Thesis (M. Pharm. (Pharmacy Practice))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.

More people living with HIV/AIDS reside in South Africa than any other country in the world, and the nation faces colossal challenges in broadening its response to the now-mature and widespread HIV epidemic (WHO, 2005:1). According to South Africa's Medical Research Council, HIV/AIDS has now become the single largest cause of death in South Africa (Dorrington et a/., 2001:6) and has triggered a prominent transferal in the pattern of mortality from the elderly to the young, particularly among young women (Dorrington, 2001:4). The routine treatment of HIV/AIDS with antiretroviral drugs has transformed HIV-infection from an unvaryingly rapidly terminal illness to a somewhat expensive treatable, chronic disease. Triple therapy or highly active antiretroviral therapy (three-drug combinations of ARVs or HAART) in particular have had paramount impacts on HIV-related morbidity and mortality in settings where these drugs are generally accessible. Objectives of ARV treatment are "maximum, durable suppression of viral load, restoration and/or preservation of immune function, improvement of quality of life and reduction of HIV related morbidity and mortality" (Martinson et a/., 2003:236; Martinez et a/., 2007:251; Hellinger, 2006:1; Kumarasamy, 2004:3). The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) estimated that a total of 111 827 South Africans were accessing free antiretroviral treatment in the 200 public health sector facilities across 53 districts and a further 60 000 via the private sector by late December 2005 (UNAIDS, 2005:1). The objective of this study was to review, analyse and interpret the usage and prescribing patterns of antiretroviral drugs in a section of the South African private health care sector for the period 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2006 by utilising a medicine claims database of a pharmacy benefit management company, and to investigate the costs associated with these drugs by performing a quantitative, retrospective drug utilisation review. It was found that the prevalence as well as the total medicine cost of ARV medicine items had increased during the study period but the average number of ARV medicine items per prescription as well as both the average cost per ARV medicine item and the average cost per ARV prescription decreased during the study period. Original innovator ARV medicine items and original ARV medicine items with no generic were found to be relatively expensive in comparison with ARV medicine items in general. Conversely, generic ARV medicine items were ascertained to be relatively inexpensive with reference to ARV medicine items in general. It was perceived that the average cost of ARV medicine items and prescriptions for both genders decreased from 2005 to 2006, while there was an increase in the prevalence of medicine items and prescriptions claimed for both female and male patients. The prevalence and cost of all types of ARV medicine items were found to be higher for female patients in general. It was also established that the prevalence of patients receiving antiretroviral treatment in the private health care sector peaks at the age of >30 to 244 years, in comparison with the lower age of >25 to 239 years in the public health care sector. ARV medicine items claimed for patients in the age group >35 to 239 years represented the highest percentage of the total medicine cost incurred during both study years for all ARV medicine types. The majority of ARV medicine items were prescribed by general medical practitioners, and most ARV medicine items were dispensed by community or private institutional pharmacies. It was determined that combinations of 2NRTI + NNRTI were prescribed with the highest frequency, which is compliant with traditional HAART or 'triple therapy' regimens. Lastly, it was found that none of the top 20 prescriptions for one, two and six ARV medicine items were compliant with the National Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) Guidelines. The majority of the top 20 prescriptions for three ARV medicine items (92.67 per cent during 2005 and 89.94 per cent during 2006) were compliant with the National ART Guidelines. Finally, less than half of the top 20 prescriptions for four ARV medicine items (49.60 per cent during 2005 and 36.11 per cent during 2006) were compliant with the National ART Guidelines. Only 5.56 per cent and 3.92 per cent of the top 16 prescriptions for five ARV medicine items were compliant with the National ART Guidelines during the two study years respectively / Thesis (M. Pharm. (Pharmacy Practice))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.

