Spelling suggestions: "subject:"melons"" "subject:"felons""
1 |
The chemistry and biochemistry of melon fruit development and quality /Wang, You Ming. January 1994 (has links)
Thesis (M. Sc.)--University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury.
|
2 |
Postharvest disease control of melons using systemic acquired resistance and other safe methodsBokshi, Anowarul Islam. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Sydney, 2008. / Includes graphs and tables. Includes list of publications co-authored with others. Title from title screen (viewed November 28, 2008. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in print form.
|
3 |
Influence of mulching materials, methods and herbicide application on growth and development of cucurbitsJones, Milam T. January 1967 (has links)
Call number: LD2668 .T4 1967 J65 / Master of Science
|
4 |
Chemical attributes of muskmelon related to textureDinus, Linda Ann 29 June 1967 (has links)
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect
of a number of physical and chemical attributes upon muskmelon
texture as described by sensory evaluation. Measurements of turgor
pressure, percent moisture, total sugars, alcohol-insoluble-solids,
three pectic fractions, total pectic materials, starch and cellulose
were performed on 50 melons. The melons were purchased at random
from a retail market in Corvallis, Oregon, over a five-week
period during July and August, 1966. Subjective evaluation of textural
quality was provided by a five-membered panel employing a
pre-tested ballot. On five-point scales, judges rated resistance to
cutting, resistance to biting, resistance to crushing, crispness,
fibrousness and sweetness. Simple and multiple correlation analyses
were performed to elucidate relationships between the objective and
subjective observations.
Considerable variation was found among melons for most of
the attributes. Variation was largest in the case of water-soluble
pectic substances and cellulose and least for alcohol-insoluble-solids.
According to the results of this study, melon texture is determined
to a great extent by the type and amount of cell wall constituents.
Significant multiple correlations were found between cell wall
constituents, cellulose and protopectin, and sensory panel scores
for resistance to cutting, resistance to biting, resistance to crushing
and crispness. Fruit maturity, as inferred from starch and
protopectin content, also exerted an effect upon texture. Significant
multiple correlations were found between starch and protopectin and
panel scores for resistance to cutting, resistance to crushing and
crispness.
Although not specifically related to texture, a significant and
positive simple correlation was found between total sugars and
sweetness. Similarly, significant negative correlations were found
between starch and total sugars and starch and sweetness.
Turgor pressure, percent moisture, alcohol-insoluble-solids,
total sugar, water-soluble pectic substances, pectates-pectinates and
total pectic materials were found not to be reliable indicators of
muskmelon texture. Although turgor pressure did not exhibit a
significant relationship to any textural aspects, a trend was observed in the data. As a result of this observation and difficulty encountered
in measuring turgor pressure, further work with this variable is
recommended.
Proximate composition of the melons analyzed compared
favorably with published data. This observation lends confidence to
the methods and analyses employed. Large standard deviations calculated
for some of the attributes measured emphasize the extent
of variation among melons, the difficulty in assessing texture in an
objective manner and the problem encountered in marketing and
purchasing the fresh fruit. / Graduation date: 1968
|
5 |
POSTHARVEST DISEASE CONTROL OF MELONS USING SYSTEMIC ACQUIRED RESISTANCE AND OTHERBokshi, A I January 2008 (has links)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / The goal of this research was to test commercially viable alternative methods to fungicides for controlling storage diseases of melons that are safe for human health and the environment. Initially, experiments were conducted on melons to develop a protocol for optimum conditions of disease development during storage for different pathogens and for different stages of fruit maturity. For all pathogens tested, the study found that humidity greater than 90% and temperatures above 20° C support infection and rapid growth of disease. Differences in the rate of infection and extent of disease development after the inoculation of different storage pathogens was observed between rockmelon and honeydew melons, indicating differences in host pathogen interactions. Among the tested pathogens, Alternaria spp. was the least aggressive in infection and disease severity, growing considerably slower than Fusarium acuminatum which was moderately aggressive and Rhizopus spp. which was very aggressive, in comparison. Green half-slip melons showed greater resistance to pathogen attack than green full-slip fruit, while yellow full-slip melons were highly susceptible to pathogen attack. Therefore, the laboratory experiments for postharvest treatments of rockmelons were performed using green full-slip fruit challenged with F. acuminatum. Evaluation of physical and safe chemical methods of postharvest treatment to control postharvest diseases of melons showed that none of the treatments alone was as effective as the commercially available fungicide. Hot water solutions of safe compounds considerably increase their efficacy against postharvest rots, however, symptoms of phytotoxicity on the rind after dipping made their use unacceptable. Iodine was the only safe chemical tested which did not cause any phytotoxicity on melons. When combined with hot water, iodine showed the best control of storage rots and was as good as the fungicides carbendazim or guazatine. Hot water iodine dipping of fruit also delayed ripening and fruit were firmer during storage for a longer period of time. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) was evaluated as a method of controlling powdery mildew in glasshouse grown rockmelon seedlings by treating with the activators 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA) or benzothiadiazole (BTH) or water. Increased resistance due to application of INA or BTH, was observed by the reduction of powdery mildew on pre-inoculated detached leaves and also on intact leaves from natural infections. Heightened resistance due to spraying with elicitors of SAR, was further evident by the increased activities of the pathogenesis related proteins (PR proteins), peroxidase and accumulation of phenolics or antifungal compounds during and after challenge inoculation. Field grown rockmelons were treated with INA or BTH or BABA (β-aminobutyric acid) or water at various stages of plant growth and evaluated for increased resistance against pre and postharvest diseases. Both powdery mildew and downy mildew were significantly less on the SAR elicitor treated plants. Preharvest treatment with SAR elicitors also reduced storage diseases of the harvested rockmelon fruit. The reduction in postharvest disease was similar whether plants were treated once, three weeks before harvest, or given four sprays during the growing season beginning at anthesis. A further postharvest dip with 500 ppm of guazatine gave substantial reduction of storage rots of melons. Enhanced activities of chitinase and peroxidase, two major PR-proteins, compared to the control, indicated induction of defence had occurred in the foliage and fruit as a result of SAR. Over the course of four field and one glasshouse experiments slight phytotoxicity was observed in plants frequently sprayed with INA or BTH, but no phytotoxicity was seen after a single spray during the late stages of fruit development. The combination of SAR elicitor treatment and use of a safe postharvest dip provided substantial control of storage rots of rockmelons. The best treatment for control of storage rots involved application of BTH (50 ppm) two weeks before harvest, combined with a hot iodine dip (55° C) of fruit, achieving equivalent or better disease control than use of guazatine fungicide dip.
