Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-08-27T00:10:08Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CarlaCamposAmico_DISSERT.pdf: 1356161 bytes, checksum: 101c435b8ddc8eeaadfbb5baac16b899 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-09-01T00:27:05Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 CarlaCamposAmico_DISSERT.pdf: 1356161 bytes, checksum: 101c435b8ddc8eeaadfbb5baac16b899 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-09-01T00:27:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CarlaCamposAmico_DISSERT.pdf: 1356161 bytes, checksum: 101c435b8ddc8eeaadfbb5baac16b899 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-05-13 / Esta pesquisa objetiva analisar, a partir da legisla??o, da doutrina e da jurisprud?ncia, o controle de constitucionalidade concentrado das leis e da execu??o or?ament?ria, diante da morosidade e debilidade do Poder p?blico em promover a gradual efetiva??o de direitos fundamentais sociais. Destaca que a implementa??o dos direitos fundamentais sociais elencados na Constitui??o Federal constitui imperativo para a Administra??o P?blica e que o Poder Judici?rio deve garantir sua efetiva??o, rebatendo cr?ticas que aludem ? neutralidade pol?tica da jurisdi??o, ? separa??o dos poderes e ? legitima??o constitucional. Ressalta a import?ncia do aprofundamento do conhecimento do or?amento p?blico que deve ser elaborado e executado de forma respons?vel, voltado para o atendimento das necessidades sociais da popula??o. Analisa o controle do or?amento p?blico nos ?mbitos interno, externo, popular e judicial. Real?a o controle de constitucionalidade difuso em a??es individuais e coletivas que buscam obter a imposi??o de obriga??es prestacionais ao Estado para a consecu??o do m?nimo existencial; e o controle de constitucionalidade das escolhas pol?tico-administrativas, como o mais vantajoso para minorar os transtornos causados ao planejamento or?ament?rio no decorrer do exerc?cio financeiro. Apresenta hip?teses em que a a??o direta de inconstitucionalidade e a argui??o de descumprimento de preceito fundamental podem ser utilizadas para impugnar atos normativos e administrativos ou omiss?es legislativas e administrativas atinentes ao or?amento p?blico, antes e durante o exerc?cio financeiro. Conclui, com embasamento nos estudos realizados, que h? a necessidade de abertura procedimental no controle de constitucionalidade concentrado do or?amento p?blico, nas fases de postula??o, instru??o, decis?o e execu??o, com o fortalecimento de mecanismos de democracia participativa e de di?logo institucional permanente entre os Poderes e destes com a sociedade para garantir a gradual concretiza??o de direitos fundamentais sociais integrantes do m?nimo existencial. / This research aims to analyze, from the point of view of legislation, doctrine and jurisprudence, the concentrated constitutionality control of laws and budget execution, given the slowness and weakness of the public power in promoting the progressive implementation of fundamental social rights. The methodology of this wok comprises a literature survey based on national and international doctrine and court decisions, especially the Brazilian Supreme Court, as well as the legislation related to the subject and other sources of investigative interest. It is pointed out that the implementation of fundamental social rights listed in the Constitution is mandatory for the public administration and the judiciary must ensure its execution, rebutting criticisms that allude to the political neutrality of jurisdiction, the separation of powers and the constitutional legitimacy. It is emphasized the importance of deepening the knowledge that the public budget should be defined and executed in a responsible manner, aimed at meeting the social needs of the population. It is analyzed the control of the public budget from internal, external, popular and judicial levels. It is emphasized the diffuse constitutional control in individual and collective actions that seek to impose obligations regarding social services on the State to achieve the existential minimum; and the control of constitutionality of political and administrative choices as the most advantageous way to minimize inconvenience to the budget during the financial year. It presents hypotheses in which the direct action of unconstitutionality and the claim of breach of fundamental precept can be used to contest normative and administrative acts or legislative and administrative omissions related to the public budget, before and throughout the financial year. Based on the studies carried out, it is concluded that there is the need for procedural opening in concentrated control of constitutionality of the public budget at the postulation, instructions, decision and execution stages, strengthening the participative democracy mechanisms and permanent institutional dialogue between the Powers and also between them and the society to ensure the progressive realization of fundamental social rights that comprise the existential minimum.