More people living with HIV/AIDS reside in South Africa than any other country in the world, and the nation faces colossal challenges in broadening its response to the now-mature and widespread HIV epidemic (WHO, 2005:1). According to South Africa's Medical Research Council, HIV/AIDS has now become the single largest cause of death in South Africa (Dorrington et a/., 2001:6) and has triggered a prominent transferal in the pattern of mortality from the elderly to the young, particularly among young women (Dorrington, 2001:4). The routine treatment of HIV/AIDS with antiretroviral drugs has transformed HIV-infection from an unvaryingly rapidly terminal illness to a somewhat expensive treatable, chronic disease. Triple therapy or highly active antiretroviral therapy (three-drug combinations of ARVs or HAART) in particular have had paramount impacts on HIV-related morbidity and mortality in settings where these drugs are generally accessible. Objectives of ARV treatment are "maximum, durable suppression of viral load, restoration and/or preservation of immune function, improvement of quality of life and reduction of HIV related morbidity and mortality" (Martinson et a/., 2003:236; Martinez et a/., 2007:251; Hellinger, 2006:1; Kumarasamy, 2004:3). The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) estimated that a total of 111 827 South Africans were accessing free antiretroviral treatment in the 200 public health sector facilities across 53 districts and a further 60 000 via the private sector by late December 2005 (UNAIDS, 2005:1). The objective of this study was to review, analyse and interpret the usage and prescribing patterns of antiretroviral drugs in a section of the South African private health care sector for the period 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2006 by utilising a medicine claims database of a pharmacy benefit management company, and to investigate the costs associated with these drugs by performing a quantitative, retrospective drug utilisation review. It was found that the prevalence as well as the total medicine cost of ARV medicine items had increased during the study period but the average number of ARV medicine items per prescription as well as both the average cost per ARV medicine item and the average cost per ARV prescription decreased during the study period. Original innovator ARV medicine items and original ARV medicine items with no generic were found to be relatively expensive in comparison with ARV medicine items in general. Conversely, generic ARV medicine items were ascertained to be relatively inexpensive with reference to ARV medicine items in general. It was perceived that the average cost of ARV medicine items and prescriptions for both genders decreased from 2005 to 2006, while there was an increase in the prevalence of medicine items and prescriptions claimed for both female and male patients. The prevalence and cost of all types of ARV medicine items were found to be higher for female patients in general. It was also established that the prevalence of patients receiving antiretroviral treatment in the private health care sector peaks at the age of >30 to 244 years, in comparison with the lower age of >25 to 239 years in the public health care sector. ARV medicine items claimed for patients in the age group >35 to 239 years represented the highest percentage of the total medicine cost incurred during both study years for all ARV medicine types. The majority of ARV medicine items were prescribed by general medical practitioners, and most ARV medicine items were dispensed by community or private institutional pharmacies. It was determined that combinations of 2NRTI + NNRTI were prescribed with the highest frequency, which is compliant with traditional HAART or 'triple therapy' regimens. Lastly, it was found that none of the top 20 prescriptions for one, two and six ARV medicine items were compliant with the National Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) Guidelines. The majority of the top 20 prescriptions for three ARV medicine items (92.67 per cent during 2005 and 89.94 per cent during 2006) were compliant with the National ART Guidelines. Finally, less than half of the top 20 prescriptions for four ARV medicine items (49.60 per cent during 2005 and 36.11 per cent during 2006) were compliant with the National ART Guidelines. Only 5.56 per cent and 3.92 per cent of the top 16 prescriptions for five ARV medicine items were compliant with the National ART Guidelines during the two study years respectively / Thesis (M. Pharm. (Pharmacy Practice))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.

Thesis (M. Pharm.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.

