comparison was performed between the RF model (proposed classifier) and the Revisited Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Barthel index (IB) referring to the risk classification of patients.

O principal objetivo do estudo foi utilizar informações de ocorrência do Traumatismo Crânio Encefálico (TCE) que possam inferir/gerar descobertas associadas ao risco de gravidade do paciente, bem como auxiliar na tomada de decisão médica ao definir o melhor prognóstico, indicando quais as possíveis medidas que podem ser escolhidas para a gravidade na lesão sofrida pela vítima. Inicialmente, foram analisadas as estatísticas descritivas dos dados dos pacientes de TCE de um hospital do interior de São Paulo. Participaram desse estudo 50 pacientes. Os resultados mostraram que a maior frequência do trauma é por acidentes de trânsito (62%), seguidos de acidentes por queda (24%). Traumas em pacientes do sexo masculino (88%) são muito mais frequentes do que em pacientes do sexo feminino. Para modelagem, transformou-se a variável resposta \"Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)\" em dicotômica, considerando 0 (zero) aos pacientes fora de risco e 1 (um) aos que apresentaram algum tipo de risco. Em seguida, técnicas de aprendizado estatístico foram utilizadas de modo a comparar o desempenho dos classificadores Regressão Logística sendo um caso do Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) e redes probabilísticas Naïve Bayes (NB). O modelo com melhor desempenho (RF) combinou os índices Accuracy (ACC) , Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) , Sensitivity (SEN), Specificity (SPE) e Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), que apresentaram os resultados mais favoráveis no quesito de apoio no auxílio da tomada de decisão médica, possibilitando escolher o estudo clínico mais adequado das vítimas traumatizadas ao considerar o risco de vida do indivíduo. Conforme o modelo selecionado foi possível gerar um ranking para estimar a probabilidade de risco de vida do paciente. Em seguida foi realizado uma comparação de desempenho entre o modelo RF (novo classificador) e os índices Revisited Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) , Índice de Barthel (IB) referente à classificação de risco dos pacientes. / The main objective of this study was to consider the information related to the occurrence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that can infer new results associated with the patients risk of severity as well as assisting in the medical decision in order to find the best prognosis; this can lead to indicate possible measures that can be chosen for severity in the injury suffered by the victim. Initially, we have presented descriptive statistics from the patients with TBI from a hospital located in the heartland of São Paulo. Fifty patients were recruited for this study. Descriptive analyzes showed that the highest frequency of trauma is due to traffic accidents (62 %) followed by crashes per accident (24 %). The causes related to trauma occur much more often in male patients (88 %) than in female patients. To order model, the response variable Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) was considered as dichotomous, where 0 (zero) was to out-of-risk patients and 1 (one) to those who presented some type of risk. Further, statistical learning techniques were used in order to compare the performance of the Logistic Regression as a Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes (NB) model. The best performing (RF) model combined the Accuracy (ACC) , Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) , Sensitivity (SEN), Specificity (SPE) e Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), which presented the most favorable results in terms of support in medical decision, making it possible to choose the most appropriate clinical study of traumatized victims based on the individual life risk. According to the selected model it was possible to generate a rank to estimate the probability of life risk of the patient. Then a performance comparison was performed between the RF model (proposed classifier) and the Revisited Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Barthel index (IB) referring to the risk classification of patients.