Spelling suggestions: "subject:"lingcod"" "subject:"addingcode""
1 |
Description and analysis of dietary preference of lingcod in the nearshore zone, Oregon /Tinus, Craig A. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Oregon State University, 2010. / Printout. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 72-76). Also available on the World Wide Web.
|
2 |
Neritic reef fishes off central Oregon : aspects of life histories and the recreational fishery /McClure, Robert Edward. January 1982 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--Oregon State University, 1982. / Typescript (photocopy). Includes bibliographical references (leaves 88-91). Also available on the World Wide Web.
|
3 |
Conceptual tools for managing two Monterey Bay fisheriesIsh, Teresa Lin. January 2003 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S.)--University of California, Santa Cruz, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 71-77)
|
4 |
The Response of a Predatory Fish, Ophiodon elongatus, to a Marine Protected Area: Variation in Diet, Catch Rates, and Size CompositionAnderson, Eric S 01 December 2016 (has links)
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are a management tool used to protect and sustain many ecologically and economically important fish species from overexploitation by recreational and commercial fishing. Lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus) and some of its prey species, such as rockfish (Sebastes spp.), are species that are protected from fishing in some California MPAs. Lingcod is an apex predator that consumes a variety of fish and invertebrate species. In this study, I sought to assess the effect of an MPA on the abundance, size and diet of Lingcod. I hypothesized that Lingcod in a no-take MPA would be more abundant and larger than Lingcod in an adjacent reference site (REF) that was open to fishing. Furthermore, I hypothesized that diet would differ between Lingcod in caught the MPA and Lingcod in the REF. I collected Lingcod from the Point Buchon State Marine Reserve (MPA) and an adjacent REF site that was open to fishing. I measured, weighed, sexed, and collected stomach contents from Lingcod using the gastric lavage (stomach pumping) technique. Then, I identified prey items from Lingcod stomach contents down to the lowest taxonomic level possible and quantified diet composition by percent by occurrence, percent by number, and percent by mass. Lingcod in the MPA consumed more fish prey items than Lingcod in the REF site. Lingcod in the REF consumed more cephalopod prey items than Lingcod in the MPA. I analyzed the four most common prey items (rockfish, anchovies, flatfish, and octopus) for nutritional content. My data suggest that Lingcod increased in size and abundance in a no-take MPA because they do not suffer from fishing mortality. However, a more nutritious diet could also contribute to a biologically significant advantage for Lingcod in the MPA. To address this would require further research focused on calculating the net energy (gross energy extracted from the prey item minus the energetic costs of handling and digesting the prey item) obtained by Lingcod from consuming different fish and cephalopod prey items. MPAs can be an effective management tool for protecting fish stocks, although, it is important to understand the interspecific interactions between predator and prey species to adaptively mange MPAs and the species that reside within them.
|
5 |
Monitoring fish using passive acousticsMouy, Xavier 31 January 2022 (has links)
Some fish produce sounds for a variety of reasons, such as to find mates, defend their territory, or maintain cohesion within their group. These sounds could be used to non-intrusively detect the presence of fish and potentially to estimate their number (or density) over large areas and long time periods. However, many fish sounds have not yet been associated to specific species, which limits the usefulness of this approach. While
recording fish sounds in tanks is reasonably straightforward, it presents several
problems: many fish do not produce sounds in captivity or their behavior and sound production is altered significantly, and the complex acoustic propagation conditions in tanks often leads to distorted measurements. The work presented in this thesis aims to address these issues by providing methodologies to record, detect, and identify species-specific fish sounds in the wild. A set of hardware and software solutions are developed to simultaneously record fish sounds, acoustically localize the fish in three-dimensions, and record video to identify the fish and observe their behavior. Three platforms have been developed and tested in the field. The first platform, referred to as the large array, is composed of six hydrophones connected to an AMAR acoustic recorder and two open-source autonomous video cameras (FishCams) that were developed during this thesis. These instruments are secured to a PVC frame of dimension 2 m x 2 m x 3 m that can be transported and assembled in the field. The hydrophone configuration for this array was
defined using a simulated annealing optimization approach that minimized localization uncertainties. This array provides the largest field of view and most accurate acoustic localization, and is well suited to long-term deployments (weeks). The second platform, referred to as the mini array, uses a single FishCam and four hydrophones connected to a SoundTrap acoustic recorder on a one cubic meter PVC frame; this array can be deployed more easily in constrained locations or on rough/uneven seabeds. The third platform, referred to as the mobile array, consists of four hydrophones connected to a SoundTrap recorder and mounted on a tethered Trident underwater drone with built-in video, allowing remote control and real-time positioning in response to observed fish presence, rather than long-term deployments as for the large and mini arrays. For each array, acoustic localization is performed by measuring time-difference of arrivals between hydrophones
and estimating the sound-source location using linearized (for the large array) or non-linear (for the mini and mobile arrays) inversion. Fish sounds are automatically detected and localized in three dimensions, and sounds localized within the field of view of the camera(s) are assigned to a fish species by manually reviewing the video recordings. The three platforms were deployed at four locations off the East coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada, and allowed the identification of sounds from quillback rockfish (Sebastes maliger), copper rockfish (Sebastes caurinus), and lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus), species that had not been documented previously to produce sounds. While each platform developed during this thesis has its own set of advantages and limitations, using them in coordination helps identify fish sounds over different habitats and with various budget and logistical constraints. In an effort to make passive acoustics a more viable way to monitor fish in the wild, this thesis also investigates the use of automatic detection and classification algorithms to efficiently find fish sounds in large passive acoustic datasets. The proposed approach detects acoustic transients using a measure of spectrogram variance and classifies them as “noise” or “fish sounds” using a binary classifier. Five different classification algorithms were trained and evaluated on a dataset of more than 96,000 manually annotated examples of fish sounds and noise from five locations off Vancouver Island. The classification algorithm that performed best (random forest) has an Fscore of 0.84 (Precision = 0.82,Recall = 0.86) on the test dataset. The
analysis of 2.5 months of acoustic data collected in a rockfish conservation area off Vancouver Island shows that the proposed detector can be used to efficiently explore large datasets, formulate hypotheses, and help answer practical conservation questions. / Graduate
|
Page generated in 0.0429 seconds