One in five Australians has a mental disorder and it is estimated that one in four families have a member who has a mental disorder. Since the 1960s there has been an 80 percent decrease in Australian institution-based mental health care. The majority of people who have a mental disorder are now treated in their local community and many of them live with their families. The change in the delivery of mental health care has seen the family emerge as one of the most important supports to their ill family member. While the changes in the delivery of mental health care have been based on human rights concerns, changes in mental health legislature, and economic factors, the multi-dimensional experience of being a primary carer of a person with a mental disorder remains relatively unexplored. The need for empirical evidence on the primary carer's experience is noted in both the scientific literature and from carers themselves and the principal aim of conducting this research was to address the identified need. This qualitative study, using grounded theory methodology, presents the findings of interviews with 27 primary carers and memos documented throughout the study. In addition, existing literature of relevance to the findings of this study is presented. A substantive theory of seeking balance to overcome being consumed is presented in this thesis. Using the grounded theory method the constant comparative analysis of data revealed that the basic social psychological problem shared by all participants was the experience of "being consumed". The problem of being consumed consisted of two stages: "disruption of established lifestyle" and a "sustained threat to self-equilibrium". Six conditions were identified as influencing participants' experience of being consumed. / In order to address the problem of being consumed, participants engaged in a basic social psychological process of "seeking balance". When participants were engaged in this process they moved from a state of being consumed to one whereby they established and consolidated a balanced life perspective that incorporated their caregiving role. The process of seeking balance consisted of three phases: "utilising personal strategies to reduce the problem of being consumed', "restoring self- identity", and "reaching out to make a difference". In addition, data analysis identified the presence of a three phase sub-process entitled "trying to make sense of what was happening". Phases one of the core and sub- processes occurred primarily in the period prior to the time when a psychiatric diagnosis was made on the affected family member. Participants became engaged in the remaining two phases of the core and sub-processes when they became aware that their affected family member had a mental disorder. At the time of being interviewed for this study some participants were not yet engaged in the final phase of the process of seeking balance. Participants' experience of seeking balance was not related to the length of their caregiving experience but rather to their experience of seeking balance and the conditions influencing that process. Four conditions were identified as influencing participants' experience of seeking balance. / This thesis presents the substantive theory of seeking balance to overcome being consumed. While the findings support existing scientific literature, the substantive theory also presents a new insight on caring from the primary carer's perspective. In particular, the findings challenge health professionals to actively pursue strategies to reduce carers' experience of being consumed. The findings of this study have implications for service provision and clinical practice, policy and planning, research, education, the general population, mental health consumers, and carers.

SOCIALINIO DIALOGO IR SOCIALINĖS PARTNERYSTĖS VAIDMUO PSICHIKOS SVEIKATOS PRIEŽIŪROS SISTEMOJE. Santrauka. Informacijos visuomenėje, keičiantis visuomeniniams, technologiniams procesams, socialinio dialogo ir socialinės partnerystės vaidmuo didėja visose srityse. Tai ypač aktualu psichikos sveikatos priežiūros srityje, nes visa sistema praranda autonomiškumą ir yra veikiama įvairaus lygio sąveikų, integruojami daugialypiai socialiniai santykiai. Socialinis dialogas ir socialinė partnerystė apima bendradarbiavimą, koordinavimą, konsultavimą, tarpininkavimą, apsikeitimą informacija, teikiant psichikos sveikatos priežiūros paslaugas. Socialinio dialogo ir socialinės partnerystės svarba išryškėjo prasidėjus struktūriniams pokyčiams psichikos sveikatos srityje, nes reformos apima daugiasektorinę politiką, į kurią įtraukiamas platus partnerių ir suinteresuotųjų ratas. Prastas bendradarbiavimas ir koordinavimas tarp teikiamų paslaugų ar skirtingų sektorių finansavimas veda prie prastos ir neefektyvios priežiūros. Tyrimo tezė. Socialinis dialogas ir socialinė partnerystė tampa sudėtine šiuolainės visuomenės dalimi, keičiasi psichikos sveikatos priežiūros problemų sprendimo būdai, įtraukiami nauji metodai ir naujos pagalbos teikimo fomos, tokios kaip socialinių partnerių tinklai, tarpdisciplininis komandinis darbas, stiprinama nevyriausybinių organizacijų ir pačių paslaugų vartotojų bei jų šeimų organizacijų įtaka. Raktažodžiai: socialinis dialogas, socialinė partnerystė, socialinių... