陳志華. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學硏究院哲學學部. / Manuscript. / Includes bibliographical references: leaves 203-216. / Chen Zhihua. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue yan jiu yuan zhe xue xue bu. / 自序 / Chapter (一) --- 前言 / Chapter (二) --- 阿毘達磨的自性形而上學：一個自性形而上學的典範 / Chapter (三) --- 自性形而上學的批判(I)：語言的省察 / Chapter (四) --- 自性形而上學的批判(II)：實體化概念的消解 / Chapter (五) --- 中管哲學的基本立場：形而上學：是/否？ / Chapter (六) --- 結語 / 注釋 / Chapter 附錄一 --- <<龍樹：其人及其著作>> / Chapter 附錄二 --- 參考文獻

The current study examines several recent comparisons made between the writings of Nagarjuna and Derrida. The main question under examination is why in particular should such a comparison of two widely different thinkers hold obvious appeal for contemporary scholars? In an attempt to answer this question the comparisons of Robert Magliola, David Loy, Harold Coward and others are analysed as are critiques of this type of comparison presented by Richard Hayes, A. Bharati and others. It is concluded that the basis for these comparisons is a strong concern for a "middle way" perspective between forms of absolutism and nihilism in contemporary Western culture.

No description available.