Submitted by Ana Maria Fiscina Sampaio (fiscina@bahia.fiocruz.br) on 2012-11-30T21:17:29Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Juliana Perrone Bezerra De Menezes Avaliacao do papel... - 2005.pdf: 32348298 bytes, checksum: 109d71b2fb835421caaa135becd309de (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2012-11-30T21:17:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Juliana Perrone Bezerra De Menezes Avaliacao do papel... - 2005.pdf: 32348298 bytes, checksum: 109d71b2fb835421caaa135becd309de (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, Bahia, Brasil / Micobactérias ambientais podem ser encontradas em água, solo, poeira, alimentos e animais. A importância do estudo dessas micobactérias tem aumentado nos últimos anos, principalmente, devido a predisposição de pacientes com imunodeficiência à infecção por essas espécies de micobactéria. Além disso, a exposição a micobactérias ambientais pode constituir um dos fatores associados à baixa eficácia da imunização com a vacina BCG. As manifestações da doença, assim como a manutenção da infecção micobateriana, dependem da interação entre a micobactéria e o sistema imune do hospedeiro. O presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a resposta de macrófagos peritoneais de camundongos susceptíveis BALB/c infectados com M intracellulare ou M fortuitum. Macrófagos peritoneais de camundongos BALB/c foram infectados por M intracellulare ou M fortuitum e as diferenças entre essas duas espécies quanto à capacidade de infectar e sobreviver no interior de macrófagos primários, tratados ou não com IFN-y, e produzir óxido nítrico foram avaliadas. Foi observado que os macrófagos infectados com M fortuitum apresentam um maior percentual de células infectadas que aqueles infectados com M. intracellulare, após 4, 24 e 48 horas de infecção. Entretanto, tanto M. fortuitum quanto M intracellulare são capazes de sobreviver no interior de macrófagos peritoneais, pois não há alteração da carga bacilar dessa duas espécies de micobactéria ao longo da infecção. Observamos ainda que M. intracellulare induziu uma maior produção de óxido nítrico por macrófagos primários infectados e tratados por IFN-y que M fortuitum. No entanto, o pré-tratamento com IFN-y não alterou o percentual de células infectadas nem a viabilidade de M intracellulare ou M. fortuitum. Os dados obtidos neste trabalho mostram que, in vitro, M. fortuitum e M. intracellulare interagem de formas distintas, levando á diferentes respostas do macrófago e a destinos intracelulares distintos. Além disso, mostramos que M intracellulare e M. fortuitum são resistentes ao óxido nítrico produzido por macrófagos após ativação por IFN-y. / Environmental mycobacteria are found in water, soil, dust, food and animals. Environmental Mycobacterium importance has increased in the last few years, mostly because of immunodeficient patient predisposition to infection. Moreover, exposure to environmental mycobacteria could be associated to low levels of protection induced by immunization with BCG. Disease manifestations as well as infection outcome depend on interaction between mycobacteria and host immune system. The goal of this work was to evaluate peritoneal macrophage response, from the susceptible BALB/c mice, to M. intracellulare or M. fortuitum infection. Peritoneal inflammatory macrophages, pre-activated or not with IFN-y, were infected by M. intracellulare or M fortuitum and diferences between these two species related to the capacity to infect macrophages, to survive intracellularly and to induce NO production were evaluated. It was observed that the percentage of M. fortuitum-xnÍQoXQá cells was higher related to M. intracellulare-míecieá ones, after 4, 24 and 48 hours of infection. In addition, both M. fortuitum and M. intracellulare presented the ability to survive in peritoneal macrophages. It was also observed that in response to IFN-y activation, M. intracellulare induced higher NO production thanM fortuitum. However, pre-activation with IFN-y did not modify, neither the percentage of M. intracellulare and M. fortuitum infected cells, nor intracellular bacillum survival. These data demonstrate that, in vitro., M. fortuitum and M. intracellulare differently interact with macrophages, inducing diferent macrophage reponses and that both M. intracellulare and M fortuitum are resistant to NO production upon IFN-y activation.

Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare are environmental opportunistic pathogens whose source for human infection is water and soil. M. avium and M. intracellulare cause pulmonary infections (tuberculosis) in immunocompetent individuals and bacteremia in immunodeficient individuals (e.g. AIDS). One factor likely influencing the lack of success of antibiotic therapy in patients would be their ability to form biofilms. Growth in biofilms might result in antimicrobial resistance because (1) cells are protected by layers of other cells and extracellular material (2) and differences in physiologic state of cells as a consequence of growing on surfaces. The objectives of the work were to (1) establish methods for reproducible growth of mycobacterial biofilms (2) measure the formation of biofilms on surfaces by cells of M. avium and M. intracellulare (3) measure the antibiotic- and chlorine- susceptibility of M. avium and M. intracellulare strain TMC1406T in cell grown in suspension, cells grown in biofilms and suspended and of cells grown in biofilms (4) measure the hydrophobicity of M. avium and M. intracellulare grown in suspension and in biofilms. Methods were developed for growing mycobacteria in biofilms in polystyrene flasks and on glass beads. Although both strains formed biofilms, M. intracellulare strain TMC 1406T more readily formed biofilms than M. avium strain A5 in polystyrene flasks. The majority of M. intracellulare strain TMC 1406T cells grew on the walls of the flasks rather than in suspension like M. avium strain A5. The susceptibility of M7H9 medium-grown cells of M. avium strain A5 and M. intracellulare strain TMC 1406T cells grown in suspension, cells grown in biofilms and suspended and cells grown in biofilms was measured against clarithromycin, ethambutol, kanamycin, rifampicin and streptomycin. Cells grown in biofilms and exposed to antibiotics in biofilms were five-fold resistant to antibiotics than were cells grown in biofilms and exposed in suspension. Cells grown and exposed in suspension were ten-fold more sensitive to antibiotics than were cells grown in biofilms and exposed in suspension. The chlorine susceptibility of cells grown in medium and water was also measured. Cells grown in biofilms were more resistant to chlorine than cells grown in biofilms and suspended. Cells grown in suspension were more sensitive to chlorine than cells grown in biofilms and suspended. The hydrophobicity data (i.e., hexadecane adherence and contact angle measurements) showed that cells grown in biofilms are more hydrophobic than cells grown in biofilms and suspended and cells grown in suspension. It is clear that there are physiological changes between cells grown in suspension, cells grown in biofilms and suspended and cells in biofilms. / Master of Science