In South Africa, significant changes in health care have taken place since the first democratic elections in 1994. The change had lead to a position of integrated service delivery with specific reference to primary health care. Increasingly in developing countries, the private sector impacts significantly on the rights to education and the highest attainable standard of health. Inappropriate prescribing e.g. prescribing a drug without an acceptable indication, specifying an incorrect dosage, schedule or duration of treatment, duplicating therapeutic agents and prescribing drugs without adequate regard to potential interactions, can cause adverse outcomes, deplete health care resources, compromise the quality of care and possible increase in health costs. One approach monitoring prescribing practices is drug utilisation review. The general objective of this study was to review and interpret aspects of drug usage patterns in a private primary health care setting, with special reference to the top ten diagnoses made and the top twenty medicine items prescribed as well as the associated costs. A quantitative, retrospective drug utilisation review as well as certain aspects of managed and primary health care, pharmacoeconomics, pharmacoepidemiology, medicine formularies and standard treatment guidelines were reviewed in the literature as a base for the study. The results of the empirical study showed that 83648 patients consulted at the nine medicentres during the study period (1 January to 31 December 2001). A total number of 132591 patient visits (consultations) were made, 140723 medical conditions (diagnoses) performed and 516177 medicine items prescribed during the study period. Analysis of medicine usage patterns and associated costs of the top ten diagnoses made and top twenty medicine items prescribed in the study population, revealed the following: The top ten diagnoses determined accounted for 29.07% of the total number of diagnoses made, . a total medicine treatment cost accounting for 32.11% in the study population, . the top twenty medicine items determined accounted for 56.23% of the total medicine items prescribed and . a total medicine treatment cost accounting for 28.63% in the study population. The highest prevalence of diagnoses made and medicine items prescribed was found in age groups 4 and 5 (Le. patients between the ages of 19 to 40 years) and was also found to be more prevalent in the female than in the male population. In completion of the research, recommendations to review the medicentres medicine treatment protocols and on provision of primary health care education were made. Reference to the investigation of environmental factors is also made. / Thesis (M.Pharm.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2004.

In South Africa, significant changes in health care have taken place since the first democratic elections in 1994. The change had lead to a position of integrated service delivery with specific reference to primary health care. Increasingly in developing countries, the private sector impacts significantly on the rights to education and the highest attainable standard of health. Inappropriate prescribing e.g. prescribing a drug without an acceptable indication, specifying an incorrect dosage, schedule or duration of treatment, duplicating therapeutic agents and prescribing drugs without adequate regard to potential interactions, can cause adverse outcomes, deplete health care resources, compromise the quality of care and possible increase in health costs. One approach monitoring prescribing practices is drug utilisation review. The general objective of this study was to review and interpret aspects of drug usage patterns in a private primary health care setting, with special reference to the top ten diagnoses made and the top twenty medicine items prescribed as well as the associated costs. A quantitative, retrospective drug utilisation review as well as certain aspects of managed and primary health care, pharmacoeconomics, pharmacoepidemiology, medicine formularies and standard treatment guidelines were reviewed in the literature as a base for the study. The results of the empirical study showed that 83648 patients consulted at the nine medicentres during the study period (1 January to 31 December 2001). A total number of 132591 patient visits (consultations) were made, 140723 medical conditions (diagnoses) performed and 516177 medicine items prescribed during the study period. Analysis of medicine usage patterns and associated costs of the top ten diagnoses made and top twenty medicine items prescribed in the study population, revealed the following: The top ten diagnoses determined accounted for 29.07% of the total number of diagnoses made, . a total medicine treatment cost accounting for 32.11% in the study population, . the top twenty medicine items determined accounted for 56.23% of the total medicine items prescribed and . a total medicine treatment cost accounting for 28.63% in the study population. The highest prevalence of diagnoses made and medicine items prescribed was found in age groups 4 and 5 (Le. patients between the ages of 19 to 40 years) and was also found to be more prevalent in the female than in the male population. In completion of the research, recommendations to review the medicentres medicine treatment protocols and on provision of primary health care education were made. Reference to the investigation of environmental factors is also made. / Thesis (M.Pharm.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2004.

Thesis (M. Pharm.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.

Thesis (M. Pharm.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.

