Y-chromosome testing has become more prevalent in recent years as a means of identifying forensic samples using STRs or identifying biomarkers for disease or determining geographic origins of populations. Additionally, Y-chromosome analysis is especially useful in paternity testing as the Y chromosome is inherited paternally and the male-specific region of the Y chromosome does not undergo any recombination events, allowing the genotypic data of both the father and son to be identical. Though in most cases a father-son pair will have the same Y-allelic data, random mutations like allele insertions and deletions can occur, which can interfere and result in incorrect conclusions in regards to paternity testing, forensic analysis, or genealogy. Though the exact mechanism of Y loci mutability is unknown, postulations of factors that can cause mutations have been studied, as well as attempts to determine mutation rate specific to each locus. A multi-generational pedigree consisting of 9 males was analyzed using two different methodologies: capillary electrophoresis and next-generation sequencing. The samples were amplified using either a ForenSeq™ Signature DNA Prep Kit (Verogen, San Diego, CA) or a YFiler™ Plus PCR Amplification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Between the two methods, five Y-STR loci were identified as being discordant between a father-son pair. Next-generation sequencing identified an allele insertion at DYS385a/b, resulting in a potential tri-allelic locus, but was disproved after comparison with the capillary electrophoresis data of the sample. The capillary electrophoresis data identified four discordances between father-son pairs, one of which was an allele mutation with a gain of a repeat at DYS458. At DYS 389II, an allele insertion was identified, but was contradicted after comparison with the next-generation sequencing data. There was a potential null allele at DYS518 and either an OL variant allele or a 2 base pair deletion at DYS481. Following peak height ratio, stutter, and comparative analysis between the genotypic data of the two analysis methods, two of these discordances were proven to be errors, one was a definitive mutational event, and the other two could neither be confirmed nor denied due to differences in loci tested in each kit.

The following is a comparison study of the Globalfiler™ PCR Amplification Kit analyzed on an ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) versus the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit analyzed on the MiSeq FGx™ System. The MiSeq FGx™ System measures results by Allele Read Count (ARC), while the CE measures results as Relative Fluorescent Units (RFU). Mixture samples were prepared in ratios of 1:1, 1:4, and 1:10 in replicates of four using a female major contributor and a male minor contributor, intended to represent some commonly seen mixture samples ratios in forensic cases [48]. Both systems performed equally well for the 1:1 mixture while the MiSeq FGx™ System had improved accuracy and precision for the 1:4 mixture compared to CE (4.033 + 1.506 ARC and 4.678 + 2.093 RFU, respectively). The MiSeq FGx™ System showed increased variation in the 1:10 mixture compared to CE (10.347 + 5.184 ARC and 9.311 + 3.363 RFU, respectively). Over the four replicates, the MiSeq FGx™ System had a total of 15 out of 528 possible alleles (2.84%) dropout compared to a total of 13 out of 384 possible alleles (3.39%) dropout on CE. The additional loci analyzed by the MiSeq FGx™ System results in a lower percentage of alleles lost due to dropout compared to CE. Isoalleles in sequence data may reveal the presence of minor contributor alleles that would otherwise be masked by the major contributor in length-based STR analysis. The presence of isoalleles are most helpful in mixture ratios greater than 1:1, where it is easier to assign alleles to a specific contributor. In certain cases, deconvolution of loci with shared alleles may not be improved by sequencing if intra-contributor isoalleles are present. Unless using known reference profiles, it is difficult to accurately assign alleles to contributors when intra-contributor isoalleles are present. Additionally, the sequencing data from the MiSeq FGx™ System provided information to aid the separation of stutter from true alleles. Previous studies report a significant increase in the amount of alleles present at some loci due to differences by nucleotide sequence, which may improve the discriminating power of those loci [31,52,53,54]. With all its potential, there is still much room for sequencing technology to improve before it becomes a standard analysis method in forensic laboratories.