Global ETD Search

31	Continuity of Personality Pathology Constructs in an Inpatient Sample: A Comparison of Linear and Count Regression Analyses Using the PID-5 and MMPI-2-RF Menton, William 02 May 2016 (has links) No description available. Psychology Psychological Tests personality personality assessment personality disorders MMPI MMPI-2-RF PID-5 DSM-5 multiple regression linear regression count regression negative binomial regression self-report inventories
32	The Effects of Over-reporting and Under-reporting Response Bias on the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) McGee, Sarah A. 05 December 2013 (has links) Accurate self-report assessment of psychopathology depends on individuals responding honestly and accurately. Some respondents, however, may respond in a manner not representative of their traits/symptoms. The MMPI-2-RF contains “validity” scales to detect elevations on over-reporting (OR) or under-reporting (UR) scales which typically correspond to elevations on MMPI-2-RF substantive scales and on instruments administered alongside the MMPI-2-RF. We examined effects of OR and UR on the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5); a self-report instrument that assesses 25 pathological traits used with other diagnostic criteria to diagnose personality disorders (PDs) in Section III of the DSM-5. Using MMPI-2-RF validity scale scores, 908 students and 255 psychiatric outpatients were classified into OR, UR or within normal limit response groups. Significant group differences were found such that differences in the frequency of PD diagnosis emerged across response groups. We believe the PID-5 is vulnerable to OR and UR responding, which potentially compromises its validity. DSM-5 MMPI-2-RF non-credible responding over-reporting under-reporting personality disorders Personality Inventory for DSM-5 PID-5 response bias validity scales invalid responding PD diagnosis 0347 0622 0625 0622
33	The Effects of Over-reporting and Under-reporting Response Bias on the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) McGee, Sarah A. 05 December 2013 (has links) Accurate self-report assessment of psychopathology depends on individuals responding honestly and accurately. Some respondents, however, may respond in a manner not representative of their traits/symptoms. The MMPI-2-RF contains “validity” scales to detect elevations on over-reporting (OR) or under-reporting (UR) scales which typically correspond to elevations on MMPI-2-RF substantive scales and on instruments administered alongside the MMPI-2-RF. We examined effects of OR and UR on the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5); a self-report instrument that assesses 25 pathological traits used with other diagnostic criteria to diagnose personality disorders (PDs) in Section III of the DSM-5. Using MMPI-2-RF validity scale scores, 908 students and 255 psychiatric outpatients were classified into OR, UR or within normal limit response groups. Significant group differences were found such that differences in the frequency of PD diagnosis emerged across response groups. We believe the PID-5 is vulnerable to OR and UR responding, which potentially compromises its validity. DSM-5 MMPI-2-RF non-credible responding over-reporting under-reporting personality disorders Personality Inventory for DSM-5 PID-5 response bias validity scales invalid responding PD diagnosis 0347 0622 0625 0622

Page generated in 0.0225 seconds