This thesis is a study of certain linguistic aspects of the Jingfa and the Jing (known also as Shiliu jing), two manuscripts discovered in a Han dynasty tomb at Mawangdui, China, in 1973. The manuscripts have been the object of intense study since their discovery. After a review of the major publications and an account of their contribution to the field of ancient Chinese thought, this thesis examines the rhetorical strategies and the vocabulary used in the two texts, in order to offer a description of the linguistic differences between the manuscripts. Various grammatical and argumentative patterns are analyzed: the use of sentence connectives, inference, implication, narrative procedures. The two texts show considerable discrepancy, attributable to their independent origin, an issue still debated among the experts. The perception of the manuscripts as belonging to different cultural milieux is confirmed by an analysis of the vocabulary, and in particular of the technical terms.

No description available.

published_or_final_version / Chinese / Master / Master of Philosophy

鄧佩玲. / "2003年7月". / 論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2003. / 參考文獻 (leaves 182-218). / 附中英文摘要. / "2003 nian 7 yue". / Deng Peiling. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2003. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 182-218). / Fu Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / Chapter 第一章 --- 緒論 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一節 --- 上博楚竹書〈性情論〉槪述 --- p.1 / Chapter 壹、 --- 上博楚竹書的發現與整埋 --- p.1 / Chapter 貳、 --- 〈性情論〉的形制、內容及硏究槪況 --- p.2 / Chapter 第二節 --- 出土古文獻對古漢語語法硏究的價値 --- p.4 / Chapter 第三節 --- 本文的硏究動機及方法 --- p.9 / Chapter 第二章 --- 〈性情論〉所見「之」、「其」的語法研究 --- p.13 / Chapter 第一節 --- 代詞「之」、「其」語法功能綜論 --- p.14 / Chapter 壹、 --- 代詞「之」的語法功能 --- p.15 / Chapter 貳、 --- 代詞「其」的語法功能 --- p.17 / Chapter 參、 --- 代詞「之」、「其」語法功能的比較硏究 --- p.21 / Chapter 第二節 --- 助詞「之」語法功能綜述 --- p.26 / Chapter 壹、 --- 「定語+『之』+中心詞」結構述補 --- p.27 / Chapter 貳、 --- 「中心詞+『之』+補語」用例淺析 --- p.34 / Chapter 參、 --- 「主語+『之』+謂語」析論 --- p.35 / Chapter 肆、 --- 「賓語+『之』+動詞」的語法功能 --- p.37 / Chapter 伍、 --- 「中心詞+『之』+定語」的語法功能 --- p.38 / Chapter 第三節 --- 小結 --- p.39 / 附表一：〈性情論〉所見「之」的語法功能分類 --- p.41 / 附表二 ：〈性情論〉所見「其」的語法功能分類 --- p.44 / 附表三：〈性情論〉所見「之」、「其」語法功能統計 --- p.48 / Chapter 第三章 --- 〈性情論〉所見「也」的語法研究 --- p.49 / Chapter 第一節 --- 助詞「也」語法功能綜論 --- p.50 / Chapter 壹、 --- 助詞「也」用以表示陳述語氣的用例硏究 --- p.50 / Chapter 貳、 --- 助詞「也」用以表示提頓的用例硏究 --- p.62 / Chapter 第二節 --- 戰國楚簡中助詞「也」的疑問用法小議 --- p.63 / Chapter 第三節 --- 小結 --- p.68 / 附表一:〈性情論〉所見「也」的語法功能分類 --- p.69 / 附表二 ：〈性情論〉所見「也」語法功能統計 --- p.73 / 附表三：出土文獻中助詞「也」的疑問用法統計 --- p.74 / Chapter 第四章 --- 〈性情論〉所見「以」、「而」的語法研究 --- p.76 / Chapter 第一節 --- 動詞「以」的語法功能辨析 --- p.77 / Chapter 第二節 --- 介詞「以」的語法功能辨析 --- p.78 / Chapter 第三節 --- 「以」、「而」用作連詞的語法功能探論 --- p.82 / Chapter 壹、 --- 連詞「以」的語法功能 --- p.82 / Chapter 貳、 --- 連詞「而」的語法功能 --- p.83 / Chapter 參、 --- 連詞「以」、「而」語法功能的分別 --- p.88 / Chapter 第四節 --- 〈性情論〉所見「然而」、「而後」結構形式的探 討 --- p.94 / Chapter 第五節 --- 小結 --- p.98 / 附表一 ：〈性情論〉所見「以」的語法功能分類 --- p.100 / 附表二 ：〈性情論〉所見「而」的語法功能分類 --- p.102 / 附表三：〈性情論〉所見「以」、「而」語法功能統計 --- p.104 / Chapter 第五章 --- 〈性情論〉所見「斯」、「夫」的語法研究 --- p.105 / Chapter 第一節 --- 「斯」用作助詞的語法功能辨析 --- p.106 / Chapter 第二節 --- 「斯」用作連詞的語法功能辨析 --- p.110 / Chapter 第三節 --- 代詞「夫」的語法功能探述 --- p.112 / Chapter 第四節 --- 小結 --- p.113 / 附表一：〈性情論〉所見「斯」的語法功能分類 --- p.114 / 附表二：〈性情論〉所見「夫」的語法功能分類 --- p.115 / 附表三：〈性情論〉所見「斯」、「夫」語法功能用例統計 --- p.116 / 附表四：淸代及現代學者對語氣助詞「斯」的硏究槪略 --- p.117 / Chapter 第六章 --- 從語法角度探討〈性情論〉的釋讀問題 --- p.120 / Chapter 第一節 --- 〈性情論〉文字考釋的硏究槪況 --- p.120 / Chapter 第二節 --- 〈性情論〉簡文釋讀重探舉隅 --- p.122 / Chapter 壹、 --- 「惹（快）於其者之胃（謂）兌（悦）」（性情 6) --- p.123 / Chapter 貳、 --- 「並生於人」（性情論8-9) --- p.131 / Chapter 第三節 --- 小結 --- p.137 / 附表一：先秦古籍中「皆」、「並」與「動詞+『於』字介 賓結構」的結合用例統計 --- p.138 / Chapter 第七章 --- 從語法角度探討〈性情論〉的成篇年代 --- p.139 / Chapter 第一節 --- 〈性情論〉成篇年代槪說 --- p.139 / Chapter 第二節 --- 〈性情論〉成篇年代再探 --- p.141 / Chapter 壹、 --- 從「之謂」、「謂之」結構的分別探討〈性情論〉 的成篇年代 --- p.143 / Chapter 貳、 --- 從「有以」、「無以」結構的運用探討〈性情論〉 的成篇年代 --- p.151 / Chapter 第三節 --- 小結 --- p.158 / Chapter 第四節 --- 餘論一一〈性情論〉的版本問題 --- p.159 / Chapter 壹、 --- 上博〈性情論〉與郭店〈性自命出〉的比較硏究 --- p.159 / Chapter 貳、 --- 〈性情論〉異文與其他簡帛文獻所見異文的比較硏 究 --- p.165 / 附表一：傳世及出土文獻所見「謂」字雙賓語結構統計 --- p.167 / 附表二 ：古籍中「有以」、「無以」用例統計 --- p.171 / 附表三：上博〈性情論〉及郭店〈性自命出〉使用虛詞及有 關字詞增的增損現象比較表 --- p.172 / Chapter 第八章 --- 總結 --- p.177 / 參考書目 --- p.182 / Chapter 甲、 --- 主要參考專書 --- p.182 / Chapter 乙、 --- 主要參考論文 --- p.193 / 附錄 --- p.219 / 附錄一：上博楚竹書〈性情論〉釋文修訂稿 --- p.219 / 附錄二：上博楚竹書〈性情論〉釋文修訂說明 --- p.225 / 附錄三：本文統計數據引錄資料一覽表 --- p.235 / 附錄四：郭店楚簡〈性自命出〉、上博楚竹書〈性情論〉有 關硏究論著目錄綜覽 --- p.238 / 附錄五：上博楚竹書〈性情論〉、郭店楚簡〈性自命出〉全 文對照表 --- p.250 / 附錄六：郭店楚簡、馬王堆漢墓帛書、今本（老子》全文對 照表 --- p.263 / 附錄七：馬王堆漢墓帛書《老子》甲、乙本全文對照表 --- p.285 / 附錄八：郭店楚簡、上博楚竹書及今本〈緇衣〉全文對照表 --- p.301