|
6 |
Studies on a bacterial disease of melonsSimonsen, Maryhelen Emmons, 1924- January 1949 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
Problems in production of canned and bottled watermelon juiceChan, Sung-Tsu 06 1900 (has links)
Graduation date: 1949
|
8 |
POSTHARVEST DISEASE CONTROL OF MELONS USING SYSTEMIC ACQUIRED RESISTANCE AND OTHERBokshi, A I January 2008 (has links)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / The goal of this research was to test commercially viable alternative methods to fungicides for controlling storage diseases of melons that are safe for human health and the environment. Initially, experiments were conducted on melons to develop a protocol for optimum conditions of disease development during storage for different pathogens and for different stages of fruit maturity. For all pathogens tested, the study found that humidity greater than 90% and temperatures above 20° C support infection and rapid growth of disease. Differences in the rate of infection and extent of disease development after the inoculation of different storage pathogens was observed between rockmelon and honeydew melons, indicating differences in host pathogen interactions. Among the tested pathogens, Alternaria spp. was the least aggressive in infection and disease severity, growing considerably slower than Fusarium acuminatum which was moderately aggressive and Rhizopus spp. which was very aggressive, in comparison. Green half-slip melons showed greater resistance to pathogen attack than green full-slip fruit, while yellow full-slip melons were highly susceptible to pathogen attack. Therefore, the laboratory experiments for postharvest treatments of rockmelons were performed using green full-slip fruit challenged with F. acuminatum. Evaluation of physical and safe chemical methods of postharvest treatment to control postharvest diseases of melons showed that none of the treatments alone was as effective as the commercially available fungicide. Hot water solutions of safe compounds considerably increase their efficacy against postharvest rots, however, symptoms of phytotoxicity on the rind after dipping made their use unacceptable. Iodine was the only safe chemical tested which did not cause any phytotoxicity on melons. When combined with hot water, iodine showed the best control of storage rots and was as good as the fungicides carbendazim or guazatine. Hot water iodine dipping of fruit also delayed ripening and fruit were firmer during storage for a longer period of time. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) was evaluated as a method of controlling powdery mildew in glasshouse grown rockmelon seedlings by treating with the activators 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA) or benzothiadiazole (BTH) or water. Increased resistance due to application of INA or BTH, was observed by the reduction of powdery mildew on pre-inoculated detached leaves and also on intact leaves from natural infections. Heightened resistance due to spraying with elicitors of SAR, was further evident by the increased activities of the pathogenesis related proteins (PR proteins), peroxidase and accumulation of phenolics or antifungal compounds during and after challenge inoculation. Field grown rockmelons were treated with INA or BTH or BABA (β-aminobutyric acid) or water at various stages of plant growth and evaluated for increased resistance against pre and postharvest diseases. Both powdery mildew and downy mildew were significantly less on the SAR elicitor treated plants. Preharvest treatment with SAR elicitors also reduced storage diseases of the harvested rockmelon fruit. The reduction in postharvest disease was similar whether plants were treated once, three weeks before harvest, or given four sprays during the growing season beginning at anthesis. A further postharvest dip with 500 ppm of guazatine gave substantial reduction of storage rots of melons. Enhanced activities of chitinase and peroxidase, two major PR-proteins, compared to the control, indicated induction of defence had occurred in the foliage and fruit as a result of SAR. Over the course of four field and one glasshouse experiments slight phytotoxicity was observed in plants frequently sprayed with INA or BTH, but no phytotoxicity was seen after a single spray during the late stages of fruit development. The combination of SAR elicitor treatment and use of a safe postharvest dip provided substantial control of storage rots of rockmelons. The best treatment for control of storage rots involved application of BTH (50 ppm) two weeks before harvest, combined with a hot iodine dip (55° C) of fruit, achieving equivalent or better disease control than use of guazatine fungicide dip.
|
9 |
I. A Bacterial Disease of Melons in Southern Arizona II. Virus Diseases of MelonsBrown, J. G., Emmons, Maryhelen, Keener, Paul D. 08 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
Temperature and hormonal effects on reproduction in cucurbitsSibia, Tejinder Singh. January 1963 (has links)
Call number: LD2668 .T4 1963 S53 / Master of Science
|
Page generated in 0.0488 seconds