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / THE ROLE OF SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP IN MENTAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. Summary. With changes in societal and technical processes, the role of Social dialogue and social partnership in the Information society, have increased in all areas. This issue is crucial while talking about mental health care system. System is loosing its autonomy and is determined by interactions of different levels. Multiple social relations are integrated. Social dialogue in mental health care services include all types of negotiation, coordination, mediation and consultation, starting with the exchange of information. Social dialogue has proved particularly important in situations of structural change and reform in the health sector. Such situations are particularly complex, however, and take a long time to evolve. They involve a wide variety of social partners and stakeholders who have to deal with a long agenda of issues. Insufficient or bad cooperation and coordination between services; single-sector approaches and specific organizational objectives, budgets and activities, leads to ineffective and low quality care services. Thesis. Social dialogue and social partnership becomes a component of modern society. The problems of the mental health care system are solving by using new methods and forms, such as networks of social partners, interdisciplinary team work, capacity-building of NGO and representatives of services users and their families. Keywords. Social dialogue, social... [to full text]

CONTEXTE : Les critères de jugement prenant en compte le ressenti des patients, tels que la qualité de vie, deviennent des éléments déterminants pour l’évaluation des prises en charge et l’aide à la décision. Bien que les troubles mentaux représentent un fardeau considérable tant en termes de prévalence que de conséquences économiques, les connaissances sur la qualité de vie des patients pris en charge par les services de psychiatrie sont limitées, ce qui complexifie la prise de décisions éclairées dans le champ de la santé mentale.OBJECTIFS : Nos objectifs étaient d’évaluer la qualité de vie, mesurée par des scores d’utilité, des patients souffrant de troubles mentaux en France, de mesurer la perte de qualité de vie attribuable à ces troubles et d’identifier les facteurs qui y sont associés.MATERIEL ET METHODES : Après une revue de la littérature décrivant les instruments de mesure de la qualité de vie utilisés en santé mentale, nous avons évalué la qualité de vie des patients pris en charge par le secteur de psychiatrie générale en mobilisant deux instruments permettant le calcul de scores d’utilité : le SF-36, permettant le calcul de scores d’utilité via le SF-6D, et l’EQ-5D. Nous avons comparé leurs performances et avons évalué leur concordance. Nous avons confronté la qualité de vie des patients souffrant de troubles mentaux à celle de la population générale en mobilisant les données du volet « ménages » de l’enquête Handicap-Santé. Enfin, nous avons recouru à des outils de modélisation adaptés aux spécificités des distributions des scores d’utilité pour étudier les caractéristiques sociodémographiques, cliniques et les prises en charge psychiatriques des patients qui y sont associées.RESULTATS : Notre enquête a inclus 212 patients. Leurs scores d’utilité moyens s’élevaient à 0,684 dans le cas d’une mesure par le SF-6D et à 0,624 dans le cas de l’EQ-5D et étaient inférieurs de 11% à ceux de la population générale. Le fait d’être une femme et le fait d’être sévèrement malade étaient associés à des scores d’utilité plus faibles. Les patients ayant été librement hospitalisés à temps plein, par rapport à ceux ne l’ayant pas été, avaient tendance à avoir des scores SF-6D plus faibles tandis que les patients pris en charge à temps partiel présentaient des scores SF-6D plus élevés. Les scores d’utilité SF-6D et EQ-5D n’étaient pas concordants. Si les deux instruments étaient comparables en termes d’acceptabilité et de validité discriminante et convergente, l’EQ-5D était moins sensible, présentant un effet plafond, et les modèles mis en œuvre pour identifier les facteurs associés à ce score présentaient des performances modestes.CONCLUSION : Nos travaux ont permis d’objectiver l’impact négatif des troubles mentaux sur la qualité de vie des personnes atteintes. Les différences importantes identifiées entre les scores d’utilité SF-6D et EQ-5D font du choix