Spelling suggestions: "subject:"listeria monocytogenesthrough africa"" "subject:"listeria monocytogenesthrough affrica""
1 |
Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644 on tomatoes using sodium dodecyl sulphate, levulinic acid and sodium hypochlorite solutionMnyandu, Elizabeth January 2015 (has links)
Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science in Food Science and Technology, Durban University of Technology, 2015. / Listeria monocytogenes have been implicated as a public health concern worldwide. The study explored the survival of non-adapted, heat adapted and chlorine adapted L. monocytogenes on tomatoes; as well as the survival of non-adapted, heat adapted and chlorine adapted biofilms after exposure to sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), levulinc acid, sodium hypochlorite solution. Contact time of 1, 3 and 5 minutes was used. The survival of L. monocytogenes was monitored at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours. The sanitizers were used individually or combined as follows; 1% sodium dodecyl sulphate individually; 0.5% levulinic acid individually; 200 ppm sodium hypochlorite solution individually and 0.5% levulinic acid/0.05% sodium dodecyl sulphate in combination (mixture). The samples were kept at 4 °C throughout the period of assessment. The effect of these sanitizers on pH, total soluble solids (TSS) and titratable acidity (TA) was also determined. Furthermore, the attachment of L. monocytogenes on tomatoes was investigated using a scanning electron microscope.
Highest log reduction of non-adapted L. monocytogenes were observed on tomatoes treated with 1% SDS and least log reduction was achieved when tomatoes were treated with sodium hypochlorite solution. Though the log reduction achieved by 0.5% levulinic acid was higher that sodium hypochlorite solution, it was lower than log reduction achieved when 0.05% SDS / 0.5% levulinic acid mixture was used for all contact times. Using non-adapted L. monocytogenes, SDS was able to destroy all L. monocytogenes at 1, 3 and 5 minutes contact time. The trend was the same when heat adapted and chlorine adapted L. monocytogenes were used. There was no significant log reduction observed with biofilms. More favourable results were observed as contact time was increased from 1 to 5 minutes. Though there was a decrease in surviving bacteria from 1 to 3 minutes contact time, this decrease was not significant.
The study investigated if exposure to sanitizer has an effect on pH, titratable acidity (TA) and total soluble solids (TSS) of the tomatoes. It was revealed that levulinic acid and mixture can have detrimental effect on pH, TA and TSS of tomatoes. The TA and TSS of samples treated with levulinic acid and mixture varied significantly (P ≤ 0.05) compared to the control sample. Although the TA and TSS of samples treated with SDS and sodium hypochlorite solution were different from the control, the differences were not significant.
As much as sanitizers have the potential to reduce the bacterial population in fresh produce they may not completely destroy pathogens. Chlorine based sanitizers such as sodium hypochlorite though frequently used in the fresh produce industry, are not the best sanitizer to be used against food borne pathogens. Other sanitizers such as SDS used alone or in combination with another sanitizer can achieve better results than the widely used sodium hypochlorite solution as observed in this study. Stress adapted pathogens become less responsive to sanitizers during subsequent treatments. Through this research, it was established that biofilms are resistant to sanitizers. Though application of sanitizers in fresh produce is cheaper and simpler to apply, there is need to monitor varying concentrations of sanitizers, contact time and minimise contact with sub-surfaces as this could lead to sensory quality losses.
|
2 |
Genomic characterisation and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from pig farmsMasemola, Puseletso Maselepe 07 1900 (has links)
Listeria monocytogenes is a zoonotic foodborne pathogen, transmissible from the natural
agricultural environment to animals and humans. In recent years, the pig production industry has
experienced a series of monetary losses as a result of the L. monocytogenes outbreak which
threatened the economy of South Africa. This outbreak also had a detrimental effect on the health
system of the country. In South Africa however, there is limited information regarding the genomic
diversity of L. monocytogenes. Therefore, an overview of the genomic diversity of L.
monocytogenes strains circulating at different levels of the pork production chain needs to be
determined so as to be able to identify routes of contamination of the pathogen and thus improve
meat safety. This study was aimed to determine the antimicrobial resistance patterns and
population structure of L. monocytogenes isolated from pig farms in South Africa. Based on wholegenome
sequence analysis, 77 isolates of L. monocytogenes were differentiated into four molecular
serogroups with IIa (45.5%) being the most prevalent followed by IIc (26.0%), IVb (22.1%) and IIb (6.5%). Overall, 11 clonal complexes (CCs) were identified in this study, with the
predominance being observed from; CC204 (23.4%), CC1 (19.5%) and CC2 (16.9%). Genetic
elements associated with biocide, antimicrobial and heavy metal resistance were noted in 24.7 %,
48% and 11.7% of the isolates, respectively. Listeria pathogenicity island 1 and 3 that harbored
clusters of virulence genes were present in 38.8% of the isolates. Five different plasmids were
found in 68.9% of the isolates. This study has given baseline data on the genomic diversity of L.
monocytogenes strains that are associated with biocides, heavy metal and antibiotics resistance
genes. The data again demonstrated the genotypes of L. monocytogenes that are prone to
contaminate the farm environment and possibly cause diseases in animals and humans. / Life and Consumer Sciences / M. Sc. (Life Sciences)
|
Page generated in 0.118 seconds