Thesis--Münster. / Includes bibliographical references.

Inaug.-Diss.--Frankfurt am Main. / Vita. Bibliography: p. 170-196.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1971. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliography.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Oregon, 2006. / Typescript. Includes vita and abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 223-257). Also available for download via the World Wide Web; free to University of Oregon users.

Diss.--Bochum--Ruhr Universität, 1998. / Bibliogr. p. 295-313.

Texte remanié de: Th. Ph. D.--University of Edinburgh, 1985. / Bibliogr. p. 275-312. Notes. Index.

Texte remanié de: Ph. D.--Philosophy--University of St Andrews, 1980. Titre de soutenance : The theology of the cross and Marx's concept of man, with reference to the Caribbean. / Bibliogr. p. 267-295.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:23:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2013-11-07Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T20:11:05Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000735263.pdf: 982994 bytes, checksum: e71ffbefaeda4e9a3a999f684dbb3ff1 (MD5) / O objetivo desta pesquisa consiste em compreender o papel do Estado moderno no interior do sistema sociometabólico do capital de acordo com a análise de István Mészáros, observando a relação de complementaridade que assenta o Estado como parte constitutiva da base material. Partimos da hipótese de que a relação de complementaridade estabelecida entre Estado e sistema do capital é ancorada na existência do Estado como estrutura de comando político, que articula sua própria superestrutura legal e política – como concebida por Marx –, com seu papel vital de assegurar e salvaguardar as condições gerais de expansão e acumulação do sistema do capital. Como está diretamente envolvido na produção e reprodução do capital, cabe ao Estado reforçar a dominação do capital contra as forças antagônicas que poderiam lhe desafiar. Nesse papel, corporifica o imperativo de garantir e proteger as condições de separação entre propriedade e produtores, reforçando a relação de alienação ao assegurar as condições para a subordinação estrutural-hierárquica do trabalho ao capital. Por manifestar seu papel ao articular a dependência entre capital e trabalho, o fundamento entre Estado e capital encontra no trabalho o elo explicativo de sua reciprocidade dialética. É assim que o Estado moderno impõe aos indivíduos a reprodução ampliada desse metabolismo social, complementando politicamente e oferecendo soluções corretivas sobre as contradições continuamente desenvolvidas e reproduzidas no confronto de forças sociais que se opõem. A partir dessa concepção, Mészáros desenvolve a tese da existência do tripé capital-trabalho-Estado. Para realizar a presente proposta será tomado como objeto a discussão de Mészáros sobre o papel do Estado moderno no sistema sociometabólico do capital, tendo como referência principal a obra Para além do capital: rumo a uma teoria da transição. Secundariamente, recorremos... / The objective of this research is to understand the role of the modern State within the social metabolism of capital according to analysis by István Mészáros, observing the complementary relationship that places the State as part of the constitutive material basis. From the hypothesis that the complementary relationship established between the State and the system of capital is anchored in the existence of the State as political command structure, that articulates its own legal and political superstructure – as conceived by Marx – with its vital role to ensure the conditions of expansion and accumulation of the system of capital. Directly involved in the production and reproduction of capital, the State must strengthen the domination of capital against opposing forces could challenge him. In this paper, embodies the need to protect the conditions of separation between ownership and producers reinforcing the relationship of alienation to ensure the conditions for the structural-hierarchical subordination of labor to capital. By expressing its role in linking the dependency between capital and labor, the labor is the link of the dialectical relationship between State and capital. This is how the modern State imposes on individuals the expanded reproduction of that social metabolism complementing and offering corrective solutions on the contradictions continually developed and reproduced in the clash of social forces that oppose. Based on this concept, Mészáros develops the thesis of the existence of the tripod State-capital-labor. To accomplish this proposal will be taken as the object Mészáros's discussion about the role of the modern State in the system of capital. We have as main reference Beyond capital: towards a theory of transition. Secondly, we turn to other works by the same author – The theory of alienation in Marx, Philosophy, Ideology and Social Science and the power of ideology – in addition to the production...

Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-09T12:28:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2014-11-04Bitstream added on 2015-04-09T12:48:11Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000812687.pdf: 968479 bytes, checksum: 9b1199ebeef148e0aa80f8be71cef215 (MD5) / Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) / O propósito que impulsiona esta pesquisa é apreender conceitualmente a categoria da politicidade no pensamento de Marx, explicitando que sua concepção desenvolve-se numa trajetória de continuidade, reafirmando-se na maturidade os fundamentos da crítica ontológica iniciada em sua juventude. Crítica, pois, que não só desloca a política do foco que tradicionalmente ocupa, como eleva ao primeiro plano a emancipação do trabalho. Sua precisa apreensão é, desse modo, pressuposto para a consecução da luta revolucionária. Com o intuito de apresentar elementos que possam contribuir para elucidar a polêmica das supostas cesuras entre a produção teórica do “jovem Marx” e do “cientista” propriamente dito, propomos que o estudo seja delimitado prioritariamente pelos escritos marxianos produzidos no decênio 1843-1852, incorporando tanto os textos de sua “juventude” quanto os materiais reconhecidamente próprios a conquistas da “maturidade”. O resgate da dimensão ontológica das formulações de Marx abre caminho para um intenso debate ideológico dentro do próprio marxismo, com implicações diretas quanto às delimitações de sua função social na luta pela superação dos estranhamentos sociais e pela consequente emancipação da individualidade na afirmação da autêntica generidade humana. Nesse sentido, pretende-se demostrar, ademais, que sustentar a oposição que privilegia os escritos mais tardios em detrimento dos produzidos na tenra idade – ou seja, a “epistéme marxiana” – compromete a luta emancipatória em seu cerne, hipostasiando um formato político qualquer em detrimento da efetivação da liberdade humana na auto-edificação da mundaneidade pelo trabalho social. / The purpose that drives this research is to apprehend, in its concepts, the political category in Marx's thought, explaining that his conception develops a path of continuity, reaffirming on his maturity the bases of the ontological rewiew he had started in his youth. Rewiew, therefore, that not only shifts the historical spot that politics has taken place so far, as well as it focus the emancipation of labor. Its precise apprehensiveness is a prerequisite for the achievement of the revolutionary struggle. In order to provide evidence that may help to elucidate the controversy of the alleged break between the theoretical production of the young Marx and scientist itself, we propose that the study be defined mainly by Marx‟s writings produced in the decade 1843-1852, incorporating both, texts of his youth as well as the materials recognized as achievements of maturity. To resume the ontological dimension of the formulations of Marx gives way to an intense ideological debate within Marxism itself, with direct implications for the delimitation of its social function in the struggle to overcome social estrangements and the consequent emancipation of individuality in the affirmation of genuine human gender. In this sense, we intend to demonstrate that, besides, to sustain the opposition that privileges the later writings in order of those produced earlier – that means, the Marx‟s epistéme – compromises the emancipatory struggle in its main point, enhancing the political form in discountenance of the realization of human freedom in the self-edification of men‟s world by social labor.

The theology of the cross is both a method of doing evangelical theology, as well as an evangelical confession of the Christian Faith. It is universal in scope, and it is set within the context of the Reformation doctrine of the Two Kingdoms. It, therefore, insists that while the Kingdom of the world and the Kingdom of Christ are to be distinguished from each other, nevertheless, they constitute an intrinsic unity. Marx's concept of man and his theory of history constitute his peculiar atheistic Weltanschauung. This preoccupation with man as an alienated being is paralleled by the concern for man's salvation as expressed in the theology of the cross. However, Marx's anthropology remains one-dimensional in scope, and is thereby placed within the realm of the Kingdom of the world. The Marxian claim that man is the centre of himself and the final and sole arbiter of his own destiny, and that God is a totally human idea which ultimately enslaves man, challenges the Church to proclaim and "incarnate" the liberating message of the Gospel anew today. The Church is called to articulate a theology of the cross in which God is confessed as being pro-man. The Church points to the cross of Christ where it sees God paradoxically revealed in suffering, shame and death, where God seemed (and seems) to be most absent, it is precisely there that He is most present, actively struggling on behalf of man. Cross and Resurrection are bound together. The Christian life is therefore a life of celebration and hope sub cruce. Caribbean theology is at the crossroads: it is historically connected with western theology and finds some "natural" affinities with Liberation Theology. However, while it may and should attempt to draw from the richness of both theologies, it should guard against capitulating to either of those forms. It must articulate an indigenous theology of the cross which maintains the tension between identity and relevance of the Gospel. To do otherwise would lead to a theology (or ideology) of glory. In short, Caribbean theology's primary concern must be the proclamation and "incarnation" of the message that the Triune God, through the praxis of love in His Son, and through the witness of His Spirit, is present in suffering and death, wrath and judgement, working on behalf of man and his reconciliation.