The aim of the study was to evaluate type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) medicine management in Government Clinics in Maseru, Lesotho. A two-dimensional research method was employed, consisting of a literature review and an empirical investigation. The objective of the literature review was to provide information on the pathophysiology, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and clinical management of DM. The empirical investigation consisted of a descriptive pharmacoepidemiological study, in which data for analysis was collected retrospectively from patients‘ medical records (―bukanas‖) at dispensing points, a using data collection tool. The selected study sites were Domiciliary Health Center, Mabote, Likotsi, and Qoaling filter clinics in Maseru district of Lesotho. Data on costs of antidiabetic agents was collected from purchase invoices provided by the pharmacy department of Domiciliary Health Center. Results showed that the overall ratio of males to females was 1.3. There were no statistical difference in DM prevalence between males and females in the different clinics (p = 0.48). The mean age of males and females was 57.5 ± 14.2 years and 58.6 ± 11.3 years, respectively (Cohen‘s d = 0.07). DM was more prevalent in patients 59 to 69 years for both males and females, with the exception of Mabote and Qoaling filter clinics, where DM was more prevalent in patients 49 to 59 years. These differences in prevalence were not statically significant. Overall, 20% (n = 69) of the study sample had DM alone, while 80.0% of patients had DM concurrently with hypertension. The odds ratio implicated that women were 1.7 times more likely to have hypertension concurrently with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The mean blood glucose level at 95% confidence interval for females and males were 10.1 ± 5.9 mmol/L (95% CI: 10.1–11.7) and 10.9 ± 6.2 mmol/L (95% CI: 11.0–14.0) respectively. The difference in the mean blood glucose levels of males vs. females was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). In both males and females there were outliers as high as 33.3 mmol/L. Metformin 850 mg given three times, metformin 500 mg three times a day, glibenclamide 10 mg daily and glibenclamide 5 mg twice daily are oral hypoglycaemic agents that were first, second, third and fourth choice treatment of DM at all four study sites at a frequency of 54.2% (n = 160), 27.7% (n = 82), 4% (n = 12) and 2.7% (n = 27), respectively. Actraphane® 20 units in the morning and 10 units in the evening was prescribed at a frequency of 11.6% (n = 432) in comparison to other Actraphane®-containing regimens. The frequencies of prescribing metformin and Actraphane® as combination therapies represented 10.6% (n = 40), 7.1% (n = 27), and 6.6% (n = 25), respectively, for Actraphane® 20 units in the morning and 10 units in the evening, plus metformin 500 mg three times per day; Actraphane® 20 units in the morning and 10 units in the evening plus metformin 850 mg three times per day; and Actraphane® 30 units in the morning and 15 units in the evening plus metformin 850 mg three times per day. The combination therapy of metformin and glibenclamide were prescribed at frequencies of 24.6% (n = 172), 22.9% (n = 160), and 13.4% (n = 94) respectively for glibenclamide 10 mg daily plus metformin 850 mg three times per day, glibenclamide 5 mg daily plus metformin 850 mg three times per day, and glibenclamide 5 mg once a day plus metformin 500 mg three times per day as first, second and third choice treatments at all study sites. The total cost incurred for all the oral drugs prescribed alone within different regimens was M75.6 with the weighted average cost per patient of M0.81 ± 2.06 per day compared to the cost of Actraphane® which was M40 660.52 per month at a weighted average daily cost of M21.43 ± 6.23 per patient. The overall cost of Actraphane® and metformin combination therapy amounted to M50 676.50, at an average cost per patient of M21.77 ± 6.80 per day. The cost of combination therapy consisting of metformin and glibenclamide amounted to M377.10, at a weighted average cost amounting to M0.49 ± 0.16 per patient, per day. Based on the results of this study some conclusions were reached on the prevalence of DM, prescribing patterns and the cost of antidiabetic agents. Recommendations pertaining to the clinics and further research were made. / MPham (Pharmacy Practice), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