吳啓超. / "2003年5月". / 論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2003. / 參考文獻 (leaves 107-108). / 附中英文摘要. / "2003 nian 5 yue". / Wu Qichao. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2003. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 107-108). / Fu Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / 引言 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一章： --- 在哲學史背景下確立本文的中心課題 --- p.3 / Chapter 1. --- 探究之方法 --- p.3 / Chapter 2. --- 孔子的「禮」、「義」、「仁」 --- p.6 / Chapter 3. --- 孔子對隱逸之態度 --- p.20 / Chapter 4. --- 郭店儒簡的立論要旨 --- p.26 / Chapter 5. --- 孟子的德性義之「禮」 --- p.30 / Chapter 6. --- 中心課題之確立 --- p.38 / Chapter 第二章： --- 儒簡理論分析 --- p.40 / Chapter 1. --- 《性自命出》的「禮作於情」 --- p.41 / Chapter 2. --- 《性自命出》的「性」、「情」、「心」 --- p.48 / Chapter 3. --- 眾篇對踐禮之重要性的論述，及兩條基本原 則 --- p.69 / Chapter 4. --- 《五行》´ؤ´ؤ儒簡與孟子之間的過渡 --- p.79 / Chapter 附錄： --- 儒簡各篇之內容簡述 --- p.93 / 參考書目 --- p.107

This thesis analyses a change in the ways people composed and engaged with texts during the Warring States (481-221 BCE) period in Early China. It examines changes in the textual sphere as a result of an emergent manuscript culture, that is to say, the increased spread and reliance on manuscript texts for the communication of ideas. This shift moved away from the predominantly oral, commemorative, and ritual use of text in earlier periods, and provided key elements that would function in the text based discourse of the early empires. It influenced the way text across a variety of genres of writing was used and understood, structured and composed, and how it was collected and combined to form new arguments. I focus on texts from the Documents ?, and Odes ? genres, in addition to philosophical texts dealing with the past, and collections of sayings and arguments dealing with questions from cosmological to ethical issues. These materials form the mainstay of Warring States intellectual discourse, and exemplify the following textual developments: 1) the rise of collecting materials into compilations; 2) the emergence of genre classification; 3) the development of new authorship functions, 3) an increase in textual structuring and the integration of lore about the past, 4) the development of commentarial traditions, 5) the emergence of an explicit, self-reflexive understanding of writing and transmission, 6) advances in material structuring of manuscript-texts that interrelate form and content. The analysis is based primarily on excavated materials not edited during the early empires, and engages with comparative and interdisciplinary theory. It argues against models solely based on transmitted sources, which explained Warring States developments as a response to socio-political contexts. Instead, it posits developments in the textual culture itself as a necessary condition to explain the changes in intellectual discourse of the period.