Submitted by PPG Medicina e Ci?ncias da Sa?de (medicina-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-12-05T13:29:31Z No. of bitstreams: 1 RUY_DE_ALMEIDA_BARCELLOS.pdf: 2171813 bytes, checksum: d242fe874538146ea8081420b788cadb (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Sheila Dias (sheila.dias@pucrs.br) on 2018-12-06T18:13:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 RUY_DE_ALMEIDA_BARCELLOS.pdf: 2171813 bytes, checksum: d242fe874538146ea8081420b788cadb (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-06T18:20:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RUY_DE_ALMEIDA_BARCELLOS.pdf: 2171813 bytes, checksum: d242fe874538146ea8081420b788cadb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-09-24 / Objective: To evaluate the impact of the implantation of a checklist during multidisciplinary daily round in the period of using invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) and permanence in the ICU. Methods: In a non-randomized clinical trial with historical controls, 466 patients submitted to MV were evaluated in a Hospital in Caxias do Sul (RS). Of this total, 235 and 231 were evaluated in the pre-intervention and post-intervention phases, respectively. The outcomes studied were SAPS-3, SOFA, frequency of infections, ICU stay, days of MV, reintubations, rehospitalizations, deaths in the ICU and hospital. Results: There was a significant reduction after the routine use of the checklist in the lenght of permanence in 37.5% (p <0.001) and 60% (p <0.001) in the time of mechanical ventilation. The frequency of pulmonary focus infection was reduced by 11.9% (p = 0.030). Conclusions: The multidisciplinarity structured through the use of checklists has an impact on the reduction of the days of use of mechanical ventilation and stay in the ICU. / Objetivo: Avaliar o impacto da implanta??o de uma lista de verifica??o durante round di?rio multiprofissional nos tempos de ventila??o mec?nica invasiva (VM) e perman?ncia na UTI. M?todos: Em um ensaio cl?nico n?o randomizado com controles hist?ricos, foram avaliados 466 pacientes submetidos ? VM em um hospital em Caxias do Sul (RS). Foram avaliados 235 e 231 pacientes nas fases pr?-interven??o e p?s-interven??o respectivamente. As vari?veis estudadas foram: Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS-3), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), frequ?ncia de infec??es, perman?ncia na UTI, dias de VM, reintuba??es, reinterna??es, ?bitos na UTI e hospitalar. Resultados: Houve redu??o significativa ap?s a implanta??o da lista de verifica??o no tempo de perman?ncia em 37,5% (p<0,001) e de 60% (p<0,001) no tempo de ventila??o mec?nica. A frequ?ncia de infec??o de foco pulmonar teve redu??o 11,9% (p=0,030). Conclus?es: A multidisciplinaridade estruturada atrav?s da utiliza??o da lista de verifica??o teve impacto na redu??o dos dias de utiliza??o de ventila??o mec?nica e perman?ncia na UTI.