No description available.

No description available.

This study examines the modern history of the Hui to understand how China, a multiethnic empire-turned-nation-state, has shaped and been shaped by its many “others,” particularly its ethnic and religious minorities. The Hui, as millions of Chinese-speaking Muslims scattered throughout China are known, are unique among the People’s Republic of China’s 55 officially recognized minorities in sharing nothing in common other than a religious identity, Islam. Moreover, unlike Tibetans and Mongolians in the PRC and many minorities in other post-imperial states, the Hui inherited no system of representation from the dynastic era. This lack of political institutionalization through the Qing reign should draw attention to what remains an underexamined period in Hui history—from the fall of the Qing to the founding of the PRC in 1949—and an unexamined question—How did the Hui become a nation? Focused on the large, inland province of Henan, Hui Nation tells this story. I show that Hui nationhood was not simply an elaboration of Communist ethnic policy but rather the consequence of a bottom-up social movement. Incorporating cultural and organizational change into social history, I further argue that this movement hinged on changes in Huis’ understanding of Islam and in the institutions that connected them to one another in the first half of the twentieth century.

In this study, a discourse analysis is performed on the discourse among Muslims in Sweden about the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, its founder and its adherents. Previous research shows that globally, Muslims of all denominations, both Sunni and Shia, consider followers of Ahmadiyya to be non-Muslim. This study shows that the anti-Ahmadiyya discourse is also present amongst Muslims in Sweden, and examines the different types of discourse strategies that are applied. Ahmadiyya played an important role in introducing Islam in Sweden. However, there is a lack of academic research regarding its relationship with other denominations of Islam, even though many researchers have previously referred to it whenever the movement comes under discussion.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No