de l’instrument le plus adapté un enjeu majeur. Le manque de sensibilité du score d’utilité EQ-5D et les difficultés rencontrées pour trouver un modèle statistique adapté aux spécificités de ce score suggèrent une meilleure adéquation du SF-6D au champ de la santé mentale. Cependant, des travaux menés sur des échantillons de taille plus conséquente seront mis en œuvre pour préciser nos résultats. / BACKGROUND: Assessment criteria which take patients’ perceptions into account, such as quality of life, are becoming increasingly important in health services assessment and policy and clinical decision-making. Despite the fact that mental disorders represent a significant burden in terms of prevalence and economic consequences, there is a lack of knowledge regarding quality of life of patients cared for by mental health care services which impedes informed decision-making in the field of psychiatry.OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to measure quality of life using utility scores of people cared for by mental health care services in France; to assess the loss of quality of life attributable to mental disorders; and to identify factors associated with quality of life.MATERIAL AND METHODS: After a literature review describing quality of life tools used in the field of mental health, we undertook a survey to measure the quality of life of people suffering from mental disorders who were treated in the general psychiatric sector using two tools and the corresponding utility scores: the SF-36, allowing calculation of utility scores by the SF-6D, and the EQ-5D. We compared them in terms of performance, and we assessed their consistency. We evaluated the quality of life loss attributable to mental disorders considering data from the French general population-based survey on health and disabilities as a reference. Finally, we used several models adapted to the specificities of the utility score distributions to identify socio-demographic, clinical and mental health care utilization characteristics associated with quality of life.RESULTS: 212 patients were included. The mean utility score was 0.684 when assessed by the SF-6D, and 0.624 when assessed by the EQ-5D. Utility scores of patients suffering from mental disorders were 11% lower than those of the general population. Being a woman and being severely ill were factors associated with lower utility scores using both tools. In comparison with no hospitalization, voluntary hospitalization within the past 12 months was associated with lower SF-6D utility scores, whereas part-time hospitalization was linked with higher SF-6D utility scores. SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores showed poor agreement in measuring quality of life. These instruments were similar in terms of acceptability as well as discriminant and convergent validity; however, the EQ-5D showed lower sensitivity, illustrated by a ceiling effect, and the models used to study factors associated with this score showed poor performances.CONCLUSION: We objectivized the negative impact of mental disorders on quality of life. Considering the significant differences identified between the SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores, the choice of the most adapted instrument constitutes a major issue. The lack of sensitivity of the EQ-5D and the difficulties experienced in finding a model adapted to the specificities of this score would suggest that the SF-6D is better suited to the field of mental health. However, our results must be confirmed by analysis on larger samples.

This thesis deals with the Czech and international ideas applied in the "Strategy of Reform of Psychiatric Care" issued in 2013 by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. The main starting point of this work is the fact that the care of people with mental illness in Czech and international environment is oriented on the biological treatment of the patient with psycho- pharmaceuticals and that there is a deficit in the area of psychosocial treatment. International and Czech mental health policy seeks to promote a bio-psycho-social approach to patient's care. However, current psychiatry continues to be involved in conducting clinical research focused on the efficiency of psycho-pharmaceuticals. These studies are driven and sponsored mainly by the pharmaceutical industry. But international and Czech policies are still not able to adequately reflect this situation within the field of psychiatry. The Czech Republic has not so far paid attention to mental health issues and has lagged behind the other developed countries in this area. The empirical part of this work is divided into two parts. The first part of the research focuses on the Czech and international ideas applied in the "Strategy of Reform of Psychiatric Care" issued in 2013 by Ministry of Health. The methods used here are - content...

