published_or_final_version / Philosophy / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy

Thesis (M.A.)--Zhongguo wen hua xue yuan. / Reproduced from typescript copy. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hong Kong, 2000. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves [312]-328).

Thesis (M.A.)--Zhongguo wen hua xue yuan. / Reproduced from typescript copy. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--Fu ren da xue, 1974. / Reproduced from typescript copy; on double leaves. Includes bibliographical references.

鄭宗義. / 手稿本, 複本據稿本複印. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學歷史學部, 1989. / Shou gao ben, fu ben ju gao ben fu yin. / Includes bibliographical references: leaves 314-339. / Zheng Zongyi. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue li shi xue bu, 1989. / 序論 / Chapter 第一章： --- 近現代中國的文化保守主義 / Chapter 第一節： --- 從花果飄零到靈根自植 / Chapter 第二節： --- 文化保守主義研究的回顧 / Chapter 第三節： --- 文化保守主義發展的鳥瞰 / Chapter 第四節： --- 文化保守主義的特質 / Chapter 第二章： --- 當代新儒家探索 / Chapter 第一節： --- 儒學第三期發展說 / Chapter 第二節： --- 當代新儒家出現的思想史背景 / Chapter 第三節： --- 為中國文化敬告世界人士宣言 / Chapter 第三章： --- 當代新儒家的文化保守性格 / Chapter 第一節： --- 梁漱溟´إ文化三期的歷史¯إ¡學 / Chapter 第二節： --- 張君勱´إ「精神自由」的文化哲學 / Chapter 第三節： --- 唐君毅´إ中國文化精神之宏揚 / 小結 / 參考書目

李煥華. / "2003年8月" / 論文 (神道學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2003. / 參考文獻 (leaves 58-61) / 附中英文摘要. / "2003 nian 8 yue" / Li Huanhua. / Lun wen (shen dao xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2003. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 58-61) / Fu Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / Chapter 甲、 --- 前言 --- p.1 / Chapter 乙、 --- 儒家人格改造的實踐 --- p.5 / Chapter 一. --- 儒家在建構理想人格方面的適切性 --- p.5 / Chapter (1) --- 爲人類實踐理想人格提供終極關懷 --- p.5 / Chapter (2) --- 以自身而及於他者作爲理想人格實踐之本 --- p.6 / Chapter 二 . --- 從成聖之道的實踐論儒家人格改造的限制 --- p.9 / Chapter (1) --- 人格改造的依據 --- p.9 / Chapter (2) --- 人格改造的實踐 --- p.11 / Chapter 三. --- 小結：自我修身對儒家理想人格改造的主導性 --- p.17 / Chapter 丙、 --- 登山寶訓人格改造的實踐 --- p.19 / Chapter 一 . --- 登山寶訓在建構理想人格的適切性 --- p.19 / Chapter (1) --- 登山寶訓乃人格成全的根本性指向 --- p.21 / Chapter (2) --- 登山寶訓中的虛己精神 --- p.26 / Chapter (3) --- 登山寶訓中理想人格的實踐 --- p.32 / Chapter 二 . --- 小結：信仰力量對登山寶訓人格改造的主導性 --- p.48 / Chapter 丁、 --- 登山寶訓對儒家人格改造的獻議 --- p.50 / Chapter 一 . --- 比較兩者的異同 --- p.50 / Chapter (1) --- 儒家方面 --- p.50 / Chapter (2) --- 登山寶訓方面 --- p.51 / Chapter 二 . --- 登山寶訓對儒家人格改造的幾項建議 --- p.53 / Chapter 戊、 --- 總結 --- p.56

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2002. / Adviser: Robert Hymes. Includes bibliographical references.

L? ritual (禮) is one of the most distinctive features of Confucianism (r? ji?, 儒家), but interpreters have yet to agree on the extent of its functions and whether the Confucians provide any justification of its use. Contemporary attempts to derive such justification have typically relied upon explaining l?'s relationship with r?n humaneness (仁), another core concept for Confucianism that is frequently given great prominence in Confucian ethics. Drawing upon such approaches, I propose that at least one aspect of l?'s function is best understood as being bound-up with that of r?n and that this function arguably justifies Confucian appeals to l? as a guide to conduct. My approach is distinct from previous interpretations, however, in that I argue that l? serves metaphorically as the language by which attitudes conducive to r?n are managed and expressed, and that the successful application of l?, including its use in symbolizing ethically significant normative statuses, contributes to the Confucian ideal of harmony (h?, 和) on both interpersonal and intrapersonal levels. The upshot of this interpretation is that, despite criticisms both modern and ancient, we can clearly see how the Confucians justifiably imbue a particular aspect of traditional mores with normative ethical force. / published_or_final_version / Philosophy / Master / Master of Philosophy

published_or_final_version / Chinese / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy