Spelling suggestions: "subject:"1ieasurement incertainty"" "subject:"1ieasurement ncertainty""
1 |
Optimising uncertainty from sampling and analysis of foods and environmental samplesLyn, Jennifer A. January 2003 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Determination of measurement uncertainty in the analysis of sodium lactate using the HPLC methodFakir, Rehana Ebrahim 11 May 2009 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
Uncertainty of Stereo PIV Calibration and Self-CalibrationWilliams, Braydon J 01 May 2017 (has links)
Particle image velocimetry (PIV) is a widely used fluid measurement technique. Three dimensional PIV data or stereo PIV is acquired using two cameras. Stereo cameras are calibrated from camera coordinates, pixels, to real world units such as millimeters using calibration models. Stereo calibration is fundamental to the accuracy of a PIV measurement. In this thesis, the accuracy of the stereo calibration is assessed. The mean error of stereo calibration was found to be 0.23%.
|
4 |
Estimating measurement uncertainty for particulate emissions from stationary sourcesWoollatt, Gerald Bancroft 19 January 2016 (has links)
A research report submitted to
the Faculty of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand for the degree of Master of Science
Johannesburg, 2015 / Quantifying or estimating emission uncertainty for particulate matter from stationary sources in South Africa.
The estimation of measurement uncertainty with regards to hazardous air pollution emissions from stationary sources is currently the most uncertain element associated with obtaining relevant, valid stack emission data in South Africa. This project is aimed at developing an appropriate method to evaluate the uncertainty associated with particulate matter measurements conducted for stationary source emissions in the South African context. A series of In-Stack measurements were taken in accordance with recognized international methodology (ISO 9096:1992, and 2003) on two different industrial processes, representing a best and worst case scenario. A comparison between the two scenarios was made in an attempt to establish what components of the sampling technique have the greatest error.
The effect of cumulative errors in the sampling train as well as external factors that may influence the results were evaluated and included in the final estimate of uncertainty. Some of the factors used included the sampling location, industrial process and external environmental factors.
The overarching goal of this project was to establish an estimate of the cumulative uncertainty on the final emission values obtained, inclusive of both analytical, field sampling and process related variables that may result in a cumulative error associated with quantifying stationary source particulate matter emission values.
The results of the study found that the estimated combined expanded uncertainty for both sets of data was calculated to be between 62 – 72%. Upon closer analysis of the data it was ascertained that the data obtained were inadequate and the calculation of the uncertainty of the results both with the compliant and non-compliant sampling campaigns revealed that the variability of the results was too great for both scenarios to make any statistically valid observations or conclusions about the data.
In lieu of this, and considering the significant costs, time and labour involved in order to obtain enough data to enable adequate quantification of an uncertainty budget for the results obtained, the author has developed an alternative tool for assessing the quality and reliability of reported emission figures. The author has developed what he has named a sampling suitability matrix, this tool although subjective in nature will add significant value (in the authors opinion) to the interpretation of the quality and reliability of the final emission results reported. The intention of this tool is to be incorporated as supplementary information into all emission reports in future. This will enable the plant operator and regulator to assess the quality of reported data and final emission results, thus assisting in establishing whether the plant is in compliance with their Air Emission License (AEL) requirements or not.
|
5 |
3D freeform surface measurement on coordinate measuring machine using photometric stereo methodSomthong, Thammarat January 2017 (has links)
Surface metrology has been widely used in manufacturing for many years. There has been a wide range of techniques applied for measuring surface topography. A photometric stereo technique is one of the best ways for the analysis of three-dimensional (3D) surface textural patterns. Many published works are concerned the developed approach for recovering the 3D profiles from surface normal. This research not only presents a methodology used to retrieve the profiles of surface roughness standards but also investigates the uncertainty estimation of textural measurement determined by the photometric stereo method. Various input quantities have been studied such as pixel error from recovered 3D surface textural patterns, the power of light source which involved with surface roughness average (Ra) value and the effect of room temperature. The surface roughness standards were utilized as the reference value. In term of increasing accuracy of the reference value, a contact method (stylus instrument) was used to calibrate them. Illumination angles of light source had some influence on the measurement results. A coordinate measuring machine (CMM) was used for holding the light source in order to study the effects of tilt and slant angles. The effect of tilt and slant angles were investigated. The results of these experiments successfully indicated that the angle used in photometric stereo method played an important role to the accuracy level of the roughness measurement results. The surface roughness specimen manufactured by a Computer Numerical Control (CNC) was applied to validate the capability of the photometric stereo system.
|
6 |
A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF PRESSURE IN HYDRAULIC LINESSprague, Susan, Chorney, Andrew 10 1900 (has links)
International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 23-26, 2000 / Town & Country Hotel and Conference Center, San Diego, California / This presentation summarizes a study characterizing strain gages and pressure transducers used to
measure the fluid pressure within aircraft hydraulic lines. A series of laboratory calibrations and finite
element analyses was performed to demonstrate the quality of data from both pressure transducers and
strain gages under variations in both temperature and external strains on the hydraulic lines. Strain gages
showed a marked susceptibility to external strains on hydraulic lines, and wide variations in
susceptibility to temperature changes. Pressure transducers were found to be relatively immune to both
conditions. It is recommended that strain gages be used for trend data only.
|
7 |
The improvement of vehicle noise variability through the understanding of phase angle and NVH analysis methodsDowsett, Amy January 2018 (has links)
Noise, vibration and harshness (NVH)levels in the luxury automotive industry are used by customers as a subjective method of determining the vehicle quality. This can be achieved by adjusting the vehicle design, where simulations are used to predict the NVH behaviour. Changes can be expensive and time consuming when made after the design stage has been completed, so it is important to produce accurate simulations of the product. Variability exists to some extent in all products, even those just off the production line, however, if a high level of variability exists then only a small portion of products will meet the predicted behaviour. The aim of the project is to provide information that may lead to the reduction of variability in an automotive vehicle. This is achieved by quantifying the statistical spread of FRFs (frequency response function) in a set of nominally identical vehicles. Once overall levels have been calculated, the location of the most variable sources can be identified. Project also seeks to develop new methods of analysis for the system phase response to determine whether further information may be extracted compared to the magnitude response. There are three main themes that run throughout this thesis, with the first being the quantification of variability due to the measurement taking process which is covered in chapter 3. A novel application of a method to separate the measurement variability from the overall system uncertainty was achieved as well as the quantification of the vehicle to- vehicle variability. The second theme that runs through the study concerns the identification of variability sources. This is realised in chapter 4 and chapter 6 as a set of structural and acoustic tests on a luxury sedan door. The trim was found to be held to the door panel by a series of 11 polymer clips and 4 metal screws. The variability of small changes to a significant boundary condition at the door trim was quantified, showing that the removal of rigid clips had a more significant effect on the overall variability that if a loose clip has been removed. It was also found that clips at the corners were the most sensitive to change. The final theme outlines and tests new analysis methods on the phase and compares the statistical spread of the phase with the equivalent spread of the magnitude. Data taken from the same tests was used and for most of the cases the two results were found to be approximately the same.
|
8 |
Implantação de um guia orientativo de incerteza de medição para avaliadores de laboratório da Rede Metrológica RSJornada, Daniel Homrich da January 2009 (has links)
Esta dissertação aborda a implantação de um guia orientativo de incerteza de medição aplicável aos avaliadores de laboratório da Rede Metrológica RS. A incerteza de medição é um importante tema para organismos de avaliação de laboratórios, como é o caso da Rede Metrológica RS, pois consiste em um dos requisitos básicos para o reconhecimento de competência de laboratórios. Dessa forma, é fundamental garantir que todos os avaliadores possuam um nível de conhecimento adequado sobre incerteza de medição. Assim, o objetivo principal deste trabalho consiste em implantar o referido guia orientativo de incerteza, propiciando melhorias no processo de avaliação da Rede Metrológica RS. Adicionalmente, foi elaborado um fluxograma explicativo dos passos para a expressão da incerteza de medição, assim como listadas componentes de incerteza típicas para áreas de ensaio e calibração e elaborada uma check-list para auxílio aos avaliadores quando da avaliação da incerteza. A implantação do guia orientativo de incerteza dos avaliadores foi realizada segundo as etapas do ciclo de melhoria PDCA. Na etapa plan foram coletados dados que corroboraram para uma necessidade de maior qualificação do grupo de avaliadores com relação à incerteza, sendo a área de ensaios a mais carente. Na etapa do, a minuta do documento foi elaborada de acordo com tópicos previamente definidos com um grupo de especialistas, que envolveu avaliadores experientes e membros da Rede Metrológica RS, assim como especialistas em incerteza do Inmetro. Na etapa check, a minuta do documento passou pela análise crítica do grupo de especialistas consultados e na etapa act foram realizados os ajustes finais e aprovado o documento. Como resultado, foi evidenciada a melhoria do nível de conhecimento dos avaliadores com relação ao tema. Tal fato pôde ser comprovado através da aplicação de provas antes e após o treinamento no novo documento elaborado, mostrando melhoria dos conhecimentos dos avaliadores com relação à incerteza. / This work is concerned with the implantation of a measurement uncertainty guideline applicable to Rede Metrológica RS' assessors. Measurement uncertainty is a quite relevant subject for all laboratory assessment bodies, such as Rede Metrológica RS, because it consists in an elementary requirement for laboratory competence recognition. Thus, it is essential to assure that all assessors have an adequate level of knowledge about measurement uncertainty. Therefore, the main objective of this work consists in the implantation of the referred guideline, yielding improvements on Rede Metrológica RS' assessment process. Additionally, a flow-chart was elaborated to help assessors better understand the procedure to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. A list of common uncertainty sources in calibration and testing fields was prepared, as well as a check-list to help assessors carry out measurement uncertainty assessment. The guideline implementation was carried out following the steps of PDCA improvement cycle. During the step 'plan', some data were collected that corroborated the identified need for better qualification of assessors with respect to measurement uncertainty theory and application. The most deficient field identified was testing assessors. On 'do' step, a guideline draft was prepared in accordance with the topics previously agreed with a group of experts, formed by experienced assessors and Rede Metrológica RS' collaborators, as well as, invited uncertainty experts from Inmetro. On the step 'check', the guideline draft was analyzed by the same group of experts and during the step act, the final adjustments were made and the guideline was formally approved. As a result, an improvement on the assessors' level of knowledge concerning measurement uncertainty was achieved. This was possible to verify by applying assessors' written exams about measurement uncertainty, before and after the training on the new guideline. The exams showed the improvement of the assessors.
|
9 |
Implantação de um guia orientativo de incerteza de medição para avaliadores de laboratório da Rede Metrológica RSJornada, Daniel Homrich da January 2009 (has links)
Esta dissertação aborda a implantação de um guia orientativo de incerteza de medição aplicável aos avaliadores de laboratório da Rede Metrológica RS. A incerteza de medição é um importante tema para organismos de avaliação de laboratórios, como é o caso da Rede Metrológica RS, pois consiste em um dos requisitos básicos para o reconhecimento de competência de laboratórios. Dessa forma, é fundamental garantir que todos os avaliadores possuam um nível de conhecimento adequado sobre incerteza de medição. Assim, o objetivo principal deste trabalho consiste em implantar o referido guia orientativo de incerteza, propiciando melhorias no processo de avaliação da Rede Metrológica RS. Adicionalmente, foi elaborado um fluxograma explicativo dos passos para a expressão da incerteza de medição, assim como listadas componentes de incerteza típicas para áreas de ensaio e calibração e elaborada uma check-list para auxílio aos avaliadores quando da avaliação da incerteza. A implantação do guia orientativo de incerteza dos avaliadores foi realizada segundo as etapas do ciclo de melhoria PDCA. Na etapa plan foram coletados dados que corroboraram para uma necessidade de maior qualificação do grupo de avaliadores com relação à incerteza, sendo a área de ensaios a mais carente. Na etapa do, a minuta do documento foi elaborada de acordo com tópicos previamente definidos com um grupo de especialistas, que envolveu avaliadores experientes e membros da Rede Metrológica RS, assim como especialistas em incerteza do Inmetro. Na etapa check, a minuta do documento passou pela análise crítica do grupo de especialistas consultados e na etapa act foram realizados os ajustes finais e aprovado o documento. Como resultado, foi evidenciada a melhoria do nível de conhecimento dos avaliadores com relação ao tema. Tal fato pôde ser comprovado através da aplicação de provas antes e após o treinamento no novo documento elaborado, mostrando melhoria dos conhecimentos dos avaliadores com relação à incerteza. / This work is concerned with the implantation of a measurement uncertainty guideline applicable to Rede Metrológica RS' assessors. Measurement uncertainty is a quite relevant subject for all laboratory assessment bodies, such as Rede Metrológica RS, because it consists in an elementary requirement for laboratory competence recognition. Thus, it is essential to assure that all assessors have an adequate level of knowledge about measurement uncertainty. Therefore, the main objective of this work consists in the implantation of the referred guideline, yielding improvements on Rede Metrológica RS' assessment process. Additionally, a flow-chart was elaborated to help assessors better understand the procedure to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. A list of common uncertainty sources in calibration and testing fields was prepared, as well as a check-list to help assessors carry out measurement uncertainty assessment. The guideline implementation was carried out following the steps of PDCA improvement cycle. During the step 'plan', some data were collected that corroborated the identified need for better qualification of assessors with respect to measurement uncertainty theory and application. The most deficient field identified was testing assessors. On 'do' step, a guideline draft was prepared in accordance with the topics previously agreed with a group of experts, formed by experienced assessors and Rede Metrológica RS' collaborators, as well as, invited uncertainty experts from Inmetro. On the step 'check', the guideline draft was analyzed by the same group of experts and during the step act, the final adjustments were made and the guideline was formally approved. As a result, an improvement on the assessors' level of knowledge concerning measurement uncertainty was achieved. This was possible to verify by applying assessors' written exams about measurement uncertainty, before and after the training on the new guideline. The exams showed the improvement of the assessors.
|
10 |
Implantação de um guia orientativo de incerteza de medição para avaliadores de laboratório da Rede Metrológica RSJornada, Daniel Homrich da January 2009 (has links)
Esta dissertação aborda a implantação de um guia orientativo de incerteza de medição aplicável aos avaliadores de laboratório da Rede Metrológica RS. A incerteza de medição é um importante tema para organismos de avaliação de laboratórios, como é o caso da Rede Metrológica RS, pois consiste em um dos requisitos básicos para o reconhecimento de competência de laboratórios. Dessa forma, é fundamental garantir que todos os avaliadores possuam um nível de conhecimento adequado sobre incerteza de medição. Assim, o objetivo principal deste trabalho consiste em implantar o referido guia orientativo de incerteza, propiciando melhorias no processo de avaliação da Rede Metrológica RS. Adicionalmente, foi elaborado um fluxograma explicativo dos passos para a expressão da incerteza de medição, assim como listadas componentes de incerteza típicas para áreas de ensaio e calibração e elaborada uma check-list para auxílio aos avaliadores quando da avaliação da incerteza. A implantação do guia orientativo de incerteza dos avaliadores foi realizada segundo as etapas do ciclo de melhoria PDCA. Na etapa plan foram coletados dados que corroboraram para uma necessidade de maior qualificação do grupo de avaliadores com relação à incerteza, sendo a área de ensaios a mais carente. Na etapa do, a minuta do documento foi elaborada de acordo com tópicos previamente definidos com um grupo de especialistas, que envolveu avaliadores experientes e membros da Rede Metrológica RS, assim como especialistas em incerteza do Inmetro. Na etapa check, a minuta do documento passou pela análise crítica do grupo de especialistas consultados e na etapa act foram realizados os ajustes finais e aprovado o documento. Como resultado, foi evidenciada a melhoria do nível de conhecimento dos avaliadores com relação ao tema. Tal fato pôde ser comprovado através da aplicação de provas antes e após o treinamento no novo documento elaborado, mostrando melhoria dos conhecimentos dos avaliadores com relação à incerteza. / This work is concerned with the implantation of a measurement uncertainty guideline applicable to Rede Metrológica RS' assessors. Measurement uncertainty is a quite relevant subject for all laboratory assessment bodies, such as Rede Metrológica RS, because it consists in an elementary requirement for laboratory competence recognition. Thus, it is essential to assure that all assessors have an adequate level of knowledge about measurement uncertainty. Therefore, the main objective of this work consists in the implantation of the referred guideline, yielding improvements on Rede Metrológica RS' assessment process. Additionally, a flow-chart was elaborated to help assessors better understand the procedure to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. A list of common uncertainty sources in calibration and testing fields was prepared, as well as a check-list to help assessors carry out measurement uncertainty assessment. The guideline implementation was carried out following the steps of PDCA improvement cycle. During the step 'plan', some data were collected that corroborated the identified need for better qualification of assessors with respect to measurement uncertainty theory and application. The most deficient field identified was testing assessors. On 'do' step, a guideline draft was prepared in accordance with the topics previously agreed with a group of experts, formed by experienced assessors and Rede Metrológica RS' collaborators, as well as, invited uncertainty experts from Inmetro. On the step 'check', the guideline draft was analyzed by the same group of experts and during the step act, the final adjustments were made and the guideline was formally approved. As a result, an improvement on the assessors' level of knowledge concerning measurement uncertainty was achieved. This was possible to verify by applying assessors' written exams about measurement uncertainty, before and after the training on the new guideline. The exams showed the improvement of the assessors.
|
Page generated in 0.071 seconds