Spelling suggestions: "subject:"managerially"" "subject:"managerial""
1 |
A implementa??o do programa Gest?o nota 10 no sistema municipal de educa??o em Mossor?/RN (2005 a 2009)Albuquerque, Eug?nia Morais de 20 October 2010 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:36:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
EugeniaMA_DISSERT.pdf: 1169428 bytes, checksum: 02b1b65125dbfbeca02688a54f35fccf (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010-10-20 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico / This research work is focused to show the changes in educational administration from the
agreements between the Mossor? / RN and the Ayrton Senna Institute IAS, for education
provision. Nowadays, the partnership policy is a constitutive element of the reform of the
Brazilian State, which dropped its action on social policies and to strengthen its regulatory
role, encouraging private participation in planning, preparation and implementation of public
policies, new printing setting the political-social. In this context, the 10 Note Management
Programme, developed by the IAS, is part of the neoliberal logic of modernization of public
school systems, focusing on results and developing strategies for control and regulation of
schools work and its efficiency, effectiveness and greater productivity. The 10 Note focuses
on two dimensions: the management of learning and teaching in networking, in a managerial
perspective to overcome the culture of failure (expressed as age-grade, dropout and repetition
rates in) and implantation of culture of success (as measured in the improvement of the
indices). To understanding the process, we have delimited as the object of study, the process
of implementing them mentioned program in the city, which its objective is to analyze
implications for the school community from the perspective of democratic management,
adopting the dimensions of autonomy and participation in institutional processes as a criterion
of analysis. From a methodological point of view, the survey was conducted from a literature
review and documentary about educational policy developed in the country since the 1990?s,
seeking to understand, in a dialectical perspective, the political dimensions of teaching,
training and performance of the subjects involved in the school work. Besides the empirical
observation, it was also used semi-structured interviews with a methodological tool for
gathering information and opinions about the partnership and the implementation of the 10
Note Management Program in the county. The interviewee participants were ex-former
education managers, coordinators, school managers, secretaries and teachers. Regarding the
dimensions inside the analysis (autonomy and participation), the research led to the
conclusion: that GEED, under the guidance of IAS promoted regulation of school autonomy,
set up the selection process for exercising the office of school administration and system
awards to schools, pupils and teachers, subject to results, there is mismatch between the
managerial logic and the democratic management principles, that the ideological discourse of
modernization of municipal management coexists with traditional practices, centralizing
patronage, which ignores the democratic participation in the school decisions processes, the
goals of the partnership were partially achieved, since that the city has improved over the
approval and dropouts, although the approval of the Education Municipal Plan of the rules
institutional (administrative, financial and educational) and the creation of the Councils
observed that the school community participation is still limited, not being characterized as a
coordinated intervention, capable of promoting the transformation and improvement its
quality in the county. In the same way, the orientation of networking is a limit to the
autonomy of schools, given the external definition of goals and strategies to be adopted, along
with pressure exerted through the accountability of each school community for their
achievements / Este trabalho se constitui num estudo sobre as mudan?as ocorridas na gest?o
educacional a partir das parcerias firmadas entre o munic?pio de Mossor?/RN e o Instituto
Ayrton Senna-IAS para a oferta educacional. Na contemporaneidade, a pol?tica de parcerias ?
parte constitutiva da reforma do Estado brasileiro, que diminuiu sua atua??o relativa ?s
pol?ticas sociais e, ao fortalecer seu papel regulador, incentiva a participa??o do setor privado
no planejamento, elabora??o e execu??o das pol?ticas p?blicas, imprimindo nova
configura??o ao cen?rio pol?tico-social. Nesse contexto, o programa Gest?o Nota 10,
desenvolvido pelo IAS, insere-se na l?gica neoliberal de moderniza??o dos sistemas p?blicos
de ensino, focalizando os resultados e desenvolvendo estrat?gias de controle e regula??o do
trabalho escolar em vista da efici?ncia, da efic?cia e da maior produtividade. O Gest?o Nota
10 est? centrado em duas dimens?es: na gest?o da aprendizagem e do ensino e no trabalho
em rede, numa perspectiva gerencial de supera??o da cultura do fracasso (expressa na
distor??o idade-s?rie, na evas?o e na repet?ncia) e de implanta??o da cultura do sucesso
(expressa na melhoria dos ?ndices).
Para a compreens?o desse processo, delimitamos, como objeto de estudo, o processo
de implementa??o desse programa no munic?pio. O objetivo ? analisar suas implica??es para
a comunidade escolar sob a ?tica da gest?o democr?tica, adotando as dimens?es da autonomia
e da participa??o nos processos institucionais como crit?rio de an?lise. Do ponto de vista
metodol?gico, a pesquisa foi realizada a partir de uma revis?o bibliogr?fica e documental
sobre a pol?tica educacional desenvolvida no pa?s desde os anos 1990, buscando entender,
numa perspectiva dial?tica, as dimens?es pol?tico-pedag?gicas, de forma??o e de atua??o dos
sujeitos envolvidos no trabalho escolar. Al?m da observa??o emp?rica, utilizamos as
entrevistas semi-estruturadas com instrumento metodol?gico de levantamento das
informa??es e opini?es acerca da parceria e da implementa??o do Gest?o Nota 10 no
munic?pio. Fizeram parte da pesquisa ex-gerentes de educa??o, coordenadores, gestor escolar,
secret?rios e professores.
Em rela??o ?s dimens?es privilegiadas na an?lise (autonomia e participa??o), a
pesquisa permitiu constatar: que a GEED, sob a orienta??o do IAS, promoveu a
regulamenta??o da autonomia escolar, instituiu o processo seletivo para o exerc?cio do cargo
de dire??o escolar e o sistema de premia??o ?s escolas, aos alunos e aos professores,condicionada a resultados; que h? incompatibilidade entre a l?gica gerencial e a o princ?pio da
gest?o democr?tica; que o discurso ideol?gico de moderniza??o da gest?o municipal coexiste
com pr?ticas tradicionais, centralizadoras e clientelistas, que prescindem da participa??o
democr?tica nas decis?es relativas aos processos escolares; que os objetivos da parceria foram
parcialmente alcan?ados, visto que os dados do munic?pio melhoraram em rela??o ?
aprova??o e ? evas?o escolar. N?o obstante a aprova??o do Plano Municipal de Educa??o, a
regulamenta??o da autonomia institucional (administrativa, financeira e pedag?gica) e a
cria??o de Conselhos, observamos que a participa??o da comunidade escolar ainda ? muito
limitada, n?o se caracterizando como uma interven??o articulada, capaz de promover a
transforma??o e a melhoria da qualidade educacional no munic?pio. Neste mesmo sentido, a
orienta??o de trabalho em rede representa um limite para a autonomia das escolas, haja vista a
defini??o externa de metas e estrat?gias a serem adotadas, al?m da press?o exercida atrav?s da
responsabiliza??o de cada comunidade escolar pelos resultados alcan?ados
|
Page generated in 0.038 seconds