The aim of the study was to evaluate type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) medicine management in Government Clinics in Maseru, Lesotho. A two-dimensional research method was employed, consisting of a literature review and an empirical investigation. The objective of the literature review was to provide information on the pathophysiology, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and clinical management of DM. The empirical investigation consisted of a descriptive pharmacoepidemiological study, in which data for analysis was collected retrospectively from patients‘ medical records (―bukanas‖) at dispensing points, a using data collection tool. The selected study sites were Domiciliary Health Center, Mabote, Likotsi, and Qoaling filter clinics in Maseru district of Lesotho. Data on costs of antidiabetic agents was collected from purchase invoices provided by the pharmacy department of Domiciliary Health Center. Results showed that the overall ratio of males to females was 1.3. There were no statistical difference in DM prevalence between males and females in the different clinics (p = 0.48). The mean age of males and females was 57.5 ± 14.2 years and 58.6 ± 11.3 years, respectively (Cohen‘s d = 0.07). DM was more prevalent in patients 59 to 69 years for both males and females, with the exception of Mabote and Qoaling filter clinics, where DM was more prevalent in patients 49 to 59 years. These differences in prevalence were not statically significant. Overall, 20% (n = 69) of the study sample had DM alone, while 80.0% of patients had DM concurrently with hypertension. The odds ratio implicated that women were 1.7 times more likely to have hypertension concurrently with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The mean blood glucose level at 95% confidence interval for females and males were 10.1 ± 5.9 mmol/L (95% CI: 10.1–11.7) and 10.9 ± 6.2 mmol/L (95% CI: 11.0–14.0) respectively. The difference in the mean blood glucose levels of males vs. females was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). In both males and females there were outliers as high as 33.3 mmol/L. Metformin 850 mg given three times, metformin 500 mg three times a day, glibenclamide 10 mg daily and glibenclamide 5 mg twice daily are oral hypoglycaemic agents that were first, second, third and fourth choice treatment of DM at all four study sites at a frequency of 54.2% (n = 160), 27.7% (n = 82), 4% (n = 12) and 2.7% (n = 27), respectively. Actraphane® 20 units in the morning and 10 units in the evening was prescribed at a frequency of 11.6% (n = 432) in comparison to other Actraphane®-containing regimens. The frequencies of prescribing metformin and Actraphane® as combination therapies represented 10.6% (n = 40), 7.1% (n = 27), and 6.6% (n = 25), respectively, for Actraphane® 20 units in the morning and 10 units in the evening, plus metformin 500 mg three times per day; Actraphane® 20 units in the morning and 10 units in the evening plus metformin 850 mg three times per day; and Actraphane® 30 units in the morning and 15 units in the evening plus metformin 850 mg three times per day. The combination therapy of metformin and glibenclamide were prescribed at frequencies of 24.6% (n = 172), 22.9% (n = 160), and 13.4% (n = 94) respectively for glibenclamide 10 mg daily plus metformin 850 mg three times per day, glibenclamide 5 mg daily plus metformin 850 mg three times per day, and glibenclamide 5 mg once a day plus metformin 500 mg three times per day as first, second and third choice treatments at all study sites. The total cost incurred for all the oral drugs prescribed alone within different regimens was M75.6 with the weighted average cost per patient of M0.81 ± 2.06 per day compared to the cost of Actraphane® which was M40 660.52 per month at a weighted average daily cost of M21.43 ± 6.23 per patient. The overall cost of Actraphane® and metformin combination therapy amounted to M50 676.50, at an average cost per patient of M21.77 ± 6.80 per day. The cost of combination therapy consisting of metformin and glibenclamide amounted to M377.10, at a weighted average cost amounting to M0.49 ± 0.16 per patient, per day. Based on the results of this study some conclusions were reached on the prevalence of DM, prescribing patterns and the cost of antidiabetic agents. Recommendations pertaining to the clinics and further research were made. / MPham (Pharmacy Practice), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014