Mental illness that affects an accused’s fitness to stand trial is an ill-explored topic in the South African criminal justice system. The necessity to explore this topic is motivated by the increasing number of persons with mental illness moving into the criminal justice systems in South Africa, Canada, and the United States of America. An accused’s fitness to stand trial is assessed once concern about his ability to follow the proceedings, or give proper instructions to his legal representative, is in doubt. The assessment is conducted in the forensic system where the vastly different fields of law and psychiatry meet. The South African forensic system is plagued with resources and skills shortages. These inadequacies cause delays in resolving pre-trial issues for an accused in respect of whom fitness is at issue. The accused is oftentimes detained in a correctional facility awaiting fitness assessment for anything between three months to two years. Generally, detention in a correctional facility has a negative effect on the mental state of a person with a mental illness. The logistics of fitness assessments differ between the three jurisdictions referred to above. However, the threshold for fitness in these jurisdictions is relatively low, with the result that the majority of accused persons sent for fitness assessments are found fit to stand trial. Such a finding does not imply that the accused is not mentally ill; it simply means that the illness does not affect his understanding of the court proceedings and that it does not influence his ability to communicate with his legal representative. An accused with a serious mental illness such as schizophrenia or major depression can, for example, be found fit to stand trial. After a fitness assessment, a court may either find an accused fit to stand trial or unfit to stand trial. The fact that many persons found fit to stand trial have a mental illness suggests that there is a third category on the fitness continuum that must be acknowledged, namely, fit but mentally ill accused persons. No alternatives to traditional prosecution currently exist in South Africa for this third group of accused persons despite the fact that their situation in the criminal justice system calls for a therapeutic response. The South African legislative framework that regulates fitness assessments and the processes associated therewith are not without challenges. The assessment practices have recently been under scrutiny by the Constitutional court, which judgment changed the position for the accused found unfit to stand trial. The position of the fit but mentally ill accused remains unregulated. The Canadian and American criminal justice systems have implemented diversion programmes for fit but mentally ill accused persons in the form of Mental Health Courts. The underlying principle of a Mental Health Court is therapeutic jurisprudence. Therapeutic jurisprudence evaluates the impact of the law on those in conflict with it. It promotes the inclusion of expertise from other disciplines to improve the effectiveness of the law in a particular set of circumstances. Many South African scholars acknowledge the need for mental health expertise in the criminal justice system, and suggestions have been made for the diversion of mentally ill accused persons charged with minor offences. Those above notwithstanding, no formal diversion programmes exist in South Africa for the fit but mentally ill accused. This research investigates the Mental Health Court as a therapeutic response to the mentally ill accused in the South African criminal justice system. The Mental Health Court models as employed in Canada and the United States of America are studied to identify elements thereof that can be employed in the South African context to provide an effective alternative to traditional prosecution for the mentally ill accused. The Toronto Mental Health Court is studied in the Canadian context as a court that is not a diversion programme as such but has a diversion component attached to it. Diversion in Canada is reserved for those charged with less serious offences, and only these accused persons are allowed into the diversion component of the Mental Health Court. However, the Canadian Mental Health Court assists those who do not qualify for diversion but who need the specialised skills of the Mental Health Court for purposes of, for example, a bail application. The Brooklyn Mental Health Court in the United States of America is investigated as a model that constitutes a complete diversion programme and considers diversion of accused persons charged with more serious offences. The unique structure and procedure of each of these Mental Health Courts are investigated with due consideration to the eligibility criteria of each and the sanctions employed for non-compliance of the court-monitored treatment programmes. Further, the successes and challenges of each model are highlighted. Finally, a proposal is made for a Mental Health Court model mindful of the uniquely South African factors that have to be taken into account when building such a model. Amendments to the existing legislative framework are proposed to incorporate a Mental Health Court as a therapeutic response to mentally ill accused persons in the South African criminal justice system. / Criminal and Procedural Law